1
|
Caro Martínez A, González Vera MDLÁ, Prieto Velasco M, Olry de Labry Lima A. Evidence on outsourcing dialysis services: a scoping review. Nefrologia 2022; 42:621-632. [PMID: 36914543 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic kidney disease represents an important health problem, due to its high incidence and prevalence, as well as its significant morbidity and mortality and socioeconomic cost. AIMS compare the effectiveness and economic consequences of outsourcing versus hospital dialysis. METHOD A scoping review, for which different databases were consulted, using controlled and free terms. Those articles that compared concerted versus in hospital dialysis in terms of effectiveness were included. Likewise, those publications that compared, in the Spanish field, the cost between both modes of service provision and the public price rates of the different Autonomous Communities were included. RESULTS 11 articles were included in this review: 8 on comparison of effectiveness, all of them in the USA, and 3 on costs. A higher rate of hospitalization was observed in subsidized centers, but no differences in mortality were observed. Additionally, greater competition among providers was associated with lower hospitalization rates. The cost studies reviewed show that hospital hemodialysis is more expensive than in subsidized centers, due to the structural costs. The data of the public rates of the different Autonomous Communities show a wide heterogeneity in the payment of the concerts. CONCLUSIONS the coexistence in Spain of public and subsidized centers, the variability in the provision and costs of dialysis techniques, and the low of evidence on the effectiveness of outsourcing treatment show all the need to continue promoting strategies that result in improvement in the care for Chronic Kidney Disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Araceli Caro Martínez
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain; Programa de Doctorado Interuniversitario en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Jaén-Universidad de Sevilla (UJA-US), Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | - Antonio Olry de Labry Lima
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, ibs, Granada, Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain; CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caro Martínez A, González Vera MDLÁ, Prieto Velasco M, Olry de Labry Lima A. Evidencia sobre la externalización de los servicios de diálisis: Una revisión de alcance. Nefrologia 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
3
|
Heaf J, Heiro M, Petersons A, Vernere B, Povlsen JV, Sørensen AB, Clyne N, Bumblyte I, Zilinskiene A, Randers E, Løkkegaard N, Ots-Rosenberg M, Kjellevold S, Kampmann JD, Rogland B, Lagreid I, Heimburger O, Lindholm B. Choice of dialysis modality among patients initiating dialysis: results of the Peridialysis study. Clin Kidney J 2021; 14:2064-2074. [PMID: 34476093 PMCID: PMC8406075 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), home dialysis offers socio-economic and health benefits compared with in-centre dialysis but is generally underutilized. We hypothesized that the pre-dialysis course and institutional factors affect the choice of dialysis modality after dialysis initiation (DI). Methods The Peridialysis study is a multinational, multicentre prospective observational study assessing the causes and timing of DI and consequences of suboptimal DI. Clinical and biochemical data, details of the pre-dialytic course, reasons for DI and causes of the choice of dialysis modality were registered. Results Among 1587 included patients, 516 (32.5%) were judged unsuitable for home dialysis due to contraindications [384 ( 24.2%)] or no assessment [106 (6.7%); mainly due to late referral and/or suboptimal DI] or death [26 (1.6%)]. Older age, comorbidity, late referral, suboptimal DI, acute illness and rapid loss of renal function associated with unsuitability. Of the remaining 1071 patients, 700 (65.4%) chose peritoneal dialysis (61.7%) or home haemodialysis (HD; 3.6%), while 371 (34.6%) chose in-centre HD. Somatic differences between patients choosing home dialysis and in-centre dialysis were minor; factors linked to the choice of in-centre dialysis were late referral, suboptimal DI, acute illness and absence of a ‘home dialysis first’ institutional policy. Conclusions Given a personal choice with shared decision making, 65.4% of ESKD patients choose home dialysis. Our data indicate that the incidence of home dialysis potentially could be further increased to reduce the incidence of late referral and unplanned DI and, in acutely ill patients, by implementing an educational programme after improvement of their clinical condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Heaf
- Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Nephrology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maija Heiro
- Department of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Aivars Petersons
- Latvia Nephrology Department, P. Stradins University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Baiba Vernere
- Latvia Nephrology Department, P. Stradins University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
| | - Johan V Povlsen
- Department of Nephrology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Naomi Clyne
- Department of Nephrology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Inge Bumblyte
- Nephrological Clinic, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Alanta Zilinskiene
- Nephrological Clinic, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Else Randers
- Department of Medicine, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | | | - Mai Ots-Rosenberg
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | | | - Björn Rogland
- Department of Medicine, Kristianstad Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Inger Lagreid
- Department of Medicine, St Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Olof Heimburger
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Lindholm
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gao Y, Shan Y, Jiang T, Cai L, Zhang F, Jiang X, Li X, Wang H. Dietary Adherence, Self-Regulatory Fatigue and Trait Self-Control Among Chinese Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:443-451. [PMID: 33658768 PMCID: PMC7920602 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s298231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about factors that predict dietary adherence among Chinese patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. We investigated whether self-regulatory fatigue and trait self-control influence dietary adherence among Chinese patients with peritoneal dialysis. METHODS A total of 192 Chinese patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis were recruited at two peritoneal dialysis centers. The dietary adherence, trait self-control and self-regulatory fatigue of these patients were assessed using self-administered questionnaires. Clinical data were extracted from the hospital medical records. The significance of several social demographic factors on dietary adherence was analyzed using One-way ANOVA was used to analyze, whereas the association between dietary adherence and self-regulatory fatigue as well as trait self-control were analyzed using Pearson correlation. The independence association between dietary adherence and other influencing factors was assessed using Multivariable linear regression analyses. RESULTS We found that peritoneal dialysis patients only moderately adhere to dietary prescriptions. The top three least adherences were observed for salt intake (1.89±0.36), face of difficulty (2.86±0.26) and fluid restriction adherence intake (2.97±0.30). Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that education level (β=0.339, P<0.001), residence (β=-0.151, P=0.015), self-regulatory fatigue (β= -0.648, P<0.001), and trait self-control (β=0.118, P=0.022) were independent predictors of dietary adherence. CONCLUSION Education level and residence strongly influence dietary adherence among Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients. On the other hand, Self-regulatory fatigue and trait self-control are independent predictors of dietary adherence among peritoneal dialysis patients. These findings can guide the enhancement of dietary adherence of peritoneal dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Gao
- Nursing and Health School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Shan
- Medical School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Yan Shan Email
| | - Tingting Jiang
- Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Cai
- Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shangai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fanliang Zhang
- Zhengzhou University First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xinxin Jiang
- Nursing and Health School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xue Li
- Nursing and Health School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hong Wang
- Nursing and Health School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Breuer C, Jadeau C, Testa A, Brunori G. Dialysis Reimbursement: What Impact Do Different Models Have on Clinical Choices? J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8020276. [PMID: 30823518 PMCID: PMC6406585 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Allowing patients to live for decades without the function of a vital organ is a medical miracle, but one that is not without cost both in terms of morbidity and quality of life and in economic terms. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) consumes between 2% and 5% of the overall health care expenditure in countries where dialysis is available without restrictions. While transplantation is the preferred treatment in patients without contraindications, old age and comorbidity limit its indications, and low organ availability may result in long waiting times. As a consequence, 30–70% of the patients depend on dialysis, which remains the main determinant of the cost of RRT. Costs of dialysis are differently defined, and its reimbursement follows different rules. There are three main ways of establishing dialysis reimbursement. The first involves dividing dialysis into a series of elements and reimbursing each one separately (dialysis itself, medications, drugs, transportation, hospitalisation, etc.). The second, known as the capitation system, consists of merging these elements in a per capita reimbursement, while the third, usually called the bundle system, entails identifying a core of procedures intrinsically linked to treatment (e.g., dialysis sessions, tests, intradialyitc drugs). Each one has advantages and drawbacks, and impacts differently on the organization and delivery of care: payment per session may favour fragmentation and make a global appraisal difficult; a correct capitation system needs a careful correction for comorbidity, and may exacerbate competition between public and private settings, the latter aiming at selecting the least complex cases; a bundle system, in which the main elements linked to the dialysis sessions are considered together, may be a good compromise but risks penalising complex patients, and requires a rapid adaptation to treatment changes. Retarding dialysis is a clinical and economical goal, but the incentives for predialysis care are not established and its development may be unfavourable for the provider. A closer cooperation between policymakers, economists and nephrologists is needed to ensure a high quality of dialysis care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino Italy, 10100 Torino, Italy.
- Nephrologie, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | | | - Conrad Breuer
- Direction, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | - Christelle Jadeau
- Centre de Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, 72000 Le Mans, France.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marshall MR, Hsiao CY, Li PK, Nakayama M, Rabindranath S, Walker RC, Yu X, Palmer SC. Association of incident dialysis modality with mortality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Syst Rev 2019; 8:55. [PMID: 30782218 PMCID: PMC6379951 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-0972-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND At least 2.6 million adults and children receive dialysis treatment for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide. The large majority of these receive hemodialysis (HD), while the remaining receive peritoneal dialysis (PD). Peritoneal dialysis may be associated with similar mortality outcomes as HD, and patient-reported outcomes are potentially increased with PD. Existing evidence for the mortality associated with PD was summarized over 20 years ago, and there has been greater marginal improvement in survival with PD relative to HD since that time. It is therefore timely to reexamine the question of differential mortality by modality and summarize evidence from more contemporary practice settings. METHODS/DESIGN Electronic databases will be systematically searched for publications that report the association between dialysis modality (HD or PD) with death from any cause and cause-specific death in incident patients with end-stage kidney disease. The database searches will be supplemented by searching through citations and references and consultation with experts. Studies published before 1995 will be excluded. Screening of both titles and abstracts will be done by two independent reviewers. All disagreements will be resolved by an independent third reviewer. A quantitative meta-analysis of effect sizes and standard errors will be applied. DISCUSSION Our systematic review will update previous evidence summaries and provide a quantitative and standardized assessment of the contemporary literature comparing HD and PD including published and unpublished non-English studies from greater China, Taiwan, and Japan. This review will inform shared decision-making around initial dialysis modality choice and jurisdiction-level considerations of dialysis practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42018111829.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark R Marshall
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. .,Department of Renal Medicine, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand. .,Baxter Healthcare (Asia) Pte Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Chun-Yuan Hsiao
- Department of Renal Medicine, Middlemore Hospital, Counties Manukau Health, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Philip K Li
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Masaaki Nakayama
- Research Division of Chronic Kidney Disease and Dialysis Treatment, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.,Nephrology Department, St Lukes International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Rabindranath
- Department of Nephrology, Waikato District Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Rachael C Walker
- Nursing and Health Science, Eastern Institute of Technology, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand
| | - Xueqing Yu
- Institute of Nephrology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, Guangdong, China.,Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Suetonia C Palmer
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li PKT, Chow KM, Van de Luijtgaarden MWM, Johnson DW, Jager KJ, Mehrotra R, Naicker S, Pecoits-Filho R, Yu XQ, Lameire N. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat Rev Nephrol 2016; 13:90-103. [PMID: 28029154 DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 332] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
As the global burden of chronic kidney disease continues to increase, so does the need for a cost-effective renal replacement therapy. In many countries, patient outcomes with peritoneal dialysis are comparable to or better than those with haemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis is also more cost-effective. These benefits have not, however, always led to increased utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Use of this therapy is increasing in some countries, including China, the USA and Thailand, but has proportionally decreased in parts of Europe and in Japan. The variable trends in peritoneal dialysis use reflect the multiple challenges in prescribing this therapy to patients. Key strategies for facilitating peritoneal dialysis utilization include implementation of policies and incentives that favour this modality, enabling the appropriate production and supply of peritoneal dialysis fluid at a low cost, and appropriate training for nephrologists to enable increased utilization of the therapy and to ensure that rates of technique failure continue to decline. Further growth in peritoneal dialysis use is required to enable this modality to become an integral part of renal replacement therapy programmes worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Kam-Tao Li
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Carol &Richard Yu PD Research Centre, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Kai Ming Chow
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Carol &Richard Yu PD Research Centre, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Moniek W M Van de Luijtgaarden
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Division of Medicine, ARTS Building, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Kitty J Jager
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, Amsterdam 1100 DE, Netherlands
| | - Rajnish Mehrotra
- Kidney Research Institute and Harborview Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, BOX 359606, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA
| | - Sarala Naicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | | | - Xue Qing Yu
- Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Norbert Lameire
- University Hospital Gent, 185, De Pintelaan, BE-9000 Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Machowska A, Alscher MD, Reddy Vanga S, Koch M, Aarup M, Qureshi AR, Lindholm B, Rutherford PA. Factors influencing access to education, decision making, and receipt of preferred dialysis modality in unplanned dialysis start patients. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016; 10:2229-2237. [PMID: 27843302 PMCID: PMC5098564 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s119243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Unplanned dialysis start (UPS) leads to worse clinical outcomes than planned start, and only a minority of patients ever receive education on this topic and are able to make a modality choice, particularly for home dialysis. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for patients receiving education, making a decision, and receiving their preferred modality choice in UPS patients following a UPS educational program (UPS-EP). METHODS The Offering Patients Therapy Options in Unplanned Start (OPTiONS) study examined the impact of the implementation of a specific UPS-EP, including decision support tools and pathway improvement on dialysis modality choice. Linear regression models were used to examine the factors predicting three key steps: referral and receipt of UPS-EP, modality decision making, and actual delivery of preferred modality choice. A simple economic assessment was performed to examine the potential benefit of implementing UPS-EP in terms of dialysis costs. RESULTS The majority of UPS patients could receive UPS-EP (214/270 patients) and were able to make a decision (177/214), although not all patients received their preferred choice (159/177). Regression analysis demonstrated that the initial dialysis modality was a predictive factor for referral and receipt of UPS-EP and modality decision making. In contrast, age was a predictor for referral and receipt of UPS-EP only, and comorbidity was not a predictor for any step, except for myocardial infarction, which was a weak predictor for lower likelihood of receiving preferred modality. Country practices predicted UPS-EP receipt and decision making. Economic analysis demonstrated the potential benefit of UPS-EP implementation because dialysis modality costs were associated with modality distribution driven by patient preference. CONCLUSION Education and decision support can allow UPS patients to understand their options and choose dialysis modality, and attention needs to be focused on ensuring equity of access to educational programs, especially for the elderly. Physician practice and culture across units/countries is an important predictor of UPS patient management and modality choice independent of patient-related factors. Additional work is required to understand and improve patient pathways to ensure that modality preference is enacted. There appears to be a cost benefit of delivering education, supporting choice, and ensuring that the choice is enacted in UPS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Machowska
- Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: Anna Machowska, Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, M99, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden, Email
| | - Mark Dominik Alscher
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Satyanarayana Reddy Vanga
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Michael Koch
- Center of Nephrology, Nephrologisches Zentrum, Mettmann, Germany
| | - Michael Aarup
- Department of Nephrology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Abdul Rashid Qureshi
- Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bengt Lindholm
- Division of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|