Association between Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Preventive Medications and In-Hospital Mortality among Non-Reperfused ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Academic Center in a Developing Country

Comparison of in-hospital outcomes of acute myocardial infarction between patients with cardiogenic shock and with cardiac arrest

In-hospital mortality of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high. Also, in-hospital mortality of AMI complicated with cardiac arrest (CA) has been reported to be highest among any AMI. However, there were few reports that compared in-hospital mortality directly between AMI complicated with CS and complicated with CA. The purpose of this study was to compare in-hospital outcomes between AMI complicated with CS and complicated with CA. We retrospectively included 195 AMI patients complicated by CS or CA, and divided those into the CA group (n = 109) and the CS group (n = 86). We also subdivided the CA group into CA with persistent CS (n = 83) and CA without persistent CS (n = 26). One-third of the study population died during the index admission. In-hospital death was more frequently observed in the CA group (45.0%) than in the CS group (20.9%) (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was highest in the CA with persistent CS group (68.7%), followed by the CS group (20.9%), and least in the CA without persistent CS group (11.5%) (p < 0.001). Favorable neurological function was more frequently observed in the CA without persistent CS group (76.9%) and the CS group (74.4%) than in the CA with persistent CS group (27.7%) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality was higher in AMI patients with CA than in those with CS. However, when we divided AMI patients with CA into those with and without persistent CS, in-hospital mortality was lowest in CA without persistent CS, followed by CS, and highest in CA with persistent CS.

The Difference in Accuracy Between Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Score in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Background

In-hospital mortality of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients varies between 1% and 19% in Asia. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score are the most frequently used risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality. These two scores have different accuracy depending on the risk profiles of each region. This study aimed to identify the difference in accuracy between GRACE and TIMI scores.

Methods

This was an observational cohort retrospective study on consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung between July 2018 and June 2019.

Results

The risk scores were evaluated in 255 patients with STEMI, whose data were collected from medical records. Patients in this study were 58 ± 11 years old, more often male (78.8%) and have smoking (65.5%), dyslipidemia (61%), hypertension (56.5%) and diabetes mellitus (21.6 %) as their risk factors. Forty-five patients died in hospitalization (17%). The TIMI and GRACE scores revealed a significant graded increase in mortality with a rising score. There was a statistically significant difference in accuracy between the scores of 0.082 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.040 - 0.125; P < 0.001) with the GRACE score (C statistics of 0.91; P < 0.001) having better accuracy compared to TIMI score (C statistics of 0.83; P < 0.001). This might be due to the fact that the GRACE scoring system has more detail and complete variables than the TIMI score.

Conclusion

There is a significant difference between the accuracy of GRACE and TIMI scores in predicting in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients. The accuracy of the GRACE score is better than the TIMI score for predicting in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients.