Treatment of distal femur fractures in a regional Australian hospital

Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?

INTRODUCTION

Distal femur fractures make up < 1% of all fractures and 3-6% of all femur fractures. In the literature, both intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locked plating (LP) have shown favorable results, but there is no consensus on a gold standard. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare outcomes of native distal femur fractures treated via IMN versus LP in an effort to determine if one is superior to the other.

METHODS

Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Only articles published within the last ten years were included. Evidence and study quality were evaluated with the MQOE and Oxford Criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-six articles were included in the review. Fractures treated with IMN were found to have a 93.9% union rate, an average time to union of 19.2 weeks, an average arc of motion of 105.1 degrees, with an average of 14.4 degrees of malalignment. Fractures treated with LP were found to have a 90.2% union rate, an average time to union of 20.5 weeks, an average arc of motion of 104 degrees, with an average of 12.6 degrees of malalignment.

CONCLUSION

Compiled data comparisons revealed no differences in union rate, malalignment, time to union, average arc of motion, or complication rates requiring a return to the operating room. Until higher level randomized data is available, either IMN or LP are acceptable methods of treatment for native distal femur fractures.

Outcomes of distal femoral fractures treated with dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plate system: a single centre experience spanning 15 years

Introduction

the dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plate is an angular stable fixation (95°) system for distal femur fractures that allows for the ability to apply compression across the femoral condyles. The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience treating distal femur fractures with this device and give the long-term outcome.

Methods

a retrospective study was undertaken in our institution during the period from January 2002 to December 2016. A total number of 240 patients with distal femur fractures were managed using DCS plate system and included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 33 months (26 - 62 months). Clinico-radiological progression of fracture union as well as the functional outcome was studied.

Results

most of the fractures were closed injuries in young male patients resulting from traffic accidents. The average time to union was 12.6 weeks (range 11 - 23). Eight patients (3.3%) suffered superficial infection. Five patients (2.1%) developed deep venous thrombosis. Delayed union was observed in nine cases (3.7%) and non union in six cases (2.5%). At final follow-up, the mean range of motion (ROM) of knee was 115.7° (100°-148°). The mean Knee Society Score (KSS) was 84.5 (59 - 94) and the mean Lysholm score was 88.6 (range, 61 - 96), translating to good clinical results.

Conclusion

our study conclusively establishes that excellent functional outcome can be achieved with DCS plate inserted with skilled surgical technique in distal femur fractures including the ones that are communited or occurring in osteoporotic bone with a negligible complication rates.

Incidence of nonunion after surgery of distal femoral fractures using contemporary fixation device: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Nonunion is the most frequent cause of reoperation and is associated with high morbidity after distal femur fracture (DFF). We examined the rates of nonunion requiring reoperation after fixation for DFF using a locking compression plate (LCP) or retrograde intramedullary nail (RIMN).

METHODS

We included four studies comparing LCP and RIMN and 38 single-cohort studies reporting LCP or RIMN. In total, 2156 femurs were included and 166 non-unions were detected. We conducted a pair-wise meta-analysis (with a fixed-effects model) on the four comparative studies and a proportional meta-analysis on the 38 articles to estimate the nonunion rate. We performed sensitivity analysis by comparing studies using LCP with less invasive surgical systems (LISS) with those that used RIMN.

RESULTS

The pairwise meta-analysis showed a similar nonunion rate between the groups [odds ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.11, p = 0.633]. According to proportional meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of nonunion was 5% (95% CI 4-7) totally, 6% (95% CI 4-8) in the LCP group, and 4% (95% CI 2-6) in the RIMN group (heterogeneity: p = 0.105). According to the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference in the union rate. The pooled prevalence of nonunion from sensitivity analysis was 4 % (95% CI, 3-5); it was 4% (95% CI, 3-6) in LCP with LISS and was 4% (95% CI, 2-6) in RIMN group (heterogeneity: p = 0.941).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 5% of patients who underwent LCP or RIMN fixation developed nonunion. Therefore, LCP and RIMN are effective DFF techniques and mastering one of them is essential.