Stenoses in the surgically manipulated segment have better angioplasty response compared to the surgically naive segment in fistulas

The RADAR technique in reconstruction of failed autologous arteriovenous fistulas due to juxta-anastomotic stenosis is equivalent to that with traditional surgery in maintenance hemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

Autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is recommended as superior vascular access for hemodialysis but has a high rate of failure, and juxta-anastomotic stenosis (JAS) is one of the predominant causes of fistula failure. The aim of this study was to compare the primary patency in reconstruction of failed AVFs due to JAS between the radial artery deviation and reimplantation (RADAR) technique and traditional surgery (end-vein to side-artery neo-anastomosis) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients.

METHODS

A total of 1215 MHD patients with failed AVF were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study, and 614 patients with failed AVF received surgical intervention. Among these surgical interventions, 417 patients experienced AVF failure due to JAS. Finally, 25 patients who received the RADAR technique were enrolled. Controls of 50 patients received traditional surgery were randomly selected matched by age and sex. Clinical data such as age, sex, comorbidities, and blood biochemical indices were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to explore the difference between the RADAR group and the traditional group in reconstruction of failed AVFs.

RESULTS

The RADAR group and the traditional group shared common baseline characteristics. The primary patencies of the reconstructed AVFs were 88.8%, 79.0%, 72.2%, 57.4%, and 38.3% at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months among the 75 patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated similar primary patencies in the two groups (log-rank test, p = 0.73). Compared with the traditional group, the RADAR group had no difference in predicting AVF failure after adjusting for potential confounders, with an HR of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.18-4.63).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary patency of the RADAR technique and the traditional surgery in the reconstruction of failed AVFs due to JAS is almost equal in 5 years.

Treatment with imatinib was useful to delay the neointimal hyperplasia of aortocaval fistula in adenine-induced renal failure rats

PURPOSE

The study was conducted to investigate the effect of the treatment with imatinib, a c-kit specific inhibitor, on the neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) of aortocaval fistula (ACF) in adenine-induced renal failure rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups: rats were fed on a normal diet (normal group); rats were fed on a 0.75% adenine-rich diet (renal failure group). The remaining rats underwent ACF after receiving a 0.75% adenine-rich diet and received daily saline gavage (model group) or imatinib gavage (imatinib group) for 7 days after surgery. Immunohistochemical method was used to detect c-kit expression, and Elastomeric Verhoeff-Van Gieson (EVG) staining was used to observe morphological changes of the ACF. The Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlations of c-kit expression with intimal thickness and the percentage of stenosis, respectively.

RESULTS

The renal failure group showed positive c-kit expression on the intima of the inferior vena cava (IVC), whereas the normal group did not. Compared to the model group, intimal thickness (P = 0.001), the percentage of stenosis (P = 0.006) and c-kit expression (P = 0.04) were decreased in the imatinib group at 8 weeks postoperatively. C-kit expression was positively correlated with both intimal thickness and percentage of stenosis (intimal thickness: R = 0.650, P = 0.003; the percentage of stenosis: R = 0.581, P = 0.011) in both the model and imatinib groups.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with imatinib, a c-kit specific inhibitor, was useful to delay the NIH of ACF in adenine-induced renal failure rats.

Stent Diameter, Not Cephalic Arch Anatomy, Predicts Stent Graft Patency in Cephalic Arch Stenosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between anatomic factors and primary patency of brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) after stent graft (SG) placement for cephalic arch stenosis (CAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed all cephalic arch SGs placed in brachiocephalic AVFs in a tertiary academic medical center between 2014 and 2017. Sixty-three patients were included in the study. The mean patient age at the time of SG placement was 62.6 years ± 19, and the mean patient follow-up was 1,994 days ± 353. A cohort of patients (n = 31) who underwent brachiocephalic fistulograms for CAS but only received percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was the control group. Patient demographic characteristics, AVF anatomy, SG type, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. The duration of primary cephalic arch patency after SG placement was compared with that after previous PTA.

RESULTS

The median AVF age at the time of data retrieval was 345 days. The primary patency of CAS after SG placement at 6 months, 12 months, and 3 years was 64%, 49.9%, and 23.5%, respectively. Primary cephalic arch patency was significantly associated with the SG diameter (P = .007) but not with cephalic vein-axillary vein junction anatomy, size of feeding artery, or SG length (P > .05). The primary patency of CAS in patients treated with PTA only (n = 31) at 6 months, 12 months, and 3 years was 61%, 35%, and 0%, respectively, which was significantly lower than that in patients treated with SG placement (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the primary patency of CAS after SG placement was significantly higher than that of PTA-only treatment. Moreover, primary cephalic arch patency after SG placement was significantly associated with the SG diameter.

Arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: Brief review and current problems

The number of people worldwide living with end-stage renal disease is increasing. Arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred method of vascular access in patients who will require hemodialysis. As the number of patients with arteriovenous fistulas grows, the role of physicians who intervene who maintain and salvage these fistulas will grow in importance. This review aims to familiarize practitioners with the rationale for arteriovenous fistula creation, the detection of fistula dysfunction, and the state of the art on fistula maintenance and preservation. Current controversies are briefly reviewed.

Angioplasty to promote arteriovenous fistula maturation and maintenance

The arteriovenous fistula is currently the best permanent access for the hemodialysis patient. Unfortunately, stenosis impairs maturation, long-term survival, and function of the arteriovenous fistula. Angioplasty currently is the best procedure for the treatment of immature and dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulas. In this review, the authors discuss the optimum time to evaluate arteriovenous fistulas for maturity, methods of evaluation for maturity, and the role of angioplasty in salvaging immature arteriovenous fistulas. The review also discusses the effect of stenosis on dysfunction in mature arteriovenous fistulas and the role of angioplasty to treat this complication. Finally, the impact of cutting balloons and drug-eluting balloons in the treatment of resistant and recurrent stenosis, respectively, is also discussed.

Predicting Technical Success after Fistuloplasty: An Analysis of 176 Procedures

BACKGROUND

Significant stenoses in arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) with limitation of flow and dialysis inadequacy should prompt consideration for fistuloplasty. We sought to identify fistulae, lesions, and patient-specific variables, which predict for outcomes after fistuloplasty.

METHODS

Data were extracted retrospectively from a renal access database from 2011 to 2016 of patients undergoing fistuloplasty. Demographics, comorbidities, outcomes of intervention, and flow rates documented on preintervention and postintervention duplex were collected. Secondary analysis of factors associated with postfistuloplasty flow rates of >600 mL/min, previously shown to be predictive of not requiring future intervention, was performed.

RESULTS

Of 204 attempted fistuloplasties, 176 were completed. One hundred forty (79.5%) were native AVFs and 34 (19.3%), AVGs (no data for 2). Median stenosis treated was 75%, with a majority (43.8%) in the proximal outflow vein. Flow rate on duplex after fistuloplasty was significantly better in AVFs (mean improvement 189.2 mL/min) than that in AVGs (mean improvement 51.8 mL/min; P = 0.034). Greatest flow improvement occurred for needling site stenotic lesions compared with other locations (from anastomosis to central vein) but was not significant. Brachio-brachial or brachio-axillary AVGs did significantly (P < 0.05) worse than all other fistulae types. The presence of hypertension was predicted for postfistuloplasty flow rate of >600 mL/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow rates after fistuloplasty vary depending on the type of fistula treated and the presence of hypertension. Knowledge of this can lead to better patient selection and counseling for fistuloplasty.