Deep Brain Stimulation and Thalamotomy for the Treatment of Dystonia Acquired by Moyamoya Disease with Stroke

Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders after stroke: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Stroke remains the leading cause of disability in the United States. Even as acute care for strokes advances, there are limited options for improving function once the patient reaches the subacute and chronic stages. Identification of new therapeutic approaches is critical. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) holds promise for these patients. A number of case reports and small case series have reported improvement in movement disorders after strokes in patients treated with DBS. In this systematic review, the authors have summarized the patient characteristics, anatomical targets, stimulation parameters, and outcomes of patients who have undergone DBS treatment for poststroke movement disorders.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The PubMed, Scopus, and SpringerLink databases were searched for the keywords "DBS," "stroke," "movement," and "recovery" to identify patients treated with DBS for movement disorders after a stroke. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklists for case reports and case series were used to systematically analyze the quality of the included studies. Data collected from each study included patient demographic characteristics, stroke diagnosis, movement disorder, DBS target, stimulation parameters, complications, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The authors included 29 studies that described 53 patients who underwent placement of 82 total electrodes. Movement disorders included tremor (n = 18), dystonia (n = 18), hemiballism (n = 6), spastic hemiparesis (n = 1), chorea (n = 1), and mixed disorders (n = 9). The most common DBS targets were the globus pallidus internus (n = 32), ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus (n = 25), and subthalamic area/subthalamic nucleus (n = 7). Monopolar stimulation was reported in 43 leads and bipolar stimulation in 13. High-frequency stimulation was used in 57 leads and low-frequency stimulation in 6. All patients but 1 had improvement in their movement disorders. Two complications were reported: speech impairment in 1 patient and hardware infection in another. The median (interquartile range) duration between stroke and DBS treatment was 6.5 (2.1-15.8) years.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review of DBS for poststroke movement disorders. Overall, most studies to date have been case reports and small series reporting heterogeneous patients and surgical strategies. This review suggests that DBS for movement disorders after a stroke has the potential to be effective and safe for diverse patients, and DBS may be a feasible option to improve function even years after a stroke.

An artificial nervous system to treat chronic stroke

Despite remarkable advances in the treatment of numerous medical conditions, neurological disease and injury remains an outstanding challenge and cause of disability worldwide. The decreased regenerative capacity and extreme complexity and heterogeneity of nervous tissue, in particular the brain, and the fact that the brain remains the least understood organ, have hampered our ability to provide definitive treatments for prevalent conditions such as stroke. Stroke is the second-leading cause of death worldwide, and the nervous system is intimately involved in other prevalent conditions including ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Advances in neuromodulation, electroceuticals, microsurgical techniques, optogenetics, brain-computer interfaces, and autologous constructs offer potential solutions to address the otherwise permanent neurological deficits of stroke and other conditions. Here we review these various approaches to build an "artificial nervous system" that could restore function and independence in people living with these conditions. We focus on stroke both because it is the leading cause of neurological disability worldwide and because we anticipate that advances in the reversal of stroke-related deficits will have ripple effects benefiting people with other neurological conditions including spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, ALS, and muscular dystrophy.