1
|
Bhanushali A, Tran L, Nairne-Nagy J, Bereza S, Callary SA, Atkins G, Ramasamy B, Solomon LB. Patient-Related Predictors of Treatment Failure After Two-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00376-0. [PMID: 38677343 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) treatment has high failure rates even after 2-stage revision. Risk factors for treatment failure (TF) after staged revision for PJI are not well defined, nor is it well established how they correlate with the risks of developing an index PJI. Identifying modifiable risk factors may allow preoperative optimization, while identifying nonmodifiable risk factors can influence surgical options or advise against further surgery. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define predictors of TF in 2-stage revision for PJI. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched from their inception in December 1976 to April 15, 2023. Studies comparing patient-related variables between patients successfully treated who had 2-staged revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and patients with persistent infections were included. Studies were screened, and 2 independent reviewers extracted data, while a third resolved discrepancies. Meta-analysis was performed on these data. There were 10,052 unique studies screened, and 21 studies met the inclusion criteria for data extraction. RESULTS There was good-quality evidence that obesity, liver cirrhosis, and previous failed revisions for PJI are nonmodifiable risk factors, while intravenous drug use (IVDU) and smoking are modifiable risk factors for TF after 2-stage revision for hip PJI. Reoperation between revision stages was also significantly associated with an increased risk of TF. Interestingly, other risk factors for an index PJI including male gender, American Society of Anesthesiology score, diabetes mellitus, and inflammatory arthropathy did not predict TF. Evidence on Charlson Comorbidity Index was limited. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a smoking history, obesity, IVDU, previous failed revision for PJI, reoperation between stages, and liver cirrhosis are more likely to experience TF after 2-stage revision THA for PJI. Modifiable risk factors include smoking and IVDU and these patients should be referred to services for cessation as early as possible before 2-stage revision THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameya Bhanushali
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Liem Tran
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jaiden Nairne-Nagy
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Samuel Bereza
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stuart A Callary
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gerald Atkins
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Boopalan Ramasamy
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lucian B Solomon
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ashkenazi I, Benady A, Ben Zaken S, Factor S, Abadi M, Shichman I, Morgan S, Gold A, Snir N, Warschawski Y. Radiological Comparison of Canal Fill between Collared and Non-Collared Femoral Stems: A Two-Year Follow-Up after Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Imaging 2024; 10:99. [PMID: 38786553 PMCID: PMC11121886 DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10050099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Collared femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offer reduced subsidence and periprosthetic fractures but raise concerns about fit accuracy and stem sizing. This study compares collared and non-collared stems to assess the stem-canal fill ratio (CFR) and fixation indicators, aiming to guide implant selection and enhance THA outcomes. This retrospective single-center study examined primary THA patients who received Corail cementless stems between August 2015 and October 2020, with a minimum of two years of radiological follow-up. The study compared preoperative bone quality assessments, including the Dorr classification, the canal flare index (CFI), the morphological cortical index (MCI), and the canal bone ratio (CBR), as well as postoperative radiographic evaluations, such as the CFR and component fixation, between patients who received a collared or a non-collared femoral stem. The study analyzed 202 THAs, with 103 in the collared cohort and 99 in the non-collared cohort. Patients' demographics showed differences in age (p = 0.02) and ASA classification (p = 0.01) but similar preoperative bone quality between groups, as suggested by the Dorr classification (p = 0.15), CFI (p = 0.12), MCI (p = 0.26), and CBR (p = 0.50). At the two-year follow-up, femoral stem CFRs (p = 0.59 and p = 0.27) were comparable between collared and non-collared cohorts. Subsidence rates were almost doubled for non-collared patients (19.2 vs. 11.7%, p = 0.17), however, not to a level of clinical significance. The findings of this study show that both collared and non-collared Corail stems produce comparable outcomes in terms of the CFR and radiographic indicators for stem fixation. These findings reduce concerns about stem under-sizing and micro-motion in collared stems. While this study provides insights into the collar design debate in THA, further research remains necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Shai Factor
- Division of Orthopedics, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Castagnini F, Pardo F, Lucchini S, Rotini M, Cavalieri B, Dalla Rosa M, Vitacca S, Di Martino A, Faldini C, Traina F. Cementless Primary Stems in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:604. [PMID: 38276110 PMCID: PMC10816713 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Cementless primary stems in revision hip arthroplasties may be conservative options to preserve bone stock and provide adequate reconstruction of the hip biomechanics. However, there is still little evidence about indications, limitations, and outcomes. This narrative review showed that conventional standard stems were adopted in different revision settings, up to Paprosky IIIA grade bone defects. In cases of acceptable metaphyseal bone stock, when a scratch fit of at least 4 cm can be achieved, a conventional cementless stem may be an adequate solution. Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates were similar to long revision stems, whereas complications, surgical time, and costs were lower among conventional stems. However, unsuitable contexts for conventional stems included canal diameters larger than 18 mm and failed revision stems with cortical weakening. Even short stems can be considered in revisions, in order to preserve bone stock and stay proximal to femoral remodeling zones and bone/cement plugs. Short stems were successfully adopted up to Paprosky IIIA bone defects, achieving mid-term survival rates not inferior to long revision stems. Ageing, osteoporosis, and intraoperative femoral fractures were the main negative prognostic factors. In very select cases, a downsizing technique (from longer to shorter stems) may be adopted to simplify the procedure and reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Castagnini
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Francesco Pardo
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Stefano Lucchini
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Marco Rotini
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Bruno Cavalieri
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Mattia Dalla Rosa
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Stefano Vitacca
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
| | - Alberto Di Martino
- 1 Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (A.D.M.); (C.F.)
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Cesare Faldini
- 1 Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (A.D.M.); (C.F.)
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Traina
- Ortopedia-Traumatologia e Chirurgia Protesica e dei Reimpianti d’Anca e di Ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy; (F.P.); (S.L.); (M.R.); (B.C.); (M.D.R.); (S.V.); (F.T.)
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences—DIBINEM, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|