An Exploratory Study of Sleep Quality, Daytime Function, and Quality of Life in Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support

Nighttime sleep and daytime sleepiness patterns among left ventricular assist device patients

Despite the high prevalence of sleep disturbance in the heart failure population, information about its consequence on daytime function in patients with left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is limited. This study examined the nighttime and daytime sleep patterns and changes from pre-implant to 6 months post-implant. This study included 32 LVAD patients. Demographics, nighttime and daytime sleep variables were collected pre-implant and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-implant. Wrist actigraphy and self-report questionnaires measured objective and subjective sleep, respectively. Objective nighttime sleep data were sleep efficiency (SE), sleep latency (SL), total sleep time (TST), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep fragmentation (SF). Objective daytime sleep data were nap times. Self-reported Subjective Sleep Quality Scale (SSQS) and Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) were subjective measures. Increased SF and WASO scores and decreased TST and SE scores were found pre-LVAD implant, indicative of poor sleep quality. TST, SE, naptime and SSQS scores were higher at 3 and 6 months post-implant compared to baseline. Decreases in TST and SF scores were observed at 3 and 6 months post-implant along with increases in SSS scores. Increasing SSS scores and decreasing overall scores from pre- and up to 6 months post-implant suggest improvement in daytime function. This study provides information on sleep-daytime function in the LVAD patient population. Improvements in daytime sleepiness do not imply "good" sleep quality, consistent with the extant knowledge in LVAD literature. Future investigations should elucidate the mechanism by which sleep-daytime function influences quality of life.

It's not only the pump: Assessment of human factors of wearable components and user experience of patients with left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Despite design improvements in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) over the past decade, limitations of external, wearable VAD components affect patient quality of life and safety. The aim of this study was to describe both user experience and human factor issues of 2 contemporary LVADs.

METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional study included LVAD outpatients who were at least 3 months after implantation. Before developing the 16-item survey, a systematic literature review and 2-round Delphi method involving 9 VAD clinicians were used to select items in 6 domains: power supply, emergency situations, wearability, mobility, and freedom to travel, user modifications, lifestyle, and home adaptations.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (61.6 ± 11.6 years, 13.8% female, HeartMate 3 (HM3)/HVAD: n = 39/19) completed the one-time survey after median of 853 days on device: 10.3% reported problems changing power supply, 12.7% unintentional driveline disconnection (HM3: 5.6% vs HVAD: 26.3%, p = 0.041). Against the recommendation 74.1% sleep with battery-support (HM3: 88.9% vs HVAD: 44.4%, p = 0.001). About 65.3% criticized the carry bag weight/size (HM3: 71.4% vs HVAD: 50.0%, p = 0.035), thus 24.1% wear an own carrying-system, 42.1% modified their wearables, 38.9% their clothing, and 65.3% their home to cope with life on LVAD support. Mobility is reduced due to limited wearability: 18.9% went abroad (only 3.7% by plane) and 40.0% use less public transport than before implantation (the older the less: r = -0.37, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

HVAD and HM3 wearables still show a variety of human factors issues and potential for improved user experience. User-centered design and incorporation of patient feedback may increase user satisfaction, and patient safety.

Sleeping prone with a left ventricular assist device: Dream or reality?

BACKGROUND

Among many other factors, restrictions on sleeping positions decrease quality of life after durable left ventricular assist device implantation. Specifically, device manufacturers and clinicians typically advise against sleeping in the prone position owing to concerns for driveline disruption, exit site infection, and hemodynamic compromise. Yet, no data exist to inform these recommendations and to the best of our knowledge no studies have examined sleep position in people with left ventricular assist devices. We report the first case of a person with a left ventricular assist device who slept prone, every night, for over one year.

CASE

This is a 38-year-old man with a HeartWare™ left ventricular assist device who had previously not disclosed that he was sleeping in the prone position for the 16 months following device implantation. The patient did not suffer any episodes of device-related malfunction, infection, neurologic insult, or hemodynamic compromise. We performed a non-invasive assessment in both supine and prone positions to better understand the hemodynamic effects of the prone position.

CONCLUSION

In select recipients of left ventricular assist devices, sleeping in the prone position may be safely tolerated.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.

Sleep disturbance in heart failure: A concept analysis

AIM

This concept analysis aims to analyze the concept of sleep disturbance (SD) in the context of heart failure (HF) to guide the development of a clearly defined definition.

BACKGROUND

The term "sleep disturbance" has been used in the literature to describe sleep problems and sleep disorders among individuals with HF. Environmental, physical, psychological, behavioral, and developmental factors complicate the phenomenon of SD in HF.

DESIGN

Walker and Avant's method was used for this concept analysis.

DATA SOURCE

Published literature from 2000 to 2020 was identified from electronic health profession-related databases. The current definition and usages of SD were abstracted from empirical work and electronic databases.

REVIEW METHODS

A focused review of abstracts and full text relating to SD in HF was performed. Studies featuring original data and peer-reviewed articles written in English were included to investigate the multifactorial contextual meaning of the concept.

RESULTS

SD in HF can be described as a condition in which individuals experience difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep, and difficulty continuing or resuming sleep due to frequent nocturnal arousals due to HF symptoms, sleep-disordered breathing, insomnia, and psychological burdens.

CONCLUSIONS

To evaluate SD in HF, clinicians must examine the underlying causes to provide the contextual meaning of the concept. A clearly defined and distinguishable concept of SD in HF provides a possibility for accurate measurements of sleep quality, exploring interventions, and evaluating outcomes.

Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Depression and anxiety disorders are prevalent in patients with heart failure. They are associated with adverse effects such as rapid disease progression, poor medication compliance, low quality of life and increased mortality rate. The current literature review aims to provide an overview of the overall rate of depression in patients who receive left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and identify the psychological phases that these individuals experienced peri- and post-LVAD implantation. A PubMed search using regular and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) keywords identified 239 articles. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, removal of duplicate studies, and careful review of articles, 40 studies provided relevant information on our primary end-point. These 40 studies selected include 13 paid articles with abstracts and 27 free full-text articles comprising eight prospective cohort studies, five retrospective cohort studies, six cross-sectional studies, one qualitative study, one randomized clinical trial, one systematic review, four literature reviews, and one practice guide. Our review shows that patients experienced different psychological phases after LVAD implantation. However, as the time from implantation progressed, these patients showed a significant improvement in depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life.

A longitudinal comparison of health-related quality of life in rural and urban recipients of left ventricular assist devices

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a common treatment for advanced heart failure (HF) to improve ventricular function, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Many LVAD recipients travel long distances from rural areas for LVAD implantation and follow-up care. Individuals with HF in rural settings who have not undergone LVAD implantation have reported poor HRQOL. However, to date, no studies have compared HF-specific or generic HRQOL in rural and urban LVAD recipients. The purpose of this study was to compare generic and HF-specific HRQOL longitudinally from preimplantation to 1-, 3-, and 6- months postimplant in a cohort of rural and urban LVAD recipients (n = 95; rural n = 32 and urban n = 63). We measured generic HRQOL using the European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale and HF-specific HRQOL with the quality of life domain of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Latent growth curve modeling identified two phases of change in generic and HF-specific HRQOL: the initial response to LVAD between preimplantation and 1-month postimplant and the subsequent change between 1- and 6-months postimplant. Comparable improvements in generic HRQOL were noted in rural and urban LVAD recipients during both phases of change. Urban LVAD recipients had greater initial improvements in HF-specific HRQOL (KCCQ) compared with rural recipients (13.0 ± 5.6, p = .02), but subsequent improvements were similar among rural and urban recipients. Ongoing assessment of generic and HF-specific HRQOL is necessary during LVAD therapy.

Association between sleep quality and domains of quality of life amongst patients with first episode psychosis

Background

There is a lack of studies exploring associations between sleep and quality of life (QOL) among patients with schizophrenia who have limited exposure to antipsychotics and are in the early stage of their illness. Our study investigates the association of poor sleep quality and its components with domains of QOL amongst patients with first episode psychosis (FEP).

Methods

Data was utilized from a longitudinal study that examined sleep, smoking and alcohol use amongst patients with FEP who were enrolled in the Early Psychosis Intervention Programme (EPIP). The data were collected during the patients’ baseline visit; i.e., within 3 months of admission into the EPIP. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) was employed to examine sleep quality and its 7 components over the last month. The WHO quality of life-BREF was used to examine QOL and its 4 domains: physical health, psychological, social relationship, and environment. Clinical data such as Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores were obtained from a clinical data base. Linear regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association between poor sleep quality and the domains of QOL.

Results

Amongst the 280 recruited patients, 62.9% suffered from poor sleep quality. Poor sleep quality was associated with significantly lower scores in all domains of QOL, despite controlling for socio-demographics and clinical variables. Respondents with higher scores in subjective sleep quality and daytime dysfunction were associated with lower scores in the physical health and social relationship domain. Furthermore, respondents with higher scores in subjective sleep quality, sleep latency and daytime dysfunction were associated with lower scores in the psychological domain of QOL. Finally, respondents with higher scores in subjective sleep quality were associated with lower scores in the environment domain of QOL.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the importance of monitoring sleep quality amongst patients with FEP to improve their QOL. Clinical programmes should also pay more attention to sleep components in order to maintain satisfactory QOL amongst patients with FEP. Future interventions should focus on improving the relevant sleep components to ensure better treatment outcomes.

Unforeseen challenges of living with an LVAD

BACKGROUND

The implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is being used more commonly, and is associated with improved outcomes physically but can be related to psychological distress.

KEY POINTS

A 28-year-old male of Asian ethnicity who received LVAD implantation for advanced heart failure. Incidents are described wherein the external battery pack for his LVAD was misidentified as an explosive device, and he a security threat. These impacted on the patient's psychological wellbeing. These difficulties were ameliorated after successful heart transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar incidents could occur, as rates of hate crimes and support for racial profiling increase. Thus, this report calls for greater recognition of the challenge of living with the LVAD by clinicians, leading to better patient education and increased access to psychological therapy. There is also an avenue for national bodies to develop greater awareness of LVAD and improve access to psychological support.

DISPOSITIVOS DE ASSISTÊNCIA VENTRICULAR E CUIDADOS DE ENFERMAGEM

RESUMO Objetivo: descrever o funcionamento, os benefícios e as complicações associadas ao uso de dispositivos de assistência ventricular e identificar as intervenções realizadas por enfermeiros no cuidado ao paciente com este dispositivo, de acordo com as evidências. Método: revisão integrativa, com artigos coletados em bases de dados da saúde, em fevereiro de 2015. Os descritores utilizados foram heart diseases, heart-assist devices e nursing. Identificaram-se 34 artigos, os quais foram submetidos à análise temática. Resultados: os dispositivos de assistência ventricular funcionam como bombas mecânicas promotoras de débito cardíaco adequado. Seu principal benefício é a estabilização hemodinâmica. A complicação mais comum é a infecção. Educação em saúde, suporte emocional, cuidados com sítio de saída e realização de curativo são os principais cuidados realizados por enfermeiros. Conclusão: as evidências comprovam a melhoria da sobrevida de pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca grave com o uso dos dispositivos de assistência ventricular, reiterando a importância da ampliação dessa tecnologia no Brasil como possibilidade de tratamento.

The Experience of Family Caregivers of Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Objective:

The purpose of this review is to understand the experience of caregivers of patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and to evaluate how health professionals can support them properly.

Background:

Left ventricular assist device can improve quality of life, enhance functional status, and prolong survival in patients with advanced heart failure. Nonetheless, LVAD can adversely influence quality of life for their family caregivers.

Methods:

An integrative literature review was conducted using scientific databases between January to March 2015.

Results:

A total of 15 studies are included in the final review. Three major themes emerged “emotional distress,” “responsibility,” and “coping strategies” that characterize family caregivers’ experiences with care of patients with LVAD.

Conclusion:

Health care providers should understand the pivotal role of caregivers in promoting and maintaining patients’ well-being and be able to help the caregiver to moderate the impact being overloaded. Research should be addressed to create interventions that motivate the caregivers to engage in activities that promote their health.

Predictors of changes in health status between and within patients 12 months post left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Improving patient-reported outcomes (e.g. health status) has become an important goal in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, in addition to reducing mortality and morbidity. We examined predictors of changes in health status scores between and within patients 12 months post LVAD implantation.

METHODS

Health status [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ); Short-Form 12 (SF-12)] were assessed at 3-4 weeks after implantation, and at 3, 6 and 12 months follow up in 54 LVAD patients (74% men; mean age 54 ± 9 years).

RESULTS

Patients experienced significant improvements in health status between baseline and 3 months follow-up as assessed by the KCCQ (clinical summary score: F = 33.49, P < 0.001; overall summary score: F = 31.13, P < 0.001) and the SF-12 (physical component score: F = 31.59, P < 0.001; mental component score: F = 21.77, P < 0.001), but not between 3 months and 12 months follow-up (P > 0.05 for all). Higher scores on anxiety and depression over time, older age, lower ejection fraction, and more co-morbidity were associated with poorer health status scores on one or both of the KCCQ and SF-12 subscales. The majority of the between-patient variance of the mental component summary scores (82.6%), but not the KCCQ overall summary score (41.9%), KCCQ clinical summary score (36.2%) and physical component summary scores (23.2%), was explained by the sociodemographic, clinical and psychological factors.

CONCLUSION

The majority of LVAD patients show a significant improvement in health status after LVAD implantation. However, there are large differences in individual health status score trajectories which are only partly explained by measures of disease severity pre-LVAD, co-morbidity and psychological stress.

Psychological distress in patients with a left ventricular assist device and their partners: an exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure, and may have a significant psychological impact on both patients and their partners. Hence, we examined the distress levels of LVAD patients and their partners.

METHODS

Anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were assessed at 3-4 weeks after implantation, and at 3 and 6 months follow-up in 33 LVAD patients (73% men; mean age=54±10 years) and 33 partners (27% men; mean age=54±11 years).

RESULTS

The prevalence of anxiety in LVAD partners was significantly higher compared to LVAD patients at baseline (48% vs. 23%, p=0.03) and 3 months follow-up (44% vs. 15%, p=0.02), but not at 6 months follow-up (p=0.43). No differences were found for depression and PTSD (ps>0.05). Scores between the LVAD patients and partners showed only a significant correlation at baseline between the anxiety, depression and PTSD score of the patient and the depression score of the partner (r anx=0.40, p=0.04; rdep=.40, p=0.04; r PSTD=0.46, p=0.05). Multivariable analyses showed no significant association between the role (patient vs. partner) and anxiety, depression and PTSD over time after correction for age, gender and clinical covariates. However, after correction for Type D personality and the use of psychotropic medication the LVAD partners showed significantly higher anxiety (F=6.95, p=0.01) and depression (F=3.94, p=0.04) scores over time compared to LVAD patients.

CONCLUSION

LVAD partners had significantly higher levels of anxiety than LVAD patients. Emotional distress of LVAD partners should gain more attention, as partners are an essential source of support for LVAD patients.