Reliability and concurrent validity of postural asymmetry measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Do cervical stabilization exercises change the effects of conventional exercises in patients with Parkinson's disease?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine whether cervical stabilization exercises (CSEs) change the effects of conventional exercises (CEs) in patients with PD.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with PD were randomized into two groups. While the experimental group (EG) received CSEs in addition to CEs, the control group (CG) received only CEs. Both programs lasted 8 weeks. Eighteen participants were able to complete the study. The outcomes were the changes in posture, cervical joint position sense (JPS), balance assessment, 10-m walking tests (10MWT), and the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, significant improvement was observed in both groups in terms of trunk rotation angle and pelvic asymmetry, the time parameter of TUG, and the 10MWT (p < 0.05). In the EG, greater improvement was detected in the Berg Balance Scale, static posturography, postural alignment, JPS, and the cadence parameter of TUG (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

CEs and CSEs could improve walking speed and posture in patients with PD, but if CSEs are added to CEs, greater improvements could be achieved in JPS and postural control.(Clinical Trials ID: NCT03854747).

Test characteristics of rasterstereography for the early diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

This study aimed to evaluate rasterstereography of the spine as a diagnostic test for adolescent idiopathic soliosis (AIS), and to compare its results with those obtained using a scoliometer. Adolescents suspected of AIS and scheduled for radiographs were included. Rasterstereographic scoliosis angle (SA), maximal vertebral surface rotation (ROT), and angle of trunk rotation (ATR) with a scoliometer were evaluated. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots were used to describe the discriminative ability of the SA, ROT, and ATR for scoliosis, defined as a Cobb angle > 10°. Test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) were reported for the best threshold identified using the Youden method. AUC of SA, ATR, and ROT were compared using the bootstrap test for two correlated ROC curves method. Of 212 patients studied, 146 (69%) had an AIS. The AUC was 0.74 for scoliosis angle (threshold 12.5°, sensitivity 75%, specificity 65%), 0.65 for maximal vertebral surface rotation (threshold 7.5°, sensitivity 63%, specificity 64%), and 0.82 for angle of trunk rotation (threshold 5.5°, sensitivity 65%, specificity 80%). The AUC of ROT was significantly lower than that of ATR (p < 0.001) and SA (p < 0.001). The AUCs of ATR and SA were not significantly different (p = 0.115). The rasterstereographic scoliosis angle has better diagnostic characteristics than the angle of trunk rotation evaluated with a scoliometer, with similar AUCs and a higher sensitivity.

Scoliosis and skeletal muscle mass are strongly associated with low back pain-related disability in humans: An evolutionary anthropology point of view

OBJECTIVES

To clarify the potential risk factors and etiology of low back pain (LBP)-related disability, including structural changes of the spine (spinal scoliosis) and body composition components in a population with a high prevalence of LBP.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, two self-reported validated questionnaires were used to collect back pain and disability data in an ethnically homogeneous family-based population sample (N = 1078). The scoliosis angle of trunk rotation was measured by a scoliometer on three spinal levels while the patient was bent forward. Body composition parameters, including relative to weight (WT), fat, relative skeletal muscle mass (SMM/WT), and total body water were determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Statistical analysis was conducted, accounting for the familial composition of the sample.

RESULTS

The mixed multiple regression analyses with several LBP-related phenotypes as dependent variables consistently showed significant independent associations with scoliosis and SMM/WT, irrespective of other covariates. The odds ratios (OR)/95% CI for scoliosis ranged between 1.40 (1.19-1.64) and 1.51 (1.27-1.80), and from 0.61(0.51-0.72), to 0.71(0.58-0.87) for SMM/WT, depending on the LBP phenotype. The genetic components of the respective correlations between the LBP-phenotypes and scoliosis or SMM/WT were negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

The associations between LBP-related conditions and postured scoliosis and SMM/WT were consistent and significant and therefore may serve as markers in predicting the development of LBP-related disability. We interpret the origin of these correlations as the evolutionary event due to the imperfect spine anatomy adaptation to a vertical posture resulting from a quick transition to bipedalism from a quadrupedal ancestor.

Six-Month Results on Treatment Adherence, Physical Activity, Spinal Appearance, Spinal Deformity, and Quality of Life in an Ongoing Randomised Trial on Conservative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (CONTRAIS)

Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) often receive conservative treatments aiming to prevent progression of the spinal deformity during puberty. This study aimed to explore patient adherence and secondary outcomes during the first 6 months in an ongoing randomised controlled trial of three treatment interventions. Interventions consisted of physical activity combined with either hypercorrective Boston brace night shift (NB), scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE), or physical activity alone (PA). Measures at baseline and 6 months included angle of trunk rotation (ATR), Cobb angle, International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF), pictorial Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (pSAQ), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r), EuroQol 5-Dimensions Youth (EQ-5D-Y) and Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Patient adherence, motivation, and capability in performing the intervention were reported at 6 months. The study included 135 patients (111 females) with AIS and >1-year estimated remaining growth, mean age 12.7 (1.4) years, and mean Cobb angle 31 (±5.3). At 6 months, the proportion of patients in the groups reporting high to very high adherence ranged between 72 and 95%, while motivation ranged between 65 and 92%, with the highest proportion seen in the NB group (p = 0.014, p= 0.002). IPAQ-SF displayed significant between group main effects regarding moderate activity (F = 5.7; p = 0.004; ηp2 = 0.10), with a medium-sized increase favouring the SSE group compared to NB. Walking showed significant between group main effects, as did metabolic equivalent (MET-min/week), with medium (F = 6.8, p = 0.002; ηp2 = 0.11, and large (F = 8.3, p = < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.14) increases, respectively, for the SSE and PA groups compared to NB. From baseline to 6 months, ATR showed significant between group medium-sized main effects (F = 1.2, p = 0.019, ηp2 = 0.007) favouring the NB group compared to PA, but not reaching a clinically relevant level. In conclusion, patients reported high adherence and motivation to treatment, especially in the NB group. Patients in the SSE and PA groups increased their physical activity levels without other clinically relevant differences between groups in other clinical measures or patient-reported outcomes. The results suggest that the prescribed treatments are viable first-step options during the first 6 months.

The correlation between back posture and sagittal jaw position in adult orthodontic patients

Objective

A debate remains in evidence-based medicine about the reciprocal interchange between dental occlusion and body postural therapy. Back posture deformity has been found to be related to trunk asymmetry as one characteristic of scoliosis that is commonly reported in occlusal development issue. This study aims to determine the correlation between back posture and sagittal jaw position in adult orthodontic patients treated at the dental hospital of Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Methods

This observational study was conducted on orthodontic patients who had routine orthodontic control between October 2019 and February 2020. The sagittal jaw relationship on pre-treatment cephalometry lateral-based on Steiner analysis was done with OrthoVision software. The back posture that related to cervical, thoracic, and lumbar measurement was performed using scoliometer plastic economy (Baseline®).

Results

From 128 patients, aged between 18 and 30 years, we found 72 patients with Class I, 41 patients with Class II, and 15 patients with Class III skeletal malocclusion. There were no significant differences of trunk asymmetry based on sagittal jaw relationship (p = 0.651). Additionally, there was no significant correlation between back posture and sagittal jaw position in Class II and Class III patients (r = 0.112, p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In this study, the sagittal jaw relationship had poor correlation to back posture in orthodontic adult patients due to a compensatory mechanism. The presence of temporomandibular dysfunction, sella-nasion-B point, and head posture are specific variables in a particular dento-skeletal type that should be considered in further studies.

Measurement of Lumbar Lordosis: A Comparison of 2 Alternatives to the Cobb Angle

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare 2 alternative methods, the radiologic Harrison Posterior Tangent Method (HPTM) and the nonradiologic Spinal Mouse (SM), to the Cobb angle for measuring lumbar lordosis.

METHODS

Sixteen participants with previously existing lateral lumbopelvic radiographs underwent nonradiographic lordosis assessment with a Spinal Mouse. Then 2 investigators analyzed each radiograph twice using the Harrison Posterior Tangent Method and Cobb angle. Correlations were analyzed between HPTM, the Cobb angle, and SM using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient; intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement were analyzed for HPTM and the Cobb angle using intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The HPTM correlated highly with the Cobb angle (Spearman ρ = 0.936, P < .001); SM had moderate to strong correlations with the Cobb angle (ρ = 0.737, P = .002) and HPTM (ρ = 0.707, P = .003). Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreement for the Cobb angle and HPTM were excellent (all intraclass correlation coefficients > 0.90). One participant had slight kyphosis according to HPTM and SM analyses (which consider the entire lumbar region), whereas the Cobb angle, based only on L1 and L5, reported mild lordosis for that participant.

CONCLUSION

In this sample, HPTM measurements showed high correlation with the commonly used Cobb angle, but this method requires more time and effort, and normal values have not been established. The SM may be an alternative when radiographs are inappropriate, but it measures soft tissue contours rather than lordosis itself.

Standard reference values of the upper body posture in healthy young female adults in Germany: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

Classifications of posture deviations are only possible compared with standard values. However, standard values have been published for healthy male adults but not for female adults.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main.

PARTICIPANTS

106healthy female volunteers (21-30 years old; 25.1±2.7 years) were included. Their body weight ranged from 46 to 106 kg (60.3±7.9 kg), the heights from 1.53 to 1.82 m (1.69±0.06 m) and the body mass index from 16.9 kg/m² to 37.6 kg/m² (21.1±2.6 kg/m²).

OUTCOME MEASURES

A three-dimensional back scan was performed to measure the upper back posture in habitual standing. The tolerance ranges and CI were calculated. Group differences were tested by the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In normal posture, the spinal column was marginally twisted to the left, and the vertebrae were marginally rotated to the right. The kyphosis angle is larger than the lumbar angle. Consequently, a more kyphotic posture is observed in the sagittal plane. The habitual posture is slightly scoliotic with a rotational component (scapular depression right, right scapula marginally more dorsally, high state of pelvic right, iliac right further rotated anteriorly).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthy young women have an almost ideally balanced posture with minimal ventral body inclination and a marginal scoliotic deviation. Compared with young males, women show only marginal differences in the upper body posture. These values allow a comparison to other studies, both for control and patient data, and may serve as guideline in both clinical practice and scientific studies.

The mechanisms underlying the variety of preoperative directionalities of shoulder tilting in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve

PURPOSE

Preoperative directionality of shoulder tilting seems to be independent of the radiographic features of proximal thoracic (PT) curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. To date, no study had investigated the mechanisms underlying the variety of preoperative directionalities of shoulder tilting in AIS patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences of radiographic features between Lenke type 2 (double thoracic curve) AIS patients with different preoperative directionalities of shoulder tilting.

METHODS

A total of 130 Lenke type 2 AIS patients were included in this study and were divided into two groups according to the value of radiographic shoulder height (RSH). There were 78 cases (71 females and 7 males) with RSH less than 0 cm in Group A and 52 cases (44 females and 8 males) with RSH equal to or more than 0 cm in Group B. Preoperative standing anteroposterior X-ray films of the spine were obtained in all these subjects and were analyzed with respect to the following parameters: T1 tilt, PT Cobb angle, main thoracic (MT) Cobb angle, the apical level of PT curve, the apical level of MT curve, and RSH. These parameters were compared between these two groups and the correlations between RSH and the other parameters were analyzed in all of these subjects.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between these two groups with respect to PT Cobb angle or the apical level of PT curve (P > 0.05). The apical level of MT curve was significantly more proximal in Group A compared with Group B (P < 0.05). The MT Cobb angle was significantly larger in Group A compared with Group B (P < 0.05). Both the T1 tilt and the PT Cobb angle/MT Cobb angle ratio in Group A were significantly smaller than those in Group B (P < 0.05). The RSH was positively associated with T1 tilt, the apical level of MT curve, and the PT Cobb angle/MT Cobb angle ratio, but was negatively associated with MT Cobb angle (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The directionality of shoulder tilting is diverse in Lenke type 2 AIS patients. The preoperative directionality of shoulder mainly depends on the profile of MT curve rather than that of PT curve. The RSH should be carefully evaluated before making a surgical plan in these patients.