Risk stratification for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) with Small Beads for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) is the most frequent cause of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTSs) in elderly populations. Minimally invasive treatments of BPH are safe and effective and are gaining popularity among both professionals and patients. Prostate Artery Embolization (PAE) has proven to be effective in Trans-Urethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) in terms of prostate volume reduction and LUTS relief. PAE entails the selective catheterization of the prostatic artery and later embolization of distal vessels with beads of various calibers. Universal consensus regarding the ideal particle size is yet to be defined. We retrospectively evaluated 24 consecutive patients (median age: 75 years; range: 59-86 years) treated with PAE at our institution from October 2015 to November 2022. Particles of different sizes were employed; 12 patients were treated with 40-120 µm particles, 5 with 100 µm, 5 with 100-300 µm and 2 with 250 µm. Technical success, defined as selective prostate artery catheterization and controlled release of embolizing beads, was achieved in all patients. Removal vs. retention of the urinary catheter at the first post-procedural urological visit was the main clinical objective. No major peri-procedural complications were recorded, with 56% of patients successfully removing the urinary catheter.

Evaluating the Impact of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgical Treatments on Sexual Health

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a prevalent condition in older men, is often managed through various surgical interventions. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of these surgical treatments on sexual function, a critical aspect of patient quality of life often overlooked in BPH management. The methodology encompassed a thorough review of contemporary surgical techniques for BPH, including prostate resection, enucleation, vaporization, and minimally invasive therapies such as UroLift, Rezum, and Aquablation. Additionally, the focus was on patient-centered outcomes, with a special emphasis on sexual health following surgery. Findings reveal that, while surgical interventions effectively alleviate BPH symptoms, they often have significant repercussions in sexual function, including erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction. However, emerging techniques demonstrate potential in preserving sexual function, underscoring the need for patient-centric treatment approaches. The study highlights the complex interplay between BPH surgery and sexual health, with minimally invasive treatments showing promise in balancing symptom relief and sexual function preservation. In conclusion, the study advocates for an integrated, interdisciplinary approach to BPH treatment, emphasizing the importance of considering sexual health in therapeutic decision-making. This narrative review suggests a paradigm shift towards minimally invasive techniques could optimize patient outcomes, marrying symptom relief with quality-of-life considerations. The need for further research in this domain is evident, particularly in understanding long-term sexual health outcomes following different surgical interventions for BPH.

The effect of acute urinary retention on the results of transurethral resection of the prostate

INTRODUCTION

Acute urinary retention (AUR) is one of the most severe symptoms of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). There are some studies in the literature describing the risk factors for the development of AUR in BPH patients. However, the studies that summarize the effect of AUR on Transurethral resection of Prostate (TUR-P) surgery results are limited. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of AUR on TUR-P results.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, patients who underwent TUR-P for AUR or lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were, men over 50 years old with a BPH diagnosis and who underwent monopolar TUR-P by a single surgeon. The exclusion criteria were; patients who had prostate cancer, multiple sclerosis, or neurogenic bladder were diagnosed or had previous lower urinary tract surgeries such as TUR-P, TUR-Bladder, Urethrotomy, had a chronic indwelling catheter, and patients who did not accept immediate TUR-P and preferred trial without catheter (TWOC) protocol. The age, PSA, prostate volume, pre- and post-operative flow rates, duration of hospitalization, and complications were recorded. Two groups were constituted for comparison such as AUR and Elective Group and p values <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 14 and 46 patients for AUR and Elective Groups respectively. The age, pre-operative prostate volume, free and total PSA values, postoperative complication rate, and re-hospitalization rate were significantly higher in the AUR-Group. However, there were no differences between groups in terms of pre-operative medication, duration of hospitalization, and post-operative uroflow maximum flow rate.

DISCUSSION

Patients who underwent TUR-P after AUR have a higher risk for complications and re-hospitalization. Care should be taken in these patients and patients should be warned about the risks.

Model-based meta-analysis of the time to first acute urinary retention or benign prostatic hyperplasia-related surgery in patients with moderate or severe symptoms

Aims

Combination therapy of 5α‐reductase inhibitor and α‐blocker is a guideline‐endorsed therapeutic approach for patients with moderate‐to‐severe lower urinary tract symptoms or benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) who are at risk of disease progression. We aimed to disentangle the contribution of clinical and demographic baseline characteristics affecting the risk of acute urinary retention or BPH‐related surgery (AUR/S) from the effect of treatment with drugs showing symptomatic and disease‐modifying properties.

Methods

A time‐to‐event model was developed using pooled data from patients (n = 10 238) enrolled into six clinical studies receiving placebo, tamsulosin, dutasteride or tamsulosin‐dutasteride combination therapy. A parametric hazard function was used to describe the time to first AUR/S. Covariate model building included the assessment of relevant clinical and demographic factors on baseline hazard. Predictive performance was evaluated by graphical and statistical methods.

Results

An exponential hazard model best described the time to first AUR/S in this group of patients. Baseline International Prostate Symptom Score, prostate‐specific antigen, prostate volume and maximum urine flow were identified as covariates with hazard ratio estimates of 1.04, 1.08, 1.01 and 0.91, respectively. Dutasteride monotherapy and tamsulosin‐dutasteride combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the baseline hazard (56.8% and 66.4%, respectively). By contrast, the effect of tamsulosin did not differ from placebo.

Conclusions

Our analysis showed the implications of disease‐modifying properties of dutasteride and tamsulosin‐dutasteride combination therapy for the risk of AUR/S. It also elucidated the contribution of different baseline characteristics to the risk of these events. The use of tamsulosin monotherapy (symptomatic treatment) has no impact on individual long‐term risk.