Composite PTFE-transposed superficial femoral vein for lower limb arteriovenous access

Thigh arteriovenous grafts. Quantitative comparison with alternative options: A meta-analysis

Thigh arteriovenous grafts are required in a number of patients with exhausted upper extremity veins and comprise 1%-5% of the total access procedures performed. Alternative autogenous lower extremity options are the rarely used sapheno-tibial arteriovenous fistulae, the saphenous vein transpositions, and the femoral vein transpositions. The latter have proven to be the most durable lower limb access procedures, with low infection rates and their primary patency rates ranged from 74% up to 87% at 2 years. Synthetic thigh grafts are suitable for patients who are not good candidates for any upper limb or any autogenous lower limb access and their secondary patency rates ranged from 54% up to 83% at 2 years. Thigh grafts often get infected and their average weighed infection rate in 920 such grafts included in eight large series was 22.9%. A literature search was performed to evaluate thigh grafts compared with alternative options using meta-analysis. Lower limb accesses were found superior compared to HeRO^® device regarding 1-year primary failure rate (odds ratio = 0.28, confidence interval = 0.09-0.88, p = 0.03) and additionally autogenous lower limb accesses were found superior compared to thigh grafts regarding the 1-year primary failure rate (odds ratio = 6.54, confidence interval = 2.29-18.72, p = 0.0005).

Arteriovenous Access: Infection, Neuropathy, and Other Complications

Complications of vascular access lead to morbidity and may reduce quality of life. In this module, we review both infectious and noninfectious arteriovenous access complications including neuropathy, aneurysm, and high-output access. For the challenging patients who have developed many complications and are now nearing their last vascular access, we highlight some potentially novel approaches.

Extra- and intrathoracic access

The most complex patients requiring vascular access are those with bilateral central vein occlusions. Endovascular repair of the central lesions when feasible allow upper extremity use for access. When endovascular repair is not feasible, femoral vein transposition should be the next choice. When lower limb access sites have been exhausted or are contraindicated as in obese patients and in patients with peripheral arterial obstructive disease, a range of extrathoracic "exotic" extra-anatomic access procedures as the necklace cross-chest arteriovenous (AV) grafts, the ipsilateral axillo-axillary loops, the brachial-jugular AV grafts, the axillo-femoral AV grafts or even intra-thoracic ones as the right atrial AV bypasses represent the vascular surgeon's last resort. The selection among those extra-anatomical chest-wall procedures should be based upon each patient's anatomy or patient-specific factors.

Lower limb access

Lower limb vascular access is used as an access site in patients in whom all upper limb possibilities for arteriovenous access creation are exhausted or with bilateral upper limb central vein occlusions. Autologous arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) using the greater saphenous vein have disappointing results apart from the isolated success. Autologous AVF using the femoral vein transposition have good results both in terms of long-term patency and are associated with a 10-fold reduction in infection risk compared with arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). However, a femoral vein transposition is a major undertaking and is associated with an increased risk of ischaemic complications. It is not a good option for patients with established peripheral arterial disease, but may be a good alternative for the younger patient with a high infection risk. The type of lower-extremity vascular access should be carefully tailored to the individual patient.