A comparison of the Niagara™ and Dolphin® catheters for continuous renal replacement therapy

The Association Between Catheter Type and Dialysis Treatment: A Retrospective Data Analysis at Two U.S.-Based ICUs

Dialysis catheter type may be associated with differences in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) treatment in the critically ill, with potential implications for patient outcomes and healthcare costs.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between the catheter type and multiple dialysis treatment outcomes among the critically ill.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Two U.S.-based ICUs.

PARTICIPANTS

Critically ill patients receiving CRRT between April 1, 2018, and July 1, 2020. A total of 1,037 CRRT sessions were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Circuit life, alarm interruption frequency (including a subset of vascular access [VA]-related alarms), termination type (elective vs nonelective), and blood flow rates. Pre- (n = 530) and post-catheter change (n = 507) periods were assessed, and the post-change period was further divided into intervals of pre-COVID (n = 167) and COVID contemporaneous (n = 340) to account for the pandemic's impact.

RESULTS

Compared with pre-change sessions, post-change sessions had 31% longer circuit life (95% CI, 1.14-1.49; p < 0.001), 3% higher blood flow rate (1.01-1.05; p < 0.01), and lower proportion of nonelective terminations (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42 [0.28-0.62]; p < 0.001). There were fewer interruptions for all alarms (adjusted count ratio, 0.95 [0.87-1.05]; p = 0.31) and VA-related alarms (0.80 [0.66-0.96]; p = 0.014). The sessions during COVID period were statistically similar to pre-COVID sessions for all outcomes except a lower proportion of nonelective terminations (adjusted OR, 0.39 [0.22-0.70]; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A change in catheter type was associated with longer CRRT sessions with fewer interruptions and unexpected terminations in a population of critical patients.

Low Blood Flow Continuous Veno-Venous Haemodialysis Compared with Higher Blood Flow Continuous Veno-Venous Haemodiafiltration: Effect on Alarm Rates, Filter Life, and Azotaemic Control

TITLE

Low blood flow continuous veno-venous haemodialysis (CVVHD) compared with higher blood flow continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF): effect on alarm rates, filter life, and azotaemic control.

INTRODUCTION

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can be delivered via convective, diffusive, or mixed approaches. Higher blood flows have been advocated for convective clearance efficiency and promotion of filter life. It is unclear whether a lower blood flow predominantly diffusive approach may benefit filter life and alarm rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sequential cohort study of 284 patients undergoing 874 CRRT circuits from January 2015 to August 2018 in a single university-associated tertiary referral hospital in Australia. Patients underwent a protocol of either CVVHDF at blood flow 200-250 mL/min or CVVHD at blood flow 100-130 mL/min. Machine and patient data were analysed. Outcomes of azotaemic control, filter life, and warning alarm rates were log transformed and analysed with mixed linear modelling with patient as a random effect.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar azotaemic control (effect estimate on log creatinine CVVHD vs. CVVHDF 1.04 [0.87-1.25], p = 0.68) and median filter life (CVVHDF 16.8 [8.4-90.5] h and CVVHD 16.4 [9.4-82.3] h, p = 0.97). However, circuit pressures were less extreme with a narrower distribution during CVVHD. Multivariate analysis showed CVVHD had a reduced risk of warning alarms (incidence risk ratio [IRR] 0.51 [0.38-0.70]) and femoral access placement also had a reduced risk of alarms (IRR 0.55 [0.41-0.73]).

CONCLUSION

Low blood flow CVVHD and femoral vascular access reduce alarms while maintaining azotaemic control and circuit patency thus minimizing bedside clinician workload.

Circuit Hemodynamics and Circuit Failure During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

OBJECTIVES

To study hemodynamic changes within continuous renal replacement therapy circuits and evaluate their relationship with continuous renal replacement therapy longevity.

DESIGN

Analysis of downloaded variables recorded by continuous renal replacement therapy machines during multiple episodes of clinical care.

SETTING

Tertiary ICU in Melbourne, Australia.

PATIENTS

Cohort of 149 ICU patients: 428 episodes of continuous renal replacement therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Indices of continuous renal replacement therapy function representing 554,991 minutes were assessed including blood flow, access pressure, effluent pressure, prefilter pressure, and return pressure. We defined three patterns of artificial kidney failure: early (≤ 12 hr), intermediate (> 12-24 hr), and late (> 24 hr) in 35%, 31%, and 34% of circuits, respectively. Mean access pressure in late artificial kidney failure was 7.5 mm Hg (7.1-7.9 mm Hg) less negative than early failing circuits and pressures demonstrated lower variability in such late failing circuits. Access dysfunction, defined as access pressure less than or equal to -200 mm Hg occurred in the first 4 hours in 118 circuits (27%) which had a shorter (median [interquartile range]) life at 12.9 hr [5.5-21.3 hr]) hours than access dysfunction-free circuits (18.8 hr [10.1-33.4 hr]; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis found the first occurrence of access dysfunction (as a time-varying covariate) was independently associated with increased hazard of subsequent failure (hazard ratio, 1.75; 1.36-2.26). Classification and regression tree analysis of summary pressure indices in the first 2 hours confirmed minimum access pressure to be a significant predictor, as well as indices of transmembrane pressure and return pressure. A pressure-based predictor correctly identified early and late failing circuits (86.2% and 93.6% specificity, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Access dysfunction is a predictor of continuous renal replacement therapy circuit failure. Future monitoring of continuous renal replacement therapy hemodynamics may facilitate remedial actions to improve circuit function.

Non anti-coagulant factors associated with filter life in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT): a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Optimising filter life and performance efficiency in continuous renal replacement therapy has been a focus of considerable recent research. Larger high quality studies have predominantly focussed on optimal anticoagulation however CRRT is complex and filter life is also affected by vascular access, circuit and management factors. We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify and quantify the effect of vascular access, circuit and patient factors that affect filter life and presented the results as a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching Pubmed (MEDLINE) and Ovid EMBASE libraries from inception to 29th February 2016 for all studies with a comparator or independent variable relating to CRRT circuits and reporting filter life. Included studies documented filter life in hours with a comparator other than anti-coagulation intervention. All studies comparing anticoagulation interventions were searched for regression or hazard models pertaining to other sources of variation in filter life.

RESULTS

Eight hundred nineteen abstracts were identified of which 364 were selected for full text analysis. 24 presented data on patient modifiers of circuit life, 14 on vascular access modifiers and 34 on circuit related factors. Risk of bias was high and findings are hypothesis generating. Ranking of vascular access site by filter longevity favours: tunnelled semi-permanent catheters, femoral, internal jugular and subclavian last. There is inconsistency in the difference reported between femoral and jugular catheters. Amongst published literature, modality of CRRT consistently favoured continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHD-F) with an associated 44% lower failure rate compared to CVVH. There was a trend favouring higher blood flow rates. There is insufficient data to determine advantages of haemofilter membranes. Patient factors associated with a statistically significant worsening of filter life included mechanical ventilation, elevated SOFA or LOD score, elevations in ionized calcium, elevated platelet count, red cell transfusion, platelet factor 4 (PF-4) antibodies, and elevated fibrinogen. Majority of studies are observational or report circuit factors in sub-analysis. Risk of bias is high and findings require targeted investigations to confirm.

CONCLUSION

The interaction of patient, pathology, anticoagulation, vascular access, circuit and staff factors contribute to CRRT filter life. There remains an ambiguity from published data as to which site and side should be the first choice for vascular access placement and what interaction this has with patient factors and timing. Early consideration of tunnelled semi-permanent access may provide optimal filter life if longer periods of CRRT are anticipated. There remains an absence of robust evidence outside of anti-coagulation strategies despite over 20 years of therapy delivery however trends favour CVVHD-F over CVVH.