Use of a combination of CEA and tumor budding to identify high-risk patients with stage II colon cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

Indications for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA (T3N0M0) colon cancer are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IIA colon cancer. We aimed to examine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS in stage IIA colon cancer patients with elevated CEA levels.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIA colon cancer (N = 3477) diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the prognostic effect of CEA on CSS and OS.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis demonstrated that CEA was an independent risk factor for CSS and OS in patients with stage IIA colon cancer (CSS: HR = 2.001, 95% CI 1.603-2.499, P < 0.001; OS: HR = 1.530, 95% CI 1.335-1.752, P < 0.001). In the subgroup with elevated CEA, patients received adjuvant chemotherapy had a better OS compared with those did not (χ² = 10.585, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CEA was an independent risk factor for CSS and OS in patients with stage IIA colon cancer. Patients with stage IIA colon cancer with an elevated CEA level might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Insights into the Unique Lung Microbiota Profile of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Using Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing

The microbiota plays an important role in human health and disease development. The lung microbiota profile in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) patients and the effects of anti-TB treatment on the profile need to be determined thoroughly and comprehensively. This study primarily aimed to determine the lung microbiota profile associated with pulmonary TB and characterize the longitudinal changes during anti-TB treatment. A total of 53 participants, comprising 8 healthy individuals, 12 untreated pulmonary TB patients, 15 treated pulmonary TB patients, 11 cured pulmonary TB patients, and 7 lung cancer patients, were recruited in the present study. Bronchioalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected from the above participants, and throat swabs were taken from healthy individuals. Microbiomes in the samples were examined using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Differences in microbiota profiles were determined through a comparison of the indicated groups. Our findings indicated that the BALF samples displayed decreased richness and diversity of the microbiota compared to those of the throat swab samples, and these two kinds of samples exhibited obvious separation on principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots. Untreated pulmonary TB patients displayed a unique lung microbiota signature distinct from that of healthy individuals and lung cancer patients. Our data first demonstrated that anti-TB treatment with first-line drugs increases alpha diversity and significantly affects the beta diversity of the lung microbiota, while it also induces antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). IMPORTANCE Characterization of the lung microbiota could lead to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of pulmonary TB. Here, we applied the metagenomic shotgun sequencing instead of 16S rRNA sequencing method to characterize the lung microbiota using the BALF samples instead of sputum. We found that alterations in the lung microbiota are associated with TB infection and that anti-TB treatment significantly affects the alpha and beta diversity of the lung microbiota in pulmonary TB patients. These findings could help us better understand TB pathogenesis.

Prognostic Implication of Preoperative Serum Albumin to Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio in Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background: Preoperative serum albumin (ALB) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were useful prognostic factors in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the ALB to CEA ratio (ACR) and their individual prognostic efficacies have been less studied. Methods: A retrospective study with 156 CRC patients staged I to IV was performed. The prognostic efficacy of ACR was estimated and subsequently compared with ALB, CEA, and other systemic inflammation markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan–Meier (K-M) analysis, and the risk factors for survival were calculated by the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 31.41% (49 of 156) of patients presented with ACR-low disease, and these patients had tumors with advanced T stages, larger tumor diameters and distant metastases, and a lower LMR. When 5.98 was used as the cut-off point, it had a sensitivity of 58.50% and 61.50% and a specificity of 83.50% and 80.50% for PFS and OS, respectively. ACR displayed a superior prognostic efficacy than individual ALB, CEA and NLR, LMR, and PLR for both PFS and OS (except LMR). Patients in the ACR-low group displayed significantly worse PFS and OS than those in the ACR-high group. Finally, ACR was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.17−0.56, P < .01) and OS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16−0.66, P < .01). Conclusions: ACR was a robust prognostic factor in CRC, and patients with a relatively low preoperative ACR would have significantly worse survival.

Differential clinical impacts of tumour budding evaluated by the use of immunohistochemical and haematoxylin and eosin staining in stage II colorectal cancer

AIMS

The aim of this study was to clarify the quantitative and qualitative differences in tumour budding identification between haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for cytokeratin, and to estimate the respective clinical impacts in stage II colorectal cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively examined 314 surgically resected cases of stage II colorectal cancer, and assessed tumour budding on serial section slides with H&E staining and IHC staining for cytokeratin. Tumour budding counts based on cytokeratin-stained slides were strongly correlated with those based on H&E-stained slides, and had higher detection and reproducibility. On the basis of receiver operating characteristic analyses, the optimal cut-off values of budding counts for relapse-free survival (RFS) were 7 and 16 in a ×200 microscopic field with H&E and IHC staining, respectively. With these cut-off values, tumour budding based on H&E staining had a significant correlation with RFS (80.3% and 93.2% of 5-year RFS in the high-budding group and the low-budding group, respectively), and similar results were observed for IHC staining (79.9% and 91.7%, respectively). The Akaike Information Criterion value for RFS with H&E staining was favourable as compared with that with IHC staining.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumour budding counts based on cytokeratin-stained slides showed higher detection and better reproducibility, but did not have as satisfactory clinical impacts as those based on H&E staining.

Construction and validation of a simple scoring system for stage III colorectal cancer recurrence (SiS-SCORE). A case control study

BACKGROUND

Stage III colorectal cancer is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy; however, there is no definite view on the selection of regimen. If the recurrence can be predicted, it can serve as the indicator of regimen selection. The present study aimed to predict the recurrence of stage III colorectal cancer by constructing a simple scoring system.

METHODS

The information of stage III cases that underwent curative surgery was obtained from two facilities and analyzed. A scoring system was constructed from the analysis results and evaluated based on the cases from a different facility.

RESULTS

Five factors were extracted by multivariate analysis: age > 65, male, rectum, ≥pN2 and CA19-9 > 37. When these parameters were scored as 1 point each, the score was correlated with the cumulative recurrence rate. Additionally, when cases were divided into three groups (≤1 point, 2 points, ≥3 points), the 5-year recurrence rate was as follows:, ≤1 point: 33.3%, 2 points: 42.1%, ≥3 points: 78.6%. The cumulative recurrence rate of ≥3 points was significantly higher than that of ≤1 point (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained by evaluating that cases at a different facility (P = 0.032). Both cases with 2 points were located between ≤1 point and ≥3 points, reflecting the average recurrence rate of each institution.

CONCLUSION

As the SiS-SCORE presented the same result in the facility that was different from the base facility, it can be used widely. However, a prospective study is required to prove the usefulness of the SiS-SCORE.

Preoperative CEA levels are supplementary to CA19-9 levels in predicting prognosis in patients with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background: There are few diagnostic tools that can be used to determine which patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) can benefit from surgery actually, highlighting that the need for new preoperative stratification strategies. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive values of preoperative biomarkers in survival analyses for patients with ICC after surgical resection.

Methods: A total of 285 patients with ICC were retrospectively reviewed. Receiver operating charateristics (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive effects of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) with different cutoff values and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with ICC.

Results: Preoperative CA19-9 with a cutoff value of 200 U/ml performed better in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in ICC patients. Patients with preoperative CA19-9 value > 200 U/ml generally had a poor surgical response. However, surgical resection could also benefit patients whose CA19-9 levels decreased postoperatively or preoperative CEA levels were negative.

Conclusions: With the cutoff value of 200U/ml, CA19-9 was a better preoperative biomarker for predicting survival for ICC patients after surgical resection. Combination of preoperative CA19-9 and CEA showed the strongest predictive power in survival analyses in these patients and should be recognized in daily clinical care.