1
|
Janes WCI, Johnston P, Organ M, Thoms J, Gaviolli E. The Utility of Salvage Radiotherapy for an Inoperable Inguinal Recurrence of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis. Cureus 2023; 15:e48815. [PMID: 38106763 PMCID: PMC10722349 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare genitourinary malignancy for which limited treatment options exist beyond primary surgical resection. Metastatic lymphadenopathy represents a particularly poor prognosis with a lack of literature to suggest the effectiveness of radiation or systemic therapies. Our case documents an inguinal recurrence of penile squamous cell carcinoma not amenable to surgical intervention demonstrating complete response to salvage radiotherapy in the palliative setting. These observations propose the need for further research around the utility of radiotherapy in the management of metastatic penile malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W C Ian Janes
- Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN
| | - Paul Johnston
- Urology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN
| | - Michael Organ
- Urology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN
| | - John Thoms
- Radiation Oncology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN
| | - Eduardo Gaviolli
- Radiation Oncology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davies A, Foo M, Gan CL, Kourambas J, Redgrave N, Donnellan S, Appu S, Williams S, Coleman A, Segelov E, Bradley J, Soo G, Ramdave S, Kwan EM, Azad AA. 68 Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT as a clinical decision-making tool in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:e204-e210. [PMID: 34161628 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE PSMA PET/CT has demonstrated superior sensitivity over conventional imaging in the detection of local and distant recurrence in biochemically relapsed (BCR) prostate cancer. We prospectively investigated the management impact of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging in men with BCR, with the aim of identifying baseline clinicopathological predictors for management change. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with BCR who met eligibility criteria underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT at Monash Health (Melbourne, Australia). Intended management plans were prospectively documented before and after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential clinicopathological predictors of management change. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the nature of these changes. RESULTS Seventy men underwent 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging. Median age was 67 years (IQR 63-72) and median PSA was 0.48 ng/ml (IQR 0.21-1.9). PSMA-avid disease was observed in 56% (39/70) of patients. Pre-scan management plan was altered following scanning in 43% (30/70) of patients. Management changes were significantly more common in patients with higher baseline PSA levels (PSA≥2 ng/ml, p = 0.01). 18/36 (50%) of the patients initially planned for watchful waiting had their management changed, including the use of salvage pelvic radiotherapy (n = 7) and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy to oligometastatic disease (n = 6). CONCLUSION Management change after 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for BCR is common and typically resulted in treatment intensification strategies in those planned for a watchful waiting approach. This study adds to the growing pool of evidence supporting the clinical utility of PSMA PET/CT imaging in the care of patients with BCR after definitive therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Davies
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcus Foo
- GenesisCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chun Loo Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John Kourambas
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Redgrave
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Donnellan
- Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sree Appu
- Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Scott Williams
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Coleman
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eva Segelov
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason Bradley
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Soo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shakher Ramdave
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arun A Azad
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Segundo CGS, Couñago F, Gómez-Iturriaga A. Adjuvant versus early salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients: Time to move on. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:351-356. [PMID: 34049780 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
In the management of prostate cancer , few treatments have caused as much controversy as adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) after radical prostatectomy in high-risk patients In the present article, we assess the exclusion and inclusion criteria of the 6 randomised trials and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival and overall survival rates in order to identify the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from ART. We also evaluate treatment-related toxicity and the indications for androgen deprivation therapy . The main aim of this analysis was to determine whether the available evidence, which previously appeared to support ART, now favours early salvage radiotherapy. If so, perhaps we can finally resolve the controversy surrounding the optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid (UEM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga
- Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Basque Country University (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|