1
|
Kim HS, Kim HI, Yoon YJ, Yeom JH, Kim MG. Analysis of prognostic factors for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients undergoing emergency surgery for intestinal perforation or irreversible intestinal ischemia. Ann Surg Treat Res 2023; 105:198-206. [PMID: 37908381 PMCID: PMC10613825 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Because the global geriatric population continues to increase, the assessment of emergency surgical outcomes in elderly patients with acute peritonitis will become more important. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on the data of 174 elderly patients who underwent emergency surgery for intestinal perforation or intestinal infarction between June 2010 and November 2022. We conducted an analysis of the risk factors associated with postoperative complications and mortality by evaluating the characteristics of patients and their surgical outcomes. Results In our study, most patients (94.3%) had preexisting comorbidities, and many patients (84.5%) required transfer to the intensive care unit following emergency surgery. Postoperative complications were observed in 84 individuals (48.3%), with postoperative mortality occurring in 29 (16.7%). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative acute renal injury, hypoalbuminemia, and postoperative ventilator support as significant predictors of postoperative mortality. Conclusion When elderly patients undergo emergency surgery for intestinal perforation or infarction, it is important to recognize that those with preoperative acute renal injury, hypoalbuminemia, and a need for postoperative ventilator support have a poor prognosis. Therefore, these patients require intensive care from the early stages of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Il Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Joon Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Yeom
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Gyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sakamoto E, Dias AR, Ramos MFKP, Charruf AZ, Ribeiro-Junior U, Zilberstein B, Cecconello I. Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31:803-807. [PMID: 33232633 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is increasing due to past use of subtotal gastrectomy to treat benign diseases, improvements in the detection of gastric cancer, and increased survival rates after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Laparoscopic access provides the advantages and benefits of minimally invasive surgery. However, laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy (LCTG) for RGC is technically demanding, even for experienced surgeons. Because of its rarity and heterogeneity, no standard surgical strategy has been established and few surgeons will develop technical expertise to carry out this procedure. Aim: To describe our standard technique, giving surgeons a head start in LCTG and report the early experience with this stepwise approach. Materials and Methods: We detail all the steps involved in the procedure, including trocar placement and surgical description. Results: Between 2009 and 2019, a total of 8 patients with past history of RGC were operated with this technique. All patients had been previously operated by open method, 7 due to peptic ulcer disease and 1 due to gastric cancer. Their mean age at the time of the first surgery was 38.9 years (range 25-56 years) and the mean interval between the first and the second gastrectomy was 32.1 years (range 13.6-49). Billroth II was the previous reconstruction in all cases. A 5-trocar technique was used followed by total gastrectomy with side-to-side stapled intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy anastomosis and Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The mean operation time was 272 minutes (range 180-330) and median blood loss was 247 mL (range 50-500). There was no conversion and no major intraoperative complication. Major postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients. Conclusion: Completion total gastrectomy for RGC is a morbid procedure and laparoscopic access is technically feasible, hopefully carrying the benefits of faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain, and wound complications. By standardizing the approach, the learning curve may be shortened and better results achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Sakamoto
- Cancer Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Andre Roncon Dias
- Cancer Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Amir Zeide Charruf
- Cancer Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Bruno Zilberstein
- Cancer Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ivan Cecconello
- Cancer Institute, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laparoscopic Completion Total Gastrectomy as a Standardized Procedure for Gastric Stump Cancer: A Case Control Study. Int Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-20-00036.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
Complete gastrectomy for gastric stump cancer (GSC) can be challenging due to severe adhesions; therefore, advanced techniques are required when being performed by laparoscopic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic completion total gastrectomy (LCTG) for the treatment of GSC.
Methods
Patient records from January 2010 to October 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into 2 groups depending on whether they underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy. We compared patient characteristics; operative, clinical, and pathological data between the groups.
Results
Twenty open and 17 LCTGs were performed. Laparoscopic gastrectomy resulted in a significantly longer operation time (230 versus 182.5 min; P = 0.026), lower blood loss (14 versus 105 mL; P < 0.001), and shorter period to the first flatus passage (2 versus 3 days; P < 0.001) than open gastrectomy. No significant differences in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, duration of hospital stay, complication rate, and postoperative analgesic usage between the 2 groups were observed. No patients required conversion to open surgery in the laparoscopic-treatment group. Pathologic findings revealed that the laparoscopic group had a smaller tumor size (not pathologic T category) and fewer metastatic lymph nodes than the open group, leading to an earlier distribution of the pathologic stage in the laparoscopic group.
Conclusions
LCTG for the treatment of GSC was safely conducted with fewer complications and mortalities than previously reported results. Advanced technologies and sophistication of laparoscopic skills may further yield minimal invasiveness with better short-term outcome.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim HS, Lee JH, Kim MG. Outcomes of laparoscopic primary gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric perforation: experience from a single surgeon. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:4206-4213. [PMID: 32860136 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07902-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer perforation is rare and difficult to distinguish from gastric ulcer perforation before surgery. Peritonitis caused by gastric perforation requires emergency surgery. The optimal surgical strategy for gastric perforation has not been established. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 43 patients who underwent primary gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric perforation between June 2010 and November 2019 were reviewed. Patients were classified into gastric ulcer and gastric cancer groups. Early surgical outcomes and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups except regarding preoperative shock. Laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in 35 of 43 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery. The surgical findings demonstrated that the gastric cancer group had larger mass lesions with significantly larger perforations than did the gastric ulcer group. There were no significant differences in early surgical outcomes. Severe postoperative complications occurred in nine patients, five of whom died within one month of surgery. The majority of patients (90%) had stage III or IV gastric cancer. The 5-year survival rate was 19.5%. CONCLUSION We found no definitive differences in clinical characteristics distinguishing gastric cancer from ulcers. Considering our surgical outcomes, laparoscopic primary gastrectomy performed by an expert is a useful technique for emergency gastric perforation. However, unless an expert is available, caution should be used when selecting laparoscopic primary gastrectomy with curative intent as a surgical method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Suk Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153, Gyeongchun-ro, Guri, 471-701, Korea
| | - Jun Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153, Gyeongchun-ro, Guri, 471-701, Korea
| | - Min Gyu Kim
- Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, 153, Gyeongchun-ro, Guri, 471-701, Korea. .,Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ota M, Ikebe M, Shin Y, Kagawa M, Mano Y, Nakanoko T, Nakashima Y, Uehara H, Sugiyama M, Iguchi T, Sugimachi K, Yamamoto M, Morita M, Toh Y. Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer: A Single-institution Experience and Systematic Literature Review. In Vivo 2020; 34:1987-1992. [PMID: 32606171 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of LTG with open total gastrectomy (OTG) for RGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-two patients who underwent total gastrectomy for RGC were enrolled in this study. RESULTS LTG was carried out in seven patients, and OTG was performed in the remaining 15 patients. The mean operation time in the LTG group was longer than that in the OTG group. The estimated blood loss in the LTG group was less than that in the OTG group. No cases in the LTG group required open conversion. Postoperatively, the first meal and defecation were earlier in the LTG group than in the OTG group. The overall survival rates of the two groups were comparable. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a feasible surgical option for RGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuhiko Ota
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ikebe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuki Shin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masaki Kagawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yohei Mano
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomonori Nakanoko
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Nakashima
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hideo Uehara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masahiko Sugiyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Iguchi
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Keishi Sugimachi
- Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Manabu Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masaru Morita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yasushi Toh
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Extending the Indication for Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With Pan-Peritonitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2019; 29:120-125. [PMID: 30531448 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There have been reports of favorable results in patients with peritonitis who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The present study evaluated the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in patients with pan-peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled 148 patients who underwent open and laparoscopic surgery for pan-peritonitis between January 2015 and December 2017 at Hanyang University Guri Hospital. Patients with appendicitis or cholecystitis were excluded from this study because of the simplicity of the technique and the favorable postoperative prognosis. Surgical outcomes including open conversion, morbidity, mortality, risk, and prognostic factors were evaluated. RESULTS During the study period, 125 patients (84.5%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The conversion to open surgery occurred in 7 (5.3%) patients. In the laparoscopic surgery group, 27 patients (21.6%) experienced postoperative complications, and 6 died (4.8%). Multivariate analysis showed that age of older than 75 years was a risk factor for postoperative complications. Especially, preoperative shock (<90 mm Hg) and a longer time from symptom onset (over 2 d) to surgery were prognostic factors for postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS On the basis of our results and experiences, we believe that laparoscopic surgery is applicable to surgery of pan-peritonitis. And, preoperative shock and longer time from onset are prognostic factors of mortality in laparoscopic group. Therefore, we are confident that careful patient selection and specialized laparoscopic team should be considered in order to have best results.
Collapse
|
7
|
Otsuka R, Hayashi H, Sakata H, Uesato M, Hayano K, Murakami K, Kano M, Fujishiro T, Toyozumi T, Semba Y, Matsubara H. Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer: A single-institution experience and systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:181-186. [PMID: 30923787 PMCID: PMC6422809 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Application of laparoscopic approaches for the treatment of remnant gastric cancers (RGC) is still controversial. Therefore, in the present study, the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for RGC was investigated. METHODS A total of 27 patients who underwent gastrectomy for RGC from June 2008 to September 2017 were enrolled in this study. A comprehensive review of the literature on LG for RGC published before December 2017 using the PubMed database was carried out. RESULTS Laparoscopic gastrectomy was carried out in seven patients, and open gastrectomy (OG) was done in the remaining 20 patients. LG was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (70 ± 71 vs. 1066 ± 1428 g; P < 0.001), significantly more retrieved lymph nodes (22 ± 13 vs. 12 ± 9; P = 0.03), a relatively lower postoperative complication rate, and a relatively shorter postoperative hospital stay than OG. A comprehensive review of the literature showed that LG for RGC was more likely to correlate with longer operative time, less blood loss, lower postoperative complication rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and more retrieved lymph nodes than OG. CONCLUSION The clinical outcome of our patients with RGC and the literature indicated that a laparoscopic approach contributed to faster recovery after surgery than an open approach without sacrificing its radicality and was a safe and secure treatment option for RGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Otsuka
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Hideki Hayashi
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Haruhito Sakata
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Masaya Uesato
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Koichi Hayano
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Kentaro Murakami
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Masayuki Kano
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Takeshi Fujishiro
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Takeshi Toyozumi
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Yoshihide Semba
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| | - Hisahiro Matsubara
- Department of Frontier SurgeryGraduate School of MedicineChiba UniversityChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|