Role of radiotherapy in oligometastatic breast cancer: Review of the literature

Use of Radiotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: The Role of a Nurse

OBJECTIVES

Systemic therapy is the mainstay in advanced breast cancer (ABC), but innovations in radiation oncology have given radiotherapy a crucial role in the treatment of both intracranial and extracranial ABC. Breast cancer specialists include, in addition to medical and clinical oncologists, breast cancer nurses with unique theoretical knowledge and significant clinical experience. This review aims to discuss the function of radiotherapy in ABC and to highlight the role and importance of specialized nursing care for ABC patients receiving radiotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

An extensive literature review was conducted on the role of radiotherapy and its implementation in various settings of ABC and the pivotal contribution of nursing practices to the quality of life of these patients, with a particular focus on symptom and side effect management and prevention, education, as well as unmet patient needs. The Advanced Breast Cancer International Consensus Guidelines (ABC-5) were also included. All the above data were combined with the expert and practical considerations of breast cancer specialists within the team.

CONCLUSION

The sophisticated application of radiotherapy and the complexity of ABC patient management, concerning symptoms, side effects, and overall well-being necessitate collaborative efforts to optimize patient care. Breast cancer nurses hold a central role in this framework.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

The significance of specialized nursing in contributing to comprehensive patient care for ABC patients treated with radiotherapy outlines the need for extensive training that aims to provide a holistic approach and entails physical, mental, and emotional support and patient and caregiver education.

Oligometastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with High-Dose Chemotherapy and Targeted Radiation: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (oMBC) may benefit from aggressive local therapy. We sought to assess the effects of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) on outcomes in oMBC patients treated on a prospective phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT).

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2009, 12 patients with oMBC (≤3 metastatic sites) cancer were treated on protocol. Patients were to receive tandem HDCT supported by hematopoietic cell rescue (HCR). All radiographically identifiable oligometastatic sites received targeted radiation.

RESULTS

HDCT was initiated at a median of 6.7 (3.5-12.7) months after diagnosis of oMBC. Hormone receptors (HR) were positive in 91.6% of patients, and HER2 was overexpressed in 25% of patients. Median radiation dose (EQD2) was 41.2 (37.9-48.7) Gy. Median follow-up was 13.1 (6.8-15.1) years for living patients. Ten-year PFS and OS were 33% (95%CI, 10-59%) and 55% (95%CI, 22-79%), respectively. Durable local control of treated lesions was 87.5%. At the last follow up, two patients remained progression free and two more were without evidence of disease following additional salvage treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although modern systemic therapies have obviated the use of HDC, aggressive local therapy warrants further evaluation and fractionated radiotherapy is a viable alternative if SBRT is not available.

The continuing conundrum in oligometastatic breast carcinoma: A real-world data

The optimal management in Oligometastatic (OM) breast carcinoma is not defined.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the prognostic factors influencing OM and the effect of Locoregional treatment (LRT) on survival in OM.

METHODOLOGY

Patients with ≤5 metastases and each with ≤ 5 cm size were defined as OM. Data of OM were extracted from the Institute Registry between 2012 and 2018. The impact of prognostic factors on survival was analysed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The Kaplan Meier survival curves were used to plot PFS and OS.

RESULTS

There were 170 patients with OM. The median follow-up was 61 months. Median OS was 43.3 months. The median OS was 74 months in OMD vs 22.7 months in Oligorecurrent disease (ORD) with 5year OS rate of 55.3% vs 16.5% respectively. In the multivariate analyses of OMD both Ki67 ≤ 50% and hormone therapy (HT) showed significant favourable survival outcome. While premenopausal status and HT showed significant survival benefits in ORD. The worse survival outcome in ORD could be because of their aggressive biology and deficit in LRT compared to literature review. The prognostic factors were swayed by the uneven distribution of HR status, grade and Ki67.

CONCLUSION

The survival of OM was influenced by OMD, Ki67 ≤ 50%, premenopausal status and HT. The lesser survival rates of OM in the long term suggest the need for curative LRT to metastatic sites and primary tumor. The potential role of HT and targeted therapy with or without LRT need to be assessed in future randomised trials.