Lipid Control Post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: One Year Follow-Up of a Middle-Eastern Cohort

Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy as per the Latest Dyslipidemia Management Guideline in Predicting Favorable Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background There are limited data on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement per the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society dyslipidemia management guidelines and its impact on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We investigated the association between LDL-C levels attained 1 year after CABG and the long-term outcomes. Methods and Results A total of 2072 patients diagnosed with multivessel coronary artery disease and undergoing CABG between 2011 and 2020 were included. Patients were categorized by lipid levels at 1 year after CABG, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) was evaluated. The goal of LDL-C <1.40 mmol/L was attained in only 310 patients (14.9%). During a mean follow-up of 4.2 years after the index 1-year assessment, 25.0% of the patients experienced MACCEs. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% CIs) for MACCEs, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and cardiac rehospitalization were 1.94 (1.41-2.67), 2.27 (1.29-3.99), 2.45 (1.55-3.88), 1.17 (0.63-2.21), 2.47 (1.31-4.66), and 1.87 (1.19-2.95), respectively, in patients with LDL-C ≥2.60 mmol/L, compared with patients with LDL-C <1.40 mmol/L. The LDL-C levels at 1-year post-CABG were independently associated with long-term MACCEs. Conclusions This retrospective analysis demonstrates that lipid goals are not attained in the vast majority of patients at 1 year after CABG, which is independently associated with the increased risk of long-term MACCEs. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate if intensive lipid management could improve the outcomes of patients undergoing CABG.

Impact of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) on mid-term clinical outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: A secondary analysis of the DACAB trial

Purpose

The objective was to evaluate the influence of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

This is a secondary analysis of a 5-year follow-up of the DACAB trial (NCT02201771), in which 500 patients who underwent primary isolated CABG were randomized to three-antiplatelet therapy for 1 year after surgery. Of them, 459 patients were recruited in this secondary analysis. Baseline LDL-C and Lp(a) levels were collected, and repeated measurement of LDL-C levels during the follow-up were recorded. Cut-off values for LDL-C were set at 1.8 and 2.6 mmol/L; thus, the patients were stratified into LDL-C <1.8, 1.8-<2.6, and ≥2.6 mmol/L subgroups. Cut-off value for Lp(a) was 30 mg/dL; thus, the patients were divided into Lp(a) <30 and ≥30 mg/dL subgroups. The primary outcome was 4-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE-4), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization. Median follow-up time was 5.2 (interquartile range, 4.2-6.1) years.

Results

During the follow-up, 129 (28.1%) patients achieved the attainment of LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, 186 (40.5%) achieved LDL-C 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L, and 144 (31.4%) remained LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L. Compared with the postoperative LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L group, the risk of MACE-4 was significantly higher in the LDL-C 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L group [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.92, 95% CI, 1.12-3.29; P = 0.019] and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L group (aHR = 3.90, 95% CI, 2.29-6.64; P < 0.001). Baseline Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL was identified in 131 (28.5%) patients and was associated with an increased risk of MACE-4 (aHR = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.06-2.18; P = 0.022).

Conclusions

For CABG patients, exposure to increased levels of postoperative LDL-C or baseline Lp(a) was associated with worse mid-term clinical outcomes. Our findings suggested the necessity of achieving LDL-C target and potential benefit of adding Lp(a) targeted lipid-lowering therapy in CABG population.

Attainment of Lipid Targets Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Can We Do Better?

Objective

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remain at high cardiovascular risk; however, few studies have evaluated lipid management and attainment of lipid targets in these patients. We investigated the proportion of CABG surgery patients who attained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) targets.

Methods

Data were retrospectively obtained from patients undergoing CABG surgery at an Australian tertiary hospital between February 2015 and August 2020. The most recent lipid profile was recorded (at least 3 weeks post-operatively). We studied patients with electronically available data to ensure accuracy. Target LDL-C was defined as <1.4 (54 mg/dL) and <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), and target non-HDL-C as <2.2 (85 mg/dL) and <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL), as per the 2019 and 2016 European dyslipidaemia guidelines, respectively.

Results

Follow-up lipid results were available for 484 patients (median post-operative follow-up, 483 days; interquartile range, 177.5–938.75 days). The mean age was 62.7±10.5 years and 387 (80.1%) were male. At discharge, 469 (96.9%) patients were prescribed statins, 425 (90.6%) high-intensity. Ezetimibe was prescribed for 62 (12.8%) patients and a proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor for 1. LDL-C levels <1.4 and <1.8 mmol/L were attained in 118 (24.4%) and 231 (47.7%) patients, respectively, and non-HDL-C levels <2.2 and <2.6 mmol/L in 140 (28.9%) and 237 (49.0%) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The use of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies was limited, and many CABG surgery patients did not attain lipid targets despite high-intensity statins. Further studies are required to optimise lipid management in this very high-risk population.