Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate is Safe for Patients Above 80 Years: A Prospective Study

Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the geriatric population: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Geriatric patients, prone to adverse events (AEs) and low compliance with drugs, may benefit from minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and procedural characteristics of MISTs in geriatric patients with BPH.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was systematically searched for relevant articles through October 1, 2023. Eligible studies focused on geriatric patients (≥65 years) with BPH who were treated with MISTs and evaluated follow-up surgical, micturition, and/or sexual outcomes. Studies were included if there was separate reporting for age subgroups ≥65 years, or if the mean age minus standard deviation was ≥65 years, or if the first quartile was ≥65 years.

RESULTS

Out of 292 screened studies, 32 (N = 3972 patients) met inclusion criteria and assessed prostatic artery embolization (PAE), Rezum, GreenLight, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP), and Aquablation. Except for Rezum, all MISTs required a planned overnight stay. While PAE and Rezum could be performed under local anesthesia, the other MISTs needed general or spinal anesthesia. Postoperative catheterization duration was longest for PAE (median 14 days) and Rezum (21 days) and shortest for GreenLight (1.9 days). At 12 months postoperatively, all MISTs exhibited significant percent changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (median -69.9%) and quality of life (median -72.5%). Clavien-Dindo Grade 1 AEs ranged widely, with PAE (5.8%-36.8%), Rezum (0%-62.1%), and GreenLight (0%-67.6%) having the largest range, and HoLEP (0%-9.5%), ThuLEP (2%-6.9%), and DiLEP (5%-17.5%) having the smallest. PAE, Rezum, DiLEP, and Aquablation reported no significant changes in the International Index of Erectile Function.

CONCLUSIONS

Although all the MISTs reviewed in this study effectively treat BPH in geriatric patients, differences in procedural characteristics and safety profiles across MISTs were considerable. Physicians should use shared decision-making processes, considering risks and patient characteristics, when choosing a suitable treatment option for their patients.

Patient reported outcome and quality of life measured by a simple questionnaire in patients with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia treated by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)

Introduction

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) is established as an effective transurethral treatment option for LUTS due to BPH with improved postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medium-term results by patient reported outcome measurement and to detect potential risk factors for postoperative complications or impaired outcome.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients undergoing HoLEP in the study center between April 2019 and December 2021. Therefore, perioperative parameters and postoperative outcome was documented and all patients were asked for their outcome (PROM), complications, IPSS, QoL and changes in sexual and continence function by a questionnaire at a single time point.

Results

In the study period, a total of 541 patients with a mean age of 72.5 ± 8.4 years were treated by HoLEP in the study center. 71.7% of the questionnaires were returned after a mean observation period of 14.9 ± 6.3 month. 91% of the patients reported to the single-timepoint questionnaire reporting a good satisfaction with the procedure and a low postoperative complication rate. The international prostate symptom score could be reduced significantly to 6.2 ± 5.7 (preoperative 19.0 ± 7.2; p < 0.001). Patients with an ASA score ≥ 3, prostate volume > 80 ml, medication with platelet inhibitors or DOAK or preoperative need of an indwelling catheter didn't show an increased complication rate.

Conclusion

The overall satisfaction with the procedure and its results are high. We could not identify any independent risk factors for postoperative complications after HoLEP. The used questionnaire is a simple tool for postoperative patient reported outcome measurement with a good correlation to clinical parameters.

Perioperative care based on roy adaptation model in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: impact on psychological well-being, pain, and quality of life

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the impact of perioperative care based on the Roy Adaptation Model (RAM) on psychological well-being, postoperative pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

METHODS

A total of 160 elderly patients diagnosed with BPH between June 2021 and June 2022 and scheduled for TURP were randomly assigned to either the routine care group (n = 80) or the RAM group (n = 80). The RAM group received standard care supplemented with interventions based on the RAM model. Negative emotions measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), pain intensity by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and HRQoL by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were measured at the preoperative visit (T0), at 30 days (T1), and at 3 months of (T2) follow‑up.

RESULTS

Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences in psychological well-being, postoperative pain intensity, and HRQoL within both the routine care and RAM groups across the three time points. Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test confirmed significant differences between each time point for both groups. The RAM intervention led to significant reductions in anxiety and depression levels, alleviation of postoperative pain intensity, and improvements in various domains of HRQoL at T1 and T2 compared to routine care.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating the RAM model into perioperative care for elderly patients undergoing TURP for BPH has shown promising results in improving psychological well-being, reducing postoperative pain intensity, and enhancing HRQoL.

Procedural Intervention for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men ≥ Age 70 Years - A Review of Published Literature

Objective

We set out to review studies reporting on the use of surgical intervention to treat Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in elderly men ≥70 years of age.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted using Scopus, PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Wiley Online Library databases including studies published between January 2012 through December 2022. This 10-year interval was chosen given the recent plethora of new modalities that have entered the BPH armamentarium, many of which have been marketed as appropriate for older and high-risk patients. The following database search words were used either individually or in conjunction: "BPH", "elderly", "surgical", "ablation", "resection", "embolization", and "aging".

Results

We identified 28 studies for inclusion in this review. The pros and cons of these modalities are presented, specifically as applicable to an older and higher risk population.

Conclusion

There are a wide variety of surgical procedures available for surgically treating BPH in elderly men with varying states of health. Each of these comes with different risks and benefits, supporting that individualized approaches are important. Long-term data and further studies comparing modalities, specifically as regards the elderly and frail, would enhance our approaches to BPH treatment in this patient population.

Holmium laser enucleation of prostate in nonagenarians and octogenarians Impact of age and frailty on surgical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a well-established technique for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). With the growing aging population, a considerable percentage of octogenarians (80-90 years old) and nonagenarians (>90 years old) require surgical management for BPH. We aimed to assess the outcomes of HoLEP in those age groups.

METHODS

We reviewed a maintained database for HoLEP patients in a tertiary center. Patients were assigned to two groups: above (group A) and below (group B) 80 years old. Perioperative outcome and postoperative followup data were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

The study included 1090 patients, 201 and 889 in groups A and B, respectively. Median age was 83 and 70 years in groups A and B, respectively. Group A showed longer operative time, longer catheterization time, and higher 30-day emergency room visits and readmission rates. Hemoglobin drop was comparable, although associated with higher rate of blood transfusion in group A. Overall, 30-day postoperative complications were higher in group A (20.8% vs. 9.3%, p=0.008), although the majority of complications in both groups were grade I and II. The rate of complications over Clavien-Dindo grade II were statistically comparable (3.4% vs. 1.79%, p=0.133). Followup at six weeks, three months, and one year showed comparable functional outcomes in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP is a safe and effective option in the geriatric population of octogenarians and even nonagenarians. HoLEP is associated with higher overall complication rate in older age groups; however, most complications were minor.

En bloc holmium laser enucleation of prostate in octogenarians and nonagenarians: clinical characteristics and outcome

Extended longevity leads to greater numbers of elderly patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who seek surgical solutions. We assessed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of octogenarians and nonagenarians with BPH who underwent en bloc holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Retrospective cohort of all consecutive HoLEP patients treated in our medical center between January 2020 and January 2023. Cohort was divided into group aged < 80 years (n = 290) and group aged ≥ 80 years (n = 77). Their demographics, presentations, indications, and outcomes were compared. Octogenarians and nonagenarians had higher rates of indwelling catheters (p = 0.00001), chronic retention (p = 0.00006), larger prostates (p = 0.03), higher American Anesthesiology Association scores (p = 0.000001), and more antiplatelet medications (p = 0.0003) at presentation. They had longer operations (median 115 vs 90 min, respectively, p = 0.0008), longer hospital stay (median 2 vs 1 day, p = 0.01E-7), a higher complication rate (17% vs 7%, p = 0.02), and a higher transitory urinary incontinence (TUI) rate (54% vs 9%, p = 0.00001). TUI was more prevalent in the older group with indwelling catheters (61% vs, 13%, p = 0.00001). The functional outcome was similar for both age groups, and all patients could void spontaneously after the procedure. En-bloc HoLEP improves urinary symptoms and quality of life in patients ≥ 80 years of age despite larger prostates, more comorbidities, and higher complications rate, compared to younger men. HoLEP bestows a significant improvement in urologic quality of life regardless of age.

Age-specific effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate on overactive bladder in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: An investigation using an overactive bladder symptom score

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the age-specific effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

A total of 186 consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP were included. They were divided into three groups: patients aged less than 65 years, between 65 and 74, and 75 or older. The OAB symptom score as well as other relevant variables of lower urinary tract symptoms and function were assessed before and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Age-specific prevalence of OAB, the proportion of resolution of OAB, and de novo OAB were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 70.7 years, and the mean total prostate volume was 75.8 ml. The mean OAB symptom scores before surgery of patients aged less than 65 years, between 65 and 74, and 75 or older were 6.0, 5.2, and 5.7, respectively. At 12 months after surgery, the scores for the respective groups had significantly decreased to 2.1, 2.5, and 3.5. The prevalence of OAB based on the score in the respective groups was 45.8%, 56.9%, and 54.0% (p = .6391) preoperatively and 9.1%, 11.3%, and 15.8% at 12 months after the surgery (p = .7613). Of those with preoperative OAB, 75.0%, 79.2%, and 75.0% of the respective groups showed resolution of OAB at 12 months postoperatively (p = .9427).

CONCLUSIONS

In candidates for surgical deobstruction of benign prostatic hyperplasia, HoLEP has potential to improve OAB symptoms regardless of age.

Outcome of Patients With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Receiving Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Purpose

This study investigated functional outcomes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), the incidence of incidental prostate cancer (PCa), and changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in patients with elevated PSA and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospectively designed protocol for patients who underwent HoLEP at our institution from January 2010 to May 2020 was conducted. Patients were classified into low-PSA (<3.0 ng/mL) and high-PSA (≥3.0 ng/mL) groups at baseline. Follow-up for PSA was performed at the sixth postoperative month. Baseline and postoperative clinical parameters, functional parameters, PCa incidence, and postoperative changes in PSA were compared between the low- and high-PSA groups.

Results

The baseline PSA of 1,296 patients (mean age, 69.7±6.8 years) was 4.0±4.1 ng/mL, with 712 patients (55.0%) in the low-PSA group (1.6±0.8 ng/mL), and 584 patients (45.0%) in the high-PSA group (6.9±4.7 ng/mL). Incidental PCa was detected in 82 patients (6.3%), with a similar incidence in the low-PSA (41 patients, 5.9%) and high-PSA (41 patients, 7.0%) groups (P>0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant improvements in the maximum flow rate, postvoid residual volume, and all domains of the International Prostate Symptom Score (P<0.05). At postoperative 6 months, the PSA level significantly decreased by 66.6%±23.6% in all patients (54.3%±23.9% in the low-PSA group; 79.6%±14.7% in the high-PSA group) (P<0.05), and the PSA levels of 1,264 patients (97.6%) had normalized.

Conclusions

In patients with elevated PSA presenting with LUTS/BPH, our study demonstrated significant improvements in functional parameters and decreased PSA after HoLEP. The incidental PCa detection rate did not show a statistically significant difference between the low- and high-PSA groups. Timely surgery for LUTS/BPH without delay due to PSA monitoring should be considered.

Functional and surgical outcomes of Aquablation in elderly men

PURPOSE

As benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is an age-related process, growing interest in surgical management for elderly men has emerged. Recently, Aquablation was approved for treatment of BPH associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and utilizes robotic ultrasound guided surgeon-controlled waterjet ablation. We assessed the differences in functional and surgical outcomes between elderly and young men undergoing Aquablation for BPH/LUTS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed prospectively collected data from the WATER I (NCT02505919) and WATER II (NCT03123250) clinical trials reporting safety and efficacy of Aquablation in the treatment of LUTS/BPH in men 45-80 years with a prostate between 30 and 80 cc, and 80 cc and 150 cc, respectively. Men ≥ 65 years were defined as elderly and men < 65 years as young.

RESULTS

Of 217 patients included, 83 (38.2%) were young and 134 (61.8%) were elderly. Mean age (SD) was 59.3 (± 3.4) years and 71.2 (± 4.2) years for young and elderly men, respectively. At 3 years of follow-up compared to baseline, elderly men showed similar reductions in total IPSS (7.68 points vs 7.12 points, p > 0.05) and similar increases in Qmax (20.6 mL/s vs 19.3 mL/s, p > 0.05) compared to young men. The ejaculatory dysfunction rate was similar for both cohorts (12.0% vs 9.7%, p > 0.05). Elderly men experienced similar annual retreatment rates compared to young men (1.5% vs 0.8% p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly men undergoing Aquablation have similar functional and surgical outcomes as young men. Elderly patient BPH surgical counseling should, therefore, consider Aquablation as a treatment option for LUTS/BPH.

Outcomes of octogenarians undergoing holmium laser enucleation of prostate

PURPOSE

Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) is an effective surgical procedure in men with BPH. Due to the increase in the use of medical therapy for BPH related lower urinary symptoms more octogenarians are presenting in a delayed fashion with significant symptoms and urinary retention. We evaluate the feasibility and safety of octogenarians undergoing HoLEP.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of HoLEPs at our institution from July 2018 to December 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups based on age: < 80 and ≥ 80.

RESULTS

A total of 458 patients were identified, with 74 (16.2%) ≥ 80. In patients ≥ 80, prostate volume was higher (p < 0.0005), there was a higher rate of antiplatelet/anticoagulation (p = 0.029) use, and a lower rate of alpha-blocker use (p = 0.0016). As expected, ASA scores which correlate with increasing number of concomitant diseases were greater in the ≥ 80 cohort (p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications (p = 0.14), 90 day complication (p = 0.34), readmission rates (p = 0.425) or emergency room visits between groups (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher medical comorbidities and increased rates of anticoagulation in octogenarians, there is no increase in operative or postoperative complication rates. Age alone should not be used as exclusion criteria for HoLEP.

Long-term outcomes of Holmium laser enucleation of prostate and predictive model for symptom recurrence

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) represents one of the most studied surgical techniques for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Its efficacy in symptom relief has been widely depicted. However, few evidence is available regarding the possible predictors of symptom recurrence. We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes, symptom recurrence rate, and predictors in patients that underwent HoLEP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients that consecutively underwent HoLEP for BPH from 2012 to 2015 at two tertiary referral centers. Functional outcomes were evaluated by uroflowmetry parameters and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire administration at follow-up visits at 12, 24, and 60 months. The primary outcome was the symptomatic patients' rate presenting lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after 60 months from surgery, defined as in case of one or more of the following: IPSS more than 7, post voidal residue (PVR) more than 20 ml, need for medical therapy for LUTS or redo surgery for bladder outlet obstruction. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated predictors for being symptomatic at follow-up. Covariates consisted of: preoperative peak flow rate (PFR), PVR, and IPSS, prostate volume, age (all as continuous), and surgical technique.

RESULTS

A total of 567 patients were available for our analyses. Median prostate volume was 80cc, with a median PFR of 8 ml/s and median PVR of 100cc. One hundred and twenty-five (22%) patients were found to be symptomatic at follow-up. Redo surgery was needed for 25 (4.4%) patients. After adjusting for possible confounders, an increase in preoperative PVR (odds ratio [OR] 1.005) and IPSS (OR 1.12) resulted as independent predictors for symptom recurrence (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP can provide durable symptom relief regardless of the chosen technique. Patients with an important preoperative symptom burden or a high PVR should be carefully counseled on the risk of symptom recurrence.

Safety and Efficacy of Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Elderly Patients - A Narrative Review

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common health condition in aging men resulting in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and low quality of life (QoL). We aimed to review studies on laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) due to LUTS in elderly patients (>65 years) comparing different age groups, particularly considering functional outcomes, safety, and perioperative complications. A comprehensive search was conducted using the PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library and Cochrane Library databases over the last 10 years until 7 October 2021 with the following search terms solely or in combination: “laser enucleation”, “prostate”, “laser prostatectomy”, “aging”, “elderly patients”, “older patients” and “age”. We identified 12 articles for inclusion in our analysis. Five studies focussed mainly on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), one compared HoLEP to other laser prostatectomy procedures, two studies examined thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), and two studies focused on GreenLight laser, one study focussed on potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser, and another study compared laser prostatectomy to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These studies showed that LEP improved IPSS, Qmax and QoL compared to baseline regardless of age; no significant difference was reported among age groups. Although ASA scores and anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy rates are higher in elderly patients, studies revealed no significant difference in perioperative complication rates between age groups. Laser enucleation of the prostate is an effective and safe procedure in elderly patients, resulting in good functional outcomes, low morbidity, and few perioperative complications.

Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of bladder outlet obstruction

Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) differs from other endoscopic modalities for bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) because it extracts the whole benign prostatic hyperplasia component. AEEP has been launched for almost 40 years as a first-line treatment method for BOO regardless of prostate size according to several guidelines. However, it remains underperformed worldwide. In this review article, we elaborate on the advantages and disadvantages of AEEP compared to other surgical modalities for BOO to investigate its efficacy and safety as a gold standard surgical management option for males with BOO.

WOLF® PIRANHA VERSUS STORZ® PROSTATE MORCELLATION DEVICES: A RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL STUDY

PURPOSE

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) entails both enucleation and morcellation. Only three popular prostate morcellation devices (PMDs) are available for this procedure. In this study, a retrospective review was done to compare the Wolf and Storz morcellators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After IRB approval, a multi-institutional retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data was performed at two institutions with a single surgeon at each center performing HoLEP. Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre employed the Storz morcellator while Baylor Scott and White Medical Center used the Wolf. Preoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and demographic data for both sets of patients were analyzed and compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

506 patients in the Wolf cohort and 60 patients in the Storz cohort were analyzed. Morcellated pathologic weight was 52.3 g in the Wolf Arm and 101.7 g on the Storz arm (p < 0.0001). Overall, average morcellation rates were faster in the Storz arm; morcellation rate was 5.8 g/min for Wolf and 6.7 g/min in the Storz (p=0.0015). Morcellator malfunction was significantly lower in Wolf cohort 0% vs. 6.6% in the Storz (p=0.0001), but this did not significantly slow morcellator efficiency times. The total number of mucosal bladder injuries was comparable with rates of 1.4% and 1.6% in the Wolf and Storz groups, respectively (p=0.59). Duration of hospital stay and catheterization were less than 24 hours in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, the Storz Drillcut had higher efficacy in morcellation when compared to Wolf Piranha. However, it was associated with more malfunctions. Both morcellators have comparable rates of complications and perioperative outcomes.

Comparison of Long-term Effect and Complications Between Holmium Laser Enucleation and Transurethral Resection of Prostate: Nations-Wide Health Insurance Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate and compare the postoperative efficacy and complications of the transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) using the nationwide insurance database of Korea.

METHODS

We created a cohort of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients treated with TURP and HoLEP between 2011 and 2017 from the nationwide database of reimbursement. We compared the postoperative effects between the two surgical groups.

RESULTS

We retrieved a total of 58,346 patients (TURP 38,308 and HoLEP 20,038 patients). The mean follow-up duration was 51.6 and 47.6 months, respectively. The rate of reoperation was significantly higher in the TURP group (4.50%) than in the HoLEP group (1.27%) (P < .01). The postoperative use of alpha-blockers and dutasteride/finasteride was significantly higher in the TURP group until 24 months postoperatively. The rate of the postoperative use of medications for symptoms of overactive bladder was lower in the TURP group than in the HoLEP group until 12 months postoperatively, but it did not differ after 12 months postoperatively. Overall, urethral surgeries were less frequently performed in the TURP group than in the HoLEP group (P < .05); however, more severe cases required surgeries under general anesthesia in the TURP group (P < .05). Postoperative surgery for stress incontinence was performed in 0.10% and 0.31% of patients after TURP and HoLEP, respectively (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

This study showed the superiority of HoLEP compared to TURP in terms of postoperative efficacy and its inferiority in terms of complications of stress incontinence in real life practice.

Efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for elderly patients: surgical outcomes and King's Health Questionnaire

Background

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been a widely utilized minimally invasive surgical procedure for benign prostate hyperplasia. The current study aimed to compare surgical outcomes and King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ) assessment scores following HoLEP between younger men and those aged ≥75 years.

Methods

This prospective single-center study compared perioperative complications, postoperative urinary conditions, and KHQ scores (nine categories) between men aged ≥75 years (group A) and men aged <75 years (group B) before and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

Results

A total of 100 patients were included for analysis (group A, n=38 and group B, n=62). No differences in patient backgrounds, perioperative complications, such as perioperative decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative fever, postoperative indwelling catheterization duration, or postoperative hospitalization duration, and KHQ were observed between both groups. Both groups showed significantly better International Prostate Symptom Scores, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume 1, 3, and 6 months after HoLEP compared to their respective preoperative levels (P<0.01). Regarding KHQ categories, both groups showed significantly better general health perceptions, impact on life, emotions, and sleep/energy 1 month after HoLEP; role limitations, physical limitations, and social limitations 3 months after HoLEP; and personal relationships and incontinence severity measures 6 months after HoLEP compared to their respective preoperative levels (P<0.05).

Conclusions

HoLEP could be safe and effective even for men aged ≥75 years, comparing complications, urinary condition, and KHQ scores.

Assessing the Outcome of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate by Age, Prostate Volume, and a History of Blood Thinning Agents: Report from a Single-Center Series of >1800 Consecutive Cases

Purpose: To assess perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a real-world scenario and with a focus on demanding patient factors, such as large prostate size, advanced patient age, and anticoagulation therapy (AT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed HoLEP procedures at our institution between 2010 and 2016. After stratification by prostate volume, age, and AT, perioperative and early voiding characteristics were compared. A multivariable regression model was employed to identify predictors of prolonged time of catheterization (defined as being above group's median). Results: The study cohort consisted of 1816 men with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-76), a median prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR: 58-105), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 in 618 men (34%). Median time of enucleation and morcellation was 43 minutes (IQR: 31-60) and 10 minutes (IQR: 6-18), respectively. Perioperative blood transfusions were administered in 44 (2.4%) cases, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3b) occurred in 61 (3.3%) cases. The median time of catheterization was 2 days (IQR: 2-2), with prolonged catheterization occurring in 277 (15%) cases. After adjustment, large prostates (fourth volume quartile [106-280 mL]) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001), therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin bridging regimen (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4-3.6, p = 0.037), low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.2, p = 0.015), and a history of direct oral anticoagulation (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.0, p = 0.022), but not patient age, were independently associated with prolonged catheterization. Conclusions: We confirm HoLEP as safe and efficient; however, patients with large prostates and patients with a history of AT are at risk of prolonged catheterization.

Ten-year Follow-up Results After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

BACKGROUND

Scarce data are available about long-term follow-up (FU) in men undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of being symptomatic at 10-yr FU after HoLEP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Perioperative data from 125 patients submitted to HoLEP in 2007-2010 by a single, highly experienced surgeon were analyzed. Patients were assessed by International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and uroflowmetry at 6-mo and 10-yr FU.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Logistic regression models tested the association between clinically significant predictors and the risk of being symptomatic at long-term FU (defined as IPSS≥8 and/or peak flow rate [PFR]<15ml/s and/or postvoid residual volume [PVR]>20ml, need for symptomatic medical treatment, or redo surgery).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

At surgery, median (interquartile range) age was 66 years (61, 69), prostate volume was 78ml (56, 105), and PFR was 9ml/s (7, 12). All patients showed favorable outcomes (ie, IPSS and uroflowmetry parameters) 6 months after surgery. At median 126-month FU, PFR was 16ml/s (13, 23), PVR was 10ml (5, 15), total IPSS was 5 (1-7), and PSA was 0.7 ng/ml (0.4, 1.3). Of all, 32 patients (26%) were symptomatic at long-term FU, seven (5.7%) reported urinary incontinence, and six (4.7%) underwent redo surgery throughout the FU period due to either bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture. Older patients at surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.22; p=0.006) and patients who never recovered full continence postoperatively (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.01-0.27; p=0.001) were at a higher risk of being symptomatic at very long-term FU, after adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

HoLEP ensures a durable relief of urinary symptoms in almost 75% of patients up to 10 years after surgery. Older patients and those who do not recover from incontinence after surgery should be counseled carefully regarding a higher risk of symptom recurrence at long-term assessment.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Consistent symptom relief is preserved even 10 years after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in almost 75% of patients. Older age and incomplete continence recovery after surgery were the two most relevant risk factors for being symptomatic at long-term follow-up. Postoperative functional outcomes are kept in three out of four patients at 10-yr follow-up after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Conversely, the older the patient at surgery and the presence of incomplete continence recovery throughout the postoperative period, the greater the probability of being symptomatic at long-term follow-up.

Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: The next gold standard? Yes!

Anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP) differs from other surgical techniques for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) in that it removes the entire benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) component of the prostate. We summarise the main advantages of AEEP compared to other surgical techniques for BPO. These include better urodynamic relief of bladder outlet obstruction, superior outcomes for urinary retention even in the presence of impaired detrusor contractility, safe and effective for any size prostate, and superior durability compared to vaporisation and resection techniques. We summarise evidence that suggests AEEP offers outcomes that are independent of patient age and prostate volume. We conclude that AEEP is the gold standard surgical treatment for men with either lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or urinary retention, regardless of prostate volume, detrusor contractility and age. It offers the ability to safely and effectively treat a wider range of patients than any other BPO procedure. More widespread use of mentorship programmes, that take advantage of the growing number of experienced mentors, is recommended to train more urologists in AEEP.

Lasers in Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate-Do We Really Need Them

The acronym EEP, coding for transurethral Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate, was introduced in 2016 by the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Since then, a laser-based treatment, Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP), and the current-based treatment of bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipoLEP) are equally appreciated as valuable options for the management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). This was mainly inspired by the results of two meta-analyses on randomized controlled trials, comparing open prostatectomy with either Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) or bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipoLEP). Prior to that, HoLEP was embraced as the only valid option for transurethral enucleation, although evidence for equivalence existed as early as 2006, but was not recognized due to a plethora of acronyms for bipolar energy-based treatments and practiced HoLEP-centrism. On the other hand, the academic discourse focused on different (other) laser approaches that came up, led by Thulium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) Vapoenucleation (ThuVEP) in 2009 and, finally, transurethral anatomical enucleation with Tm:YAG support (thulium laser enucleation of the prostate, ThuLEP) in 2010. Initially, the discourse on lasers focused on the different properties of lasers rather than technique or surgical anatomy, respectively. In and after 2016, the discussion ultimately moved towards surgical technique and accepting anatomical preparation as the common of all EEP techniques (AEEP). Since then, the unspoken question has been raised, whether lasers are still necessary to perform EEP in light of existing evidence, given the total cost of ownership (TCO) for these generators. This article weighs the current evidence and comes to the conclusion that no evidence of superiority of one modality over another exists with regard to any endpoint. Therefore, in the sense of critical importance, AEEP can be safely and effectively performed without laser technologies and without compromise.

[Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: Analysis of early complications. Patient selection for day-case surgery]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the complications and the risk factors of Holmium LASER Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and to propose selection criteria for day-case surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We included retrospectively all consecutive single-center HoLEP procedures performed between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016. We reported the pre-operative characteristics of the patients (age, BMI, ASA score, estimated prostate volume, presence of a preoperative catheter, operative indication, antiplatelet or anticoagulant intake) and the peri operative data (duration of intervention, catheterization, hospitalization, transfusion, histopathological findings, 30-day postoperative complications given to Clavien-Dindo classification, presence of a catheter at discharge, urologist experience). Uni- and multi-variate analyzes were performed to investigate risk factors for complications.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred and one patients were included. The overall complication rate was 19.15 %. The transfusion rate was 3.7%. We demonstrated that the age at procedure (P=0.019), an ASA score>2 (P=0.0019), a high prostatic volume (P=0.011), an anticoagulant intake (P=<0.0001), a poor-urologist experience (P=0.048) and a long operative time (P=0.0144) were at risks of complications.

CONCLUSION

The identification of postoperative complication risk factors after HoLEP could help to better select patients who are offered day-case surgery and minimize the risk of failure or early readmission.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in geriatric patients-use and limitations of existing guidelines]

The demographic developments of western society and the resulting increase in the number of very old patients in urology represents a challenge for the design of clinical studies and, consequently, recommendations of guidelines. While in internal medicine there is already a subspecialization with a focus on the treatment of elderly and multimorbid patients, in urology there is hardly any subspecialization into the problems of geriatric patients. Thus, using a case study as an example, the treatment decisions for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in geriatric patients are discussed. In addition the available evidence from the literature and guidelines are presented in order to assiste in daily management of geriatric patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and to critically discuss potential fields of application and limitations of the existing guidelines. In this context, we also examine the challenges when choosing a drug therapy and in deciding which of the many surgical options should be used.

Enucleated Weight/Enucleation Time, Is It Appropriate for Estimating Enucleation Skills for Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate? A Consideration of Energy Consumption

Purpose

To date, the parameters for evaluating enucleation efficiency have only considered enucleation time, although operators simultaneously consume both time and energy during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. This study was undertaken to find a better way of assessing enucleation skills, considering both enucleation time and consumed energy.

Materials and Methods

One hundred (n=100) consecutive patients who underwent holmium laser enucleation of the prostate from April 2012 to April 2014 by a single surgeon were enrolled. Ten groups of 10 consecutive cases were used to analyze the parameters of enucleation efficiency.

Results

The mean enucleation time, consumed energy, and enucleated weight were 41.3±19.2 minutes, 66.2±36.0 kJ, and 26.6±21.8 g, respectively. Concerning learning curves, like enucleation time-efficacy (=enucleated weight/enucleation time), enucleation energy-efficacy (=enucleated weight/consumed energy) also had an increasing tendency. Enucleation ratio efficacy (=enucleated weight/transitional zone volume/enucleation time) plateaued after 30 cases. However, enucleation time-energy-efficacy (=enucleated weight/enucleation time/consumed energy) continued to increase after 30 cases and plateaued at 61 to 70 cases. Furthermore, one-way analysis of variance showed that group means for enucleation time-energy-efficacy (F=3.560, p=0.001) were significantly different, but that those of enucleation ratio efficacy (F=1.931, p=0.057) were not.

Conclusions

When both time and energy were considered, enucleation skills continued to improve even after 30 cases and plateaued at 61 to 70 cases. Therefore, we propose that enucleation time-energy-efficacy should be used as a more appropriate parameter than enucleation ratio efficacy for evaluating enucleation skills.

Development of Decision Support Formulas for the Prediction of Bladder Outlet Obstruction and Prostatic Surgery in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptom/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Part II, External Validation and Usability Testing of a Smartphone App

PURPOSE

We aimed to externally validate the prediction model we developed for having bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and requiring prostatic surgery using 2 independent data sets from tertiary referral centers, and also aimed to validate a mobile app for using this model through usability testing.

METHODS

Formulas and nomograms predicting whether a subject has BOO and needs prostatic surgery were validated with an external validation cohort from Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center between January 2004 and April 2015. A smartphone-based app was developed, and 8 young urologists were enrolled for usability testing to identify any human factor issues of the app.

RESULTS

A total of 642 patients were included in the external validation cohort. No significant differences were found in the baseline characteristics of major parameters between the original (n=1,179) and the external validation cohort, except for the maximal flow rate. Predictions of requiring prostatic surgery in the validation cohort showed a sensitivity of 80.6%, a specificity of 73.2%, a positive predictive value of 49.7%, and a negative predictive value of 92.0%, and area under receiver operating curve of 0.84. The calibration plot indicated that the predictions have good correspondence. The decision curve showed also a high net benefit. Similar evaluation results using the external validation cohort were seen in the predictions of having BOO. Overall results of the usability test demonstrated that the app was user-friendly with no major human factor issues.

CONCLUSIONS

External validation of these newly developed a prediction model demonstrated a moderate level of discrimination, adequate calibration, and high net benefit gains for predicting both having BOO and requiring prostatic surgery. Also a smartphone app implementing the prediction model was user-friendly with no major human factor issue.

Measuring change in prostate size after holmium laser enucleation: A prospective study

Purpose

To analyze postoperative outcomes of prostate surgery, resected specimen weight is commonly used. The difference between the preoperative calculated transitional zone volume and actual enucleated specimen weight following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is reported at over 20%. The reason for this difference is unclear. We assessed the association of volume of the prostatic adenoma with enucleated weight, the volume and calculated volume of the adenoma by pre- and postoperative ultrasonographic measurement.

Materials and Methods

All patients were prospectively enrolled who underwent HoLEP by two surgeons (SJO and JKO) between 2010 and 2015. Preoperative and postoperative prostate ultrasonography examinations were performed by a single examiner (JKO) during surgery, and weight and volume of the enucleated adenoma were measured. We compared preoperative adenoma size with postoperative weight and volume of the enucleated adenoma, calculated enucleated volume using ultrasonography, and calculated the correlation coefficients between preoperative adenoma volume and postoperative parameters.

Results

One hundred forty-two patients with a mean age (±standard deviation) of 69.8 (±8.8) years were analyzed. The mean preoperative ultrasound-measured adenoma volume was 31.7 (±21.4) mL, while postoperatively the mean retrieved weight of the adenoma was 22.3 (±17.0) g and the mean volume was 22.3 (±16.8) mL. Postoperatively calculated enucleated volume using ultrasonography was most strongly correlated with preoperative adenoma size (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.965, p<0.01).

Conclusions

Our study showed a significant difference between preoperative adenoma size and postoperative enucleated weight of adenoma during HoLEP. Postoperatively calculated enucleated volume using ultrasonography may be the most reliable parameter to assess surgical outcomes following HoLEP.