Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Add-On Therapy to Solifenacin for Overactive Bladder

A Comparative Study of Solifenacin, Mirabegron, and Their Combination as Bladder Relaxants in the Management of Overactive Bladder

Introduction  Overactive bladder (OAB) is a medical state that presents as the urgency of urine and increased frequency of micturition and is diagnosed on the basis of the presence of these symptoms in the absence of other explainable diagnoses. The management of this condition includes conservative management, medical management/pharmacotherapy, and surgical management. The overactive bladder has been treated with smooth muscle relaxants, but there are conflicting results. Hence, this study aimed to assess the result of the two smooth muscle relaxants, mirabegron and solifenacin, and their combination to manage an overactive bladder. Methodology  A clinical trial was conducted at Swaroop Rani Nehru Hospital, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Prayagraj, India, over the period from November 2019 to December 2020. Ninety patients with OAB were divided into three groups: G1, G2, and G3. These groups were administered solifenacin, mirabegron, and a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin (S+M), respectively. Follow-ups were conducted at 2, 4, 12, and 18 weeks for evaluation. Data were entered into IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). Appropriate statistical tests, including the chi-square and ANOVA, were employed in this study. Observation  The combination of mirabegron and solifenacin was significantly more effective in terms of response compared to solifenacin alone. There was no significant difference between solifenacin versus mirabegron, or between mirabegron (M) and the combination of mirabegron (M) and solifenacin (S). Side effects were more severe in patients taking high doses of solifenacin. Conclusion  The S + M combination has higher efficacy than solifenacin and mirabegron when given alone.

Mirabegron for treatment of overactive bladder symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial (Parkinson's Disease Overactive bladder Mirabegron, PaDoMi Study)

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron for Parkinsonism patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Inclusion criteria are Parkinsonism with OAB symptoms for 4 weeks or more, OAB symptom score (OABSS) questionnaire scores greater than 2, and OABSS urgency question scores greater than 1. After a 2-week wash-out period, the patients were randomized into placebo and mirabegron groups at visit 2. Visit 3 was performed after 4 weeks of medication. Mirabegron was prescribed to the two groups for the rest of the study period at visit 4.

RESULT

The mean age was 68.1 ± 8.1 years and 72 males and 64 females were included. A total of 136 patients were screened, 117 patients were randomized, and 25 patients dropped out. The OABSS scores were significantly different between the two groups at Weeks 4 and 8. The OABSS scores became the same in the two groups at Week 12 (visit 5). The postvoid residual urine volume showed a mild increase to 64 ml in the mirabegron group compared to the placebo group at visit 4. Adverse events occurred in 27 patients (23.1%). The degree was mild in 26 cases (78.8%), moderate in five (15.2%), and severe in two (6.1%). Only 13 cases (39.4%) showed medication-related adverse events. Acute urinary retention occurred in a single case. The treatment satisfaction questionnaires showed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Mirabegron was effective in treating OAB symptoms in patients with Parkinsonism with acceptable adverse events.

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Imidafenacin for Overactive Bladder Induced by Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Men Receiving Alpha-Blocker Therapy

Purpose

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imidafenacin for overactive bladder (OAB) induced by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men receiving alpha-blocker monotherapy.

Methods

We performed a systematic research of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, and searched for studies about alpha-blocker with or without imidafenacin treatment for OAB in patients with BPH. We also investigated the original references of the included texts.

Results

Four randomized controlled trials including 779 participants with BPH (389 in the alpha-blocker+imidafenacin group and 390 in the alpha-blocker only group) were studied. The main efficacy endpoint was the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, which showed a mean difference of -1.88 (95% confidence interval, -2.32 to -1.44; P<0.00001), suggesting that alpha-blocker and imidafenacin treatment was effective in treating men with OAB. As other primary efficacy end points, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) total score (P=0.47), the IPSS storage symptom score (P=0.07), the IPSS voiding symptom score (P=0.60), and the IPSS quality of life score (P=0.18) indicated that 2 methods had no significant differences in treating men with OAB. In terms of safety, which was assessed using postvoid residual volume (P=0.05) and maximum flow rate (P=0.53), the analysis suggested that combination treatment was very well tolerated.

Conclusions

This study suggested that imidafenacin plus alpha-blocker was an efficacious and safe treatment for OAB symptoms in BPH patients.