Evaluation of PADUA Score as Predictor of Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) during Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN)

Minimising warm ischaemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. A video-based assessment of tumour excision, kidney reconstruction and intermediate time

INTRODUCTION

Surgical video review is an emerging tool for assessing patient outcomes, especially in complex surgeries such as robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Assessing and measuring warm ischaemia time (WIT) during RAPN by dividing it into the time used for tumour excision time (ExcT), time used for kidney reconstruction time (RecT) and intermediate time (IntT) has not been performed before. This study aimed to analyse the factors that can influence all surgical times and assess their impact on positive surgical margins (PSMs) and complication rates.

METHODS

We evaluated 32 surgical video recordings from patients undergoing RAPN and measured WIT, ExcT, RecT and IntT with a stopwatch. Factors such as tumour characteristics and surgeon experience were also recorded. SPSS software was used to identify the predictors for all surgical times and to correlate ExcT with PSM and RecT with complication rate.

RESULTS

We recorded a median WIT of 1,048 s (17 min and 28 s). The median of ExcT, RecT and IntT was 398 s (37.1% of WIT), 518 s (46.7% of WIT) and 180 s (16.2% of WIT), respectively. We found a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between R.E.N.A.L. score and all surgical times. No correlation was found between ExcT and PSM (P = 0.488) and between RecT and the probability of developing complications (P = 0.544).

CONCLUSION

Tumour morphology influences all surgical times, and surgeon experience influences only ExcT. We observed a short RecT during RAPN though at the cost of increased ExcT, and we believe that improving surgical experience, especially for the excision of more complex tumours, can reduce WIT during RAPN.

Predictive Value of Nephrometry Scores in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Over the last decade, several nephrometry scores (NSs) have been introduced with the aim of facilitating preoperative decision making, planning, and counseling in the field of nephron-sparing surgery. However, their predictive role remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To describe currently available nephrometry scores and to determine their predictive role for different outcomes by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Embase®, and Web of Science were screened to identify eligible studies. Identification and selection of the reports were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). A pooled analysis of NS predictive role of intraoperative, postoperative, oncological, and functional outcomes was performed. Odds ratio was considered the effect size. All the analyses were performed using Stata 15.0, and statistical significance was set at p≤ 0.05.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 51 studies meeting our inclusion criteria were identified and considered for the analysis. Except for one prospective randomized trial, all the studies were retrospective. All the studies were found to be of intermediate quality, except for one of high quality. Most studies assessed the predictive role of the Radius-Exophytic/Endophytic-Nearness-Anterior/Posterior-Location (RENAL) and Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) scores, mostly regarding complications after nephron-sparing surgery. RENAL was an independent predictor of an on-clamp procedure (p< 0.001). Mayo Adhesive Probability score was related to adhesive perinephric fat (p= 0.005). Continuous and high-complexity RENAL scores were predictors of warm ischemia time (WIT; p= 0.006 and p< 0.001, respectively). Continuous (p< 0.001) and high-complexity (p< 0.001) PADUA scores were related to WIT. Continuous and high-complexity RENAL scores were predictors of overall complications (p= 0.002 and p< 0.001, respectively). PADUA score was related to complications both as continuous (p< 0.001) and as a categorical value (p< 0.002). The RENAL scores R=3 (p= 0.008), E=2 (p= 0.039), and hilar location (p= 0.006) were predictors of histological malignancy. Continuous and categorical RENAL scores were independent predictors of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increase (p= 0.006 and p< 0.001, respectively). The Diameter-Axial-Polar score (p= 0.018) and Peritumoral Artery Scoring System (PASS; p= 0.02) were also independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature regarding nephrometry scoring systems is sparse, and mostly focused on RENAL and PADUA, which are easy to calculate and have a good correlation with most outcomes. Renal Pelvic Score is the best predictor of pelvicalyceal entry/repair and urine leak, whereas Surgical Approach Renal Ranking and PASS strongly predict surgical approach and renal function variation, respectively. Other nephrometry scores based on mathematical models are limited by their complexity, and they lack evidence supporting their predictive value.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the medical literature regarding the use and value of so-called "nephrometry scores," which are scoring systems based on radiological imaging and made to grade the complexity of a renal tumor. We analyzed whether these scoring systems can predict some of the outcomes of patients undergoing surgical removal of renal tumors.

The correlation between affected renal function and affected renal residual volume: A retrospective outcome of laparoscopic nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery blocking-up for localized renal tumors

Laparoscopic nephron-sparing partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery blocking (SRPN) has been widely used in the treatment of localized renal tumors. However, the impact of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) during SRPN remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the correlation between affected renal function and affected renal volume after SRPN for localized renal tumor treatment, explore the effect of IRI on renal function after SRPN.A total of 39 patients who underwent SRPN for localized renal tumor from June 2009 to April 2012 were reviewed. These patients were followed-up for 5 years. The preoperative affected renal glomerular filtration rate (aGFRpre), postoperative affected renal glomerular filtration rate (aGFRpost), preoperative affected renal volume (aVolpre), and postoperative affected renal volume (aVolpost) were collected during the follow-up period. The correlation between aGFRpost/aGFRpre and aVolpost/aVolpre was compared.A total of 33 patients were successfully followed up. After 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months, aGFRpost was 34.6 ± 4.6, 34.7 ± 4.8, 34.9 ± 4.4, 35.1 ± 4.4, and 35.2 ± 4.2 mL/min. The correlation coefficients between aGFRpost/aGFRpre and aVolpost/aVolpre were 0.659 (P = .000), 0.667 (P = .000), 0.663 (P = .000), 0.629 (P = .000), and 0.604 (P = .000), respectively. The limitation of this study was the small cohort size.For the localized renal tumor, aGFRpost was associated with aVolpost, but was not associated with intraoperative factors, such as the time of clamping of the affected segmental renal artery. As a part of nephrons, the resected tumor tissue caused the lack of inherent nephrons, resulting in the loss of renal function. More nephrons should be maintained before resecting the tumor completely during SRPN.Trial registration: ChiCTR-RRC-17011418.

Role of R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

Background:

Preoperative anatomical scoring system is conducive to comparison between treatment options and evaluation of postoperative outcomes in patients with small renal tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical application efficacy of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) in predicting perioperative outcomes in patients with renal tumor who underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

Methods:

The clinical data of 139 patients with renal tumors who underwent LPN between 2009 and 2015 were collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to their RNS (low, moderate, and high). Clinical characteristics including perioperative variables, complications, and RNS were compared to evaluate the differences between the three groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative complications.

Results:

According to the RNS, there were 74, 50, and 15 patients in the low, moderate, and high RNS groups, respectively. There were significant differences in estimated blood loss (EBL; χ² = 7.285, P = 0.026), warm ischemia time (WIT; χ² = 13.718, P = 0.001), operation time (OT; χ² = 6.882, P = 0.032), perioperative creatinine clearance change (PCCC; χ² = 6.206, P = 0.045), and number of patients with complications (NPC; P = 0.002) among the three groups. The values for EBL, WIT, OT, PCCC, and NPC for patients in the high RNS group were higher than those for patients in the low RNS group. After adjustment for OT, WIT, and EBL, RNS was statistically significantly associated with the risk of postoperative complications in a multivariable logistic regression model (odds ratio = 1.541, 95% confidence interval: 1.059–2.242, P = 0.024).

Conclusions:

The RNS is a valuable tool for evaluating the complexity of renal tumor anatomy. It can aid surgeons in preoperative decision-making concerning management therapy. Future multicenter, large sample size studies are warranted for evaluating its predicting performance of perioperative outcomes.