Extra- and intrathoracic access

Loop arteriovenous graft of the chest wall as a viable option for dialysis

The search for a reliable, complication-free vascular access is crucial among dialysis patients. The creation of a long-term access site for hemodialysis is dependent on several factors that mandate forming a life-plan for dialysis access, with upper extremity vascular access being the preferred route. However, complications including poor maturation, venous anastomosis lesions, and thrombosis are all associated with poor survival of these accesses. As a result, numerous patients within the dialysis population have exhausted access sites in the upper and lower extremities, requiring the search for other access options including chest wall arteriovenous graft (AVG). However, limited data is available about the outcomes of these chest wall grafts. Here, we describe two 62-year-old female dialysis patients who exhausted other dialysis access sites and subsequently underwent arteriovenous loop graft of the chest wall that connected the axillary artery with the ipsilateral axillary vein. These AVGs remained functional during the follow up period. This report highlights the viability of chest wall AVG access in the unique subset of hemodialysis patients who exhausted all other access sites.

Chest wall arteriovenous graft for dialysis: A case report

Upper extremity access sites are the preferred access sites for hemodialysis. With the improvement of the survival in dialysis population, most patients outlive the dialysis access lifespan. As such, some patients exhaust the vascular access options of the upper extremities, which necessitates the search for new access sites. While lower extremity grafts and hemodialysis reliable outflow devices are potential alternatives, these access sites are plagued with recurrent lesions at the venous anastomosis and subsequent thrombosis leading to poor access survival. Within this framework, the axillary-based dialysis access was developed to address these challenges. In this report, we describe a 70-year-old woman who exhausted her upper extremity access sites and eventually underwent a chest wall arteriovenous graft (AVG) that connected the right axillary artery to the right axillary vein. This chest wall AVG remained functional without any intervention for more than 3 years. In conclusion, chest wall AVG access can be a viable option for hemodialysis patients who have exhausted the access sites of the upper extremities, while potentially minimizing complications seen in other methods of vascular access.

Brachio-azygos transthoracic arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis patients with bilateral central venous obstruction: A small case series

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to find a reliable outflow vein for vascular access in hemodialysis patients with bilateral central venous obstruction. The lower extremity veins are currently used as the most common alternative veins to make a new vascular access. However, in patients not amenable to make lower extremity access, intrathoracic vein should be considered as an outflow vein, but there are limitations in its use due to postoperative complications.

METHODS

We introduce a series of cases that underwent arteriovenous graft operation using an intrathoracic vein, the azygos arch, as an outflow vein. Brachio-azygos transthoracic arteriovenous graft is a surgical procedure that anastomoses the azygos arch and the brachial artery with 7 mm ringed polytetrafluoroethylene graft via lateral thoracotomy without median sternotomy.

RESULTS

The chest tubes of the patients were removed on the third postoperative day and they discharged within a week. About 1 month later, hemodialysis was initiated through the BATAVG, and it has been used without access dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Brachio-azygos transthoracic arteriovenous grafts were performed using the azygos arches without major complications. The azygos arch can be a good alternative outflow vein to make a new vascular access for hemodialysis patients with bilateral central venous obstruction.

Thigh arteriovenous grafts. Quantitative comparison with alternative options: A meta-analysis

Thigh arteriovenous grafts are required in a number of patients with exhausted upper extremity veins and comprise 1%-5% of the total access procedures performed. Alternative autogenous lower extremity options are the rarely used sapheno-tibial arteriovenous fistulae, the saphenous vein transpositions, and the femoral vein transpositions. The latter have proven to be the most durable lower limb access procedures, with low infection rates and their primary patency rates ranged from 74% up to 87% at 2 years. Synthetic thigh grafts are suitable for patients who are not good candidates for any upper limb or any autogenous lower limb access and their secondary patency rates ranged from 54% up to 83% at 2 years. Thigh grafts often get infected and their average weighed infection rate in 920 such grafts included in eight large series was 22.9%. A literature search was performed to evaluate thigh grafts compared with alternative options using meta-analysis. Lower limb accesses were found superior compared to HeRO^® device regarding 1-year primary failure rate (odds ratio = 0.28, confidence interval = 0.09-0.88, p = 0.03) and additionally autogenous lower limb accesses were found superior compared to thigh grafts regarding the 1-year primary failure rate (odds ratio = 6.54, confidence interval = 2.29-18.72, p = 0.0005).