1
|
Frost H, Tooman TR, Aujla N, Guthrie B, Hanratty B, Kaner E, O'Donnell A, Ogden ME, Pain HG, Shenkin SD, Mercer SW. New models of health and social care for people in later life: mapping of innovation in services in two regions of the United Kingdom using a mixed method approach. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:812. [PMID: 39004735 PMCID: PMC11247813 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11274-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovation for reforming health and social care is high on the policy agenda in the United Kingdom in response to the growing needs of an ageing population. However, information about new innovations of care being implemented is sparse. METHODS We mapped innovations for people in later life in two regions, North East England and South East Scotland. Data collection included discussions with stakeholders (n = 51), semi-structured interviews (n = 14) and website searches that focused on technology, evaluation and health inequalities. We analysed qualitative data using framework and thematic analyses. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS One hundred eleven innovations were identified across the two regions. Interviewees reported a wide range of technologies that had been rapidly introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic and many remained in use. Digital exclusion of certain groups of older people was an ongoing concern. Innovations fell into two groups; system-level ones that aimed to alleviate systems pressures such as preventing hospital (re)admissions, and patient-level ones which sought to enhance health and wellbeing directly. Interviewees were aware of the importance of health inequalities but lacked data to monitor the impact of innovations on these, and evaluation was challenging due to lack of time, training, and support. Quantitative findings revealed that two thirds of innovations (n = 74, 67%) primarily focused on the system level, whilst a third (n = 37, 33%) primarily focused on the patient-level. Overall, over half (n = 65, 59%) of innovations involved technologies although relatively few (n = 12, 11%) utilised advanced technologies. Very few (n = 16, 14%) focused on reducing health inequalities, and only a minority of innovations (n = 43, 39%) had undergone evaluation (most of which were conducted by the service providers themselves). CONCLUSIONS We found a wide range of innovative care services being developed for people in later life, yet alignment with key policy priorities, such as addressing health inequalities, was limited. There was a strong focus on technology, with little consideration for the potential to widen the health inequality gap. The absence of robust evaluation was also a concern as most innovations were implemented without support to monitor effectiveness and/or without plans for sustainability and spread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Frost
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Tricia R Tooman
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Navneet Aujla
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Bruce Guthrie
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Eileen Kaner
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Amy O'Donnell
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North East and North-Cumbria, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Margaret E Ogden
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Helen G Pain
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Susan D Shenkin
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Stewart W Mercer
- Advanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 9 Little France Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wallis JA, Shepperd S, Makela P, Han JX, Tripp EM, Gearon E, Disher G, Buchbinder R, O'Connor D. Factors influencing the implementation of early discharge hospital at home and admission avoidance hospital at home: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD014765. [PMID: 38438114 PMCID: PMC10911892 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014765.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide there is an increasing demand for Hospital at Home as an alternative to hospital admission. Although there is a growing evidence base on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Hospital at Home, health service managers, health professionals and policy makers require evidence on how to implement and sustain these services on a wider scale. OBJECTIVES (1) To identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research evidence on the factors that influence the implementation of Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home and Early Discharge Hospital at Home, from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, including policy makers, health service managers, health professionals, patients and patients' caregivers. (2) To explore how our synthesis findings relate to, and help to explain, the findings of the Cochrane intervention reviews of Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home and Early Discharge Hospital at Home services. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus and Scopus until 17 November 2022. We also applied reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies. We searched for studies in any language. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with qualitative data collection and analysis methods examining the implementation of new or existing Hospital at Home services from the perspective of different stakeholders. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted study characteristics and intervention components, assessed the methodological limitations using the Critical Appraisal Skills Checklist (CASP) and assessed the confidence in the findings using GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research). We applied thematic synthesis to synthesise the data across studies and identify factors that may influence the implementation of Hospital at Home. MAIN RESULTS From 7535 records identified from database searches and one identified from citation tracking, we included 52 qualitative studies exploring the implementation of Hospital at Home services (31 Early Discharge, 16 Admission Avoidance, 5 combined services), across 13 countries and from the perspectives of 662 service-level staff (clinicians, managers), eight systems-level staff (commissioners, insurers), 900 patients and 417 caregivers. Overall, we judged 40 studies as having minor methodological concerns and we judged 12 studies as having major concerns. Main concerns included data collection methods (e.g. not reporting a topic guide), data analysis methods (e.g. insufficient data to support findings) and not reporting ethical approval. Following synthesis, we identified 12 findings graded as high (n = 10) and moderate (n = 2) confidence and classified them into four themes: (1) development of stakeholder relationships and systems prior to implementation, (2) processes, resources and skills required for safe and effective implementation, (3) acceptability and caregiver impacts, and (4) sustainability of services. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Implementing Admission Avoidance and Early Discharge Hospital at Home services requires early development of policies, stakeholder engagement, efficient admission processes, effective communication and a skilled workforce to safely and effectively implement person-centred Hospital at Home, achieve acceptance by staff who refer patients to these services and ensure sustainability. Future research should focus on lower-income country and rural settings, and the perspectives of systems-level stakeholders, and explore the potential negative impact on caregivers, especially for Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home, as this service may become increasingly utilised to manage rising visits to emergency departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Wallis
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia
| | - Sasha Shepperd
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Petra Makela
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jia Xi Han
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Evie M Tripp
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Gearon
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gary Disher
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Denise O'Connor
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Westby M, Ijaz S, Savović J, McLeod H, Dawson S, Welsh T, Le Roux H, Walsh N, Bradley N. Virtual wards for people with frailty: what works, for whom, how and why-a rapid realist review. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae039. [PMID: 38482985 PMCID: PMC10938537 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Virtual wards (VWs) deliver multidisciplinary care at home to people with frailty who are at high risk of a crisis or in crisis, aiming to mitigate the risk of acute hospital admission. Different VW models exist, and evidence of effectiveness is inconsistent. AIM We conducted a rapid realist review to identify different VW models and to develop explanations for how and why VWs could deliver effective frailty management. METHODS We searched published and grey literature to identify evidence on multidisciplinary VWs. Information on how and why VWs might 'work' was extracted and synthesised into context-mechanism-outcome configurations with input from clinicians and patient/public contributors. RESULTS We included 17 peer-reviewed and 11 grey literature documents. VWs could be short-term and acute (1-21 days), or longer-term and preventative (typically 3-7 months). Effective VW operation requires common standards agreements, information sharing processes, an appropriate multidisciplinary team that plans patient care remotely, and good co-ordination. VWs may enable delivery of frailty interventions through appropriate selection of patients, comprehensive assessment including medication review, integrated case management and proactive care. Important components for patients and caregivers are good communication with the VW, their experience of care at home, and feeling involved, safe and empowered to manage their condition. CONCLUSIONS Insights gained from this review could inform implementation or evaluation of VWs for frailty. A combination of acute and longer-term VWs may be needed within a whole system approach. Proactive care is recommended to avoid frailty-related crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Westby
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Sharea Ijaz
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Jelena Savović
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Hugh McLeod
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Tomas Welsh
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
- RICE – The Research Institute for the Care of Older People, Bath, UK
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - Hein Le Roux
- Churchdown Surgery, Parton Rd, Churchdown, Gloucester GL3 2JH, UK
- NHS England and NHS Improvement South West, Somerset, UK
- One Gloucestershire Integrated Care System Quality Improvement, Gloucester, UK
| | - Nicola Walsh
- The National Institute for Health and Care Research, Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 2NT, UK
- Centre for Health & Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK
| | - Natasha Bradley
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queens University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alvarado N, Hargreaves G, Storey K, Montague J, Broughton R, Randell R. Staff experiences of integrating community and secondary care musculoskeletal services: A qualitative investigation. Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:1279-1287. [PMID: 37596876 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Integrated models of care intend to provide seamless and timely access to health and social care services. This study investigated the integration of musculoskeletal services across community and secondary care boundaries, including the introduction of a single point of access from which patients were triaged. METHODS Staff (n = 15) involved in service development and delivery were interviewed about how, why and to what extent integration impacted service delivery. The analysis focused on staff experiences of using an on-line patient self-referral form and co-located clinics to enhance decision-making in triage, and on the provision of educational materials and de-medicalising language in patient consultations to support self-management. RESULTS Single point of access, including online self-referral, were operationalised during data collection, but co-located clinics were not. Triage staff explained that the volume of referrals and quality of information provided in online self-referrals sometimes constrained decision-making in triage. Secondary care staff discussed concerns that the single point of access might not consistently identify patients with hard to diagnose conditions that require timely surgical intervention. This concern appeared to constrain staff engagement with integration, potentially inhibiting the delivery of co-located clinics. However, triage staff accessed support to inform secondary care referral via alternate modes. Patient circumstances, for example, need for reassurance, necessitated multiple self-management strategies and innovative approaches were developed to provide patients ongoing and professionally led support. CONCLUSION Findings emphasise that restructuring services requires engagement from diverse stakeholders. Collaborating with stakeholders to address their concerns about the impact of restructures on well-established pathways may help cultivate this engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Alvarado
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Gerard Hargreaves
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Karen Storey
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jane Montague
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Randell
- University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liapi F, Chater AM, Kenny T, Anderson J, Randhawa G, Pappas Y. Evaluating step-down, intermediate care programme in Buckinghamshire, UK: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1087. [PMID: 37280556 PMCID: PMC10242590 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15868-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intermediate care (IC) services are models of care that aim to bridge the gap between hospital and home, enabling continuity of care and the transition to the community. The purpose of this study was to explore patient experience with a step-down, intermediate care unit in Buckinghamshire, UK. METHODS A mixed-methods study design was used. Twenty-eight responses to a patient feedback questionnaire were analysed and seven qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted. The eligible participants were patients who had been admitted to the step-down IC unit. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS Our interview data generated five core themes: (1) "Being uninformed", (2) "Caring relationships with health practitioners", (3) "Experiencing good intermediate care", (4) "Rehabilitation" and (5) "Discussing the care plan". When comparing the quantitative to the qualitative data, these themes are consistent. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the patients reported that the admission to the step-down care facility was positive. Patients highlighted the supportive relationship they formed with healthcare professionals in the IC and that the rehabilitation that was offered in the IC service was important in increasing mobility and regaining their independence. In addition, patients reported that they were largely unaware about their transfer to the IC unit before this occurred and they were also unaware of their discharge package of care. These findings will inform the evolving patient-centred journey for service development within intermediate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fani Liapi
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, LU2 8LE, UK.
| | - Angel Marie Chater
- Institute for Sport and Physical Activity Research, University of Bedfordshire, MK41 9EA, Bedford, UK
- University College London, Centre for Behaviour Change, WC1E 7HB, London, UK
| | - Tina Kenny
- Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK
| | - Juliet Anderson
- Buckinghamshire Health and Social Care Academy, Aylesbury, HP21 7Q, UK
| | - Gurch Randhawa
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, LU2 8LE, UK
| | - Yannis Pappas
- Institute for Health Research, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, LU2 8LE, UK
| |
Collapse
|