Behavior Analysis of Psychotic Disorders: Scientific Dead End or Casualty of the Mental Health Political Economy?

The role of the behavior analyst on interprofessional mental health teams: opportunities for collaboration and enhancing patient care

Patients living with mental illness have needs that span a range of professional disciplines, settings, and service systems. These needs are best addressed through interprofessional collaboration. Behavior analysts can play a valuable role in enhancing patient care as part of the interprofessional mental health team. We provide information about the field of applied behavior analysis and its contribution to the assessment and treatment of patients living with mental health and substance use challenges. We outline how behavior analysts are trained and touch upon the practice of behavior analysis in North America and beyond. We describe collaborative relationships with other mental health professionals and, as an example, review the role of the behavior analyst on interprofessional teams in our mental health and addiction teaching hospital in Canada. We highlight some of the challenges faced by behavior analysts working in the mental health field and offer suggestions to increase their profile and opportunities for collaboration in clinical programs.

What is evidence-based behavior analysis?

Although applied behavior analysts often say they engage in evidence-based practice, they express differing views on what constitutes "evidence" and "practice." This article describes a practice as a service offered by a provider to help solve a problem presented by a consumer. Solving most problems (e.g., increasing or decreasing a behavior and maintaining this change) requires multiple intervention procedures (i.e., a package). Single-subject studies are invaluable in investigating individual procedures, but researchers still need to integrate the procedures into a package. The package must be standardized enough for independent providers to replicate yet flexible enough to allow individualization; intervention manuals are the primary technology for achieving this balance. To test whether the package is effective in solving consumers' problems, researchers must evaluate outcomes of the package as a whole, usually in group studies such as randomized controlled trials. From this perspective, establishing an evidence-based practice involves more than analyzing the effects of discrete intervention procedures on behavior; it requires synthesizing information so as to offer thorough solutions to problems. Recognizing the need for synthesis offers behavior analysts many promising opportunities to build on their existing research to increase the quality and quantity of evidence-based practices.

Behavior analysis in the era of medicalization: the state of the science and recommendations for practitioners

Recent decades have witnessed an increase in biological explanations of common disorders such as depression and anxiety, a phenonmenon termed "medicalization" (Conrad, 2007). Behavior analysts may find it difficult to implement non-drug treatment with a populace that has become inundated with biological explanations and a preference for medication as the treatment of choice. Research frequently cited in support of medicalization includes studies of drug effectiveness, as well as family studies and studies of brain structure and function. Methodological and interpretation difficulties within those bodies of research are described and recommendations are made so that behavioral practitioners may function optimally within the culture of biological causation.