High efficacy of biofeedback therapy for treatment of dysfunctional voiding in children

Elevating pediatric urology care: The crucial role of nursing research in quality improvement

This educational article highlights the critical role of pediatric urology nursing research in improving the care of children with urological conditions. It discusses the multifaceted nature of pediatric urology nursing, addresses challenges such as limited nurse scientists and resource constraints, and highlights the need to overcome barriers to increase research involvement. The authors emphasize the importance of prioritizing research areas, the promotion of collaboration, and the provision of adequate funding and academic time for pediatric nurses to contribute to evidence-based practice, to improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of research in advancing nursing practice, shaping protocols, and advocating for the rights and needs of children with urological conditions and their families.

[Using the DFree device for balanced bladder management]

BACKGROUND

Bladder dysfunctions, regardless of their origin, have significant psychosocial effects. Depending on the existing disorder and bladder functionality, behavioural therapy and supporting tools are the first choice of therapy but the need for medication, intervention and surgery is significant.

OBJECTIVE

The DFree ultrasonic sensor enables sonographic measurement of bladder filling and feeds this back to the sensor wearer via an app. The primary outcome of the study was the influence of the DFree on the quality of life of the patients. Secondary endpoints were usefulness and user-friendliness of the DFree device as well as the self-reported degree of autonomy.

METHODS

In the present pilot study, 18 urological patients with various bladder dysfunctions were equipped with the DFree ultrasonic sensor for at least 12 hours daily over a period of three months. The parameters were collected at baseline (T1) and at end of the study (T2) using the Kings Health Questionnaire (KHQ) and the German version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (ZUF-8) (quantitative data) as well as guided interviews (qualitative data).

RESULTS

Improvement in bladder dysfunction based on the KHQ could not be statistically confirmed. However, the average value based on the ZUF-8 showed satisfaction with the DFree. In the interviews at T2, the participants gave a positive feedback with specific suggestions for improving user-friendliness. The device was described as helpful and easy to use.

CONCLUSIONS

The DFree ultrasonic sensor is a new technical tool in the treatment of bladder dysfunctions. Improving specific technical details could increase the user-friendliness as well as the usefulness of the device.

The role of interferential current electrical stimulation in pediatric urology: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Background

In recent years, interferential current (IFC) electrical stimulation has been studied as a novel treatment for various lower urinary tract dysfunctions in children. As the findings of multiple studies may vary, we aimed to evaluate the current view on IFC in pediatric urology problems based on the findings of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods

We performed a systematic search in the Embase, Medline, and SCOPUS databases in accordance with the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies comprised studies evaluating IFC for lower urinary tract problems in children. The studies' quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool 2.

Results

A total of 125 articles were initially obtained, among which 40 articles were duplicates. There were six eligible RCTs with an overall low RoB. All subjects underwent 10-18 sessions of treatment. The outcomes measured consisted of the alleviation of symptoms and urodynamic parameters. The trials reported that 61-90% of patients responded positively to the treatment. Both IFC and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation generated improvements in the subjects. However, overall the IFC group showed better immediate and short-term improvement.

Conclusion

IFC is a promising therapy for bladder dysfunction and enuresis in children. More comparative RCTs are required in the future to quantitatively determine the superiority of IFC to other alternatives. The safety aspects of the treatment should also be studied further before it can be used in a clinical setting as the standard and protocol for children are still unclear.

The effect of biofeedback treatment for children with non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Children's non-neurogenic voiding dysfunction (NVD) is a syndrome characterized by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTs) because of the inability to relax the external sphincter. Patients with NVD always suffer from urinary tract infections (UTI), incontinence, constipation. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of biofeedback treatment for children's NVD.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library database were searched for all relevant studies. Two independent reviewers decided whether to include the study, conducted quality evaluation, and extracted article data. A random-effects model was used to calculate overall effect sizes. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) served as the summary statistics for meta-analysis. And sensitivity analysis was subsequently performed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies and 1274 patients were included in the systemic review, seven RCTs and 539 patients were included in meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed efficacy of biofeedback treatment in following aspects, (1) relieving UTI (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.11 to 2.64), (2) reducing PVR (MD: 9.51, 95% CI: 2.03 to 16.98), (3) increasing maximum urine flow rate (MD: 4.28, 95% CI: 2.14 to 6.42) and average urine flow rate (MD: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.53 to 2.46), (4) relieving constipation (RR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.26)，(5) improving abnormal voiding pattern (RR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.30 to 2.36) and abnormal EMG during voiding (RR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.91). The improvement of UTI symptoms, maximum urine flow rate and average urine flow rate took a longer time (12 months). In terms of daytime incontinence (RR: 1.20, 95% CI [0.96, 1.50], p = 0.11), nighttime incontinence (RR: 1.20, 95% CI [0.62, 2.32], p = 0.58), no significant difference was found between biofeedback treatment and standard urotherapy. The qualitative analysis showed that biofeedback treatment was beneficial for NVD.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard urotherapy, biofeedback treatment is effective for some symptoms, such as UTI and constipation, and can improve some uroflowmetric parameters, such as PVR. Biofeedback treatment seems to have a better long-term effect.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Bladder Bowel Dysfunction and its Extrapolation as Biofeedback Therapy to Train Pelvic Floor Muscles

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the noninvasive methods to diagnose bladder bowel dysfunction (BBD) and its extrapolation on biofeedback therapy and pelvic floor exercises (PFE) to treat these children.

Settings and Design

A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care center was conducted between January 2010 and December 2020, on 204 children, aged 4-18 years, arbitrarily divided into two groups-4-12 and 13-18 years.

Subjects and Methods

Details of lower urinary tract dysfunction were recorded as International Children's Continence Society nomenclature. Bowel habits were recorded and functional constipation was graded using ROME IV. The data recorded were urine analysis, a voiding diary, a dysfunctional voiding symptom score, and uroflowmetry with or without electromyography. Ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrogram, and magnetic resonance imaging were done in appropriate cases. Dysfunctional Voiding Severity Score was used to assist the evaluation and outcome. The treatment protocol included urotherapy, uroflow biofeedback, PFEs, prophylactic antibiotics, pharmacotherapy, and treatment of constipation.

Statistical Analysis Used

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 26 and paired t-test was used for comparison and calculating P value.

Results

There was a significant improvement in DVSS and uroflow parameters. However, the magnitude of change produced varied among the age groups. Patients who failed to show any clinical benefit were subjected to alternative therapies such as intrasphincteric Botulinum A toxin with or without neuromodulation.

Conclusions

Integrated uroflow biofeedback (IUB) and PFE expedites the recovery by supplementing the effect of urotherapy; hence, this should be offered to all children with BBD.

Effects of behavioural therapy versus interferential current on bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients; a randomised clinical study

Objectives

This study examines the effect of behavioural therapy (biofeedback) and interferential current on bladder dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients.

Methods

Fifty patients with secondary progressive type multiple sclerosis (SPMS) suffering from bladder dysfunction were divided equally into two groups randomly. Group A (GA) received behavioural therapy (biofeedback training), while Group B (GB) received interferential current training. Both groups were assessed by urodynamics for detrusor pressure and maximum flow rate before and after eight weeks of behavioural therapy and interferential training.

Results

Both groups, GA and GB, showed significant increase in the detrusor pressure and maximum flow rate after eight weeks of training. There was no significant difference between both methods. However, GA showed more improvement by close observation.

Conclusions

Both behavioural therapy and interferential current training effectively managed bladder dysfunction in patients with SPMS, with more evident effects in behavioural therapy patients by close observation.

The efficacy of physiotherapeutic intervention with biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training in children with dysfunctional voiding

INTRODUCTION

Dysfunctional voiding (DV) in children is a common issue, which can be found in up to 30% of children with wetting problems. Biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is an established nonpharmacological method to treat DV. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of physiotherapeutic intervention with biofeedback assisted PFMT in children with DV.

STUDY DESIGN

Children referred with DV, unresponsive to standard urotherapy were included in this study. All children underwent biofeedback assisted PFMT sessions with a physiotherapist. Uroflowmetries and measurements of post-void residual (PVR) urine were performed before and after the treatment, and the following parameters were registered; daytime incontinence (DI), nocturnal enuresis (NE), constipation, faecal incontinence (FI), and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI). Other concomitant treatments were noted. The primary outcomes were the resolution of DV evaluated by uroflow curve configuration and PVR. Secondary outcomes were the resolution of DI, NE and the reduction of recurrent UTIs.

RESULTS

Forty-six children (mean age 9.6 ± 2.4 years, 38 girls) were included in the analysis. The median period of treatment was 9.0 ± 8.5 months (2-9 visits). Twenty-seven (59%) children responded to treatment according to one or both primary outcomes; uroflow configuration (50%) and PVR (28%). DI resolved in 12 (26%) children and 27 of the 32 children, who prior to the treatment had recurrent UTIs experienced no UTIs during the follow up period. The use of anticholinergics was a significant negative predictor for response to treatment. We found that almost half of the responders (48%) reached effect prior to the fourth visit.

DISCUSSION

Biofeedback assisted PFMT can improve the symptoms in children with DV. When comparing to existing literature we find a less pronounced effect of the intervention. A possible explanation may be that the children enrolled in this study were recruited from a tertiary referral centre and were all refractory to standard urotherapy. Moreover, the difference in patient characteristics and treatment protocols between different studies make direct comparisons of efficacy difficult.

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapeutic intervention with biofeedback assisted PFMT seems to lead to better uroflow patterns in approximately 60% of cases in DV improving the uroflow curves and PVR, however improvement in uroflowmetry patterns is not necessarily reflected in the resolution of incontinence or UT symptoms. The use of anticholinergics seems to be a negative predictor for response to treatment.

Assessment of pediatric bowel and bladder dysfunction: a critical appraisal of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) is a clinical syndrome defined by the coexistence of constipation and lower urinary tract symptoms. Although BBD is a common condition in pediatric urology and can cause significant stress to patients/parents, clinical diagnosis of BBD has not been standardized. Bowel and bladder dysfunction instruments have gained popularity over the past decade to aid in diagnosis. In this review, the currently published BBD symptom questionnaires were summarized and an analysis on their psychometric validation process was provided.

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS

PubMed was searched for articles on BBD symptom questionnaires/instruments/surveys since 2000. Two investigators (R.Y.J. & M.S.K.) conducted the search in duplicate. The search was limited to English language. The included search terms were 'dysfunctional elimination syndrome', 'bowel and bladder dysfunction', 'dysfunctional voiding', 'voiding dysfunction symptom score', and 'dysfunctional voiding symptom scale'. Reference lists of included studies were screened for missed studies. Unpublished abstracts presented at the following scientific meetings were also manually searched for: the American Urological Association, the Society for Pediatric Urology, and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Urology. Exclusion criteria included articles in languages other than English, articles not related to BBD questionnaires, and articles not pertaining to pediatric patients.

RESULTS

After initial search, a total of 54 articles were obtained. Of the seven questionnaires reviewed, only one did not measure sensitivity or specificity. Almost all questionnaires showed excellent discriminative property with an Area under the curve (AUC) >0.85. Criterion validity was not reported in any of the questionnaires. Known-group validation was used as a common method to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency was reported in 2 studies, and only 1 study measured questionnaire responsiveness during initial validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although BBD is a common pediatric urology condition; a large amount of heterogeneity exists in the questionnaires' psychometric testing and validation process. To further improve the diagnosis and management of BBD in pediatric patients, there is a need for consensus on the gold standard questionnaire measure.

Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?

Objective:

To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding.

Patients and Methods:

The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared.

Results:

A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.