1
|
Pereira MA, Ramos MFKP, Charruf AZ, Dias AR, Ribeiro U. Risk Scoring System to Predict Mortality in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Med Sci (Basel) 2024; 12:30. [PMID: 38921684 PMCID: PMC11205632 DOI: 10.3390/medsci12020030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has a particularly unfavorable prognosis. This limited survival raises doubts about which factors confer an extremely worse outcome and which patients could benefit from more aggressive treatments, in an attempt to improve survival and better control the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with PC due to GC and develop a prognostic score to predict 6-month mortality. We performed an analysis of clinical stage IV GC with PC. Scores were assigned to risk factors and calculated for each patient from nine variables. Among 326 IVB GC, 211 (64.7%) had PC and were included. After calculating the score, 136 (64.5%) GCs were classified as a low-risk group and 75 (35.5%) as a high-risk group. Median OS was 7.9 and 1.9 months for low- and high-risk patients (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group, 77.3% of the patients died in <6 mo (p < 0.001). Palliative surgery and chemotherapy were associated with better survival, and the prognostic groups maintained statistical significance even when the same type of treatment was performed. In conclusion, the scoring system developed with variables related to patient performance status and clinical data was able to distinguish GC with PC with a high risk of 6-month mortality. Accordingly, verifying and validating our findings in a large cohort of patients is necessary to confirm and guarantee the external validation of the results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Alessandra Pereira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01249-000, Brazil; (M.F.K.P.R.); (A.Z.C.); (A.R.D.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, São Paulo 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01249-000, Brazil; (M.F.K.P.R.); (A.Z.C.); (A.R.D.)
| | - Amir Zeide Charruf
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01249-000, Brazil; (M.F.K.P.R.); (A.Z.C.); (A.R.D.)
| | - André Roncon Dias
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01249-000, Brazil; (M.F.K.P.R.); (A.Z.C.); (A.R.D.)
| | - Ulysses Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto do Cancer, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01249-000, Brazil; (M.F.K.P.R.); (A.Z.C.); (A.R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dal Cero M, Bencivenga M, Liu DHW, Sacco M, Alloggio M, Kerckhoffs KGP, Filippini F, Saragoni L, Iglesias M, Tomezzoli A, Carneiro F, Grabsch HI, Verlato G, Torroni L, Piessen G, Pera M, de Manzoni G. Clinical Features of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Cancer: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5191. [PMID: 37958365 PMCID: PMC10647446 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicting results about the prognostic relevance of signet ring cell histology in gastric cancer have been reported. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis focusing on the clinicopathological features and prognosis of this subgroup of cancer compared with other histologies. METHODS A systematic literature search in the PubMed database was conducted, including all publications up to 1 October 2021. A meta-analysis comparing the results of the studies was performed. RESULTS A total of 2062 studies referring to gastric cancer with signet ring cell histology were identified, of which 262 studies reported on its relationship with clinical information. Of these, 74 were suitable to be included in the meta-analysis. A slightly lower risk of developing nodal metastases in signet ring cell tumours compared to other histotypes was found (especially to undifferentiated/poorly differentiated/mucinous and mixed histotypes); the lower risk was more evident in early and slightly increased in advanced gastric cancer. Survival tended to be better in early stage signet ring cell cancer compared to other histotypes; no differences were shown in advanced stages, and survival was poorer in metastatic patients. In the subgroup analysis, survival in signet ring cell cancer was slightly worse compared to non-signet ring cell cancer and differentiated/well-to-moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Most of the conflicting results in signet ring cell gastric cancer literature could be derived from the lack of standardisation in their classification and the comparison with the different subtypes of gastric cancer. There is a critical need to strive for a standardised classification system for gastric cancer, fostering clarity and coherence in the forthcoming research and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariagiulia Dal Cero
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124 Verona, Italy; (M.D.C.)
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Bencivenga
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124 Verona, Italy; (M.D.C.)
| | - Drolaiz H. W. Liu
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Clinical Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Kepler University Hospital and Johannes Kepler University, 4021 Linz, Austria
| | - Michele Sacco
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124 Verona, Italy; (M.D.C.)
| | - Mariella Alloggio
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124 Verona, Italy; (M.D.C.)
| | - Kelly G. P. Kerckhoffs
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, VieCuri Medical Centre, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands
| | - Federica Filippini
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124 Verona, Italy; (M.D.C.)
| | - Luca Saragoni
- Pathology Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47100 Forlì, Italy
| | - Mar Iglesias
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Tomezzoli
- Department of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Fátima Carneiro
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of the University of Porto/Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João and Ipatimup/i3S, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Heike I. Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Division of Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Giuseppe Verlato
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Lorena Torroni
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Lille University Hospital, 59000 Lille, France
| | - Manuel Pera
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Borgo Trento Hospital, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37124 Verona, Italy; (M.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hung HC, Hsu PJ, Lee CW, Hsu JT, Wu TJ. Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Additional Information Helps to Optimize Patient Selection before Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072089. [PMID: 37046754 PMCID: PMC10093399 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The prognosis of gastric cancer-associated peritoneal carcinomatosis (GCPC) is poor, with a median survival time of less than six months, and current systemic chemotherapy, including targeted therapy, is ineffective. Despite growing evidence that cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for GCPC improves overall survival (OS), optimal patient selection remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate preoperative clinical factors and identify indicative factors for predicting postoperative OS in patients with GCPC undergoing CRS-HIPEC. (2) Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 44 consecutive patients with GCPC who underwent CRS-HIPEC between May 2015 and May 2021. Data on demographics and radiologic assessment were collected and analyzed. (3) Results: Elevated preoperative serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 4.4 (p = 0.003, HR = 3.70, 95% CI = 1.55–8.79) and number of computed tomography risks > 2 (p = 0.005, HR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.33–7.98) were independently indicative of OS post-surgery. A strong correlation was observed between intraoperative peritoneal cancer index score and number of computed tomography risks (r = 0.534, p < 0.0001). Two patients after CRS-HIPEC ultimately achieved disease-free survival for more than 50 months. (4) Conclusions: Our experience optimizes GCPC patients’ selection for CRS-HIPEC, may help to improve outcomes in the corresponding population, and prevent futile surgery in inappropriate patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Ting-Jung Wu
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +886-3-3281200 (ext. 3366)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Surgical Options for Peritoneal Surface Metastases from Digestive Malignancies-A Comprehensive Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59020255. [PMID: 36837456 PMCID: PMC9960111 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The peritoneum is a common site for the dissemination of digestive malignancies, particularly gastric, colorectal, appendix, or pancreatic cancer. Other tumors such as cholangiocarcinomas, digestive neuroendocrine tumors, or gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) may also associate with peritoneal surface metastases (PSM). Peritoneal dissemination is proven to worsen the prognosis of these patients. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), along with systemic chemotherapy, have been shown to constitute a survival benefit in selected patients with PSM. Furthermore, the association of CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) seems to significantly improve the prognosis of patients with certain types of digestive malignancies associated with PSM. However, the benefit of CRS with HIPEC is still controversial, especially due to the significant morbidity associated with this procedure. According to the results of the PRODIGE 7 trial, CRS for PSM from colorectal cancer (CRC) achieved overall survival (OS) rates higher than 40 months, but the addition of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC failed to improve the long-term outcomes. Furthermore, the PROPHYLOCHIP and COLOPEC trials failed to demonstrate the effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based HIPEC for preventing peritoneal metastases development in high-risk patients operated for CRC. In this review, we discuss the limitations of these studies and the reasons why these results are not sufficient to refute this technique, until future well-designed trials evaluate the impact of different HIPEC regimens. In contrast, in pseudomyxoma peritonei, CRS plus HIPEC represents the gold standard therapy, which is able to achieve 10-year OS rates ranging between 70 and 80%. For patients with PSM from gastric carcinoma, CRS plus HIPEC achieved median OS rates higher than 40 months after complete cytoreduction in patients with a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤6. However, the data have not yet been validated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the controversies regarding the most efficient drugs that should be used for HIPEC and the duration of the procedure. We also discuss the current evidence and controversies related to the benefit of CRS (and HIPEC) in patients with PSM from other digestive malignancies. Although it is a palliative treatment, pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) significantly increases OS in patients with unresectable PSM from gastric cancer and represents a promising approach for patients with PSM from other digestive cancers.
Collapse
|
5
|
Drubay V, Nuytens F, Renaud F, Adenis A, Eveno C, Piessen G. Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1406-1428. [PMID: 36160745 PMCID: PMC9412924 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
While the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in general has decreased worldwide in recent decades, the incidence of diffuse cancer historically comprising poorly cohesive cells-GC (PCC-GC) and including signet ring cell cancer is rising. Literature concerning PCC-GC is scarce and unclear, mostly due to a large variety of historically used definitions and classifications. Compared to other histological subtypes of GC, PCC-GC is nevertheless characterized by a distinct set of epidemiological, histological and clinical features which require a specific diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The aim of this review was to provide an update on the definition, classification and therapeutic strategies of PCC-GC. We focus on the updated histological definition of PCC-GC, along with its implications on future treatment strategies and study design. Also, specific considerations in the diagnostic management are discussed. Finally, the impact of some recent developments in the therapeutic management of GC in general such as the recently validated taxane-based regimens (5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel), the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as well as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy and targeted therapy have been reviewed in depth for their relative importance for PCC-GC in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Drubay
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Cambrai Hospital Center and Sainte Marie, Group of Hospitals of The Catholic Institute of Lille, Cambrai 59400, France
| | - Frederiek Nuytens
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Florence Renaud
- Department of Pathology, University Lille Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
| | - Antoine Adenis
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Monpellier 34000, France
- IRCM, Inserm, University of Monpellier, Monpellier 34000, France
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prabhu A, Mishra D, Brandl A, Yonemura Y. Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis-A Comprehensive Review of Current Intraperitoneal Treatment Modalities. Front Oncol 2022; 12:864647. [PMID: 35719946 PMCID: PMC9204320 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.864647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of patients with peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer continues to evolve. With various forms of intraperitoneal drug delivery available, it is now possible to reach the sites of peritoneal metastases, which were otherwise sub-optimally covered by systemic chemotherapy, owing to the blood peritoneal barrier. We conducted a narrative review based on an extensive literature research, highlighting the current available intraperitoneal treatment options, which resulted in improved survival in well-selected patients of peritoneally metastasized gastric cancer. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy showed promising results in four different treatment modalities: prophylactic, neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative. It is now possible to choose the type of intraperitoneal treatment/s in combination with systemic treatment/s, depending on patients' general condition and peritoneal disease burden, thus providing individualized treatment to these patients. Randomized controlled trials for the different treatment modalities were mainly conducted in Asia and lack further validation in the other parts of the world. Most recent application tools, such as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, seem promising and need to pass the ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Prabhu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Thangam Cancer Center, Namakkal, India
| | - Deepti Mishra
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Thangam Cancer Center, Namakkal, India
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Centee, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
- Japanese/Asian School of Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Regional Cancer therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kusatsu General Hospital, Shiga, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gronau F, Feldbruegge L, Oberwittler F, Gonzalez-Moreno S, Villeneuve L, Eveno C, Glehen O, Kusamura S, Rau B. HIPEC in Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Origin: A Systematic Review of Regimens and Techniques. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051456. [PMID: 35268546 PMCID: PMC8911234 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery including gastrectomy and complete removal of all peritoneal lesions followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) achieves promising results. There exists an immersive variety of approaches for HIPEC that makes it difficult to weigh different results obtained in the literature. In order to enable standardization and development of HIPEC, we here present a systematic review of different drug regimens and technical approaches. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched on 26 May 2021 using the mesh terms “intraperitoneal chemotherapy AND gastric cancer”. Under consideration of systematic review guidelines, articles reporting on HIPEC in combination with CRS were selected. Data on duration, drugs, dosage, and other application parameters as well as morbidity and long term survival data were extracted for subsequent statistical analysis, tabulation, and descriptive synthesis. We assessed the risk of bias due to inhomogeneity of the patient cohort and incompleteness of report of HIPEC parameters. (3) Results: Out of 1421 screened publications, 42 publications presenting data from 1325 patients met the criteria. Most of the publications were single institutional retrospective cohort studies. The most common HIPEC regimen is performed after gastrointestinal anastomosis and consists of 50–200 mg/m2 cisplatinum and 30–40 mg/m2 mytomycin C at 42–43 °C for 60–90 min in a closed abdomen HIPEC system with three tubes. Almost every study reported incompletely on HIPEC parameters. Lower rates of anastomotic leakage were reported in studies that performed HIPEC after gastrointestinal anastomosis. Studies that performed open HIPEC and integrated a two-drug regimen indicated better overall survival rates. (4) Discussion: This is an exhaustive overview of the use of drug regimens and techniques for HIPEC after CRS for gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. Other indications and application modes of intraperitoneal chemotherapy such as prophylactic or palliative HIPEC apart from CRS were not addressed. (5) Conclusion: Complete report of HIPEC parameters should be included in every publication. A consensus for dose expression either per BSA or as flat dose is desirable for comparison of the drug regimens. Despite numerous variations, we identified the most common regimens and techniques and their advantages and disadvantages according to the data in the literature. More phase I/II studies are needed to identify the best approach for HIPEC. (6) Other: This review was not supported by third parties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Gronau
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
| | - Linda Feldbruegge
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
| | - Frauke Oberwittler
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
| | | | - Laurent Villeneuve
- Réseau National de Prise en Charge des Tumeurs Rares du Péritoine, French National Registry of Rare Peritoneal Surface Malignancies, 69002 Lyon, France;
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France; (C.E.); (O.G.)
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Pierre-Bénite, France; (C.E.); (O.G.)
| | - Shigeki Kusamura
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Istituto Nazionale Tumori dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy;
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (F.G.); (L.F.); (F.O.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-30-450-622-214
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mazurek M, Szlendak M, Forma A, Baj J, Maciejewski R, Roviello G, Marano L, Roviello F, Polom K, Sitarz R. Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:681. [PMID: 35055500 PMCID: PMC8776178 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis tend to achieve poor clinical outcomes. Until recently, the treatment options were limited mainly to either palliative chemotherapy or radiation therapy in exceptional cases. Currently, these patients benefit from multimodal treatment, such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Despite good overall results, this treatment modality is still widely debated. The following study is designed to assess the papers about the possible application and utility of HIPEC in GC. A search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was performed to assess the papers devoted to the role of HIPEC in GC treatment; a literature search was performed until March 21st; and, finally, 50 studies with a total number of 3946 patients were analyzed. According to the most recent data, it seems to be reasonable to limit the duration of HIPEC to the shortest effective time. Moreover, the drugs used in HIPEC need to have equal concentrations and the same solvent. Perioperative chemotherapy needs to be reported in detail and, furthermore, the term "morbidity" should be defined more clearly by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Mazurek
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Voivodship Hospital in Siedlce, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Szlendak
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Alicja Forma
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Jacek Baj
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | - Ryszard Maciejewski
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
| | | | - Luigi Marano
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Franco Roviello
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (F.R.)
| | - Karol Polom
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-070 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Robert Sitarz
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; (M.S.); (J.B.); (R.M.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Center, 20-090 Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iavazzo C, Fotiou A, Psomiadou V, Lekka S, Katsanos D, Spiliotis J. Small Bowel PCI Score as a Prognostic Factor of Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), a Retrospective Analysis of 130 Patients. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12:258-265. [PMID: 34295068 PMCID: PMC8272783 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01304-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecologic malignancies. Combining cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can benefit patients with advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluate the role of small bowel peritoneal cancer index (sb-PCI) score as a prognostic factor. We retrospectively analyzed characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients that underwent intermediate cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patient's characteristics underwent debulking surgery plus HIPEC for recurrence disease. One hundred thirty patients were included. Eighty-five of them (65.4%) were treated for recurrent ovarian cancer, while 45 (34.6%) underwent intermediate cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a mean age of 52 years. Mean intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 11.84 with a mean sb-PCI score of 5.57. Univariate analysis revealed that PCI, sb-PCI, and completeness of cytoreduction (CC) were parameters that correlated significantly with overall survival, while after multivariate analysis sb-PCI and CC were identified as independent prognostic factors of survival. A statistically significant correlation between sb-PCI score and overall survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer was revealed. Further larger future studies are required to confirm our conclusion in order to change the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Iavazzo
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, 51, Botasi Str., Piraeus, Greece
| | - Alexandros Fotiou
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, 51, Botasi Str., Piraeus, Greece
| | - Victoria Psomiadou
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, 51, Botasi Str., Piraeus, Greece
| | - Sofia Lekka
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, 51, Botasi Str., Piraeus, Greece
| | | | - John Spiliotis
- Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ji ZH, Zhang Y, Li Y. Intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S70-S78. [PMID: 33968427 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from gastric cancer (GC) has long been regarded as the terminal disease, lacking of effective treatments. In recent 40 years, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, including hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS), and early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), has been recommended as a preferred treatment option for some selected patients with GCPM. Intraperitoneal free cancer cells were recognized as the pathological cause of PM and the primary target for intraperitoneal chemotherapy. There were a lot of evidence demonstrating that HIPEC could effectively eradiate intraperitoneal free cancer cells and prolong overall survival in GCPM. However, there are still no standard HIPEC protocols. This review summarized the current HIPEC regimens used in GCPM from a literature search, trying to conclude the optimal HIPEC in GCPM, and indicate the future direction of HIPEC study. Moreover, the new data on the exploration of HIPEC in GCPM at Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University was shared. In conclusion, there was not enough evidence from publications and our own experience to conclude a recommended HIPEC regimen for GCPM. There is urgent need for standardizing HIPEC protocols worldwide. Accordingly, more international collaborations focusing on pharmacology and HIPEC-related parameters to generate high level evidence are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-He Ji
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Pathology, Cancer Center of Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ji ZH, Yu Y, Liu G, Zhang YB, An SL, Li B, Li XB, Yan GJ, Li Y. Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) based patient selecting strategy for complete cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: A single-center retrospective analysis of 125 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:1411-1419. [PMID: 33293213 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM) is still controversial, mainly due to the limited survival benefit and uncertain patient selection. This study aims to construct a selecting strategy in GCPM for CRS + HIPEC. METHODS From a prospective established database, 125 patients were enrolled. All these patients were pathologically confirmed as GCPM and treated with CRS + HIPEC with or without preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy. The clinical documents and follow-up results were collected and analyzed with the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint of perioperative serious adverse events (SAEs). RESULTS The median OS of 125 GCPM patients treated with CRS + HIPEC was 10.7 months, with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 43.8%, 24.7%, 18.6%, and 15.7%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified completeness of cytoreduction (CC), SAEs, HIPEC drugs, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors on OS. The median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 16.8-43.3) months in CC-0 group, significantly better than 7.3 (95%CI: 5.8-8.8) months in CC1-3 group (P < 0.001). The median OS showed no significant difference among CC-1 (8.5, 95%CI: 6.7-10.2, months), CC-2 (5.6, 95%CI: 3.0-8.2, months) and CC-3 (6.5, 95%CI: 5.2-7.7, months) groups (P > 0.05 for all pairwise comparations). The nomogram based on peritoneal metastasis timing, preoperative tumor marker (TM), and peritoneal cancer index (PCI), with AUC of 0.985, showed a good accuracy and consistency between actual observation and prediction of the probability of complete CRS. The cutoffs of PCI were 16 for synchronous GCPM with normal TM, 12 for synchronous GCPM with abnormal TM, 10 for metachronous GCPM with normal TM, and 5 for metachronous GCPM with abnormal TM, setting the probability to achieve complete CRS as 50%. CONCLUSIONS Only complete CRS + HIPEC (CC-0) could improve survival for high selected GCPM patients with acceptable safety. An incomplete CRS (CC1-3) should be avoided for GCPM patients. Synchronous GCPM with PCI ≤16 and normal TM, synchronous GCPM with PCI ≤12 and abnormal TM, metachronous GCPM with PCI ≤10 and normal TM, or metachronous GCPM with PCI ≤5 and abnormal TM maybe potential indications for complete CRS + HIPEC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-He Ji
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Yan-Bin Zhang
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Song-Lin An
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Xin-Bao Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Guo-Jun Yan
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brandl A, Yonemura Y, Glehen O, Sugarbaker P, Rau B. Long term survival in patients with peritoneal metastasised gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC: A multi-institutional cohort from PSOGI. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:172-180. [PMID: 33071173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal metastasis (PM) of gastric cancer (GC) is relatively common (17%) and is associated with poor survival. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is still controversially discussed, as it has proven an increase in survival in selected patients, but only a small subgroup reached long-term survival. The aim of this study was to collect and analyse a worldwide cohort of patients treated with CRS and HIPEC with long-term survival in order to explore relevant patient characteristics. METHODS We conducted a questionnaire, which was distributed to all collaborators of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI). Inclusion criteria were: histopathologic proven PM of GC, treated with CRS and HIPEC, and overall survival >5 years. Patient, tumour, and therapeutic details were collected and analysed. RESULTS From an analysis of 448 patients treated between 1994 and 2014, a total of 28 patients with a mean age of 53.0 years and mean PCI of 3.3 were included. The overall median survival was 11.0 years (min 5.0; max 27.9). The predictors completeness of cytoreduction (CC-0) and PCI<6 were present in 22/28 patients. 12/28 patients developed at a median of 9.6 years tumour recurrence, and was associated with inferior median overall survival compared to patients without recurrence (8.8 years vs. not reached; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Long-term survival and even cure are possible in patients with PM of GC treated with CRS and HIPEC. Completeness of cytoreduction and low PCI seemed to be crucial. Further studies are needed in order to improve existing selection criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Brandl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- Department of Regional Cancer Therapy, Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Paul Sugarbaker
- Program in Peritoneal Surface Oncology, Washington Cancer Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li Y, Zhu Z, Ma F, Xue L, Tian Y. Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Current Management and Future Challenges. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:7973-7981. [PMID: 32943931 PMCID: PMC7478370 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s268032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in the epidemiology, pathology, molecular mechanisms, and combined modality therapy (CMT) fields have shown that gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) should be considered a distinct cancerous entity. Clinical management of this cancer is challenging, with chemoradioresistance and poor outcomes in advanced stages. Pathological and molecular sets of GSRC demonstrate different features of poor cohesion and differentiation according to the WHO, Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, and Laurén classifications. These features also result in poor response to adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Certain studies of GSRC showed the disputed effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Our aim was to discuss how an improved understanding of these therapeutic benefits may provide better treatment selection for patients, and therefore improve survival. The challenges in the new understanding of GSRC in routine practice and pathology, and the current limitations of treatment will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Li
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhikai Zhu
- School of Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fuhai Ma
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Liyan Xue
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yantao Tian
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The Chicago Consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: Management of gastric metastases. Cancer 2020; 126:2541-2546. [PMID: 32282074 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of gastric cancer specifically as it relates to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness of the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- Chicago Consensus Working Group, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Management of Gastric Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:1768-1773. [PMID: 32285269 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08320-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of gastric cancer specifically as it relates to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness of the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
16
|
Machlowska J, Pucułek M, Sitarz M, Terlecki P, Maciejewski R, Sitarz R. State of the art for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: from classification, prognosis, and genomic characteristics to specified treatments. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:2151-2161. [PMID: 30936747 PMCID: PMC6421895 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s188622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is responsible for 9% of cancer deaths worldwide. Over 950,000 new cases are diagnosed each year, and about 90% of them are in advanced stage, requiring chemotherapy. In Europe there has been research based on pre- and postoperative chemotherapy treatment, using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cisplatin, capecitabine, and docetaxel. Chemotherapy significantly impairs the quality of life of patients; however, the final effects are not always satisfactory. There is scientific evidence that gastric mucus tumors and signet ring cell carcinomas have a pattern of specific signatures, that distinguish them from other gastric cancer subtypes, and may be associated with a poor response to systematic treatment. Signet ring cell carcinoma is less chemosensitive than others, and the increase in the percentage of signet ring cells correlates with resistance to chemotherapy. Perioperative chemotherapy in advanced signet ring cell carcinomas is an independent factor of poor prognosis and survival, which is explained by the toxicity of neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, curative surgical resection enhanced by standardized lymphadenectomy remains the recommended gold standard in GC therapy. According to presented studies, early detection and aggressive treatments for this subtype of GC is a reasonable approach. This review paper is mostly addressed to physicians who are interested in updating to the state of the art concerning different subtypes of gastric carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julita Machlowska
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland,
| | - Małgorzata Pucułek
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland,
| | - Monika Sitarz
- Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Paweł Terlecki
- Department of Surgery, St. John's Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland,
| | | | - Robert Sitarz
- Department of Human Anatomy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland, .,Department of Surgery, St. John's Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland,
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Carmona-Bayonas A, Jiménez-Fonseca P, Echavarria I, Sánchez Cánovas M, Aguado G, Gallego J, Custodio A, Hernández R, Viudez A, Cano JM, Martínez de Castro E, Macías I, Martín Carnicero A, Garrido M, Mangas M, Álvarez Manceñido F, Visa L, Azkarate A, Ramchandani A, Fernández Montes A, Longo F, Sánchez A, Pimentel P, Limón ML, Arias D, Cacho Lavin D, Sánchez Bayona R, Cerdá P, García Alfonso P. Surgery for metastases for esophageal-gastric cancer in the real world: Data from the AGAMENON national registry. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1191-1198. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
18
|
|
19
|
Ji ZH, Peng KW, Yu Y, Li XB, Yonemura Y, Liu Y, Sugarbaker PH, Li Y. Current status and future prospects of clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for gastric cancer peritoneal metastases. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 33:562-570. [PMID: 28124576 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1283065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no standard treatment for peritoneal metastases (PM) from gastric cancer (GC). The aim of this review is to evaluate the clinical trials on cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for GC PM. MATERIALS AND METHODS The published clinical trials on CRS + HIPEC for GC PM are critically evaluated, and survival and safety are the primary endpoints. In addition, the registered ongoing clinical trials are summarised. RESULTS The natural course of GC PM is <5 months. CRS + HIPEC could improve the overall survival (OS). In prospective studies, the median OS was 11.0 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 5.4 months in the CRS alone group. In case-control studies, the median OS was 13.3 months in the CRS + HIPEC group vs. 7.9 months in the CRS alone group. In cohort studies, the median OS after CRS + HIPEC was 13.3. The median 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates after CRS + HIPEC were 50.0%, 35.8% and 13.0%, respectively. There is no statistically significant increase in serious adverse events that are directly attributed to CRS + HIPEC. CONCLUSIONS The combination of CRS and HIPEC is a promising integrated treatment strategy for GC PM that has encouraging initial results, calling for urgent further evaluation of this strategy in randomised control trials (RCTs).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong-He Ji
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China
| | - Kai-Wen Peng
- b Department of Oncology , Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors and Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center , Wuhan , China
| | - Yang Yu
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China
| | - Xin-Bao Li
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China
| | - Yutaka Yonemura
- c NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment , Kishiwada, Osaka , Japan
| | - Yang Liu
- c NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment , Kishiwada, Osaka , Japan
| | | | - Yan Li
- a Department of Peritoneal Cancer Surgery , Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing , China.,b Department of Oncology , Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors and Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center , Wuhan , China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Girshally R, Demtröder C, Albayrak N, Zieren J, Tempfer C, Reymond MA. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as a neoadjuvant therapy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 2016; 14:253. [PMID: 27678344 PMCID: PMC5039790 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-1008-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug delivery system able to induce regression of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in the salvage situation. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical characteristics, tumor histology, and extent of disease of the patients having undergone cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after "neoadjuvant" PIPAC. METHODS This study was performed at a single institution, tertiary center. In a prospective registry, retrospective analysis was done. PIPAC indication was restricted to patients in the salvage situation who were not eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). RESULTS Nine-hundred sixty-one PIPAC sessions were successfully performed in 406 patients: 21 patients (5.2 %) were scheduled for CRS and HIPEC. Twelve of these patients had a low PCI (mean 5.8 ± 5.6). The remaining nine patients showed an advanced peritoneal disease (mean PCI 14.3 ± 5.3) at initial laparoscopy. After repeated PIPAC (mean number of cycles 3.5 ± 0.9), radiological tumor regression was observed in 7/9 patients and major histological regression was observed in 8/9 patients, so that secondary CRS and HIPEC became possible. CONCLUSIONS PIPAC might be used as a neoadjuvant therapy before CRS and HIPEC in order to improve the outcome of CRS and HIPEC, to select patients with chemosensitive, biologically favorable tumors, to extent the indications of CRS and HIPEC in the presence of diffuse small bowel involvement, and to reduce the extent of cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramy Girshally
- Therapy center for peritoneal diseases, Elisabethengruppe, Herne, Germany
- Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Cedric Demtröder
- Therapy center for peritoneal diseases, Elisabethengruppe, Herne, Germany
- Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nurettin Albayrak
- Therapy center for peritoneal diseases, Elisabethengruppe, Herne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Zieren
- Therapy center for peritoneal diseases, Elisabethengruppe, Herne, Germany
- Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Clemens Tempfer
- Therapy center for peritoneal diseases, Elisabethengruppe, Herne, Germany
- Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marc A. Reymond
- Department of Surgery, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Str. 3, T2076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chia CS, Seshadri RA, Kepenekian V, Vaudoyer D, Passot G, Glehen O. Survival outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a systematic review. Pleura Peritoneum 2016; 1:67-77. [PMID: 30911610 PMCID: PMC6386497 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2016-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/08/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The current treatment of choice for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a new aggressive form of loco-regional treatment that is currently being used in pseudomyxoma peritoneii, peritoneal mesothelioma and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. It is still under investigation for its use in gastric cancer. Methods: The literature between 1970 and 2016 was surveyed systematically through a review of published studies on the treatment outcomes of CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. Results: Seventeen studies were included in this review. The median survival for all patients ranged from 6.6 to 15.8 months. The 5-years overall survival ranged from 6 to 31%. For patients with complete cytoreduction, the median survival was 11.2 to 43.4 months and the 5-years overall survival was 13 % to 23%. Important prognostic factors were found to be a low peritoneal carcarcinomatosis index (PCI) score and the completeness of cytoreduction. Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that CRS and HIPEC has a role to play in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. Long term survival has been shown for a select group of patients. However, further studies are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
|
22
|
Dehal A, Smith JJ, Nash GM. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an evidence-based review-past, present and future. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:143-57. [PMID: 26941992 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has historically been considered a terminal condition with merely palliative treatment achieving a survival rate measured in months. Cytoreductive surgery (CyRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) have emerged as potentially effective regional treatments with the potential for long-term survival in well-selected patients. The fundamentals of CyRS and IPC are patient selection and complete cytoreduction. Since there is now sufficient evidence for the superiority of CyRS and IPC to systemic chemotherapy alone in a highly select group of patients, surgeons and oncologists should be aware of this modality as a potential benefit for patients with PC. The aim of this report is to highlight cancer-specific evidence in the context of ongoing studies regarding the outcome of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Dehal
- 1 Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, CA, USA ; 2 Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- 1 Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, CA, USA ; 2 Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Garrett M Nash
- 1 Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, CA, USA ; 2 Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Feingold PL, Kwong MLM, Sabesan A, Sorber R, Rudloff U. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer and other less common disease histologies: is it time? J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:87-98. [PMID: 26941987 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide, and once spread to the peritoneum, has a 5-year survival of less than 5%. Recent years have demonstrated advances in the use of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis due to various malignancies. The frequent desmoplastic stroma and poor vascularization impeding drug delivery particularly in the diffuse form of gastric cancer is thought to provide a sound rationale for a regionalized treatment approach in this disease. Here, we seek to review the available data to define the role of CRS and HIPEC in gastric cancer metastatic to the peritoneal surface, and furthermore, analyze the use of CRS and HIPEC in malignancies less commonly treated with the regionalized perfusion approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul L Feingold
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mei Li M Kwong
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Arvind Sabesan
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca Sorber
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Udo Rudloff
- Thoracic and Gastrointestinal Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 2016; 7:198-207. [PMID: 27065710 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-016-0502-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis, either synchronous or metachronous, is commonly seen in gastric cancer. It is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median survival of less than one year. The outcomes are not significantly improved by the use of systemic chemotherapy. We review the relevant literature on the role of HIPEC in gastric cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used in three situations in gastric cancer. Besides its role as a definitive treatment in patients with established peritoneal metastasis (PM), it has been used as a prophylaxis against peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery and also as a palliative treatment in advanced peritoneal metastasis with intractable ascites. While prophylactic HIPEC has been shown to reduce peritoneal recurrence and improve survival in many randomised trials, palliative HIPEC can reduce the need for frequent paracentesis. Although CRS with HIPEC has shown promise in increasing the survival of selected patients with established PM from gastric cancer, larger studies are needed before this can be accepted as a standard of care.
Collapse
|
25
|
Seshadri RA, Glehen O. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:1114-30. [PMID: 26811651 PMCID: PMC4716024 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer associated peritoneal carcinomatosis (GCPC) has a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than one year. Systemic chemotherapy including targeted agents has not been found to significantly increase the survival in GCPC. Since recurrent gastric cancer remains confined to the abdominal cavity in many patients, regional therapies like aggressive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been investigated for GCPC. HIPEC has been used for three indications in GC- as an adjuvant therapy after a curative surgery, HIPEC has been shown to improve survival and reduce peritoneal recurrences in many randomised trials in Asian countries; as a definitive treatment in established PC, HIPEC along with CRS is the only therapeutic modality that has resulted in long-term survival in select groups of patients; as a palliative treatment in advanced PC with intractable ascites, HIPEC has been shown to control ascites and reduce the need for frequent paracentesis. While the results of randomised trials of adjuvant HIPEC from western centres are awaited, the role of HIPEC in the treatment of GCPC is still evolving and needs larger studies before it is accepted as a standard of care.
Collapse
|
26
|
Pecqueux M, Fritzmann J, Adamu M, Thorlund K, Kahlert C, ReiΔfelder C, Weitz J, Rahbari NN. Free intraperitoneal tumor cells and outcome in gastric cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2015; 6:35564-78. [PMID: 26384352 PMCID: PMC4742125 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 08/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite continuously improving therapies, gastric cancer still shows poor survival in locally advanced stages with local recurrence rates of up to 50% and peritoneal recurrence rates of 17% after curative surgery. We performed a systematic review with meta-analyses to clarify whether positive intraperitoneal cytology (IPC) indicates a high risk of disease recurrence and poor overall survival in gastric cancer. METHODS Multiple databases were searched in December 2014 to identify studies on the prognostic significance of positive intraperitoneal cytology in gastric cancer, including: Medline, Biosis, Science Citation Index, Embase, CCMed and publisher databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from the identified studies. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model on overall survival, disease-free survival and peritoneal recurrence free survival. RESULTS A total of 64 studies with a cumulative sample size of 12,883 patients were included. Cytology, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or both were performed in 35; 21 and 8 studies, respectively. Meta analyses revealed free intraperitoneal tumor cells (FITC) to be associated with poor overall survival in univariate (HR 3.27; 95% CI 2.82 - 3.78]) and multivariate (HR 2.45; 95% CI 2.04 - 2.94) analysis and poor peritoneal recurrence free survival in univariate (4.15; 95% CI 3.10 - 5.57) and multivariate (3.09; 95% CI 2.02 - 4.71) analysis. Subgroup analysis showed this effect to be independent of the detection method, Western or Asian origin or the time of publication. CONCLUSIONS FITC oder positive peritoneal cytology is associated with poor survival and increased peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathieu Pecqueux
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Fritzmann
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mariam Adamu
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristian Thorlund
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christoph Kahlert
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph ReiΔfelder
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nuh N. Rahbari
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Long noncoding RNA aberrant expression profiles after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy of AGC ascertained by microarray analysis. Tumour Biol 2015; 36:5021-9. [PMID: 25652469 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3153-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 01/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to be involved in the development and progression of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, the roles of lncRNAs in advanced gastric cancer during the process of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are not well understood. A high-throughput microarray analysis was performed to compare the expression profiles of lncRNAs and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in AGC serum samples during the process of CRS + HIPEC. Several potentially AGC-associated lncRNAs were verified by real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Using abundant and varied probes, we were able to assess 33,045 lncRNAs and 30,215 mRNAs in our microarray. We found that 566 lncRNAs were differentially expressed (2-fold change) in AGC serum samples, indicating the significantly up- or downregulated lncRNAs play important roles in AGC during the process of CRS + HIPEC. Quantitative PCR results further verified that eight lncRNAs were aberrantly expressed in AGC serum samples after CRS + HIEC compared with matched serum sample before CRS + HIPEC. Among them, BC031243 and RP11-356I2.2 were the most aberrantly expressed lncRNAs, as estimated by quantitative PCR in six pairs of AGC serum samples. Our study demonstrated the expression patterns of lncRNAs in AGC serums before and after CRS + HIPEC by microarray. These results revealed that lncRNAs were differentially expressed during the process of CRS + HIPEC, suggesting that they might play key roles in tumor development.
Collapse
|