Evolutionary Trends in Integrated Care in 2000–2020 in China: A Scientometric Review Using CiteSpace

Choice Preference of Middle-Aged and Elderly People on Integrated Medical Services and Elderly Care Model: A Cross-Sectional Study

Facing the increasingly severe aging situation, China has started to implement the "integrated medical services and elderly care (IMSEC)" policy, which covers a variety of IMSEC models. However, there is currently little research on middle-aged and elderly people's choice preference for these IMSEC models and their associated factors. Through the face-to-face questionnaire method, the choice preference of middle-aged and elderly people aged 45 years and over in Zhejiang Province, China, to the IMSEC model is explored. Through the multinomial logistic regression model, the influencing factors of choice preference are analyzed. A total of 1034 people are included in 2022. Their choice preference for the 4 major types of IMSEC models are Home IMSEC model (48.07%), Community IMSEC model (23.79%), Institutional IMSEC model (21.76%), and Internet Plus IMSEC model (6.38%). "C1. Home elderly care and contracted with a family doctor" is the most chosen subtype, accounting for 34.53%. The rural elderly are more likely to choose "Home IMSEC model" (OR(95%CI) = 2.977(1.343-6.601)). Elderly people with relatively large life care needs are more likely to choose "Institutional IMSEC model" (OR(95%CI) = 1.114(1.042-1.190)). Moreover, age, education, and self-reported health status are also influencing factors of choice preference. The government should focus on promoting the development of the "Home IMSEC model" and increase the promotion of "Internet Plus IMSEC model." In addition, the life care service capacity and spiritual comfort capacity of IMSEC institutions, as well as the medical service capacity of the community, need to be enhanced.

Outcomes of the Pilot Project for Community Care Among Older Adults in South Korea

The Korean government implemented the pilot project for community care for older adults in June 2019. This study investigated the outcomes of the pilot project among Korean older adults by linking survey data from the pilot project with data of Korean National Health Insurance Service. The final sample included 17,801 pilot project participants and 68,145 in a matched comparison group. Pilot program participants experienced an increase of 4.8 days for length of home stay and a reduction of $956 (US) per participant relative to the matched comparison group. Pilot program participants with long-term care insurance who used home care services experienced an increase of 8.9 days for length of home stay and a reduction in $1,177 (US) in total costs, along with a reduction in the admission to long-term care facilities, compared to the matched comparison group. Patients discharged from hospitals indicated an increase of 35.2 days for length of home stay and a reduction of $6,947 (US) in total costs, but a 3.53 times increase in hospital readmissions relative to the matched comparison group. The pilot project for community care resulted in increased length of home stay and reduced total costs among older adults in Korea.