Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty on dysplastic acetabuli

Acetabular Diameter Assessment and Three-Dimensional Simulation for Acetabular Reconstruction in Dysplastic Hips

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between acetabular width, three-dimensional (3D) simulation, and surgical results in total hip arthroplasty patients who have developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 216 DDH cases. Inner and outer acetabular width (OAW) was measured at the plane passing through the center of acetabular fossa. 3D simulation and 2D standard templating were performed. The actual cup size and the use of augments during surgery were recorded. Association among the indices and their distribution in different types of DDH were analyzed.

RESULTS

A difference of 13 to 14 millimeters (mm) was found between the inner acetabular width and actual cup size used in type II, III, and IV cases, while the difference was 0.2 to 3.6 mm for OAW. The accuracy of 2D templating and 3D simulation in predicting cup size was comparable in Crowe type I (86.5 versus 76%, P = .075), type II (72.7 versus 51.5%, P = .127), and type III (93.3 versus 66.7%, P = .169). The 3D simulation was significantly more accurate in Crowe type IV (89.1% versus 60.9%, P = .001). Augments and bone grafts were significantly more commonly used in type II (25%) than in the other types (0 to 6.5%).

CONCLUSION

OAW more accurately predicted actual cup size than inner acetabular width. The supero-lateral acetabular bone defects in type II cases require additional attention. Compared with 2D templating, 3D simulation is more accurate in predicting actual cup size in dysplastic hips with severe deformity and may be recommended in these selected cases, especially for Crowe IV patients.

A Novel Method for Accurate Preoperative Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Biplanar Digital Radiographic (EOS) System

Background:

Accurate preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) relies on conventional anteroposterior radiographs. The difficulty of determining the magnification factor of radiographs is a major limitation. Despite the use of markers for calibration, identifying the plane of the hip joint is a major challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel method for image calibration and preoperative planning in THA involving the use of a biplanar radiographic (EOS imaging) system and a self-designed coin device.

Methods:

Biplanar radiographs (with the self-designed coin device) and a conventional anteroposterior radiograph (with a coin) were made for 26 patients after primary THA. The agreement between the actual and calculated diameters for each method was assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman plots. In addition, 15 patients undergoing primary THA were prospectively enrolled to evaluate the EOS imaging-based method (EOS method), with biplanar radiographs made with use of the coin device. The accuracy of the preoperative predicted size of the implants was evaluated.

Results:

Both the EOS and conventional anteroposterior radiograph-based methods were reliable in repeated measurements of the diameter of the artificial femoral head in the reproducibility study, with the average CCCs for both methods >0.990. The agreement between the actual and EOS-based calculated diameters of the artificial femoral head was excellent, with a CCC of >0.990, while the agreement was poor between the actual and anteroposterior radiograph-based calculated diameters, with a CCC of <0.75. The EOS method exhibited a lower absolute difference (0.09 ± 0.07 mm) between the actual and calculated diameters compared with conventional anteroposterior radiography (1.26 ± 0.86 mm) (p < 0.001). EOS-based preoperative plans also exhibited excellent performance on the accuracy of the planning of the cups and stems; only 1 patient (6.7%) had a final implanted cup that differed by 1 size from the predicted size. Two patients (13.3%) had final implanted stems that differed by 1 size from the predicted size, and for 1 patient (6.7%), the stem size was off by ≥2 sizes.

Conclusions:

We describe a novel and easy-to-use method for the accurate calibration of radiographs and preoperative planning for THA. The EOS method evaluated in this study is an alternative method for preoperative planning in clinical practice.

Changes in acetabular component alignment due to screw fixation in patients with hip dysplasia

INTRODUCTION

Adequate initial stability of the acetabular cup is essential for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, changes in the alignment of the acetabular component caused by screw fixation are concerning in patients with inadequate bone stock. This study aimed to investigate the effects of screw fixation on the alignment of the acetabular component in THA patients with hip dysplasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 256 hips (range 28-87 years) that underwent THA using a navigation system. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of changes in the alignment of the intraoperative acetabular cup, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors that were predictive of changes in acetabular component alignment after screw fixation in 2 dimensions: inclination and anteversion.

RESULTS

Screw fixation led to a mean change in inclination of 1.6° (range 0-10°) and a mean change in anteversion of 1.4° (range 0-14°). The Crowe classification, the presence of bone cysts, and the use of an inferior quadrant screw were identified as factors that correlated with acetabular cup alignment changes in inclination (odds ratios, 6.01, 5.94 and 0.03, respectively). Only the Crowe classification was identified as a factor that correlated with intraoperative alignment changes in anteversion (odds ratio, 2.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Screw fixation altered the acetabular cup alignment. The inclination changes were related to the extent of the dysplasia, and the risk was reduced when the inferior quadrant screw was used. Surgeons should use caution during screw fixation in THAs performed on severely dysplastic hips.

Preoperative Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Neglected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is accompanied by morphological alterations on both the acetabular and the femoral side. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides effective treatment in cases of neglected DDH but requires elaborate preoperative planning. To determine the morphological changes resulting from the dysplasia, the anatomic acetabular position, the height of the femur head dislocation, the height of the femur head dislocation, and the combined anteversion must all be established. In addition, a vital and complicated process of strategizing leg length balance must be conducted in cases of severe DDH. Each type of leg length discrepancy (LLD), including bony and functional and anatomical LLD, should be evaluated in the context of the presence or absence of a fixed pelvic tilt. Moreover, with severe unilateral dislocated hips, a more inferior change in the original rotational center of the hip must be accounted for. Due to these multiple morphological changes, the accurate size of the prosthesis and the cup position are difficult to predict. In comparison with other methods, CT scan‐based 3‐dimensional templating provides the best accuracy. Despite the presence of anatomic alterations, various types of acetabular and femoral prostheses have been developed to treat hip dysplasia. Both cemented and cementless cups are used in DDH cases. In DDH accompanied by insufficient acetabular bone stock, a cemented cup combined with bone graft provides a reliable treatment. Monoblock stems can be used when the combined anteversion is less than 55°, and a modular stem system when this parameter is greater than 55°. Customized stems can be designed for DDH coupled with severe proximal femoral distortion. A ceramic‐on‐ceramic bearing is considered optimal for young DDH patients.