1
|
Tabone I, Robinson A, Montoya M, Alvarez-Solas J. Holocene thinning in central Greenland controlled by the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream. Nat Commun 2024; 15:6434. [PMID: 39085246 PMCID: PMC11291647 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50772-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Ice-core records from the interior of the Greenland ice sheet suggest widespread thinning during the Holocene. However, the recurring underestimation of this thinning in numerical models raises concerns about both the veracity of such reconstructions and the reliability of glaciological models. Recent work suggests the 8000-year-old Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (NEGIS), including a now-extinct northern tributary, may have been an early influence on Greenland ice-sheet dynamics. Yet, the inaccurate reproduction of NEGIS-like dynamics in most models hampers investigation of whether this feature played a role in Holocene ice-sheet thinning. Here we show that grounding-line retreat in northeast Greenland triggers elevation changes at the northern summit via ice-dynamic effects modulated by the paleo NEGIS system. In our simulations, fast ice-stream flow caused by transiently imposed reduced basal shear stress following the northeast retreat explains 55% ( ± 18%) of the estimated ice thinning, showing that ice-stream dynamics is one of the main drivers of the NGRIP Holocene surface elevation drop. Our findings show that the ice-flow in northeast Greenland plays a large role in ice-surface elevation changes in central Greenland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Tabone
- Departamento de Geofísica, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
- Departamento de Física de la Tierra y Astrofísica, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
- Institute of Geography, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Alexander Robinson
- Departamento de Física de la Tierra y Astrofísica, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Marisa Montoya
- Departamento de Física de la Tierra y Astrofísica, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Geociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Alvarez-Solas
- Departamento de Física de la Tierra y Astrofísica, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Geociencias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Millan R, Jager E, Mouginot J, Wood MH, Larsen SH, Mathiot P, Jourdain NC, Bjørk A. Rapid disintegration and weakening of ice shelves in North Greenland. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6914. [PMID: 37935697 PMCID: PMC10630314 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42198-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The glaciers of North Greenland are hosting enough ice to raise sea level by 2.1 m, and have long considered to be stable. This part of Greenland is buttressed by the last remaining ice shelves of the ice sheet. Here, we show that since 1978, ice shelves in North Greenland have lost more than 35% of their total volume, three of them collapsing completely. For the floating ice shelves that remain we observe a widespread increase in ice shelf mass losses, that are dominated by enhanced basal melting rates. Between 2000 and 2020, there was a widespread increase in basal melt rates that closely follows a rise in the ocean temperature. These glaciers are showing a direct dynamical response to ice shelf changes with retreating grounding lines and increased ice discharge. These results suggest that, under future projections of ocean thermal forcing, basal melting rates will continue to rise or remain at high level, which may have dramatic consequences for the stability of Greenlandic glaciers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Millan
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP, 38400, Grenoble, Isère, France.
| | - E Jager
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP, 38400, Grenoble, Isère, France
| | - J Mouginot
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP, 38400, Grenoble, Isère, France
| | - M H Wood
- Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, San José State University, San Jose, CA, 95192, USA
| | - S H Larsen
- Department of Glaciology and Climate, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Mathiot
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP, 38400, Grenoble, Isère, France
| | - N C Jourdain
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, INP, 38400, Grenoble, Isère, France
| | - A Bjørk
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resources Management, University of Copenhagen, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li D, DeConto RM, Pollard D. Climate model differences contribute deep uncertainty in future Antarctic ice loss. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2023; 9:eadd7082. [PMID: 36791186 PMCID: PMC9931235 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.add7082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Future projections of ice sheets in response to different climate scenarios and their associated contributions to sea level changes are subject to deep uncertainty due to ice sheet instability processes, hampering a proper risk assessment of sea level rise and enaction of mitigation/adaptation strategies. For a systematic evaluation of the uncertainty due to climate model fields used as input to the ice sheet models, we drive a three-dimensional model of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) with the output from 36 climate models to simulate past and future changes in the AIS. Simulations show that a few climate models result in partial collapse of the West AIS under modeled preindustrial climates, and the spread in future changes in the AIS's volume is comparable to the structural uncertainty originating from differing ice sheet models. These results highlight the need for improved representations of physical processes important for polar climate in climate models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawei Li
- School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
- Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
- MNR Key Laboratory for Polar Science, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200136, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Polar Life and Environment Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Robert M. DeConto
- Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
| | - David Pollard
- Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
- Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grinsted A, Bamber J, Bingham R, Buzzard S, Nias I, Ng K, Weeks J. The Transient Sea Level Response to External Forcing in CMIP6 Models. EARTH'S FUTURE 2022; 10:e2022EF002696. [PMID: 36582516 PMCID: PMC9786795 DOI: 10.1029/2022ef002696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Earth is warming and sea levels are rising as land-based ice is lost to melt, and oceans expand due to accumulation of heat. The pace of ice loss and steric expansion is linked to the intensity of warming. How much faster sea level will rise as climate warms is, however, highly uncertain and difficult to model. Here, we quantify the transient sea level sensitivity of the sea level budget in both models and observations. Models show little change in sensitivity to warming between the first and second half of the twenty-first century for most contributors. The exception is glaciers and ice caps (GIC) that have a greater sensitivity pre-2050 (2.8 ± 0.4 mm/yr/K) compared to later (0.7 ± 0.1 mm/yr/K). We attribute this change to the short response time of glaciers and their changing area over time. Model sensitivities of steric expansion (1.5 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K), and Greenland Ice Sheet mass loss (0.8 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K) are greater than, but still compatible with, corresponding estimates from historical data (1.4 ± 0.5 and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K). Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) models tends to show lower rates of sea level rise (SLR) with warming (-0.0 ± 0.3 mm/yr/K) in contrast to historical estimates (0.4 ± 0.2 mm/yr/K). This apparent low bias in AIS sensitivity is only partly able to account for a similar low bias identified in the sensitivity of global mean sea level excluding GIC (3.1 ± 0.4 vs. 2.3 ± 0.4 mm/yr/K). The balance temperature, where SLR is zero, lies close to the pre-industrial value, implying that SLR can only be mitigated by substantial global cooling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aslak Grinsted
- Physics of Ice, Climate, and EarthNiels Bohr InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Jonathan Bamber
- School of Geographical SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
- Department of Aerospace and GeodesyData Science in Earth ObservationTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Rory Bingham
- School of Geographical SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Sammie Buzzard
- School of Earth and Environmental SciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
| | - Isabel Nias
- School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
| | - Kelvin Ng
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang H, Krebs-Kanzow U, Kleiner T, Sidorenko D, Rodehacke CB, Shi X, Gierz P, Niu L, Gowan EJ, Hinck S, Liu X, Stap LB, Lohmann G. Impact of paleoclimate on present and future evolution of the Greenland Ice Sheet. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0259816. [PMID: 35051173 PMCID: PMC8776332 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Using transient climate forcing based on simulations from the Alfred Wegener Institute Earth System Model (AWI-ESM), we simulate the evolution of the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) from the last interglacial (125 ka, kiloyear before present) to 2100 AD with the Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM). The impact of paleoclimate, especially Holocene climate, on the present and future evolution of the GrIS is explored. Our simulations of the past show close agreement with reconstructions with respect to the recent timing of the peaks in ice volume and the climate of Greenland. The maximum and minimum ice volume at around 18-17 ka and 6-5 ka lag the respective extremes in climate by several thousand years, implying that the ice volume response of the GrIS strongly lags climatic changes. Given that Greenland's climate was getting colder from the Holocene Thermal Maximum (i.e., 8 ka) to the Pre-Industrial era, our simulation implies that the GrIS experienced growth from the mid-Holocene to the industrial era. Due to this background trend, the GrIS still gains mass until the second half of the 20th century, even though anthropogenic warming begins around 1850 AD. This is also in agreement with observational evidence showing mass loss of the GrIS does not begin earlier than the late 20th century. Our results highlight that the present evolution of the GrIS is not only controlled by the recent climate changes, but is also affected by paleoclimate, especially the relatively warm Holocene climate. We propose that the GrIS was not in equilibrium throughout the entire Holocene and that the slow response to Holocene climate needs to be represented in ice sheet simulations in order to predict ice mass loss, and therefore sea level rise, accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hu Yang
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Uta Krebs-Kanzow
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Thomas Kleiner
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Dmitry Sidorenko
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Christian Bernd Rodehacke
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
- Danish Meteorological Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Xiaoxu Shi
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Paul Gierz
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Lu Niu
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Evan J. Gowan
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Sebastian Hinck
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Xingxing Liu
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
- State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an, China
| | - Lennert B. Stap
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Lohmann
- Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Projected land ice contributions to twenty-first-century sea level rise. Nature 2021; 593:74-82. [PMID: 33953415 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03302-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The land ice contribution to global mean sea level rise has not yet been predicted1 using ice sheet and glacier models for the latest set of socio-economic scenarios, nor using coordinated exploration of uncertainties arising from the various computer models involved. Two recent international projects generated a large suite of projections using multiple models2-8, but primarily used previous-generation scenarios9 and climate models10, and could not fully explore known uncertainties. Here we estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios11,12 using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models. We find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges. The median decreases from 25 to 13 centimetres sea level equivalent (SLE) by 2100, with glaciers responsible for half the sea level contribution. The projected Antarctic contribution does not show a clear response to the emissions scenario, owing to uncertainties in the competing processes of increasing ice loss and snowfall accumulation in a warming climate. However, under risk-averse (pessimistic) assumptions, Antarctic ice loss could be five times higher, increasing the median land ice contribution to 42 centimetres SLE under current policies and pledges, with the 95th percentile projection exceeding half a metre even under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming. This would severely limit the possibility of mitigating future coastal flooding. Given this large range (between 13 centimetres SLE using the main projections under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming and 42 centimetres SLE using risk-averse projections under current pledges), adaptation planning for twenty-first-century sea level rise must account for a factor-of-three uncertainty in the land ice contribution until climate policies and the Antarctic response are further constrained.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rignot E, An L, Chauche N, Morlighem M, Jeong S, Wood M, Mouginot J, Willis JK, Klaucke I, Weinrebe W, Muenchow A. Retreat of Humboldt Gletscher, North Greenland, Driven by Undercutting From a Warmer Ocean. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS 2021; 48:e2020GL091342. [PMID: 34219836 PMCID: PMC8243930 DOI: 10.1029/2020gl091342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Humboldt Gletscher is a 100-km wide, slow-moving glacier in north Greenland which holds a 19-cm global sea level equivalent. Humboldt has been the fourth largest contributor to sea level rise since 1972 but the cause of its mass loss has not been elucidated. Multi-beam echo sounding data collected in 2019 indicate a seabed 200 m deeper than previously known. Conductivity temperature depth data reveal the presence of warm water of Atlantic origin at 0°C at the glacier front and a warming of the ocean waters by 0.9 ± 0.1°C since 1962. Using an ocean model, we reconstruct grounded ice undercutting by the ocean, combine it with calculated retreat caused by ice thinning to floatation, and are able to fully explain the observed retreat. Two thirds of the retreat are caused by undercutting of grounded ice, which is a physical process not included in most ice sheet models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Rignot
- Department Earth System ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAUSA
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Lu An
- Department Earth System ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAUSA
| | | | - Mathieu Morlighem
- Department Earth System ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAUSA
| | - Seongsu Jeong
- Department Earth System ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAUSA
| | - Michael Wood
- Department Earth System ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAUSA
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Jeremie Mouginot
- Department Earth System ScienceUniversity of California IrvineIrvineCAUSA
- Institut des Geosciences de l'EnvironnementUniversite Grenoble‐AlpesCNRSGrenobleFrance
| | - Josh K. Willis
- Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaCAUSA
| | - Ingo Klaucke
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielKielGermany
| | | | - Andreas Muenchow
- School of Marine Science and PolicyUniversity of DelawareNewarkDEUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamlington BD, Gardner AS, Ivins E, Lenaerts JTM, Reager JT, Trossman DS, Zaron ED, Adhikari S, Arendt A, Aschwanden A, Beckley BD, Bekaert DPS, Blewitt G, Caron L, Chambers DP, Chandanpurkar HA, Christianson K, Csatho B, Cullather RI, DeConto RM, Fasullo JT, Frederikse T, Freymueller JT, Gilford DM, Girotto M, Hammond WC, Hock R, Holschuh N, Kopp RE, Landerer F, Larour E, Menemenlis D, Merrifield M, Mitrovica JX, Nerem RS, Nias IJ, Nieves V, Nowicki S, Pangaluru K, Piecuch CG, Ray RD, Rounce DR, Schlegel N, Seroussi H, Shirzaei M, Sweet WV, Velicogna I, Vinogradova N, Wahl T, Wiese DN, Willis MJ. Understanding of Contemporary Regional Sea-Level Change and the Implications for the Future. REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 1985) 2020; 58:e2019RG000672. [PMID: 32879921 PMCID: PMC7375165 DOI: 10.1029/2019rg000672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Global sea level provides an important indicator of the state of the warming climate, but changes in regional sea level are most relevant for coastal communities around the world. With improvements to the sea-level observing system, the knowledge of regional sea-level change has advanced dramatically in recent years. Satellite measurements coupled with in situ observations have allowed for comprehensive study and improved understanding of the diverse set of drivers that lead to variations in sea level in space and time. Despite the advances, gaps in the understanding of contemporary sea-level change remain and inhibit the ability to predict how the relevant processes may lead to future change. These gaps arise in part due to the complexity of the linkages between the drivers of sea-level change. Here we review the individual processes which lead to sea-level change and then describe how they combine and vary regionally. The intent of the paper is to provide an overview of the current state of understanding of the processes that cause regional sea-level change and to identify and discuss limitations and uncertainty in our understanding of these processes. Areas where the lack of understanding or gaps in knowledge inhibit the ability to provide the needed information for comprehensive planning efforts are of particular focus. Finally, a goal of this paper is to highlight the role of the expanded sea-level observation network-particularly as related to satellite observations-in the improved scientific understanding of the contributors to regional sea-level change.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lofverstrom M, Fyke JG, Thayer‐Calder K, Muntjewerf L, Vizcaino M, Sacks WJ, Lipscomb WH, Otto‐Bliesner BL, Bradley SL. An Efficient Ice Sheet/Earth System Model Spin-up Procedure for CESM2-CISM2: Description, Evaluation, and Broader Applicability. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS 2020; 12:e2019MS001984. [PMID: 32999702 PMCID: PMC7507768 DOI: 10.1029/2019ms001984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Spinning up a highly complex, coupled Earth system model (ESM) is a time consuming and computationally demanding exercise. For models with interactive ice sheet components, this becomes a major challenge, as ice sheets are sensitive to bidirectional feedback processes and equilibrate over glacial timescales of up to many millennia. This work describes and demonstrates a computationally tractable, iterative procedure for spinning up a contemporary, highly complex ESM that includes an interactive ice sheet component. The procedure alternates between a computationally expensive coupled configuration and a computationally cheaper configuration where the atmospheric component is replaced by a data model. By periodically regenerating atmospheric forcing consistent with the coupled system, the data atmosphere remains adequately constrained to ensure that the broader model state evolves realistically. The applicability of the method is demonstrated by spinning up the preindustrial climate in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), coupled to the Community Ice Sheet Model Version 2 (CISM2) over Greenland. The equilibrium climate state is similar to the control climate from a coupled simulation with a prescribed Greenland ice sheet, indicating that the iterative procedure is consistent with a traditional spin-up approach without interactive ice sheets. These results suggest that the iterative method presented here provides a faster and computationally cheaper method for spinning up a highly complex ESM, with or without interactive ice sheet components. The method described here has been used to develop the climate/ice sheet initial conditions for transient, ice sheet-enabled simulations with CESM2-CISM2 in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Lofverstrom
- Department of GeosciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonAZUSA
- Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderCOUSA
| | - Jeremy G. Fyke
- Associated Engineering Group Ltd.CalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderCOUSA
| | | | - Laura Muntjewerf
- Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
| | - Miren Vizcaino
- Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
| | - William J. Sacks
- Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderCOUSA
| | - William H. Lipscomb
- Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderCOUSA
| | - Bette L. Otto‐Bliesner
- Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderCOUSA
| | - Sarah L. Bradley
- Department of Geoscience and Remote SensingDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
- Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Data Reduction Using Statistical and Regression Approaches for Ice Velocity Derived by Landsat-8, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12121935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
During the last decade, the number of available satellite observations has increased significantly, allowing for far more frequent measurements of the glacier speed. Appropriate methods of post-processing need to be developed to efficiently deal with the large volumes of data generated and relatively large intrinsic errors associated with the measurements. Here, we process and combine together measurements of ice velocity of Russell Gletscher in Greenland from three satellites—Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8, creating a multi-year velocity database with high temporal and spatial resolution. We then investigate post-processing methodologies with the aim of generating corrected, ordered, and simplified time series. We tested rolling mean and median, cubic spline regression, and linear non-parametric local regression (LOWESS) smoothing algorithms to reduce data noise, evaluated the results against ground-based GPS in one location, and compared the results between two locations with different characteristics. We found that LOWESS provides the best solution for noisy measurements that are unevenly distributed in time. Using this methodology with these sensors, we can robustly derive time series with temporal resolution of 2–3 weeks and improve the accuracy on the ice velocity to about 10 m/yr, or a factor of three compared to the initial measurements. The presented methodology could be applied to the entire Greenland ice sheet with an aim of reconstructing comprehensive sub-seasonal ice flow dynamics and mass balance.
Collapse
|
11
|
An Integrated View of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Changes Based on Models and Satellite Observations. REMOTE SENSING 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/rs11121407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Greenland ice sheet is a major contributor to sea level rise, adding on average 0.47 ± 0.23 mm year − 1 to global mean sea level between 1991 and 2015. The cryosphere as a whole has contributed around 45% of observed global sea level rise since 1993. Understanding the present-day state of the Greenland ice sheet is therefore vital for understanding the processes controlling the modern-day rates of sea level change and for making projections of sea level rise into the future. Here, we provide an overview of the current state of the mass budget of Greenland based on a diverse range of remote sensing observations to produce the essential climate variables (ECVs) of ice velocity, surface elevation change, grounding line location, calving front location, and gravimetric mass balance as well as numerical modelling that together build a consistent picture of a shrinking ice sheet. We also combine these observations with output from a regional climate model and from an ice sheet model to gain insight into existing biases in ice sheet dynamics and surface mass balance processes. Observations show surface lowering across virtually all regions of the ice sheet and at some locations up to −2.65 m year − 1 between 1995 and 2017 based on radar altimetry analysis. In addition, calving fronts at 28 study sites, representing a sample of typical glaciers, have retreated all around Greenland since the 1990s and in only two out of 28 study locations have they remained stable. During the same period, two of five floating ice shelves have collapsed while the locations of grounding lines at the remaining three floating ice shelves have remained stable over the observation period. In a detailed case study with a fracture model at Petermann glacier, we demonstrate the potential sensitivity of these floating ice shelves to future warming. GRACE gravimetrically-derived mass balance (GMB) data shows that overall Greenland has lost 255 ± 15 Gt year − 1 of ice over the period 2003 to 2016, consistent with that shown by IMBIE and a marked increase compared to a rate of loss of 83 ± 63 Gt year − 1 in the 1993–2003 period. Regional climate model and ice sheet model simulations show that surface mass processes dominate the Greenland ice sheet mass budget over most of the interior. However, in areas of high ice velocity there is a significant contribution to mass loss by ice dynamical processes. Marked differences between models and observations indicate that not all processes are captured accurately within models, indicating areas for future research.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The Antarctic ice sheet is one of the largest potential contributors to future sea level rise. Predicting its future behaviour using physically-based ice sheet models has been a bottleneck for the past decades, but major advances are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Pattyn
- Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, B-1050, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moon T, Ahlstrøm A, Goelzer H, Lipscomb W, Nowicki S. Rising Oceans Guaranteed: Arctic Land Ice Loss and Sea Level Rise. CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS 2018; 4:211-222. [PMID: 30956936 PMCID: PMC6428231 DOI: 10.1007/s40641-018-0107-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper reviews sea level contributions from land ice across the Arctic, including Greenland. We summarize ice loss measurement methods, ice loss mechanisms, and recent observations and projections, and highlight research advances over the last 3-5 years and remaining scientific challenges. RECENT FINDINGS Mass loss across the Arctic began to accelerate during the late twentieth century, with projections of continued loss across all future greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Recent research has improved knowledge of ice hydrology and surface processes, influences of atmospheric and oceanic changes on land ice, and boundary conditions such as subglacial topography. New computer models can also more accurately simulate glacier and ice sheet evolution. SUMMARY Rapid Arctic ice loss is underway, and future ice loss and sea level rise are guaranteed. Research continues to better understand and model physical processes and to improve projections of ice loss rates, especially after 2050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Twila Moon
- National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), 449 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0449 USA
| | - Andreas Ahlstrøm
- Department of Glaciology and Climate, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heiko Goelzer
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - William Lipscomb
- National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO USA
| | - Sophie Nowicki
- NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
| |
Collapse
|