Short-term outcomes of open hip preservation surgery for symptomatic extraarticular femoroacetabular impingement

Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, hip arthroscopy has become more commonly used in the treatment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as well as those with many other intra-articular hip pathologies. As such, the indications for open surgical hip dislocation have narrowed to include complex intra-articular and extra-articular bony morphologies and revision hip preservation. Although surgical hip dislocation has been established as an effective approach, previous research using contemporary indications has been limited primarily to smaller cohorts with short-term follow-up. Furthermore, factors associated with reoperation, conversion arthroplasty, and not achieving clinical improvement remain ambiguous.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up in patients treated for FAI with surgical hip dislocation, (1) how much did patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) improve, and what percentage of patients achieved the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS)? (2) What was the survivorship free from reoperation of the hip for any reason? (3) What was the survivorship free from conversion to arthroplasty (THA or hip resurfacing)?

METHODS

Between February 2011 and April 2021, 211 patients were treated at one academic institution with surgical dislocation and osteoplasty of the femoral head-neck junction or greater trochanter for FAI. Of these, patients with concomitant diagnoses including Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, osteochondritis dissecans, a benign tumor, or another neurologic or metabolic disorder were excluded. This yielded 74% (156 of 211) of patients as potentially eligible. A further 12% (18 of 156) of patients without postoperative PROMs were excluded, and another 13% (21 of 156) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years, leaving 75% (117) for analysis at a median of 4.9 years (range 2 to 12 years) in this retrospective study. A total of 88% of the patients were women (103 of 117), and 40% (47 patients) underwent the procedure as a revision. All patients underwent surgical hip dislocation. Intraoperatively, 66% (77 of 117) of patients demonstrated cam impingement, and the remainder had either pincer impingement or combined cam and pincer; 82% (96 of 117) had some component of extra-articular impingement. To answer our first research question, we obtained PROM scores for the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) before surgery and at the most-recent follow-up from our longitudinally maintained institutional database, and we determined the percentage of patients who achieved the MCID or PASS. To answer our second research question, we calculated Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from any reoperation on the hip at 5.8 years (mean follow-up) after the index procedure. To answer our third research question, we calculated the Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from conversion to arthroplasty at 5.8 years. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, factors associated with meeting these defined endpoints were identified.

RESULTS

At a mean of 6 ± 3 years, the mHHS of patients treated with surgical hip dislocation for FAI who had not had previous surgery on the hip improved from 53 ± 15 to 85 ± 13 (mean difference 31 [95% confidence interval 27 to 36]; p < 0.01) and the mean iHOT-12 score improved from 25 ± 14 to 74 ± 24 (mean difference 49 [95% CI 42 to 56]; p < 0.01). At a mean of 5 ± 3 years, for patients with prior hip surgery, mHHS improved from 55 ± 13 to 79 ± 15 (mean difference 24 [95% CI 18 to 30]; p < 0.01) and iHOT-12 scores improved from 25 ± 16 to 66 ± 26 (mean difference 41 [95% CI 31 to 50]; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID for the mHHS was 87% (55 of 63) and 83% (33 of 40), while the proportion who achieved the PASS for the mHHS was 66% (46 of 70) and 51% (24 of 47) for primary and revision surgery, respectively. The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID for the iHOT-12 was 87% (53 of 61) and 83% (33 of 40), while the proportion who achieved the PASS for iHOT-12 was 68% (47 of 69) and 57% (26 of 46) for primary and revision surgery, respectively. Higher lateral center-edge angles (odds ratio 1.2 per 1° [95% CI 1.1 to 1.3]; p < 0.01), a lower acetabular version at 2:00 (OR 0.92 per 1° [95% CI 0.85 to 0.99]; p = 0.05), the absence of a labral tear (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.79]; p = 0.02), a higher preoperative mHHS (OR 1.1 per 1 point [95% CI 1.02 to 1.2]; p < 0.01), and a higher preoperative iHOT-12 score (OR 1.1 per 1 point [95% CI 1.01 to 1.1]; p = 0.01) were associated with not achieving the MCID. In patients without a history of ipsilateral hip surgery, survivorship free from reoperation at 5.8 years after surgical hip dislocation was 90% (95% CI 82% to 98%). In the setting of prior ipsilateral hip surgery, survivorship free from reoperation at 5.8 years after surgical hip dislocation was 75% (95% CI 60% to 95%). No patients for whom surgical hip dislocation was their primary hip procedure underwent conversion to arthroplasty. Among the revision patient cohort, survivorship free from conversion to arthroplasty at 5.8 years after surgical hip dislocation was 97% (95% CI 91% to 100%).

CONCLUSION

Surgical hip dislocation effectively improves hip pain and function with high survivorship (free of reoperation or conversion to arthroplasty) for complex intra-articular and extra-articular FAI that is deemed less suitable for arthroscopic treatment, but when the procedure is used in patients who have had prior hip surgery, they should be told that revision surgery is a realistic possibility. If insufficient acetabular coverage is anticipated, acetabular reorientation osteotomy should be considered. Future studies should evaluate long-term survivorship and PROMs in larger patient cohorts, as well as identify other factors associated with reoperation and conversion to arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Posterior Extra-articular Ischiofemoral Impingement Can Be Caused by the Lesser and Greater Trochanter in Patients With Increased Femoral Version: Dynamic 3D CT-Based Hip Impingement Simulation of a Modified FABER Test

Background:

Posterior extra-articular hip impingement has been described for valgus hips with increased femoral version (FV). These patients can present clinically with lack of external rotation (ER) and extension and with a positive posterior impingement test. But we do not know the effect of the combination of deformities, and the impingement location in early flexion is unknown.

Purpose:

To evaluate patient-specific 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scans of hips with increased FV and control hips for differences in range of motion, location and prevalence of osseous posterior intra- and extra-articular hip impingement.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Osseous 3D models based on segmentation of 3D CT scans were analyzed for 52 hips (38 symptomatic patients) with positive posterior impingement test and increased FV (>35°). There were 26 hips with an increased McKibbin instability index >70 (unstable hips). Patients were mainly female (96%), with an age range of 18 to 45 years. Of them, 21 hips had isolated increased FV (>35°); 22 hips had increased FV and increased acetabular version (AV; >25°); and 9 valgus hips (caput-collum-diaphyseal angle >139°) had increased FV and increased AV. The control group consisted of 20 hips with normal FV, normal AV, and no valgus (caput-collum-diaphyseal angle <139°). Validated 3D CT–based collision detection software for impingement simulation was used to calculate impingement-free range of motion and location of hip impingement. Surgical treatment was performed after the 3D CT–based impingement simulation in 27 hips (52%).

Results:

Hips with increased FV had significantly (P < .001) decreased extension and ER at 90° of flexion as compared with the control group. Posterior impingement was extra-articular (92%) in hips with increased FV. Valgus hips with increased FV and AV had combined intra- and extra-articular impingement. Posterior hip impingement occurred between the ischium and the lesser trochanter at 20° of extension and 20° of ER. Impingement was located between the ischium and the greater trochanter or intertrochanteric area at 20° of flexion and 40° of ER, with a modification of the flexion-abduction-ER (FABER) test.

Conclusion:

Posterior extra-articular ischiofemoral hip impingement can be caused by the lesser and greater trochanter or the intertrochanteric region. We recommend performing the modified FABER test during clinical examination in addition to the posterior impingement test for female patients with high FV. In addition, 3D CT can help for surgical planning, such as femoral derotation osteotomy and/or hip arthroscopy or resection of the lesser trochanter.

Extra-articular hip impingement: clinical presentation, radiographic findings and surgical treatment outcomes

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is classically thought of as either a cam or pincer deformity causing abnormal bony contact resulting in labral pathology. However, alternate patterns of hip impingement can occur, but tend to be less commonly recognized or studied. Collectively termed 'extra-articular impingement', four subgroups of impingement can contribute to non-arthritic hip pain and disability: iliopsoas impingement, subspine impingement, ischiofemoral impingement and trochanteric-pelvic impingement. The purpose of this review article is to highlight the pertinent points to aid in proper clinical and radiographic evaluation to allow appropriate diagnosis. Additionally, a review of potential surgical treatment options and resultant outcomes will also be provided.