Basic principles and uniform terminology for the head-neck junction in hip replacement

EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty

Off-label use is frequently practiced in primary and revision arthroplasty, as there may be indications for the application of implants for purposes outside the one the manufacturers intended.

Under certain circumstances, patients may benefit from selective application of mix & match. This can refer to primary hip arthroplasty (if evidence suggests that the combination of devices from different manufacturers has superior results) and revision hip or knee arthroplasty (when the exchange of one component only is necessary and the invasiveness of surgery can be reduced).

Within the EFORT ‘Implant and Patient Safety Initiative’, evidence- and consensus-based recommendations have been developed for the safe application of off-label use and mix & match in primary as well as revision hip and knee arthroplasty.

Prior to the application of a medical device for hip or knee arthroplasty off-label and within a mix & match situation, surgeons should balance the risks and benefits to the patient, obtain informed consent, and document the decision process appropriately.

Nevertheless, it is crucial for surgeons to only combine implants that are compatible. Mismatch of components, where their sizes or connections do not fit, may have catastrophic effects and is a surgical mistake.

Surgeons must be fully aware of the features of the components that they use in off-label indications or during mix & match applications, must be appropriately trained and must audit their results.

Considering the frequent practice of off-label and mix & match as well as the potential medico-legal issues, further research is necessary to obtain more data about the appropriate indications and outcomes for those procedures.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:982-1005. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210080

Variability in stem taper surface topography affects the degree of corrosion and fretting in total hip arthroplasty

Degradation at the modular head-neck interface in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is predominately expressed in the form of corrosion and fretting, potentially causing peri-prosthetic failure by adverse reactions to metal debris. This retrieval study aimed to quantify variations in stem taper surface topographies and to assess the influence on the formation of corrosion and/or fretting in titanium alloy stem tapers combined with metal and ceramic heads. Four hip stem designs (Alloclassic, CLS, Bicontact and SL-Plus) were characterized using high-resolution 3D microscopy, and corrosion and fretting were rated using the Goldberg scoring scheme. Quantification of the taper surface topographies revealed a high variability in surface characteristics between threaded stem tapers: Alloclassic and CLS tapers feature deeply threaded trapezoid-shaped profiles with thread heights over 65 µm. The sawtooth-shaped Bicontact and triangular SL-Plus taper are characterized by low thread heights below 14 µm. Significantly lower corrosion and fretting scores were observed in lightly threaded compared to deeply threaded tapers in ceramic head combinations. No significant differences in corrosion or fretting scores with thread height were found in pairings with metal heads. Understanding the relationship between stem taper surface topography and the formation of corrosion and fretting could help to improve the performance of modern THAs and lead to longer-lasting clinical results.

Taper junctions in modular hip joint replacements: What affects their stability?

BACKGROUND

Although taper junctions are beneficial in the reconstruction of hip joints, some clinical concerns like the formation of adverse local tissue reactions have recently emerged. These reactions are associated with wear and corrosion products from the interface of insufficient taper connections regarding strength. Commonly used tapers vary in their geometric and topographical design parameter. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate interactions between design and surgical related parameters to the taper connection strength.

METHODS

In this study, the effect of the taper contact situation, surface roughness and head material in combination with assembly force on the taper connection strength were assessed using torque-off tests. Furthermore, the type of use in terms of single-use or re-use of the stem taper was investigated.

RESULTS

The study showed that the impaction force is the predominant factor that determines the taper strength followed by the type of use and the head material. The contact situation seems to slightly influence the determined torque-off moment, whereas the surface topography of the stem taper obviously plays a minor role for the taper connection strength.

CONCLUSION

Clinical users should be aware that an increased assembly force will strengthen the stability of the taper junction, whereas care should be taken when reusing hip stems with metal heads as this may decrease their connection strength.

Taper corrosion: a complication of total hip arthroplasty

The focus on taper corrosion in modular hip arthroplasty increased around 2007 as a result of clinical problems with large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings on standard stems. Corrosion problems with bi-modular primary hip stems focused attention on this issue even more.

Factors increasing the risk of taper corrosion were identified in laboratory and retrieval studies: stiffness of the stem neck, taper diameter and design, head diameter, offset, assembly force, head and stem material and loading.

The high variability of the occurrence of corrosion in the clinical application highlights its multi-factorial nature, identifying the implantation procedure and patient-related factors as important additional factors for taper corrosion.

Discontinuing the use of MoM has reduced the revisions due to metal-related pathologies dramatically from 49.7% (MoM > 32 mm), over 9.2% (MoM ⩽ 32 mm) to 0.8% (excluding all MoM).

Further reduction can be achieved by omitting less stiff Ti-alloys and large metal heads (36 mm and above) against polyethylene (PE).

Standardized taper assembly of smaller and ceramic heads will reduce the clinical occurrence of taper corrosion even further. If 36 mm heads are clinically indicated, only ceramic heads should be used.

Taper-related problems will not comprise a major clinical problem anymore if the mentioned factors are respected.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:776-784. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200013

Geometric Variations of Modular Head-Stem Taper Junctions of Total Hip Replacements

Taper degradation in Total Hip Replacements (THR) has been identified as a clinical concern, and the degradation occurring at these interfaces has received increased interest in recent years. Wear and corrosion products produced at the taper junction are associated with adverse local tissue responses, leading to early failure and revision surgery. Retrieval and in-vitro studies have found that variations in taper design affect degradation. However, there is a lack of consistent understanding within the literature of what makes a good taper interface. Previous studies assessed different design variations using their global parameters assuming a perfect cone such as: taper length, cone angle and diameters. This study assessed geometrical variations of as-manufactured head and stem tapers and any local deviations from their geometry. The purpose of this study was to provide a greater insight into possible engagement, a key performance influencing parameter predicted by Morse taper connection theory. This was achieved by taking measurements of twelve different commercially available male tapers and six female tapers using a coordinate measurement machine (CMM). The results suggested that engagement is specific to a particular head-stem couple. This is subject to both their micro-scale deviations, superimposed on their macro-scale differences. Differences in cone angles between female and male tapers from the same manufacturer was found to create a predominately proximal contact. However, distally mismatched couples are present in some metal-on-metal head-stem couples. On a local scale, different deviation patterns were observed from the geometry which appeared to be linked to the manufacturing process. Future work will look at using this measurement methodology to fully characterise an optimal modular taper junction for a THR prosthesis.

Influence of flexural rigidity on micromotion at the head-stem taper interface of modular hip prostheses

Fretting corrosion as one reason for failure of modular hip prostheses has been associated with micromotion at the head taper junction. Historically the taper diameter was reduced to improve the range of motion of the hip joint. In combination with other developments, this was accompanied by increased observations of taper fretting, possibly due to the reduced flexural rigidity of smaller tapers. The aim of the study was to investigate how the flexural rigidity of tapers influences the amount of micromotion at the head taper junction. Three different stem and two different taper designs were manufactured. Experimental testing was performed using three different activity levels with peak loads representing walking, stair climbing and stumbling. The relative motion at the head-stem taper was measured in six degrees of freedom. Micromotion was obtained by subtraction of the elastic deformation derived from monoblock and finite element analysis. Less rigid tapers lead to increased micromotion between the head and stem, enlarging the risk of fretting corrosion. The influence of the stem design on micromotion is secondary to taper design. Manufacturers should consider stiffer taper designs to reduce micromotion within the head taper junction.

The Merete BioBall system in hip revision surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Modular hip arthroplasty is widely recognized in hip surgery; nevertheless, despite advances in prosthetic design, the incidence of hip revision surgery is increasing. In these procedures, a modular adapter that engages the femoral stem and the modular femoral head could be useful in order to protect the neck-head junction and restore preoperative biomechanics and soft tissue tension when the femoral or acetabular component should be retained. The Merete™ BioBall™ system (Merete Medical, Berlin, Germany) could fill this need. However the literature regarding this device is sparse, therefore we performed a systematic review to analyze: the indications for its use and clinical results and the causes of second revision and survival in hip revision surgery, mainly focus in complications of its use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Databases including PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for English-language articles published between 01/01/1999 and 01/04/2017, using search terms related to the system Merete™ BioBall™. Studies that reported the clinical use of the Merete™ BioBall™ system in hip revision surgery were selected. Data related to the indications, characteristics of the implant, clinical results, causes of second revision and survival were gathered.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with a level IV evidence were analyzed. Information related to the implant was provided in 194 cases. Isolated acetabular revision was the main indication of implant use (139/194 [71.6%]). The most common combination used was the standard implant (69/110 specified [59.4%]), 3XL length (28/107 specified [26.2%]) with 32mm metal head (58/187 specified [31%]). After a follow-up ranging from 2 to 97 months, there were 16 complications, thirteen (81,2%) were revised, including one neck fracture of the stem (6.25%), two ceramic head fractures (12,5%) and six recurrent dislocations (37,5%). Implant survival was 92.8% at 52.5 months of follow-up in the longest published series. Clinical and functional results were provided in a heterogeneous way.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or contraindicate the use of the Merete™ BioBall™ system. The Isolated acetabular revision was the main indication of implant use. When dislocation is the indication of its use the rate of second revision is high. Some important complications possibly related with the implant design have been reported but as isolated cases. The neck adapter failure or corrosion phenomena have not been reported. Further prospective and controlled trials are needed to assess the use of this type of implant and its survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III systematic review of case series.

Evidence based recommendations for reducing head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion in hip replacement prostheses

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review seeks to summarise the published studies investigating prosthetic design, manufacture and surgical technique's effect on fretting corrosion at the head-neck taper connection, and provide clinical recommendations to reduce its occurrence.

METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases were searched using the terms taper, trunnion, cone and head-neck junction. Articles investigating prosthetic design, manufacture and surgical technique's effect on fretting corrosion were retrieved, reviewed and graded according to OCEBM levels of evidence and grades of recommendation.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1,224 unique articles, and 91 were included in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is fair evidence to recommend against the use of high offset femoral heads, larger diameter femoral heads, and to pay particular consideration to fretting corrosion's progression with time and risk with heavier or more active patients. Particular to metal-on-metal hip prostheses, there is fair evidence to recommend positioning the acetabular component to minimise edge loading. Particular to metal-on-polyethylene hip prostheses, there is fair evidence to recommend the use of ceramic femoral heads, against use of cast cobalt alloy femoral heads, and against use of low flexural rigidity femoral stems. Evidence related to taper connection design is largely conflicting or inconclusive. Head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion is a multifactorial problem. Strict adherence to the guidelines presented herein does not eliminate the risk. Prosthesis selection is critical, and well-controlled studies to identify each design parameter's relative contribution to head-neck taper connection fretting corrosion are required.

Same Same but Different? 12/14 Stem and Head Tapers in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Taper corrosion has been identified to be a major concern in total hip arthroplasty during the past years. So far, the mechanisms that lead to taper corrosion in modular taper junctions are not fully understood. However, it has been shown that corrosion is also influenced by the geometry and topography of the taper, and these parameters vary among the implant manufacturers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the variations of common stem and head tapers regarding design and surface characteristics.

METHODS

An analysis of selected commercially available 12/14 stem and head tapers was performed. As geometric parameters, the taper angle, the opening taper diameter, and the taper length were measured using a coordinate measuring machine. Several topographic parameters were determined using a tactile roughness measurement instrument.

RESULTS

Although all investigated tapers are so-called 12/14 tapers, this study showed that the stem and head tapers differ among the manufacturers. The stem tapers were clearly different in both geometry and topography, and the range in variation of the topographic parameter was greater than it was for the geometric parameter. In contrast, the head tapers were different in their geometry, although not in topography.

CONCLUSION

Ultimately, this study provides an overview on the characteristics and variations of modular hip taper connections, and in addition, a new classification system regarding the surface finish is presented. These findings could be further considered in experimental corrosion or retrieval studies.

[Spontaneous reposition of a hip prosthesis after atraumatic dislocation]

Traumatic dislocations of a hip prosthesis are not uncommon, and spontaneous repositions are well documented as well. To the best of our knowledge, however, there has been no report of a spontaneous reposition of a dislocated hip prosthesis head on the stem taper. We present such a rare case.

Corrosion of the Head-Stem Taper Junction-Are We on the Verge of an Epidemic?: Review Article

BACKGROUND

The modular head taper junction has contributed to the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA) greatly. Taper corrosion and wear problems reported for large and extra-large metal-on-metal bearings as well as for bi-modular THA stems have cast doubt on the benefit of the taper interface. Presently, corrosion problems are being reported for nearly all kinds of artificial hip joints incorporating metal heads, questioning taper connections in general.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This study aimed to review the mechanical and electrochemical relationships that may lead to taper corrosion, which have been reported more commonly in recent literature, and to also review the contribution of patient characteristics and surgical techniques involved in taper assembly that may contribute to the problem.

METHODS

The search criteria "(corrosion) AND (hip arthroplasty) AND (taper OR trunnion)" and "(hip arthroplasty) AND ((pseudotumor) OR (pseudo-tumor))" in PubMed and the JAAOS were used for the literature search. In addition, the arthroplasty registers were considered.

RESULTS

Most studies acknowledge the multifactorial nature of the problem but concentrate their analysis on taper and implant design aspects, since this is the only factor that can be easily quantified. The sometimes conflicting results in the literature could be due to the fact that the other two decisive factors are not sufficiently considered: the loading situation in the patient and the assembly situation by the surgeon. All three factors together determine the fate of a taper junction in THA. There is no single reason as a main cause for taper corrosion. The combined "outcome" of these three factors has to be in a "safe range" to achieve a successful long-term taper fixation.

CONCLUSION

No, this is not the beginning of an epidemic. It is rather the consequence of disregarding known mechanical and electrochemical relationships, which in combination have recently caused a more frequent occurrence-and mainly reporting-of corrosion issues.

Stem taper mismatch has a critical effect on ceramic head fracture risk in modular hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Modular total hip prostheses with ceramic heads are well established in orthopedic surgery and widely used. With the variety of different manufacturers and available designs, components are at risk for mismatch. Several case studies show the potentially devastating effects of mismatch.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of one arbitrary component mismatch with commercially available components that appear to provide a stable fixation during assembly. A biomechanical in-vitro analysis of fracture strength (n=5) was carried out in accordance with ISO 7206-10. "Type1" Bi-Metric®-stems were mismatched with "V40" Al₂O₃ ceramic heads.

FINDINGS

Mean fracture strength was reduced to about 50% of the recommended FDA minimum by the mismatch (Mean 23.68kN, SD 2.35kN). A small contact area between head and stem taper was identified as a potential key parameter.

INTERPRETATION

Mixing and matching components can put a patient at greater risk for ceramic head fracture and must be avoided.

Nationwide review of mixed and non-mixed components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose - Combining components from different manufacturers in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is common practice worldwide. We determined the proportion of THAs used in the Netherlands that consist of components from different manufacturers, and compared the revision rates of these mixed THAs with those of non-mixed THAs. Patients and methods - Data on primary and revision hip arthroplasty are recorded in the LROI, the nationwide population-based arthroplasty register in the Netherlands. We selected all 163,360 primary THAs that were performed in the period 2007-2014. Based on the manufacturers of the components, 4 groups were discerned: non-mixed THAs with components from the same manufacturer (n = 142,964); mixed stem-head THAs with different manufacturers for the femoral stem and head (n = 3,663); mixed head-cup THAs with different head and cup manufacturers (n = 12,960), and mixed stem-head-cup THAs with different femoral stem, head, and cup manufacturers (n = 1,773). Mixed prostheses were defined as THAs (stem, head, and cup) composed of components made by different manufacturers. Results - 11% of THAs had mixed components (n = 18,396). The 6-year revision rates were similar for mixed and non-mixed THAs: 3.4% (95% CI: 3.1w-3.7) for mixed THAs and 3.5% (95% CI: 3.4-3.7) for non-mixed THAs. Revision of primary THAs due to loosening of the acetabulum was more common in mixed THAs (16% vs. 12%). Interpretation - Over an 8-year period in the Netherlands, 11% of THAs had mixed components-with similar medium-term revision rates to those of non-mixed THAs.

Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: a study of 285 cases

Background

Adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR), characterized by a heterogeneous cellular inflammatory infiltrate and the presence of corrosion products in the periprosthetic soft tissues, has been recognized as a mechanism of failure in total hip replacement (THA). Different histological subtypes may have unique needs for longitudinal clinical follow-up and complication rates after revision arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to describe the histological patterns observed in the periprosthetic tissue of failed THA in three different implant classes due to ALTR and their association with clinical features of implant failure.

Methods

Consecutive patients presenting with ALTR from three major hip implant classes (N = 285 cases) were identified from our prospective Osteolysis Tissue Database and Repository. Clinical characteristics including age, sex, BMI, length of implantation, and serum metal ion levels were recorded. Retrieved synovial tissue morphology was graded using light microscopy. Clinical characteristics and features of synovial tissue analysis were compared between the three implant classes. Histological patterns of ALTR identified from our observations and the literature were used to classify each case. The association between implant class and histological patterns was compared.

Results

Our histological analysis demonstrates that ALTR encompasses three main histological patterns: 1) macrophage predominant, 2) mixed lymphocytic and macrophagic with or without features of associated with hypersensitivity/allergy or response to particle toxicity (eosinophils/mast cells and/or lymphocytic germinal centers), and 3) predominant sarcoid-like granulomas. Implant classification was associated with histological pattern of failure, and the macrophagic predominant pattern was more common in implants with metal-on-metal bearing surfaces (MoM HRA and MoM LHTHA groups). Duration of implantation and composition of periprosthetic cellular infiltrates was significantly different amongst the three implant types examined suggesting that histopathological features of ALTR may explain the variability of clinical implant performance in these cases.

Conclusions

ALTR encompasses a diverse range of histological patterns, which are reflective of both the implant configuration independent of manufacturer and clinical features such as duration of implantation. The macrophagic predominant pattern and its mechanism of implant failure represent an important subgroup of ALTR which could become more prominent with increased length of implantation.