Ultrasound of the Normal Brachial Plexus

Ultrasound accuracy for brachial plexus pathology

AIM

To determine (a) the accuracy of ultrasound in detecting brachial plexus pathology and (b) outline the advantages and limitations of ultrasound compared to MRI for imaging the brachial plexus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

cases with clinically suspected brachial plexus pathology were evaluated first by ultrasound, followed by MRI. Patients with prior brachial plexus imaging were excluded. The final diagnosis was based on a combination of ultrasound, MRI, clinical follow-up, and surgical findings. The accuracy of the ultrasound was assessed by comparing the ultrasound and the final diagnoses. The mean clinical follow-up time following ultrasound was 1.8 ± 1.4 years.

RESULTS

Ninety-two (64%) of the 143 cases had normal brachial plexus ultrasound and MRI examinations. Fifty-one (36%) of 143 cases had brachial plexus pathology on MRI, comprising post-radiation fibrosis (n=25, 49%), nerve sheath tumor (n=11, 21%), traumatic injury (n=7, 14%), inflammatory polyneuropathy (n=4, 8%), malignant infiltration (n=2, 4%), desmoid fibromatosis (n=1,2%), and neuralgic amyotrophy (n=1, 2%). Overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for brachial plexus pathology was 98% (140/143), with three discordant cases (neuralgic amyotrophy n=1, inflammatory neuropathy n=1, postradiation fibrosis n=1) regarded as normal on ultrasound assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ultrasound for identifying brachial plexus pathology were 94%, 100%, 100%, and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound identifies brachial plexus pathology with high accuracy and specificity, showing comparable diagnostic efficacy to MRI. Ultrasound can serve as an effective first-line imaging investigation for suspected brachial plexus pathology.

The Application of Ultrasound Guidance in Electrodiagnostic Studies - A Narrative Review

Electrodiagnostic studies, including nerve conduction study and electromyography, were conducted based on surface anatomy in a conventional manner. However, the anatomical variations and difficulty in the identification of target nerves or muscles render the accuracy of electrodiagnostic studies questionable. In recent years, high-resolution ultrasound (US) has been used to scan both the peripheral nerves and musculoskeletal system. Furthermore, an increasing number of clinicians have incorporated US into electrodiagnostic studies to achieve accurate sampling and prevent potential unwanted tissue injuries. In this review article, we present summarized information about the utility of US in assisting electrodiagnostic studies.