[Surgery of male infertility: an update]

Varicocele: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Varicocele treatment in infertility still remains controversial. It is clear, in fact, that in many patients, varicocele has no impact on fertility. Recent scientific evidence demonstrated that varicocele treatment is beneficial in improving semen parameters and pregnancy rate when an appropriate selection of patients is made. The purpose of treating varicocele in adults is mainly to improve current fertility status. On the other hand, the goal of treatment in adolescents is to prevent testicular injury and maintain testicular function for future fertility. Hence, the key to the success of varicocele treatment seems to be a correct indication. The aim of this study is to review and summarize current evidence in managing varicocele treatment focusing on the controversies regarding surgical indications in adolescent and adult patients, and in other specific situations such as azoospermia, bilateral or subclinical varicocele, and prior to ART.

Could analysis of testis-specific genes, as biomarkers in seminal plasma, predict presence of focal spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia?

Cell-free seminal mRNA (cfs-mRNA) exists in the human ejaculate that is proposed as a potential noninvasive procedure to prognosis pathophysiological conditions. This study applied cfs-mRNA of ESX1, ZMYND15 and its target haploid genes (TNP1 and PRM1) to identify the presence of spermatozoa in men with azoospermia. This study included 35 semen samples from 16 normozoospermic and 19 nonobstructive azoospermic individuals. Expression levels of target genes were determined by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using ΔΔCt method. The expression level of these genes (ZMYND15, TNP1 and PRM1) was significantly decreased in semen samples of nonobstructive azoospermia compared to normozoospermia. Similarly, the expression level of TNP1 and PRM1 was significantly decreased in the sample with negative sperm (SR-) versus positive sperm retrieval (SR+). The expression level of these genes may have the potential for prediction of successful sperm retrieval with high sensitivity and specificity according to the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome with fresh versus frozen-thawed testicular sperm in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to explore testicular sperm cryopreservation in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) whether affect the outcome of subsequent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for relevant published studies in English language (1997-2017). Studies were eligible if they included the comparison of using fresh and frozen-thawed testicular sperm followed by ICSI. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction, quality assessment and assessed the risk of bias. The overall summary risk estimated the number of events. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects or fixed effects model analysis according to the test of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with 1,261 ICSI cycles were identified. Analysis of the present data showed no difference in the fertilization outcome when comparing fresh versus frozen-thawed spermatozoa (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.09). Similarly, no difference in CR (RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.05), good embryo rate (RR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.95-1.09), and IR (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.66-1.30) was observed if the spermatozoa was fresh or frozen-thawed. Finally, no difference in CPR or LBR was noted when using fresh or frozen-thawed cycles were analyzed separately (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.24; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.41, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In men with NOA, the ICSI outcome is not affected by whether the retrieved testicular sperm is fresh or frozen. Sperm cryopreservation ought to be considered in every surgical sperm retrieval case, which remain feasible even in patients with few testicular sperm retrieved.

Expression of ZMYND15 in Testes of Azoospermic Men and Association With Sperm Retrieval

OBJECTIVE

To compare the expression levels of ZMYND15 and its target haploid genes (TNP1, PRM1, and SPEM1) in testicular samples of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) vs obstructive azoospermia (OA). The levels of these transcripts were also compared in azoospermic samples with positive and negative sperm retrieval (SR).

METHOD

This study included 63 testis biopsy samples from 16 OA and 47 NOA individuals. Expression levels of these target genes were determined by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using ΔΔCt method.

RESULT

The expression level of ZMYND15 and its target genes were significantly lower in testicular samples of NOA compared with OA. Similarly, the expression levels of these transcripts were lower in samples with negative vs positive SR.

CONCLUSION

Expression level of ZMYND15 may have potential for prediction of successful SR with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 60% for total population and sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 75% for NOA, according to the receiver operating characteristics curve.

Correlation of genetic results with testicular histology, hormones and sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with testis biopsy

To investigate the frequency and types of genetic results in different testicular histology of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA), and correlated with hormones and sperm retrieval (SR), a retrospective study was conducted in 286 Chinese NOA patients who underwent testis biopsy and 100 age-matched fertile men as the control group. Chromosome karyotype analyses were performed by the peripheral blood chromosome G-band detection method. Screening of Y chromosome microdeletions of azoospermia factor (AZF) region was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of 11 sequence-tagged sites (STS). The serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone and testosterone (T) and the appearance of scrotal ultrasound were also obtained. In 286 cases of NOA, 14.3% were found to have chromosomal alterations. The incidence of chromosomal abnormality was 2.8%. Sex chromosomal abnormalities were seen in six cases (four cases of Klinefelter's syndrome (47, XXY) and two cases of mosaics). The incidence of polymorphic chromosomal variants was 3% in the normal group and 11.5% in the NOA group. In total, 15.7% of NOA patients were found to have AZF microdeletions and AZF (c + d) was the most frequent one. The results of hormone and SR were found to be significantly different among all testicular histological types, whereas no significant differences were found when it comes to genetic alterations. It is concluded that the rate of cytogenetic alterations was high in NOA patients. So screening for chromosomal alterations and AZF microdeletions would add useful information for genetic counselling in NOA patients with testis biopsy and avoid vertical transmission of genetic defects by assisted reproductive technology.