Consecutive case series of 244 age-related macular degeneration patients undergoing implantation with an extended macular vision IOL

Optimising image quality with EyeMax Mono lens in dry age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

To investigate clinical outcomes in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) after intracapsular implantation of a novel EyeMax Mono macular lens.

METHODS

In this study, 22 phakic eyes of 19 moderate to advanced dry AMD patients with macular disciform scar and/or macular atrophy who were followed up for ≥ 3 months after surgery were studied. A thorough pre-operative ophthalmological examination was performed, including measurement of corrected distance visual acuity in logMAR and ETDR. Following phacoemulsification, the EyeMax Mono lens was implanted intracapsularly via a 2.2-mm clear corneal incision to improve retinal image quality in all areas of the macula ≤ 10° from the central fovea. Main outcome measures included optimisation of corrected distance visual acuity and surgical safety.

RESULTS

Male-to-female ratio was 13:6. Mean age at surgery was 68.37 ± 10.23 years. The mean duration of post-operative follow-up was 7.91 ± 3.42 months. The mean post-operative refractive spherical equivalent improved to + 2.31 ± 1.56 D with significant visual improvement as early as 3 months post-operatively. Post-operative corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly from 1.05 ± 0.45 to 0.72 ± 0.43 logMAR (P < 0.001), equivalent to mean ETDRS of 49.55 ± 20.05 (P < 0.001). There were no major surgical complications, either intra- or post-operatively, except in two patients who experienced intra-operative haptic rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended macular vision lenses appear to have a comparable safety profile as standard IOLs in the short to medium term. It could be the preferred lens for improving and preserving visual acuity in moderate to advanced dry AMD patients.

Implantable vision-enhancing devices and postoperative rehabilitation in advanced age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) results in progressive vision loss that significantly impacts patients' quality of life and ability to perform routine daily activities. Although pharmaceutical treatments for AMD are available and in clinical development, patients with late-stage AMD are relatively underserved. Specialized rehabilitation programs and external low-vision aids are available to support visual performance for those with advanced AMD; but intraocular vision-improving devices, including implantable miniature telescope (IMT) and intraocular lens (IOL) implants, offer advantages regarding head motion, vestibular ocular reflex development, and depth perception. IMT and IOL technologies are rapidly evolving, and many patients who could benefit from them remain unidentified. This review of recent literature summarizes available information on implantable devices for improving vision in patients with advanced AMD. Furthermore, it discusses recent attempts of developing the quality of life tests including activities of daily life and objective assessments. This may offer the ophthalmologist but also the patient a better possibility to detect changes or improvements before and after surgery. It is evident that surgery with new implants/devices is no longer the challenge, but rather the more complex management of patients before and after surgery as well as the correct selection of cases.

Improving Outcomes for Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Cataracts: The Importance of Including an Assessment of Activities of Daily Life (ADL)

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the developing world. AMD causes a substantial burden on patients, reducing independence, their ability to conduct daily activities, and increasing rates of cognitive decline and depression. There is a significant unmet need for patients with AMD, which will grow as the population ages and rates of disease increase. In the past, many studies have demonstrated a benefit when coexisting cataract formation is treated by removing the cloudy lens. AMD-lenses are intraocular implants designed to improve visual acuity in patients with AMD, avoiding the need for cumbersome manual vision aids and magnifiers. Many IOLs have been investigated in AMD, with differing mechanisms aimed at overcoming visual impairment. Most AMD studies use Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart-based assessments of vision, but BCVA does not correlate with lesion size or pattern, especially in geographic atrophy, and may not be the most appropriate measure to effectively assess vision defects in AMD before or after a cataract surgery. One option is a simple functional assessment of vision related to activities of daily living (ADL), based on a reproducible, task-based questionnaire. The test consists of 6 assessments of ADL to be completed by patients before and after cataract surgery. Experiences highlight the importance of including an assessment of ADL in patients receiving an implant, which gives an effective measure of patient satisfaction. We would welcome the use of similar questionnaires in larger studies of patients, to validate its utility in a broader patient population. In this review article, we (Scandinavian-Austrian-cooperation) summarize lenses designed for implantation in patients with AMD, and how best to improve outcomes through proper patient selection, appropriate vision evaluation using quality-of-life related assessment, and pre- and post-operative care.

Intraocular vision-improving devices in age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of blindness, especially in western countries, and will substantially burden society and the world’s health care system. Patients with late AMD often accompany a progressive loss of central vision, which will heavily influence the quality of life and associated with increased risk of functional disability. The principal visual rehabilitation methods with low-vision magnifiers, such as hand or stand magnifiers, spectacles, and closed-circuit television, were cumbersome to use and cosmetically burdensome. Therefore, the development of intraocular vision-improving devices has become an attractive alternative to extraocular visual aids, and better life quality improvement has been reached among AMD patients. To evaluate each device’s safety and efficacy based on current research, we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed using pre-reported search terms and keywords combined with both Mesh term and text words. We explored randomized clinical controlled trials, cohort studies, and case serial reports and summarizes three aspects: visual outcomes, safety outcome, and quality of life outcomes. There are four types of devices recommended for AMD patients illustrating in this article: an implantable miniature telescope (IMT), IOL-VIP System, EyeMax Mono, and Scharioth macula lens (SML). There is no doubt that these technological advancements would bring new hope for AMD patients. However, the lack of randomized controls, limited follow-up duration, and various visual acuity (VA) measurements in different studies would be difficult than IOL devices.

Four Years of Observation to Evaluate Autonomy and Quality of Life after Implantation of a High-Add Intraocular Lens in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients

Visual impairment resulting from advanced dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) limits the ability to perform activities required for independent living and adversely affects quality of life. We aimed to determine changes in these parameters in patients with AMD-related geographic atrophy who underwent magnifying cataract surgery (MAGS) using a foldable, bifocal high-add intraocular lens (IOL). The high-add IOL (LENTIS® MAX LS-313 MF 80, Oculentis) was implanted in the better seeing or dominant eye of eligible patients with clinically significant cataract, best corrected distance visual acuity 1.3–0.5 logMAR (20/400–20/63), best corrected near visual acuity >0.8 logMAR (20/125), and stable advanced dry AMD. Self-reported feasibility of performing routine activities and change in quality of life were the main outcome measures. Eleven of 15 operated patients had complete follow-up to 48 months. There were no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications. AMD converted from dry to wet in 2 patients. All patients reported functional gains in the first 3–6 months after surgery, and 10/11 patients reported improved quality of life. From baseline to 48 months, functional performance remained improved in all patients, and quality of life remained improved in the 9 patients with stable AMD. Best corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected near visual acuity improved in all cases after surgery.

Matching the Patient to the Intraocular Lens: Preoperative Considerations to Optimize Surgical Outcomes

The intraocular lens (IOL) selection process for patients requires a complex and objective assessment of patient-specific ocular characteristics, including the quality and quantity of corneal astigmatism, health of the ocular surface, and other ocular comorbidities. Potential issues that could be considered complications after surgery, including dry eye disease, anterior or epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, Salzmann nodular degeneration, and pterygium, should be addressed proactively. Aspheric IOLs are designed to eliminate the positive spherical aberration added by traditional IOLs to the pseudophakic visual axis. Spherical aberration may be a consideration with patient selection. Patient desire for increased spectacle independence after surgery is one of the main drivers for the development of multifocal IOLs and extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOLs. However, no one single multifocal or EDOF IOL suits all patients' needs. The wide variety of multifocal and EDOF IOLs, their optics, and their respective impact on patient quality of vision have to be understood fully to choose the appropriate IOL for each individual, and surgery has to be customized. Patients who have undergone previous LASIK or who have radial keratotomy and ocular pathologic features, including glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and epiretinal membrane, require specific considerations for IOL selection. Subjectively, patient-centered considerations, including visual goals, lifestyle, personality, profession, and hobbies, are key elements for the surgeon to assess and factor into an IOL recommendation. This holistic approach will help surgeons to achieve optimal surgical outcomes and to meet (and exceed) the high expectations of patients.

Implantation of Scharioth macula lens in patients with age-related macular degeneration: results of a prospective European multicentre clinical trial

Objective

To report the visual and refractive outcomes following monocular implantation of a supplementary (piggyback) Scharioth macula lens (SML) in previously pseudophakic eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods and analysis

Prospective European multicentre clinical trial. 50 eyes of 50 pseudophakic patients with either dry or previously treated and stable neovascular AMD for at least 6 months were included. The inclusion criteria were age over 55, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.4–0.1 (decimal), improvement of at least three lines of corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) when tested with a +6.0 dioptre (D) reading addition at 15 cm, compared with a +2.5 D reading addition at 40 cm using a standardised, self-illuminated Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study near vision chart. The SML intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted as an add-on/piggyback IOL in the ciliary sulcus, monocularly in the better seeing eye of each subject meeting the inclusion criteria.

Results

There were no intraoperative complications. One subject had the SML explanted in the postoperative period due to postoperative glare/halos. The mean CNVA improved from 0.23±0.12 (decimal) preoperatively to 0.57±0.33 at 1 year. The mean CDVA remained unchanged measuring 0.19±0.13 preoperatively and 0.19±0.09 at 1 year postoperatively.

Conclusion

The SML appears to be safe and effective in improving the CNVA in patients with AMD. Data suggest that the CDVA remains unaffected following implantation. Further data are needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy.

A case report detailing use of a new intraocular lens with advanced technology, designed specifically for patients with center-involving macular disorders

RATIONALE

Many studies have shown that cataract surgery can be performed safely and improve visual acuity, without increasing the risk of progression of existing age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Data are emerging for an intraocular lens (IOL) that utilizes an advanced optical design to optimize the image supplied to all areas of the macula and not just the foveal center, which may benefit patients with center-involving macular disorders.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 83-year-old Caucasian female presented with poor contrast sensitivity and color perception with increasing glare over the preceding year.

DIAGNOSIS

She had a progressive cortical cataract and stable dry AMD in the left eye, and wet AMD in the right eye. In the left eye, preoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) was 0.2 (decimal) and best-corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) was 0.05 (decimal).

INTERVENTIONS

Standard small-incision phacoemulsification was performed in the left eye, with capsular bag implantation of EyeMax Mono (LEH Pharma, London, UK), a single-piece, soft, hydrophobic, acrylic IOL designed to optimize image quality across the macula, rather than a standard monofocal lens.

OUTCOMES

At 6 months postoperation, visual acuity in the left eye had markedly improved, with a BCDVA of 0.5 (decimal) and a BCNVA of 0.2 (decimal).

CONCLUSION

In this first case undertaken at our center (and the first in Austria), cataract extraction and EyeMax Mono implantation were performed safely, with good subjective and objective outcome measures consistent with the effects of image optimization across the macula. Further studies of this IOL in patients with center-involving macular disorders, such as AMD, are warranted.

Initial Clinical Results With a Novel Monofocal-Type Intraocular Lens for Extended Macular Vision in Patients With Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of a novel intraocular lens (IOL) designed to improve retinal image quality at up to 10° of retinal eccentricity and optionally provide retinal magnification in patients with macular disease.

METHODS

In this prospective, interventional pilot study, 8 eyes of 7 patients with bilateral dry age-related macular degeneration and 1+ or less cataract underwent phacoemulsification and capsular bag implantation of a single, injectable, hydrophobic acrylic IOL. Safety and efficacy were assessed by monitoring logMAR corrected distance and near visual acuity, intraocular pressure, specular microscopy, 80-point visual field testing, and anterior segment and macular optical coherence tomography at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months postoperatively. Microperimetry was undertaken at baseline and 1 and/or 2 months postoperatively. Reading performance was assessed at baseline and 1 month postoperatively using the Minnesota low vision reading chart (MNREAD; Precision Vision, LaSalle, IL).

RESULTS

Safety outcomes were equivalent to standard monofocal IOLs. Visual acuities improved in all patients. Mean corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.93 ± 0.22 preoperatively to 0.59 ± 0.25 at 2 months postoperatively. Mean reading speed increased from 28 ± 19 to 44 ± 31 words per minute. Mean microperimetry threshold sensitivities increased from 8.2 ± 4.6 to 12 ± 5.6 dB. Mean percentage of fixation points within a 4° circle increased from 77% ± 17% to 91% ± 11% with evidence for progressive movement of preferred retinal loci away from areas of geographic atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial results indicate this novel IOL has a safety profile comparable with standard IOLs. Visual benefits may exceed those obtained with existing technologies in patients with macular disease. Further work is required to determine the full potential of extended macular vision technology. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(11):718-725.].