Imaging the Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments

Cruciate and Collateral Ligaments: 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional MR Imaging-Aid to Knee Preservation Surgery

Being a major load-bearing and dynamic functional joint of the body, the knee joint is prone to injuries to the menisci and ligaments. Injury to one or more of these structures leads to accelerated or premature osteoarthritis and chronic debilitation. The estimated cost of these injuries in terms of diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and person-hours lost amounts to over a billion dollars annually. Understanding the relevant anatomy of knee cruciate and collateral ligaments, their biomechanical functional role, and imaging considerations are essential to assist multi-disciplinary communications and timely patient treatments for improved management. MRI is considered the gold standard over other imaging modalities like X-ray, ultrasound (US), and Computed Tomography (CT) for diagnosing and assessing such injuries. High-resolution 2D and 3D MRI are considerably helpful in planning for knee preservation surgery, and this article reviews the role of such imaging as a valuable aid to knee preservation surgery in pre-and post-operative states. Relevant arthroscopy correlations have been illustrated.

UTE-T2* versus conventional T2* mapping to assess posterior cruciate ligament ultrastructure and integrity-an in-situ study

Background

Clinical-standard morphologic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited in the refined diagnosis of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. Quantitative MRI sequences such as ultrashort echo-time (UTE)-T2* mapping or conventional T2* mapping have been theorized to quantify ligament (ultra-) structure and integrity beyond morphology. This study evaluates their diagnostic potential in identifying and differentiating partial and complete PCL injuries in a standardized graded injury model.

Methods

Ten human cadaveric knee joint specimens were imaged on a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner using morphologic, conventional T2* mapping, and UTE-T2* mapping sequences before and after standardized arthroscopic partial and complete PCL transection. Following manual segmentation, quantitative T2* and underlying texture features (i.e., energy, homogeneity, and variance) were analyzed for each specimen and PCL condition, both for the entire PCL and its subregions. For statistical analysis, Friedman’s test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test was used against the level of significance of P≤0.01.

Results

For the entire PCL, T2* was significantly increased as a function of injury when acquired with the UTE-T2* sequence [entire PCL: 11.1±3.1 ms (intact); 10.9±4.6 ms (partial); 14.3±4.9 ms (complete); P<0.001], but not when acquired with the conventional T2* sequence [entire PCL: 10.0±3.2 ms (intact); 11.4±6.2 ms (partial); 15.5±7.8 ms (complete); P=0.046]. The PCL subregions and texture variables showed variable changes indicative of injury-associated disorganization.

Conclusions

In contrast to the conventional T2* mapping, UTE-T2* mapping is more receptive in the detection of structural damage of the PCL and allows quantitative assessment of ligament (ultra-)structure and integrity that may help to improve diagnostic differentiation of distinct injury states. Once further substantiated beyond the in-situ setting, UTE-T2* mapping may refine diagnostic evaluation of PCL injuries and -possibly- monitor ligament healing, ageing, degeneration, and inflammation.

Protruding anterior medial meniscus and posterior tibial translation as secondary signs of complete and partial posterior cruciate ligament tear

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether measurement of protruding anterior meniscus in the medial compartment (PAMM) and posterior tibial translation (PTT) can be used as a secondary sign of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tear for differential diagnosis of partial or complete tear.

METHODS

21 cases with complete PCL tear, 35 cases with partial PCL tear, and 55 normal cases were reviewed in this retrospective study. PTT and PAMM were measured from the MR images associated with each case. Non-parametric data were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction to compare differences among the three groups: complete tear, partial tear, and controls.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the median values of PAMM among the three groups, and with PAMM increasing as the grade of PCL injury increased. However, there were no significant differences in median PTT among the three groups. Median PAMM in the partial and complete tear groups was significantly higher than in subjects without PCL rupture (adjusted p-value <0.05). Although median PAMM in subjects in the complete tear group tended to be higher than in those with a partial tear, this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted p-values ≥0.418).

CONCLUSION

PAMM is more useful finding than PTT and can predict PCL tear with or without posterior instability. However, PAMM cannot differentiate partial tear and complete tear of the PCL.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

PAMM is more useful finding than PTT and can predict PCL tear with or without posterior instability. However, PAMM cannot differentiate partial tear and complete tear of the PCL.

Protruding anterior medial meniscus-An indirect sign of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency

BACKGROUND

to examine if PROTruding of the Anterior Medial Meniscus (PROTAMM) could be an indirect sign of PCL deficiency by comparing PROTAMM to passive posterior tibial sagging (PSS) for chronic PCL rupture on routine MRI.

METHODS

Patients with PCL reconstruction between 2011 and 2016 were included in a case control study. Primarily cases with combined ACL/PCL injury were excluded. Secondary exclusion criteria were bony fractures, medial meniscus pathology and poor quality MRIs. Three (blinded) observers reviewed the pre-operative MRIs according to a pre-defined protocol.

RESULTS

After applying the inclusion and primary exclusion criteria 16 patients were identified in the PCL rupture group. The control group consisted of 15 patients. After reviewing the MRIs, 6 were excluded due to secondary exclusion criteria. Mean PPS measured 4.8 mm (± 4.4 mm) in the PCL rupture group and 1.8 mm (±2.9 mm) in the control group, p = 0.05. Mean PROTAMM was 3.6 mm (±0.6 mm) in the PCL rupture group and 0.7 mm (±0.9 mm) in the control group, p = 0.004.

CONCLUSION

We found a mean PROTAMM of 3.6 mm in patients with PCL rupture. We suggest that this sign, after knee injury in an otherwise normal medial meniscus, is a promising indirect sign of PCL deficiency compared to PPS. Implementation of this sign in clinical practice may improve the sensitivity of routine non-weight bearing MRI in identifying PCL deficient knees.