Post-operative urinary retention: Review of literature

Erector spinae plane block versus caudal epidural block in pediatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Caudal Epidural Block (CEB) is a well-established regional anesthesia technique for abdominal and sub-abdominal pediatric surgeries. However, it has a short duration, often leading to additional analgesic administration. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), for instance, is an emerging technique that, like CEB, provides analgesic effect to a specific dermatome of the body during surgery and in the postoperative period. Therefore, we performed this systematic review with meta-analysis to compare both techniques.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing ESPB versus CEB in pediatric patients undergoing abdominal and sub-abdominal surgeries. The primary outcome was the time to first analgesic request. Secondary outcomes were I) FLACC score; II) Postoperative nausea and vomiting, and III) Urinary retention.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials encompassing 507 patients were included in this analysis (1‒9). The patients were predominantly male and under 10 years of age. There was an equal distribution between the two groups regarding the number of patients and patients' baseline characteristics. The main results were: time to first analgesic request (MD = 3.71; 95% CI: -1.88-9.29; I2 = 99%; p = 0.19); FLACC scores at 2 hours (MD = 0.15; 95% CI: -0.30-0.59; I2 = 0%; p = 0.52); FLACC scores at 24 hours (MD = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.39-0.05; I2 = 41%; I2 = 41%; p = 0.13); urinary retention events (RR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02-0.94; I2 = 0%; p = 0.04); and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) which was null in both groups in three studies. However, it is important to clarify that some limitations were identified, such as significant heterogeneity in the following outcomes: time to first analgesic request and FLACC score at 24h, possibly due to different age groups, different types of surgeries, different background analgesia administration, and a relatively small sample size. As for the risk of bias, two studies were found to have some concerns in "bias due to deviations from intended interventions" (8,9).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the administration of ESPB did not statistically differ from CEB regarding the time to first analgesic request. FLACC scores also did not show a statistically significant difference between groups. The ESPB group, however, experienced minor urinary retention events compared to the CEB group.

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE

According to the GRADE assessment, all outcomes evaluated in this study were classified as high-quality evidence. Quality assessment is detailed in Supplementary Table 1.

Improving postoperative care for neurosurgical patients by a standardised protocol for urinary catheter placement: a multicentre before-and-after implementation study

INTRODUCTION

Urinary catheterisation, including indwelling and clean intermittent catheterisation, is common in perioperative and postoperative care. Despite guidelines, practice variation is significant. Inappropriate catheterisation risks include urinary tract infections and reduced mobility, leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased antibiotic use. This study aims to improve postoperative care through appropriate catheterisation in neurosurgical groups frequently subjected to catheterisation.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, before-and-after study in four Dutch hospitals from June 2021 to January 2023, including adult neurosurgical patients who underwent pituitary gland tumour or spinal fusion surgery. Exclusion criteria included conditions requiring chronic catheter use. A multifaceted strategy was implemented, focusing on a uniform protocol, an educational programme and department-specific champions. The primary outcome was inappropriate catheterisation, analysed with ordinal logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included total catheterisations, urinary tract infections and length of hospital stay. Ethical approval was obtained. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and SQUIRE checklists were used.

RESULTS

Among 3439 patients screened, 2711 were included, with 544 in the after group. The percentage of patients without inappropriate indwelling catheterisation increased from 46% to 57%, and the proportion without inappropriate clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 34% to 67%. Additionally, overall catheter use decreased: the percentage of patients not receiving an indwelling catheter increased from 54% to 64%, while those not requiring clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 89% to 92%. Infection rates and hospital stay were similar (1.4% and 1.3%; 4.9 and 5.1 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a uniform protocol may significantly reduce inappropriate and overall catheterisation in neurosurgical patients, aligning with patient-centred, less invasive healthcare. Ongoing education and adherence to standardised protocols are crucial. Future research should assess the long-term sustainability of these strategies.

Healthcare professional's management of the risk for postoperative urinary retention in hip surgery patients - a qualitative interview study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urine retention can lead to permanent bladder dysfunction. This occurs even though healthcare personnel can access evidence-based guidelines on avoiding urine bladder injuries related to care.

AIM

This study aimed to describe healthcare professionals' experiences with, and strategies to avoid post-operative urinary retention among hip surgery patients.

METHOD

A descriptive qualitative study using telephone interviews, were conducted in April to June 2021, with 22 healthcare professionals (13 nurses, 7 nursing assistants and 2 occupational therapists) in 17 orthopaedic wards in Sweden. Qualitative content analysis of interview data was performed.

RESULTS

Five categories were identified: "Knowledge about guidelines regarding bladder monitoring", "Understanding of patients' prehospital bladder function influences healthcare professionals' reasoning and actions", "Strategies are applied to make it easier for the patients to empty their bladder", "Indwelling catheter is used routinely" and "Short length of stay creates stress".

CONCLUSION

To optimise safe patient bladder monitoring after hip surgery, health care professionals need to be more aware of the availability of guidelines about bladder monitoring to adopt consistent monitoring practices, and to have enough time to care for patients.

Spinal anesthesia in ambulatory patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess current practice in the use of spinal anesthesia in major ambulatory surgery, highlighting its advantages over general anesthesia and identifying potential areas for improvement to facilitate a transition to a sustainable healthcare system.

RECENT FINDINGS

Spinal anesthesia might be preferred in selected populations when compared to general anesthesia providing the highest standards of healthcare quality.The use of local anesthetics with short half-life has proven to be efficient in achieving high anesthesia success rates. Spinal anesthesia does not increase perioperative complications; instead, it has shown a reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting, an improvement in patient comfort, and a favorable economic impact when compared to general anesthesia.

SUMMARY

Spinal anesthesia is an appropriate method for anesthesia in ambulatory patients, offering advantages over general anesthesia in selected populations.The use of spinal anesthesia is expanding to meet surgical needs. Therefore, it is crucial to plan ahead and anticipate organizational failures in the ambulatory setting to maintain safety and efficiency during outpatient procedures and surgeries.

Adherence to evidence-based guidelines for prevention of urinary retention in hip surgery patients: a multicentre observational study

Urinary retention is a healthcare complication putting patients at risk of unnecessary suffering and harm. Orthopaedic patients are known to face an increased such risk, calling for evidence-based preoperative assessment and corresponding measures to prevent bladder problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate healthcare professionals' adherence to risk assessment guidelines for urinary retention in hip surgery patients. This was an observational study from January 2021 to April 2021 with a descriptive and comparative design, triangulating three data sources: (I) Medical records for 1382 hip surgery patients across 17 hospitals in Sweden were reviewed for preoperative risk assessments for urinary retention and voiding-related variables at discharge; (II) The patients completed a survey regarding postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms, and; (III) data were extracted from a national quality registry regarding type of surgery, preoperative physical status, and perioperative urinary complications. Group differences were analysed with Chi-square/Fisher's exact test, t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, or Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression was used to analyse variables associated with completed risk assessments for urinary retention. Of all study participants, 23.4% (n = 323) had a preoperative documented risk assessment of urinary retention. Whether a risk assessment was performed was significantly associated with acute surgery [odds ratio (OR) 3.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48-5.12] and undergoing surgery at an academic hospital (OR 4.59, 95% CI 2.68-7.85). Acute patients were more often affected by urinary retention and had bladder issues and/or an indwelling catheter at discharge. More than every tenth patient (11. 9%, n = 53) completing the survey experienced intensified bladder problems after their hip surgery. The study shows a lack of adherence to risk assessment for urinary retention according to evidence-based guidelines, which negatively affects quality of care and patient safety.

Preoperative Bladder Scanning Can Predict Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

As total joint arthroplasty (TJA) moves to the outpatient setting, it is becoming clear that postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a potential impediment to same-day discharge. Although risk factors for POUR have been widely studied, the lack of their clinical utility warrants investigation of specific preoperative factors that can assist in surgical planning and patient optimization. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether preoperative symptom surveys and bladder scanning are useful tools in identifying POUR risk.

METHODS

We performed a prospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a high-volume orthopaedic hospital between December 1, 2020, and September 30, 2021. A total of 507 patients (324 female and 183 male) undergoing TJA completed the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index preoperatively and then again at 14 and 64 days postoperatively. Post-void bladder scans were obtained in the immediate preoperative setting. POUR was defined as a bladder volume of >500 mL that required catheterization. Chi-square and quintile analysis were used to compare bladder scanning volumes, and Student t tests were used to compare AUA scores.

RESULTS

The rate of POUR was 37% (66 female and 34 male) and 23% (37 female and 19 male) in the TKA and THA groups, respectively. Increasing post-void residual volume (PVRV) measured on preoperative bladder scanning was found to be predictive of POUR. Among the TKA cohort, younger age and lower body mass index were also associated with increased catheterization, although age was not statistically significant. The AUA symptom survey was not found to correlate with POUR in either population.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a predictable and exponential increase in the rate of catheterization as preoperative PVRV increased from 50 to 200 mL. The AUA symptom score showed no utility in predicting POUR in our study population. We propose that preoperative bladder ultrasonography become standard practice in TJA, especially among patients scheduled for same-day discharge.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Moxibustion for Managing Postoperative Urinary Retention After Hemorrhoidectomy and Anorectal Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

Common surgical procedures for conditions affecting the anus and rectum such as hemorrhoidectomy are associated with high risks of postoperative urinary retention (POUR). Little is known about the efficacy of moxibustion in managing POUR after such surgical procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to review the related literature and synthesize data on the effectiveness of moxibustion in managing POUR after common anorectal surgeries.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP information, and Wanfang databases were searched to October 1, 2021 using the keywords urinary retention, moxibustion, and moxa. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating patients who had developed POUR after hemorrhoidectomy or other anorectal surgeries were eligible for inclusion. Patients receiving moxibustion formed the intervention group and the control group received usual care alone. Primary outcomes were markedly effective rate, defined as spontaneous voiding with complete symptom relief within 30 to 60 minutes after treatment; and total effective rate (ie, markedly effective rate plus effective rate, defined as spontaneous voiding with partial relief of symptoms within 60 minutes to 4 hours after treatment). Secondary outcome was time to first urination after treatment.

FINDINGS

Thirty-four RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Pooled analysis revealed that the markedly effective rate was significantly higher in the moxibustion group than that in the control group (pooled RR = 2.53, 95% CI = 2.17-2.95), and the total effective rate in the moxibustion group was also higher than that in the control group (pooled RR = 5.02, 95% CI = 4.01-6.28). The intervention group had significantly shorter times to first urination than controls (pooled effect = -2.81, 95% CI = -2.06 to -3.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Moxibustion appears superior to usual care in relieving POUR after common anorectal surgeries. Future studies are still warranted to confirm these findings.

Pre-operative prediction of post-operative urinary retention in lumbar surgery: a prospective validation of machine learning model

PURPOSE

Predicting urinary retention is difficult. The aim of this study is to prospectively validate a previously developed model using machine learning techniques.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from pre-operative clinic. Prediction of urinary retention was completed pre-operatively by 4 individuals and compared to ground truth POUR outcomes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with intercorrelation coefficient (2,1).

RESULTS

171 patients were included with age 63 ± 14 years, 58.5% (100/171) male, BMI 30.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.6 ± 0.5, 1.7 ± 1.0 levels, 56% (96/171) fusions. The observed rate of POUR was 25.7%. The model's performance was found to be 0.663 (0.567-0.759). With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, the following predictive power was achieved: specificity 90.6%, sensitivity 22.7%, negative predictive value 77.2%, positive predictive value 45.5%, and accuracy 73.1%. Intercorrelation coefficient for the regression aspect of the model was found to be 0.889 and intercorrelation coefficient for the neural network aspect of the model was found to be 0.874.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirms performance of the prediction model for POUR developed with retrospective data, showing great correlation. This supports the use of machine learning techniques in the prediction of postoperative complications such as urinary retention.

Patients' experiences of urinary retention and bladder care - A qualitative study in orthopaedic care

BACKGROUND

Urinary retention is a common complication associated with hip surgery. There are easily available, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines prescribing how to prevent both urinary retention and other voiding issues, by means of bladder monitoring and risk assessments. A detected lack of adherence to such guidelines increases risks for unnecessary suffering among patients but a greater understanding of patients' experiences can benefit tailored interventions to address quality and safety gaps in orthopaedic nursing and rehabilitation.

PURPOSE

The aim was to describe patients' experiences of urinary retention, bladder issues, and bladder care in orthopaedic care due to hip surgery.

METHOD

This was a qualitative study with a descriptive design: content analysis with an inductive approach was applied to interviews (n = 32) and survey free-text responses (n = 122) across 17 orthopaedic units in Sweden.

RESULTS

The patients had received no or limited details for the recurrent bladder care interventions (such as bladder scans and prompted voiding) while at the hospital. They relied on the staff for safe procedures but were left to themselves to manage and comprehend prevailing bladder issues. Despite the patients' experiences of bladder issues or the risk of urinary retention postoperatively, the link to hip surgery remained unknown to the patients, leaving them searching for self-management strategies and further care.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' perspectives on bladder care, urinary retention and bladder issues can serve as a means for increased understanding of procedures and issues, reinforcing improved implementation of guidelines, including person-centred information. Safer bladder procedures imply further patient engagement, highlighted in guidelines.

Patient perspectives on indwelling urinary catheters and fluid balances after transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the perceptions and experiences of patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary gland and (para)sellar tumour surgery regarding indwelling urinary catheters (IDUCs) and the postoperative fluid balance.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semistructured interviews based on the attitudes, social influence and self-efficacy model and expert knowledge.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary gland tumour surgery and received an IDUC during or after surgery.

SETTING

One patient was interviewed in the endocrinology outpatient clinic and 11 patients were interviewed on the neurosurgery ward.

RESULTS

Five major themes emerged: (1) conflicting information and preoperative expectations, (2) IDUCs perceived as patient-friendly during bedrest, particularly for women, (3) little room for patients' opinions, (4) physical and emotional limitations and (5) fluid balance causes confusion. Information regarding IDUC placement and fluid balance given to patients both preoperatively and postoperatively did not meet their expectations, which led to confusion and uncertainty. The IDUC was perceived as preferable if bedrest was mandatory, preferred particularly by women. Patient could not mobilise freely due to the IDUC and felt ashamed, judged by others and dependent on nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into the challenges patients experience in relation to the IDUC and fluid balance. Perceptions on the necessity of an IDUC varied among patients and were influenced by both physical and emotional impediments. A clear, frequent and daily communication between healthcare professionals and patients to evaluate IDUC and fluid balance use is necessary to increase patient satisfaction.

Effect of Predictive Nursing Combined with Early Drinking Water Therapy on Patients with Urinary Retention after Vaginal Delivery

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of predictive nursing combined with early drinking water therapy on patients with urinary retention after vaginal delivery. A total of 600 women who gave birth in our hospital from July 2019 to July 2020 were selected as the research objects. A double-blind method was adopted to divide them into a control group and observation group, 300 cases in each group. In the control group, routine nursing was given. In the observation group, (1) predictive nursing measures were used before surgery. (2) The postoperative observation group used early drinking water therapy; the incidence of urinary retention, the effective rate of urination, postpartum haemorrhage, and the treatment of urinary retention were compared between the two groups. In the observation group, the number of urinary retention was 17, and the incidence of urinary retention was 5.67%. The urination efficiency of the observation group was 98.33%; the urination efficiency of the control group was 86.33%; comparison results showed that $P<0.05$ . The 24 h postpartum haemorrhage of the observation group was 1.33%; the 24 h postpartum haemorrhage of the control group was 2.66%. Uroschesis therapy was performed in 17 patients in the observation group and 44 patients in the control group.. The observation group had an 88.24 percent treatment rate, while the control group had a 72.73 percent treatment rate. $P<0.05$ indicated that the difference was statistically significant.

The voiding VAS score is a simple and useful method for predicting POUR after laparoscopy for benign gynaecologic diseases: a pilot study

The aim of this study was to identify an appropriate scoring system for predicting postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery for benign disease. We analysed 99 patients who underwent gynaecological laparoscopic surgery for benign disease. All patients were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), voiding visual analogue scale (VAS), and Brief Pain Inventory-Korean version. Of the 99 patients, 27 (27.3%) experienced urinary retention at least once, while 72 (72.7%) did not. The preoperative and postoperative IPSS scores were not associated with the development of POUR. However, the voiding VAS score was significantly lower in patients that developed POUR (p = .014). In conclusion, our results show that the voiding VAS score is a simple and useful method for identifying patients at risk of POUR after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery for benign disease. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is an often underestimated complication defined as inability to void during the postoperative period despite a full bladder. Undetected POUR may lead to complications such as urinary tract infection, bladder distention, and bladder dysfunction. Routine assessment of POUR by bladder ultrasonography in all surgical patients places a larger workload on the nursing staff.What do the results of this study add? Among the self-scoring assessment tools, the voiding VAS provided the most accurate reflection of POUR in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery for benign disease.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? As laparoscopy is the most widely employed surgical procedure in gynaecology, our findings could have significant implications for postoperative care in daily clinical practice.

Mode of Anesthesia and Bladder Management Following Orthopaedic Surgery in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A System Level Analysis

BACKGROUND

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a surgical complication more prevalent in children with neurodisability and associated with an increase length of hospitalization. Risk factors include pre-existing bladder dysfunction, type and duration of surgery, anesthesia medications, postoperative opioid pain management, and patient demographics. The purpose of this investigation was (1) to determine the frequency of POUR following hip/lower limb orthopaedic procedures in which epidural analgesia was used for pain management; (2) to explore factors influencing postoperative bladder management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of clinical data was performed in an orthopaedic specialty care health care system. A health outcomes network was queried for patients with a diagnoses of cerebral palsy (ICD-9/10 codes) who had one of 57 unique CPT procedure codes corresponding to hip osteotomies or tenotomies from 2011 to 2019. All surgical observations included in analysis required a discrete data element and the confirmation of a secondary proxy. The database was also queried for postoperative medications received and patient demographics of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 704 surgical procedures met inclusion criteria resulting in a patient population with a mean age of 11 years, 58% male, 53% Caucasian, and 55% classified as quadriplegia [51% Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels IV/V]. Three hundred and thirty-five procedures (48%) involved epidural anesthesia. Sixty-five patients required intermittent catheterization (9.2%) postoperatively following foley catheter removal, of which 23 (3.3%) required recatheterization. The rate of recatheterization was similar regardless of anesthesia mode; 1.8% for general and 1.4% for epidural and was associated with a greater number of pain medications. Epidural anesthesia resulted in significantly longer periods of catheterization. For the total group the time to urinary catheter removal differed significantly among cerebral palsy subtypes, GMFCS Level, race, and ethnicity. Factors identified as significant predictors of the length of catheterization were epidural analgesia, number of pain medications, and osteotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of postoperative pain medications utilized was more predictive of POUR than the mode of analgesia delivery; however, epidural analgesia and the type of surgical procedure did significantly impact the length of catheterization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Neck Disability at Presentation Influences Long Term Clinical Improvement for Neck Pain, Arm Pain, Disability and Physical Function in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort PURPOSE: To compare perioperative characteristics, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimum clinical important difference (MCID) achievement following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients stratified by preoperative neck disability.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) assesses a patient's self-perceived neck disability and is often utilized to assess the efficacy of cervical surgical intervention. Our study evaluates how preoperative severity of patient neck disability influences postoperative clinical improvement following ACDF.

METHODS

Primary, single or multi-level ACDF procedures were included. PROMs were administered at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year/2-year timepoints and included PROMIS-PF, VAS for neck and arm pain, NDI, and SF-12 PCS. Patients were grouped: preoperative NDI score<50 (mild to moderate neck disability) or NDI score≥50 (Severe neck disability). Demographics/perioperative characteristics/postoperative complications/mean PROMs/MCID achievement rates were compared using chi-squared or Student's t-test. Postoperative improvement from preoperative baseline within each cohort was assessed with paired samples t-test. MCID achievement was determined by comparing ΔPROMs to established thresholds.

RESULTS

225 patients were included, 150 NDI<50 and 75 NDI≥50. NDI≥50 cohort was significantly younger(p=0.002). Cohorts did not differ for spinal pathology/operative duration/estimated blood loss/postoperative length of stay/postoperative narcotic consumption/adjacent segment disease rate/1-year arthrodesis rate/6-month pseudoarthrosis rate. Postoperative VAS pain score on POD0 and 1 was significantly increased in NDI≥50 cohort(p<0.048, all). Postoperative complication rates did not differ. All mean PROMs differed at all timepoints(p<0.043, all). NDI<50 patient cohort significantly improved from preoperative baseline for all PROMs and timepoints except SF-12 PCS/PROMIS-PF at 6-weeks. NDI≥50 cohort significantly improved for all PROMs and timepoints except SF-12 PCS at 6-weeks. NDI≥50 cohort demonstrated greater proportion achieving MCID for NDI at 6-weeks/2-years/overall(p<0.037, all).

CONCLUSION

Both cohorts demonstrated significant long-term clinical improvement for neck pain/arm pain/physical function/neck disability, though patients with severe preoperative neck disability reported inferior mean scores for these outcomes at all timepoints.

Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Postoperative Urinary Retention in Lung Cancer Patients

Indwelling catheter is a routine procedure in surgical patients. Studies have shown that prolonged indwelling urinary catheterization increases the risk of postoperative urinary tract infection. Although early removal of the urinary catheter after operation can reduce the risk of postoperative urinary symptoms and tract infections, it may lead to postoperative anesthetic dysuria. Therefore, this study investigates the urinary retention and related risk factors in patients after thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia. The clinical data of 214 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of a tertiary class A cancer hospital in Beijing from July 2020 to April 2021 were collected. A risk prediction model was established by logistic regression analysis, and the prediction effect was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The incidence of indwelling catheter after thoracoscopic lobectomy was 44.8% (96/214). Sex (OR = 21.102, 95% CI: 2.906-153.239, P=0.003), perception of shame (OR = 74.256, 95% CI: 6.171-893.475, P=0.001), age (OR = 1.095, 95% CI: 1.014-1.182, P=0.021), and bed rest time (OR = 1.598, 95% CI: 1.263-2.023, P < 0.021) were the factors influencing urinary retention after thoracoscopic lobectomy. This model can effectively predict the occurrence of postoperative urinary retention in patients with lung cancer and help medical staff to intervene effectively before the onset of urinary retention, which provides reference for preventive treatment and nursing intervention.

A Nurse-Led Voiding Algorithm for Managing Urinary Retention After General Thoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Untreated postoperative urinary retention (POUR) leads to bladder overdistension. Treatment of POUR involves urinary catheterization, which predisposes patients to catheter-associated urinary tract infections. The hospital's rate of POUR after lobectomy was 21%, exceeding the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' benchmark of 6.4%. Nurses observed that more patients were being catheterized after implementation of a newly revised urinary catheter protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To reduce the incidence of POUR by implementing a thoracic surgery-specific nurse-led voiding algorithm.

METHODS

Experts validated the voiding algorithm that standardized postoperative assessment. It was initiated after general thoracic surgery among 179 patients in a thoracic surgery stepdown unit of a large Magnet hospital. After obtaining verbal consent from patients, nurses collected demographic and clinical data and followed the algorithm, documenting voided amounts and bladder scan results. Descriptive statistics characterized the sample and the incidence of POUR. Associations were determined between demographic and clinical factors and POUR status by using the t test and χ2 test.

RESULTS

The POUR-positive group and the POUR-negative group were equivalent with regard to demographic and clinical factors, except more patients in the POUR-positive cohort had had a lobectomy (P = .05). The rate of POUR was 8%. Society of Thoracic Surgeons reports revealed a rapid and sustained reduction in the hospital's rates of POUR after lobectomy: from 21% to 3%.

CONCLUSION

The use of this nurse-led voiding algorithm effectively reduced and sustained rates of POUR.

Naloxegol and Postoperative Urinary Retention: A Randomized Trial

Background: Naloxegol antagonizes peripheral opioid-related side effects without preventing opioid-related analgesia. However, the effect of naloxegol on opioid-induced bladder dysfunction remains unknown. Hypothesis: patients given naloxegol have lower residual bladder urine volume than those given placebo. Methods: 136 patients scheduled for elective hip and knee surgery were randomized to oral naloxegol or placebo given the morning of surgery, and on the first two postoperative mornings. Residual urine volume was measured ultrasonographically within 30 min after voiding once in the morning and once in the afternoon for two postoperative days. Opioid-related Symptom Distress Scale (ORSDS), the need for indwelling urinary catheterization, and quality of recovery (QoR) score were secondary outcomes. Results: 67 were randomized to naloxegol and 64 to placebo. We did not identify a significant effect on urine residual volume, with an estimated ratio of geometric means of 0.9 (0.3, 2.6), p = 0.84. There were no significant differences in ORSDS or QoR. There were 19 (29%) patients assigned to naloxegol who needed indwelling urination catheterization versus 7 (11%) patients in the placebo group, p = 0.012. Conclusions: Our results do not support use of naloxegol for postoperative urinary retention after hip and knee surgery.

Preoperative prediction of postoperative urinary retention in lumbar surgery: a comparison of regression to multilayer neural network

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spine surgery and is associated with prolongation of hospital stay, increased hospital cost, increased rate of urinary tract infection, bladder overdistention, and autonomic dysregulation. POUR incidence following spine surgery ranges between 5.6% and 38%; no reliable prediction tool to identify those at higher risk is available, and that constitutes an important gap in the literature. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk model to predict the occurrence of POUR following routine elective spine surgery.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive adults who underwent lumbar spine surgery between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2019. Patient characteristics, preexisting ICD-10 codes, preoperative pain and opioid use, preoperative alpha-1 blocker use, details of surgical planning, development of POUR, and management strategies were abstracted from electronic medical records. A binomial logistic model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) were optimized using training and validation sets. The models' performance was then evaluated on model-naïve patients (not a part of either cohort). The models were then stacked to take advantage of each model's strengths and to avoid their weaknesses. Four additional models were developed from previously published models adjusted to include only relevant factors (i.e., factors known preoperatively and applied to the lumbar spine).

RESULTS

Overall, 891 patients were included in the cohort, with a mean of 59.6 ± 15.5 years of age, 52.7% male, BMI 30.4 ± 6.4, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.8 ± 0.6, and a mean of 5.6 ± 5.7 comorbidities. The rate of POUR was found to be 25.9%. The two models were comparable, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.737 for the regression model and 0.735 for the neural network. By combining the two models, an AUC of 0.753 was achieved. With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, maximal sensitivity and specificity were achieved, with specificity 68.2%, sensitivity 72.9%, negative predictive value 88.2%, and positive predictive value 43.4%. Both models individually outperformed previously published models (AUC 0.516-0.645) when applied to the current data set.

CONCLUSIONS

This predictive model can be a powerful preoperative tool in predicting patients who will be likely to develop POUR. By using a combination of regression and neural network modeling, good sensitivity, specificity, and NPV are achieved.

Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Thoracolumbosacral Spinal Fusion: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes

Objective

Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is an often-underestimated common complication following spine surgery, and it is essential to avoid its untoward long-term consequences. Besides, a dilemma exists regarding the appropriate timing for the postoperative removal of indwelling catheter (IDC). Hence, we aim to describe the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of POUR and also come up with recommendations for the removal of IDC.

Methods

Electronic records of patients who underwent elective thoracolumbosacral spinal fusion surgery from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Excluded were those who underwent fusion for indications such as trauma, cauda equina syndrome, infection, and malignancy. Both surgery-related and patient-related risk factors were tabulated, and their association with the likely development of POUR was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

One hundred sixty-eight patients (median age=64.1 years; 58.9% female) were included, with the incidence of POUR being 7.8%. Our findings suggest surgery-related factors, both intra- and postoperative, including operating time (p=0.008), anesthetic time (p=0.005), number of fusion levels (p<0.001), mobilization status prior to trial off catheter (TOC; p=0.021), and TOC timing (p=0.029) may have an association with POUR. In addition, patient-related factors, including the use of beta-blockers (p=0.020) and pre-operative mobility status (p<0.001), may also be associated with the likely development of POUR.

Conclusion

POUR seems to be a frequent complication following thoracolumbosacral spinal fusion surgery, which was found to have an association with some surgery-related and patient-related factors. While most of these factors are non-modifiable, certain modifiable risk factors provide the surgeon an opportunity to prevent POUR. Considering these factors, we recommend appropriate and timely mobilization of the patient prior to removal of IDC, which is to be performed preferably in the daytime.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of early removal of urinary catheter after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal anastomosis

AIM OF THE STUDY

To review and to analyse the feasibility of using no urinary catheter or a catheter for less than 24 h compared with longer post-operative catheter after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal dissection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing no urinary catheter or a catheter for less than 24 h (early removal, ER) and urinary catheter drainage for 2 days or longer (late removal, LR) after colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal dissection. Primary endpoint was acute urinary retention (AUR) requiring a re-catheterization. Secondary endpoints were urinary tract infection (UTI), overall morbidity and hospital length of stay. Meta-analysis met the PRISMA criteria, with a random model.

RESULTS

Out of 3659 articles found, 82 comparative studies on catheter duration were selected, of which five were in colorectal surgery: three randomized trials, one retrospective and one prospective series. There were 396 ER and 410 LR patients. All had undergone surgery with infraperitoneal dissection. There was no significant difference regarding AUR (OR = 2.09 [95%CI 0.97-4.52]) but significantly less UTI (OR = 0.39 [95%CI 0.22-0.67]) for early urinary catheter removal. The number needed to harm was much higher for AUR than for UTI (23.3 vs. 8).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests that, in terms of benefit/risk ratio, in colorectal surgery with infraperitoneal anastomosis, early removal (< 24 h) of the urinary catheter would be beneficial (because of a more frequent UTI after LR than AUR after ER) and would reduce the occurrence of UTI if no AUR risk factors are present. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the low quality of evidence.

A prediction model for postoperative urinary retention after thoracic surgery

Background

Urinary retention remains a frequent postoperative complication, associated with patient discomfort and delayed discharge following general thoracic surgery (GTS). We aimed to develop and prospectively validate a predictive model of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) among GTS patients.

Methods

We retrospectively developed a predictive model using data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons GTS Database at our institution. The patient study cohort included adults undergoing elective in-patient surgical procedures without a history of renal failure or Foley catheter on entry to the recovery suite (August 2013 to March 2017). Multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with urinary retention, and a nomogram to aid medical decision making was developed. The predictive model was validated in a cohort of GTS patients between April 2017 and November 2018 using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

The predictive model was developed from 1484 GTS patients, 284 of whom (19%) experienced postoperative urinary retention within 24 hours of the operation. Risk factors for POUR included older age, male sex, higher preoperative creatinine, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, primary diagnosis, primary procedure, and use of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. A logistic nomogram for estimating the risk of POUR was created and validated in 646 patients, 65 of whom (10%) had urinary retention. The ROC curves of development and validation models had similar favorable c-statistics (0.77 vs 0.72; P > .05).

Conclusions

Postoperative urinary retention occurs in nearly 20% of patients undergoing major GTS. Using a validated predictive model may help by targeting certain patients with prophylactic measures to prevent this complication.

Choosing the Right Catheter for Pediatric Procedures: Patient Considerations and Preference

Determining the need for bladder decompression and urinary diversion in the perioperative pediatric surgical patient can cause a clinical conundrum for the surgical team. Add in the several different types of urinary diversion devices possible, and the various materials associated therein and the process can suddenly seem unnecessarily daunting given the lack of concise recommendations and broad consensus. The decision to divert urine, though seemingly trivial, is associated with inherent risks. Managing and mitigating certain risks are best approached through proper education, selection, and technique. We provide a broad overview of pediatric catheter selection, indications, and pitfalls to streamline the process so that energy and attention can best be focused on the planned intervention at hand.

Predictors of Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Pulmonary Resection

To identify predictors of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following pulmonary resection. Retrospective chart review from a single academic institution of all patients who underwent pulmonary resection between June 2004 and January 2020. The surgical procedures consisted of pneumonectomy, lobectomy and sublobar resections. The primary outcome was occurrence of POUR within 30 days following surgery, defined as painful and palpable bladder, when the patient is unable to pass any urine, and requiring catheterization. A total of 6004 consecutive patients underwent pulmonary resection among which 306 pneumonectomies (5.1%), 3467 lobectomies (57.7%) and 2231 sublobar resection (37.2%). The surgical approach was a thoracotomy (n = 3546; 59.1%), a video-assisted [VATS] (n = 2075; 34.5%) or a robot-assisted thoracoscopy [RATS] (n = 383; 6.4%). POUR occurred in 301 cases (5%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, male gender (OR 2.30 [1.70-3.17]; P < 0.001), age (OR 1.02 [1.01-1.03]; P < 0.001), benign prostatic hyperplasia (OR 7.08 [4.57-10.83]; P < 0.001), and COPD (OR 1.52 [1.13-2.01]; P = 0.004) were significant predictors of POUR. Conversely, VATS (OR 0.62 [0.46-0.83]; P = 0.001) had a protective effect on the occurrence of POUR. In a large single-center study, we disclosed significant clinical predictors of POUR after pulmonary resection, including age, sex, comorbidities and surgical approach. Prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of chemoprophylaxis by perioperative α-blockers in order to prevent POUR.

Spinal surgery and urinary retention: A review of the literature

Objective:

Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication for patients recovering from general anesthesia or invasive surgery near the spinal column. However, no study has systematically reviewed the incidence of postoperative urinary retention for spinal surgeries performed at the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spinal regions. In this review, we critically analyze and summarize the known literature on the incidence and risk factors associated with postoperative urinary retention after spinal surgery.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature review was performed at the end of September 2019 within the PubMed database.

Results:

The average incidence of postoperative urinary retention from nine of the 10 studies was 17.2% with one paper that did not report on postoperative urinary retention incidence. Furthermore, age, male gender, location and history of spinal surgery, duration of surgery, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and Foley catheter were reported as major risk factors for postoperative urinary retention and spinal surgery.

Conclusion:

Overall, spinal cord and postoperative urinary retention remains a poorly understood area requiring further investigation into the incidence, risk factors, and surgical methods influence postoperative urinary retention and post-operative outcomes. We believe an overview of such data can help revise guidelines for the management of postoperative urinary retention and raise awareness of its prevalence in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

Clinical Protocol for Identifying and Managing Bladder Dysfunction during Acute Care after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Bladder dysfunction is widespread following traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI). Early diagnosis of bladder dysfunction is crucial in preventing complications, determining prognosis, and planning rehabilitation. We aim to suggest the first clinical protocol specifically designed to evaluate and manage bladder dysfunction in TSCI patients during acute care. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 101 patients admitted for an acute TSCI between C1 and T12. Following spinal surgery, presence of voluntary anal contraction (VAC) was used as a criterion for removal of indwelling catheter and initiating trial of void (TOV). Absence of bladder dysfunction was determined from three consecutive post-void bladder scan residuals ≤200 mL without incontinence. All patients were reassessed 3 months post-injury using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). A total of 74.3% were diagnosed with bladder dysfunction during acute care, while 57.4% had a motor-complete TSCI. Three months later, 94.7% of them reported impaired bladder function. None of the patients discharged from acute care after a functional bladder was diagnosed reported impaired bladder function at the 3-month follow-up. A total of 95.7% patients without VAC had persisting impaired bladder function at follow-up. The proposed protocol is specifically adapted to the dynamic nature of neurogenic bladder function following TSCI. The assessment of VAC into the protocol provides major insight on the potential for reaching adequate bladder function during the subacute phase. Conducting TOV using bladder scan residuals in patients with VAC is a non-invasive and easy method to discriminate between a functional and an impaired bladder following acute TSCI.

A Pragmatic Approach to the Perioperative Management of Parkinson's Disease

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) may undergo several elective and emergency surgeries. Motor fluctuations, the presence of a wide range of non-motor symptoms (NMS), and the use of several medications, often not limited to dopaminergic agents, make the perioperative management of PD challenging. However, the literature on perioperative management of PD is sparse. In this descriptive review article, we comprehensively discuss the issues in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases which may negatively affect the PD patients and discuss the approach to their prevention and management. The major preoperative challenges include accurate medication reconciliation and administration of the dopaminergic medications during the nil per os (NPO) state. While the former can be addressed with staff education and PD-specific admission protocols, knowledge of non-oral formulations of dopaminergic agents (apomorphine, inhalational levodopa, and rotigotine transdermal patch) is the key to the management of the Parkinsonian symptoms in NPO state. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices should be turned off to avert potential electromagnetic interference with surgical appliances. Choosing the appropriate anesthesia and avoiding and managing respiratory issues and dysautonomia are the major intraoperative challenges. Timely reinitiation of dopaminergic medications, adequate management of pain, nausea, and vomiting, and prevention of postoperative infections and delirium are the postoperative challenges. Overall, a multidisciplinary approach is pivotal to prevent and manage the perioperative complications in PD. Administration of anti-Parkinson medications during NPO state, prevention of anesthesia-related complications, and timely rehabilitation remain the key to healthy surgical outcomes.

A randomized controlled trial of cystoinflation to prevent bladder injury in the adhesive disease of multiple caesarean sections

Caesarean sections carry the risk of urinary bladder injury due to formation of adhesions obscuring pelvic planes. Visualizing bladder during retro-fill (cystoinflation) makes it recognizable as it rises into the abdomen taking a tense rounded contour. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to find out whether improved identification of bladder margins by cystoinflation could decrease bladder injury rate and blood loss without causing urological complications. This study included 214 healthy women with previous operative deliveries undergoing elective caesarean section and found to have dense pelvic adhesions. The subjects were randomly allocated into cystoinflation and control groups. Adhesiolysis was performed using bladder retro-fill with 300 cc saline in cystoinflation group, and without retro-fill in control. The bladder injury rate was significantly lower in cystoinflation group compared to control (2.8% vs 20.6%, P < .0001) with lesser blood loss in cystoinflation group (585.33 cc vs 797.10 cc, P < .0001). Mean operative time was similar in both groups. Urinary tract infection and micturition problems occurred more frequently in control group than cystoinflation group (16.8% vs 1.9%, P = .001 and .47 ± 1.63% vs 077 ± .633%, P = .021 respectively) with fistula in one subject compared to none in cystoinflation group. In this study, cystoinflation was effective to significantly reduce bladder injury rate and blood loss. This technique may also prove useful in the fields of surgery, urology and urogynecology.

Optimal timing of urinary catheter removal following pelvic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common postoperative complication in colorectal surgery. In pelvic colorectal operations, the optimal duration for postoperative urinary catheter use is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare early (POD 1), intermediate (POD 3), and late (POD 5) urinary catheter removal.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they compared patients with urinary catheter removal on POD 1 or earlier to patients with urinary catheter removal on POD 2 or later in major pelvic colorectal surgeries. The primary outcome was rate of postoperative AUR. The secondary outcome was rates of postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI).

RESULTS

From 691 relevant citations, five studies with 928 patients were included. Comparison of urinary catheter removal on POD 1 versus POD 3 demonstrated no significant difference in rate of urinary retention (RR 1.36, 95%CI 0.83-2.21, P = 0.22); however, compared to POD 5, rates of AUR were significantly higher (RR 2.58, 95%CI 1.51-4.40, P = 0.0005). Rates of UTI were not significantly different between POD 1 and POD 3 urinary catheter removal (RR 0.40, 95%CI 0.05-3.71, P = 0.45), but removal on POD 5 significantly increased risk of UTI compared to POD 1 (RR 0.50, 95%CI 0.31-0.81, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Risk of AUR can be minimized with late postoperative urinary catheter removal compared to early removal, but at the cost of increased risk of UTI. Patient-specific factors should be taken into consideration when deciding upon optimal duration of postoperative urinary catheterization.