Extracting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Clinical Notes in Electronic Health Records: Assessment of Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy

Natural language processing systems for extracting information from electronic health records about activities of daily living. A systematic review

Objective

Natural language processing (NLP) can enhance research on activities of daily living (ADL) by extracting structured information from unstructured electronic health records (EHRs) notes. This review aims to give insight into the state-of-the-art, usability, and performance of NLP systems to extract information on ADL from EHRs.

Materials and Methods

A systematic review was conducted based on searches in Pubmed, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies published between 2017 and 2022 were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria.

Results

The review identified 22 studies. Most studies (65%) used NLP for classifying unstructured EHR data on 1 or 2 ADL. Deep learning, combined with a ruled-based method or machine learning, was the approach most commonly used. NLP systems varied widely in terms of the pre-processing and algorithms. Common performance evaluation methods were cross-validation and train/test datasets, with F1, precision, and sensitivity as the most frequently reported evaluation metrics. Most studies reported relativity high overall scores on the evaluation metrics.

Discussion

NLP systems are valuable for the extraction of unstructured EHR data on ADL. However, comparing the performance of NLP systems is difficult due to the diversity of the studies and challenges related to the dataset, including restricted access to EHR data, inadequate documentation, lack of granularity, and small datasets.

Conclusion

This systematic review indicates that NLP is promising for deriving information on ADL from unstructured EHR notes. However, what the best-performing NLP system is, depends on characteristics of the dataset, research question, and type of ADL.

Assessing the utility of deep neural networks in detecting superficial surgical site infections from free text electronic health record data

Background

High-quality outcomes data is crucial for continued surgical quality improvement. Outcomes are generally captured through structured administrative data or through manual curation of unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data. The aim of this study was to apply natural language processing (NLP) to chart notes in the EHR to accurately capture postoperative superficial surgical site infections (SSSIs).

Methods

Deep Learning (DL) NLP models were trained on data from 389,865 surgical cases across all 11 hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark. Surgical cases in the training dataset were performed between January 01st, 2017, and October 30th, 2021. We trained a forward reading and a backward reading universal language model on unlabeled postoperative chart notes recorded within 30 days of a surgical procedure. The two language models were subsequently finetuned on labeled data for the classification of SSSIs. Validation and testing were performed on surgical cases performed during the month of November 2021. We propose two different use cases: a stand-alone machine learning (SAM) pipeline and a human-in-the-loop (HITL) pipeline. Performances of both pipelines were compared to administrative data and to manual curation.

Results

The models were trained on 3,983,864 unlabeled chart notes and finetuned on 1,231,656 labeled notes. Models had a test area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC AUC) of 0.989 on individual chart notes and 0.980 on an aggregated case level. The SAM pipeline had a sensitivity of 0.604, a specificity of 0.996, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.763, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.991. Prior to human review, the HITL pipeline had a sensitivity of 0.854, a specificity of 0.987, a PPV of 0.603, and a NPV of 0.997.

Conclusion

The performance of the SAM pipeline was superior to administrative data, and significantly outperformed previously published results. The performance of the HITL pipeline approached that of manual curation.

Noninvasive Precision Screening of Prostate Cancer by Urinary Multimarker Sensor and Artificial Intelligence Analysis

Screening for prostate cancer relies on the serum prostate-specific antigen test, which provides a high rate of false positives (80%). This results in a large number of unnecessary biopsies and subsequent overtreatment. Considering the frequency of the test, there is a critical unmet need of precision screening for prostate cancer. Here, we introduced a urinary multimarker biosensor with a capacity to learn to achieve this goal. The correlation of clinical state with the sensing signals from urinary multimarkers was analyzed by two common machine learning algorithms. As the number of biomarkers was increased, both algorithms provided a monotonic increase in screening performance. Under the best combination of biomarkers, the machine learning algorithms screened prostate cancer patients with more than 99% accuracy using 76 urine specimens. Urinary multimarker biosensor leveraged by machine learning analysis can be an important strategy of precision screening for cancers using a drop of bodily fluid.

Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care

BACKGROUND

Efficient capture of routine clinical care and patient outcomes is needed at a population-level, as is evidence on important treatment-related side effects and their effect on well-being and clinical outcomes. The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) offers new opportunities to generate population-level patient-centered evidence on oncologic care that can better guide treatment decisions and patient-valued care.

METHODS

This study includes patients seeking care at an academic medical center, 2008 to 2018. Digital data sources are combined to address missingness, inaccuracy, and noise common to EHR data. Clinical concepts were identified and extracted from EHR unstructured data using natural language processing (NLP) and machine/deep learning techniques. All models are trained, tested, and validated on independent data samples using standard metrics.

RESULTS

We provide use cases for using EHR data to assess guideline adherence and quality measurements among patients with cancer. Pretreatment assessment was evaluated by guideline adherence and quality metrics for cancer staging metrics. Our studies in perioperative quality focused on medications administered and guideline adherence. Patient outcomes included treatment-related side effects and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced technologies applied to EHRs present opportunities to advance population-level quality assessment, to learn from routinely collected clinical data for personalized treatment guidelines, and to augment epidemiologic and population health studies. The effective use of digital data can inform patient-valued care, quality initiatives, and policy guidelines.

IMPACT

A comprehensive set of health data analyzed with advanced technologies results in a unique resource that facilitates wide-ranging, innovative, and impactful research on prostate cancer. This work demonstrates new ways to use the EHRs and technology to advance epidemiologic studies and benefit oncologic care.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science."

Clinical Documentation to Predict Factors Associated with Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

Background

Advances in data collection provide opportunities to use population samples in identifying risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI), which occurs in up to 71% of men with prostate cancer following prostatectomy. Most studies on patient-centered outcomes use surveys or manual chart abstraction for data collection, which can be costly and difficult to scale. We sought to evaluate rates of and risk factors for UI following prostatectomy using natural language processing on electronic health record (EHR) data.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer between January 2008 and August 2018 using EHR data from an academic medical center. UI incidence for each patient in the cohort was assessed using natural language processing from clinical notes generated pre- and postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate potential risk factors for postoperative UI at various time points within 2 years following surgery.

Results

We identified 3792 patients who underwent prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We found a significant association between preoperative UI and UI in the first (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–4.28) and second (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.04–4.83) years following surgery. Preoperative body mass index was also associated with UI in the second postoperative year (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21).

Conclusion

We show that a natural language processing approach using clinical narratives can be used to assess risk for UI in prostate cancer patients. Unstructured clinical narrative text can help advance future population-level research in patient-centered outcomes and quality of care.