Current drug therapy of patients with BPH-LUTS with the special emphasis on PDE5 inhibitors

Stimulation of Prostate Cells by the Senescence Phenotype of Epithelial and Stromal Cells: Implication for Benign Prostate Hyperplasia

Hyperproliferation of prostate transition‐zone epithelial and stromal cells leads to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), a prevalent pathology in elderly men. Senescent cells in BPH tissue induce a senescence‐associated secretory phenotype (SASP) which, by generating inflamed microenvironment and reactive stroma, promotes leukocyte infiltration, cellular hyperproliferation, and nodular prostate growth. We examined human prostate epithelial (BPH‐1, PNT‐1α) and stromal (HPS‐19I) cells for SASP induction by ionizing radiation and assessed SASP's impacts on cell proliferation and on signal transducers that promote cellular growth, proliferation, and survival. Radiation‐induced DNA damage led to cellular senescence, evident from elevated expression of senescence‐associated β‐galactosidase and the cell‐cycle inhibitor p16/INK4a. Clinical BPH tissue showed p16 accumulation. SASP induced mRNA expression for inflammatory cytokines (IL‐1α, IL‐6, IL‐8, TNF‐α); chemokines (GM‐CSF, CXCL12); metalloproteases (MMP‐1, MMP‐3, MMP‐10); growth factor binding IGFBP‐3. Media from irradiated epithelial or stromal cells enhanced BPH‐1 proliferation. ERK1/2 and AKT, which enhance cell growth/survival and STAT5, which facilitates cell cycle progression and leukocyte recruitment to epithelial microenvironment, were activated by SASP components. The radiation‐induced cellular senescence model can be a platform for identification of individual SASP components and pathways that drive BPH etiology/progression in vivo and targeting them may form the basis for novel BPH therapy.

Tadalafil vs. tamsulosin in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective, randomized study

Introduction

To compare the efiicacy of tadalafil 5 mg with tamsulosin 0.4 mg in the treatment of Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Material and methods

A randomized prospective study on patients diagnosed with LUTS secondary to BPH with 50 patients in each group. Duration of the study is 12 weeks. Drug was given 30 min after dinner. Patients were assessed at baseline 1, 4 and 12 weeks with efficacy measures being Maximum flow rate (Qmax), Postvoid residual urine (PVR), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of life (IPSS QoL) and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) scoring. Statistical analysis was done using paired sample t test and independent sample t test.

Results

In tadalafil group, 12 (24%) patients were having mild LUTS and 38 (76%) were having moderate LUTS. In tamsulosin group, 9 (18%) patients were having mild LUTS and 41 (82%) patients were having moderate LUTS. Seventeen patients in tadalafil group had associated ED (erectile dysfunction) and 13 patients had associated ED in tamsulosin group.

Conclusions

When both groups were compared, tamsulosin showed better efficacy than tadalafil in treating LUTS secondary to BPH.

Efficacy and safety of Afalaza in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia at risk of progression: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

Introduction

In order to investigate the efficacy and safety of Afalaza in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) at risk of progression, this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was performed. Derived by technological treatment of antibodies to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOs), Afalaza was previously proved to modulate its molecular targets. The mechanism of action of the drug is associated with the modulating effect of the antibiodies (RA-Abs) on the molecular targets (PSA and eNOS) by way of conformational changes.

Material and methods

A total of 249 patients aged 45–60 years with BPH and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), total prostate volume (TPV) ≥30 cm³, Qmax 10–15 ml/s, and serum PSA<4 ng/ml were randomly assigned to receive either Afalaza (n = 125) or placebo (n = 124) for 12 months. Changes in BPH/LUTS symptoms (according to the International Prostate Symptom Score), Qmax, TPV, PSA, BPH clinical progression, occurrence of acure urinary retention (AUR) events or BPH-related surgery were estimated as the study endpoints.

Results

IPSS mean change was -3.7 ±3.0 (95% CI -4.3 to -3.2) after 12 months of Afalaza (vs. -2.9 ±2.4; 95% CI -3.3 to -2.4 in placebo; р = 0.02). Qmax growth was 2.5 ±4.3 ml/s (vs. 1.4 ±3.3 in placebo; p = 0.049), TPV reduced by 11.8 ±16.0% (vs. 6.5 ±14.7%; p = 0.01, and PSA remained unchanged. Afalaza therapy resulted in a significant decrease in the total sum of BPH progression symptoms (p = 0.01). The maximum effect of Afalaza was registered after 12 months without a tendency to form a ‘plateau’. During the study, no patients experienced AUR or BPH-related surgery.

Conclusions

A 12-month course of Afalaza therapy is effective and safe for patients with BPH. The results of end points measurements revealed asignificant advantage of Afalaza compared to placebo in the overall symptoms benefit and a decline in the risk of BPH progression.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01716104.

Alpha-blockers with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) explored the effects of α-blockers with or without phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH). However, the results were inconsistent. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the role of combination therapy (α-blockers and PDE5-Is) in patients with LUTS/BPH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for qualified RCTs. Pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to measure the effects and adverse events in combination therapy. Moreover, subgroup analyses of ethnicity, dosage of PDE5-Is, treatment duration, and severity of LUTS/BPH were performed. In addition, trial sequential analyses (TSAs) were used to assess whether the evidence for the results was sufficient.

RESULTS

Overall, this study identified 11 eligible RCTs, including 855 LUTS/BPH patients. Patients receiving combination therapy had better improvement in international prostate symptom score (IPSS: MD: 1.66, 95% CI - 3.03 to - 0.29), maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max: MD: 0.94, 95% CI 0.24-1.64), and international index of erectile function (IIEF: MD: 4.73, 95% CI 2.95-6.51), comparing those without PDE5-Is. Besides, subgroup analyses indicated that the effects of combination treatment were associated with ethnicity, treatment duration, and severity of LUTS/BPH. By TSA, the findings in the current study were based on sufficient evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that combination therapy can significantly improve IPSS, Q_max, and IIEF in patients with LUTS/BPH. Combination therapy might be more suitable for these patients.