Hip hemi-arthroplasty for neck of femur fracture: What is the current evidence?

Bilateral Femoral Neck Fractures in a 50-Year-Old Patient with Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND Renal osteodystrophy is a serious complication of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). It predisposes the patient to fragility fracture and an increased risk of mortality. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 50-year-old male patient with stage 4 CKD and consequent renal osteodystrophy, who presented with a history of a recent provoked seizure, a severe electrolyte imbalance, and excruciating pain in the hip region. He had no history of a fall or trauma. A radiographic evaluation confirmed the rare finding of a bilateral femoral neck fracture. Upon stabilizing the patient, he was surgically managed with a bilateral hemiarthroplasty. A postoperative radiograph revealed a well-fixed prosthesis with no post-surgical complications. The patient had a full recovery. At the last follow-up visit, the patient was fully functional and had resumed normal activities. CONCLUSIONS This is a rare report with unusual mechanism of injury, involving a case of bilateral femoral neck fragility fractures, secondary to renal osteodystrophy in a stage 4 CKD patient. It draws the attention of medical care providers to the high risk of femoral fragility fractures that are secondary to renal osteodystrophy. Hemiarthroplasty is a safe and highly efficacious surgical option for managing such cases. This case also reiterates the dire need for greater public awareness and knowledge of CKD. Early diagnosis and treatment can substantially mitigate the associated morbidity and mortality.

Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures in the Elderly: Outcomes and Costings

Background

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a common form of treatment for displaced neck of femur fractures. There is ongoing debate as to whether cemented or uncemented HA is a more superior treatment modality. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes between patients that underwent cemented HA to uncemented HA. Secondarily, we analysed the costs associated of each treatment option.

Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted at a busy district general hospital. The study included 335 patients that were treated with either a cemented or uncemented HA for a displaced neck of femur fracture between January 2017 and December 2018. Data collected included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, treatment modality, length of stay (LOS) and general costs.

Results

197 (58.8%) of the cohort underwent cemented HA and 138 (41.2%) underwent uncemented HA. Mean age for the cemented cohort was 84.7 years and 85.9 years in the uncemented group (p = 0.31). There was no significant differences between the groups with regard to mean LOS and discharge disposition (p = 0.44). There were no significant difference in 30-day and 1-year mortality between the two groups (p = 0.2). We did find a statistically significant difference in the costings between the two procedures, with cemented HAs costing £66 more than uncemented HAs (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We found that both cemented and uncemented HAs produced comparable results. We found a statistically significant reduction in operative time and costs associated with uncemented HA. Uncemented HA implants may be considered where a shorter operation duration is essential.

Hip Osteoarthritis-Clinical-Statistical Study and Surgical Treatment

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, also known as coxarthrosis, is a degenerative disease marked by gradual biomechanics alterations cause by articular cartilage damage in the coxofemural joint. The goal of this study was determining the incidence of patients with hip osteoarthritis who undergo surgery (hip arthroplasty) within the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the Emergency County Hospital of Drobeta-Turnu Severin, hospitalized between January 2014 and December 2019. Furthermore, we proposed gathering details about incidence, distribution according to age group, gender, living conditions, and type of arthroplasty used in studied patient group. The study included 485 patients with hip OA mainly diagnosed in elderly patients, 87.83% being over 60 years old. In terms of gender, the disease primarily impacted women, with a female/male ratio of 2/1.

Incidence of dislocation and associated risk factors in patients with a femoral neck fracture operated with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Several factors might be associated with risk of dislocating following uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to femoral neck fracture (FNF). Current evidence is limited with great variance in reported incidence of dislocation (1-15%). Aim of this study was to identify the cumulative incidence of first-time dislocation following HA and to identify the associated risk factors.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving an HA (BFX Biomet stem, posterior approach) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, in 2010-2016. Patients were followed until death or end of study (dec 2018). Dislocation was identified by code extraction from the Danish National Patient Registry. Variables included in the multivariate model were defined pre-analysis to include: age, sex and variables with a p-value < 0.1 in univariate analysis. A regression model was fitted for 90 days dislocation as the assumption of proportional hazard rate (HR) was not met here after.

RESULTS

We identified 772 stems (some patients occurred with both right and left hip) and 58 stems suffered 90 dislocations during the observation period, resulting in a 7% (CI 5-9) incidence of dislocation 90 days after index surgery. 55 of the 58 stems (95%) experienced the first dislocation within 90 days after surgery. Only absence of dementia was identified as an independent protective factor in the cause-specific model (HR 0.46 (CI 0.23-0.89)) resulting in a 2.4-fold cumulative risk of experiencing a dislocation in case of dementia. Several other variables such as age, sex, various medical conditions, surgery delay and surgical experience were eliminated as statistical risk factors. We found a decrease in survival probability for patients who experienced a dislocation during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of first-time dislocation of HA (BFX Biomet stem, posterior approach) in patients with a hip fracture is found to be 7% 90 days after surgery. Due to the non-existing attribution bias, we claim it to be the true incidence. Dementia was among several variables identified as the only risk factor for dislocation. In perspective, we may consider treating patients with dementia by other methods than HA e.g., HA with cement or with a more constrained solution. Also, a surgical approach that reduce the risk of dislocation should be considered.

Acetabular Morphology Predicts the Risk of Dislocation Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

Hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation is a devastating complication. Among other preoperative risk factors, acetabular morphology has been rarely studied. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of preoperative native acetabular morphology on hemiarthroplasty dislocation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 867 patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture between January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2019. The 380 included patients were treated with an anterior-based muscle-sparing approach. The central-edge angle (CEA) and acetabular depth-to-width ratio (ADWR) of the fractured hip were measured preoperatively on the anteroposterior pelvic view. Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to analyze the optimal cutoff for CEA and ADWR. Hemiarthroplasty dislocation occurred in 18 patients (4.7%), and the remaining 362 patients were used as the control group.

RESULTS

No significant differences in terms of sex, age, dementia, neuromuscular disease, and body mass index were found between the 2 groups. The 18 patients who had a hip dislocation had significantly smaller mean CEA than the control group (P = .0001) (mean 36.1 ± 7.5° and 43.2 ± 5.6°, respectively) as well as ADWR (mean 34 ± 6 versus 37 ± 4, respectively) (P = .001). Using the receiver operating characteristic analysis, we report significant cutoffs of 38.5° for CEA (P = .0001) and 34.5 for the ADWR (P = .017).

CONCLUSION

Higher rates of hemiarthroplasty dislocation were observed in patients who had a preoperative CEA of less than 38.5° and an ADWR of less than 34.5. Patients who have preoperative acetabular morphological risk factors for dislocation might be better candidates for a total hip arthroplasty.

A Systematic Review of the Usage of Lidocaine in Hip Replacement Surgery

Hip replacement procedures, professionally known as hip arthroplasty, are one of the most common orthopedic procedures. Due to the variation in this procedure, the use and types of anesthetics differ. One such commonly used anesthetic is lidocaine. Since there are currently no standardized or general procedures for the application of lidocaine for perioperative hip arthroplasty procedures, this review aims to delve into this topic. A literature review surrounding the key terms "hip replacement" and "lidocaine" was performed on PubMed. After reviewing 24 randomized control trials, statistical analyses between groups that had no lidocaine versus groups that did were performed. The results showed that there was no statistical significance between various age groups and the use of lidocaine. One percent (1%) and 2% injected into the lumbar region were the most commonly reported doses of lidocaine, with 2% often being the first test dose. Other conclusions were that lidocaine was used for general anesthesia for individuals that underwent hip arthroplasty due to an underlying condition (cauda equina syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.). Lidocaine was also used for postoperative pain relief, which is a potential concern from its addictive qualities. This investigation outlines the current stance and usage of lidocaine in perioperative hip arthroplasty while noting its limitations.

Imaging of the Acutely Injured Hip

Acute hip pain following injury more commonly originates locally in and around the hip joint rather than being referred from the lumbar spine, sacroiliac joints, groin, or pelvis. Clinical assessment can usually localize the pain source to the hip region. Thereafter, imaging helps define the precise cause of acute hip pain. This review discusses the imaging of common causes of acute hip pain following injury in adults, addressing injuries in and around the hip joint. Pediatric and postsurgical causes of hip pain following injury are not discussed.

Comparison of Anterior and Lateral Approach in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femur Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Introduction

Many surgical approaches have been described for hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) treating femur neck fractures (FNFs). Direct lateral approach (DLA) is one of the most used. Today, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has become very attractive, but it seems to involve more intra-operative fractures. Our main endpoint was to demonstrate that the DAA may be a valid alternative comparing to the DLA.

Materials and methods

Patients affected by FNFs and treated with HHA between the years 2016 and 2020 were studied. We divided the treatment of the fractures according to the surgical approach. The analysis was focused on perioperative complications and radiological outcomes.

Results

There were a total of 166 patients. The DLA group included patients with an average age of 83.5 years and the DAA group of 83 years. We found similar surgical times (DLA 67 min vs DAA 61 min; p = 0,55), number of transfusions (DLA 3/person vs DAA 4/person; p = 0,91), perioperative complications (fractures: DLA 0 vs DAA 0 - dislocations: DLA 2,50% vs DAA 0) and functional outcomes (HHS: DLA 83 points vs DAA 87 points; p = 0,71). There were no statistical differences comparing diaphyseal filling (Canal Fill Index at the proximal third: DLA 0,79 vs DAA 0,78; p= 0,24), bone loss (Paprosky I: DLA 96,25% vs DAA 91,86%; p = 0,47) and prevalence of heterotopic ossification (Broker low degree: DLA 93,75% vs 95, 34%; p = 0,87).

Conclusion

Analysing perioperative complications and studying post-operative radiographic evolution, our results suggest that the DAA is a valid alternative to the DLA in HHA treating FNFs.

Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures in patients aged 90 years or older: A bi-centre study comparing 209 patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of unipolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasty to treat hip fractures in patients aged ≥ 90 years.

METHODS

We conducted this study from 2007 to 2018 based on the electronic databases of two hospitals. Patients aged ≥ 90 years, treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osteosynthese 31-B3 type fractures, were included. One hospital conducted the treatment only with unipolar prostheses; the other hospital used only bipolar prostheses. We assessed 23 peri‑ and postoperative variables including any revision, dislocation, and survival. The follow-up was completed after a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. At follow-up, the functional status was evaluated via telephone using the Parker score for every living patient.

RESULTS

One-hundred unipolar prostheses, and 109 bipolar prostheses were examined. The patients' mean age was 92.9 years (range 90-102). Dementia was differently distributed between the groups (p < 0.001), with a lower survival risk (Odds Ratio 1.908; Confidence Interval 1.392 - 2.615; log rank <0.001). Based on this result, unipolar demonstrated significantly higher mortality rates compared with bipolar prostheses (log rank < 0.001). No effects were found for dislocation, revision and overall complication rate. At follow-up, 37 patients were available for functional status. The mean Parker score was 3.7 (range 0-9), with no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracapsular hip fractures in patients aged ≥ 90 years can be treated with unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty. The type of prostheses did not influence dislocation, revision, general complication, or functional status. The groups were significantly affected by dementia, a risk factor for shorter survival.

Influence of the knot position on the union of the greater trochanter after bipolar hip arthroplasty via the modified Dall approach: a prospective non-randomized study

Background

In our institute, all elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture were treated with cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BHA) using the modified Dall approach. To our knowledge, there are no reports on the knot position of the greater trochanter reattachment. The aim of this study was to determine influence of two knot positions (anterior or posterior) on the complications of the greater trochanter.

Methods

This is a prospective non-randomized study conducted on 95 elderly patients (95 hips) from September 2013 to December 2017. The knot position was changed from anterior to posterior alternately. The X-ray images obtained immediately after the operation were compared with those obtained at 3 months postoperatively; thereafter, the status of the greater trochanter was classified into three types: type A, no apparent shifting and fracture; type C, over 1-mm shifting of the fragment; and type F, fracture of the greater trochanter.

Results

Regarding age at operation, sex, BMI, size of the greater trochanteric fragment, stem type, and surgeon, there was no significant difference between two groups. In the anterior group, 34 hips (72.3%), 5 hips (10.6%), and 8 hips (17.0%) were classified under type A, C, and F, respectively. In the posterior group, 44 hips (91.7%), 1 hip (2.1%), and 3 hips (6.3%) were classified under type A, C, and F, respectively. There were significantly fewer greater trochanteric complications in the posterior group.

Conclusions

The posterior knot position improved the union of the greater trochanter after BHA compared with the anterior knot position.

Trial registration

We had approved IRB at our hospital clinical research review committee. Retrospectively registered.

Effectiveness and safety of cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures

Aims

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the mortality, morbidity, and functional outcomes of cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures, analyzing contemporary and non-contemporary implants separately.

Methods

PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched to 2 February 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the primary outcome, mortality, and secondary outcomes of function, quality of life, reoperation, postoperative complications, perioperative outcomes, pain, and length of hospital stay. Relative risks (RRs) and mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) were used as summary association measures.

Results

A total of 18 studies corresponding to 16 non-overlapping RCTs with a total of 2,819 intracapsular hip fractures were included. Comparing contemporary cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty, RRs (95% CIs) for mortality were 1.32 (0.44 to 3.99) perioperatively, 1.01 (0.48 to 2.10) at 30 days, and 0.90 (0.71 to 1.15) at one year. The use of contemporary cemented hemiarthroplasty reduced the risk of intra- and postoperative periprosthetic fracture. There were no significant differences in the risk of other complications, function, pain, and quality of life. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes except for increases in operating time and overall anaesthesia for contemporary cemented hemiarthroplasty with mean differences (95% CIs) of 6.67 (2.65 to 10.68) and 4.90 (2.02 to 7.78) minutes, respectively. The morbidity and mortality outcomes were not significantly different between non-contemporary cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty.

Conclusion

There are no differences in the risk of mortality when comparing the use of contemporary cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the management of intracapsular hip fractures. Contemporary cemented hemiarthroplasty is associated with a substantially lower risk of intraoperative and periprosthetic fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1113–1121.

Outcomes of press-fit uncemented versus cemented hip arthroplasty in the oncologic patient

Background and objectives

Cemented hip arthroplasty is considered the standard of care for treating both osteoporotic femoral neck fractures and pathologic disease of the proximal femur due to the ability to achieve strong fixation in poor quality bone. There is minimal literature evaluating uncemented arthroplasty for pathologic disease of the proximal femur. This objective of this study is to compare outcomes of patients undergoing cemented and uncemented arthroplasty of the proximal femur for an oncologic indication.

Methods

Patients who underwent hip arthroplasty procedures in one health system for an oncologic indication were identified. Demographics, cancer history, operative history, and complications were collected retrospectively. Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Scores (MSTS) were prospectively collected via telephone.

Results

41 patients met criteria for review. 18 underwent cemented and 23 underwent uncemented arthroplasty. There were no significant differences in age, demographics, complications, 30-day mortality, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirements, average HHS, or average MSTS.

Conclusion

No significant differences were found for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty for an oncologic indication regardless of whether or not the femoral component was cemented. Our results suggest that cemented and uncemented techniques are both safe and effective methods to be used at the oncologic surgeon's discretion.

Never too old for hip arthroplasty: a 111-year-old woman walks out of hospital-a case report and literature review

Centenarians population is proliferating, and hip fractures are responsible for more than 10% of all hospital admissions for centenarian patients, which represents a considerable challenge to patients and healthcare providers. Herein, we first report a case of a 111-year-old woman who suffered from a hip fracture and was successfully managed with cemented hemiarthroplasty surgery. In addition, we further reviewed case reports, news, and related studies to address the central points in managing hip fractures in the centenarian population.