Pelvic Insufficiency Fracture in Severe Osteoporosis Patient

Evaluating Treatment Outcomes for Pelvic Insufficiency Fractures: A Systematic Review

Background: Pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIF) are typical in geriatric populations with reduced bone quality, most commonly in elderly postmenopausal women. These fractures are usually caused by low-energy forces over the bones during ordinary life and cause disabling pain. Treatment options range from conservative to operative. The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of treatments for pelvic insufficiency fractures, determining optimal approaches between surgical intervention and conservative management. Methods: This literature review systematically examines articles focusing on patients with PIF, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and using PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library database. We took into account only full-text articles in indexed journals with available English abstracts, considering data about patient demographics, surgery, and outcomes. Results: After screening 128 articles, this study reviewed 20 manuscripts involving 1499 patients, mostly elderly females and focusing on sacrum fractures. Common treatments included conservative methods and sacroplasty, with a few complications reported. Osteoporosis was the prevalent comorbidity, and the survival rate post-treatment was high at 92.3%. Mobility outcomes varied, with some patients experiencing significant autonomy loss. The average follow-up period was over 17 months. Conclusions: This study found a cautious approach to surgery (timing of three weeks), which is reserved only for specific patterns, and it leads to increased autonomy and a lower risk of mortality. Due to the lack of pre- and postoperative scores as well as conflicting results, it is imperative to undertake further studies and research to be able to compare the alternative treatments efficiently.

Surgical treatment of sacral nonunions

Sacral fractures are complex injuries that follow a bimodal distribution, typically involving acute high energy trauma in young adults and low energy trauma in older adults (> 65 years old). Nonunion is a rare but debilitating potential complication of undiagnosed or improperly managed sacral fractures. Various surgical techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, sacroplasty, and percutaneous screw fixation, have been used to manage these fracture nonunions. In addition to reviewing the initial management of sacral fractures and the risk factors for fracture nonunion, this article describes techniques, specific cases and outcomes of these treatment strategies.

A systematic review regarding clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis

We conducted this systematic review to clarify the clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP). We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE for English language articles on FFP. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) of surgical patients in comparison to non-surgical patients for clinical characteristics (Rommens FFP classification, age, sex, dementia, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy), complications (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cardiac event, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcer, multiple organ failure, anemia caused by surgical bleeding, and surgical site infection), and outcomes (hospital mortality and one-year mortality). Five studies involving 1,090 patients with FFP (surgical patients, n = 432; non-surgical patients, n = 658) were included. FFP type III and IV (OR = 8.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.99 to 11.88; p<0.00001), a younger age (MD = -3.29; 95% CI -3.83 to -2.75; p<0.00001), the absence of dementia (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.57; p<0.0001), and the presence of osteoporosis (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.35; p = 0.0003) were significantly associated with the surgical patients. Urinary tract infection (OR = 2.06; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.10; p = 0.0005), anemia caused by surgical bleeding (OR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.95 to 10.62; p = 0.0005), and surgical site infection (OR = 16.74; 95% CI 3.05 to 91.87; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the surgical patients. There were no significant differences in the outcomes between the surgical and non-surgical patients. Our findings may help to further understand the treatment strategy for FFP and improve clinical outcomes.

Superiority of MRI for Evaluation of Sacral Insufficiency Fracture

Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Background: Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) are relatively rare fractures and difficult to diagnose on plain radiographs. The primary objective of the present study was to evaluate the role of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of SIF. The secondary objective was to identify the classification of SIF by computed tomography (CT). Methods: A total of 77 (Male 11, female 66, mean 80.3 years) people were included in this study. Inclusion criteria for this study were: age ≥ 60 years and no history of high energy trauma. Exclusion criteria were high energy trauma and a current history of malignancy. Differences in the fracture detection and description in the various radiologic procedures were evaluated. Fracture patterns were evaluated with CT. The detection rates of additional pathologies in the MRI of the pelvis and lumbar spine were also recorded. Results: The sensitivities for SIF were 28.5% in radiographs and 94.2% in CT, and all fractures were detected in MRI. MRI showed a more complex fracture pattern compared with CT in 65% of the cases. We observed 71.4% of single SIFs, 9.1% with other spinal fractures, 13.0% with other pelvic fractures, and 7.8% with other fractures. According to the SIF fracture pattern, the H/U type was 40.2%, transverse type was 33.7%, λ/T type was 24.7%, unilateral vertical type was 1.3%, and bilateral vertical type was 0%. Conclusions: an MRI of the lumbar spine including the sacrum with a coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted image is useful for elderly patients with suddenly increasing low back pain at an early stage. This procedure improves an early SIF detection, recognition of concomitant pathologies, and adequate treatment for the patients.

Cooccurrence of Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis with Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Case Report

Introduction

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are caused by low-energy impacts and can occur spontaneously in patients with severe osteoporosis. The clinical symptoms of FFP are frequently vague and nonspecific. Moreover, the symptoms of FFP can mimic lumbar spine pathologies. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of FFP is often difficult and the fracture may be misdiagnosed as lumbar degenerative disease. However, little is known regarding what kind of symptoms due to lumbar degenerative disease are similar to the symptoms of FFP.

Case Report

We encountered two cases in which FFP developed during the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with radiculopathy. Both patients had undergone conservative treatment for lumbar degenerative disease, but their symptoms gradually worsened and they presented with gait disturbance. FFP was diagnosed by imaging, and surgery was required in one case. Both cases showed L3 foraminal stenosis on the image, and the symptoms of L3 radiculopathy presented with thigh pain, hip pain, and knee pain, which is similar to the pain site of FFP. Therefore, diagnosis of FFP was difficult.

Conclusion

In lumbar degenerative diseases presenting with radiculopathy, the pain site may be similar to that of FFP, which may make diagnosis of FFP difficult. Therefore, especially in patients with lumbar degenerative disease presenting with L3 radiculopathy, it is necessary to consider the possibility of FFP and perform MRI imaging to make an early diagnosis when the symptoms change.

Significance of Lumbar MRI in Diagnosis of Sacral Insufficiency Fracture

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic algorithm of sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF). The primary objective was to compare the sensitivity in fracture detection and correct fracture classification according to MRI and computed tomography (CT). The secondary objective was to identify differences of additional pathologies found in MRI of the lumbar spine and the pelvis and their rates.

METHODS

A total of 943 patients (from 2010 to 2017) with fracture of the pelvic ring were screened. All patients without high-energy trauma and radiologic diagnostics consisting of X-ray, CT, and MRI of the pelvis or the lumbar spine including the sacrum were included. Differences in fracture detection and description in the various radiologic procedures were evaluated. Detection rates of additional pathologies in MRI of the pelvis and lumbar spine were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 77 subjects were included. The sensitivities for SIF were 14% in X-ray and 88% in CT, and all fractures were detected in MRI. MRI showed a more complex fracture pattern compared with CT in 65% of the cases. Additional pathologies were seen in MRI of the lumbar spine (51%) and that of the pelvis (18%).

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest performing MRI of the lumbar spine including the sacrum with coronal STIR (short tau inversion recovery) sequence for elderly patients with suddenly increasing low back pain at an early stage. This procedure might improve fracture detection, classification, and recognition of concomitant pathologies.

Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Care Conundrum

Introduction:

A need exists for improved care pathways for patients experiencing low-energy pelvic ring fractures. A review of the current literature was performed to understand the typical patient care and post-acute rehabilitation pathway within the US healthcare system. We also sought to summarize reported clinical outcomes worldwide. Significance: Low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients usually do not qualify for inpatient admission, yet they often require post-acute rehabilitative care. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) 3-day rule is a barrier to obtaining financial coverage of this rehabilitative care.

Results:

Direct admission of some patients to post-acute care facilities has shown promise with decreased cost, improved patient outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction. Secondary fracture prevention programs may also improve outcomes for this patient population.

Conclusions:

Post-acute care innovation and secondary fracture prevention should be prioritized in the low-energy pelvic fragility fracture patient population. To demonstrate the effect and feasibility of these improved care pathways, further studies are necessary.

Effect of PTH treatment on bone healing in insufficiency fractures of the pelvis: a systematic review

The aging of our society is associated with an increasing number of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the current standard of care is pain control and early mobilization. The aim of this study was to explore whether parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment can support bone healing in these patients.

We conducted a systematic review searching the databases PubMed, Embase and Cochrane. Our primary outcome was fracture healing, secondary outcome measures comprised pain, mobility and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Eight articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which two were included in a meta-analysis. However, only three studies were comparative including one randomized controlled trial. Fracture healing and reported pain were assessed after eight weeks, and were significantly improved in the group being treated with PTH (p < 0.01) in the meta-analysis. All articles described a positive effect for PTH on fracture healing and pain.

Our systematic review indicates that there is a positive effect of PTH treatment on healing and pain in patients with insufficiency fracture in the pelvic ring, but further research is necessary.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:9-14. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200029

Sacral fractures: issues, challenges, solutions

Sacral fractures are a heterogeneous group of fractures occurring in young people following road traffic accidents and falls from height, or in the elderly with osteoporosis following trivial trauma.This heterogeneity, combined with the low incidence of sacral fractures, determines a lack of experience amongst physicians, often leading to misdiagnosis, underestimation and inadequate treatment. The diagnosis should be made by assessing specific features during the clinical presentation, while computed tomography (CT) scan continues to be the choice of investigation.Sacral fractures can be treated non-operatively or surgically. Non-operative treatment is based on rest, pain relief therapy and early mobilization as tolerated. Surgical techniques can be split into two main groups: posterior pelvic fixation techniques and lumbopelvic fixation techniques. Anterior pelvic fixation techniques should be considered when sacral fractures are associated with anterior pelvic ring injuries, in order to increase stability and reduce the risk of posterior implant failure. To improve fracture reduction, different solutions could be adopted, including special positioning of the patient, manipulation techniques and use of specific reduction tools. Patients suffering from spinopelvic dissociation with associated neurologic lesions hardly ever recover completely, with residual lower-limb neurologic sequelae, urinary problems and sexual disfunction.Herein, we present issues, challenges and solutions related to the management of sacral fractures. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:299-311. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190064.

The one-year mortality rate in elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures of the pelvis

Osteoporosis is a common condition for elderly people. The incidence of osteoporotic pelvic fractures has been increasing. Osteoporotic pelvic fractures are associated with increased mortality rates. Based on the aim of our study, we found out that one-year mortality rate after a pelvic fracture is high and depends on the fracture type.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the one-year mortality rate in patients aged 65+ with osteoporotic pelvic fractures depending on the type of fracture according to AO/OTA classification.

METHODS

Patients aged 65+ with pelvic insufficiency fractures admitted to a single center between 1 June 2013 and 31 December 2016 were enrolled in the study. The fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. The start of the survival time analysis was the date of the injury. The end of the analysis was 31 December 2017 or the date of the patient's death. Mortality rates were assessed with respect to fracture types using Kaplan-Meier curves. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to assess the dependence of mortality on the fracture type.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with 95 (90.5%) being female were enrolled in this prospective study. The average age was 80.3 years (95% CI 78.8-81.7). Mean follow-up time was 23.5 months (95% CI 20.7-26.4). According to AO/OTA classification, 30 (28.6%) patients had a type A pelvic fracture, 73 (69.5%) patients-type B fracture, and 2 (1.9%)-type C fracture. Overall, the one-year mortality rate was 23.8% (95% CI 16.8-33.2%). For patients with type A fracture, the one-year mortality rate was 13.3% (95% CI 5.2-31.7%) compared with 27.4% (95% CI 18.6-39.2%) in the group with type B fracture, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that within a year after an osteoporotic pelvic fracture, the number of deaths in the patients having type B pelvic fracture was twice higher than in the patients with type A fracture.

Anatomical considerations of safe drilling corridor upper sacral segment screw insertion

The upper segment of sacrum is an important for screw insertions of unstable lumbosacral spine. Measurements of the S1-S2 as sacral wings, pedicles, sacral foraminas and sacral canal were taken from 87 sacrums. The mean depths of S1 pedicle and sacral wing were estimated as 25.8 ± 2.3 mm and 50.1 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. Angles screw trajectory of sacral pedicle anteromedial and sacral wing were measured as 29.6 ± 0.9° and 29.7 ± 2.1°, respectively. To avoid injury to the vascular structures anteriorly and nerve roots medially, depth and angle of screw trajectory is important for the entrance off pedicular screw placement to the S1.

Comparison of patients with diagnosed and suspected sacral insufficiency fractures

BACKGROUND

Patients with sacral insufficiency fractures can have a range of symptoms, and because these fractures are difficult to detect using plain radiographs, it can be tough to make a definitive diagnosis of fracture early after injury. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnosis and treatment of patients with known sacral insufficiency fractures to those with suspected insufficiency fractures to clarify the features of sacral insufficiency fractures.

METHODS

We compared patients with sacral insufficiency fractures (S group) to those with suspected insufficiency fractures (N group) using demographic data, symptoms, time to definitive diagnosis, radiological methods, and treatments.

RESULTS

Patients in the S group were older than those in the N group (p = 0.0042) and showed less localized sacral pain (p = 0.0042). Almost all of the patients in the S group (74%) required magnetic resonance imaging for definitive diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacral insufficiency fractures should not be diagnosed based on the site of pain or using plain radiographs. Patient age and magnetic resonance imaging are more informative to obtain a definitive diagnosis of sacral insufficiency fractures.

Non-hip/non-vertebral fractures - How to treat best?

Fractures of the extremities in the elderly constitute more than two-thirds of all fragility fractures befalling frail, osteoporotic and sarcopenic patients. Although treatment controversies abound, consensus exists. Upper extremity fractures hinder activities of daily living and are debilitating. Open fractures or displaced fractures will need surgical intervention. Wrist fractures treated operatively allow early use of the hand. Most pelvic fractures are treated conservatively. In the lower extremities, fractures of the long bones, tibia and femur need surgical intervention. Non-displaced fractures around the foot may be treated with immobilisation and avoidance of full weight-bearing. As a rule, fractures take four months for consolidation. Individually tailored solutions are needed for frail patients with comorbidities. Maintaining joint mobility and muscle strength preserves mobility and autonomy. Caring for extremities trauma is team work, involving family and health care providers. Prevention efforts are mandatory.

The Association of Iliac and Sacral Insufficiency Fractures and Implications for Treatment: The Role of Bone Scans in Three Different Cases

Iliac wing fractures are under-diagnosed fractures often associated with sacral insufficiency fractures in osteoporotic patients. They are rarely seen alone. Insufficiency fractures of the iliac bone can often be missed on computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) yet identified on radioisotope bone scans. Symptomatic iliac fractures present with more lateralized pain in the hip and groin compared to patients with only sacral insufficiency fractures. Since the acetabulum is the key weight-bearing articulation between the sacrum and pelvis and the femoral head and leg, worsening of iliac stress fractures can have major effects on weight bearing and should be a consideration in patients with persistent pain in this area. The anatomy of the ilium and relationship to other pelvic insufficiency fractures is reviewed as well as treatment options. Typical cases are presented where the iliac fractures were found on bone scan either in addition to the more common sacral fracture or due to the persistence of symptoms of hip and thigh pain.

Lumbar spine MRI versus non-lumbar imaging modalities in the diagnosis of sacral insufficiency fracture: a retrospective observational study

Background

Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) are a common cause of lower back pain in the elderly. However, because clinical symptoms are frequently vague and nonspecific and can mimic lumbar spine pathologies, initial imaging in SIF patients is frequently targeted at the lumbar spine rather than the sacrum, resulting in delayed diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to show the proportions of modalities used in diagnosing SIF in practice and to compare the clinical and imaging features of SIF diagnosed by lumbar spine MRI (L-spine MRI) with those diagnosed by non-lumbar imaging modalities (bone scan, pelvic bone CT, pelvis MRI).

Methods

Forty-two patients with SIF were enrolled in this study. SIFs diagnosed by L-spine were assigned to group 1 and SIFs diagnosed by non-lumbar imaging modalities (bone scan, pelvic bone CT, pelvis MRI) were assigned to group 2. The clinical and imaging features of SIFs were assessed and compared between two groups.

Results

SIF were more commonly diagnosed by L-spine MRI (group 1: n = 27, 64.3%) than non-lumbar imaging modalities (group 2: n = 15, 35.7%), which was comprised of pelvic bone CT (n = 6, 14.3%), bone scan (n = 5, 11.9%), and pelvis MRI (n = 4, 9.5%). Lower back pain, radiating pain and comorbid other causes of pain were more frequently identified in group 1. Fracture involving bilateral sacral ala with horizontal component was the most common shape and S2 being the most commonly involved horizontal component, without significant difference between two groups.

Conclusion

SIFs are more commonly diagnosed by L-spine MRI than non-lumbar imaging modalities, because of symptoms that mimic lumbar spine pathology and variable comorbid causes of pain. To know that L-spine MRI commonly reveal SIF and to be familiar with SIF features on L-spine MRI would help increase sensitivity in detecting this commonly underrecognized entity and achieve earlier and more appropriate management.

Osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fracture: An easily neglected disease in elderly patients

Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) are easily neglected by clinical physicians.The incidence of SIFs remains unclear in patients with symptomatic osteoporotic compression fractures of the lumbar-sacral area.This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing the medical records and radiological reports and by reading magnetic resonance (MR) images from August 2013 to July 2016. We identified 1233 cases with symptomatic vertebral compression fractures for which surgical interventions were performed. A total of 1144 cases were eligible for this study. Neglected diagnoses by radiologists and clinical physicians were calculated, respectively.The MR imaging (MRI) findings of SIFs were divided into the body (S1, S2, S3, and S4 levels) and alar areas (unilateral, bilateral, transverse, and none).A total of 34 (3.00%) cases with SIFs were identified through MRI. A significant difference was observed between 19 (6.53%) patients aged >80 years and 15 (1.76%) aged <80 years (P < .0001). Eight (23.53%) and 26 (76.47%) cases of SIFs were neglected by radiologists and clinical physicians, respectively. The S2 and S3 levels were the predominantly involved area (23/34; 67.65%). Furthermore, the bilateral alar area was the most commonly involved (19/34; 55.88%), as observed in coronal views of MRI.While treating other levels of osteoporotic compression fractures, radiologists and clinical physicians should be aware of SIFs, particularly when the patients are aged >80 years. The coronal oblique MR images of the thoracolumbar region should be carefully read to avoid neglecting SIFs.

Femoral head trabecular micro-architecture in patients with osteoporotic hip fractures: Impact of bisphosphonate treatment

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are effective in preventing osteoporotic fractures. However, their limited efficacy of bisphosphonates has been suggested as a result of these drugs, which prevent the resorption of bone without improving bone connectivity. The trabecular microarchitecture in patients with osteoporotic hip fractures was evaluated according to their history of bisphosphonate treatment (BT).

METHODS

One hundred thirty-three patients with hip fractures admitted and treated between November 2014 and September 2016. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had received treatment with bisphosphonates for >3years or not [non-bisphosphonate-treated patients (NT)]. One-to-one propensity score matching generated 15 matched pairs of patients. Microstructural parameters of femoral head were measured by using micro-computed tomography (μCT). Mechanical compression test (Young's modulus, yield strength, and maximum compressive force) was performed following μCT.

RESULTS

Trabecular bone pattern factor (1.15±0.7mm^-1 versus 1.61±0.5mm^-1, p=0.037) and specific bone surface (14.1±0.8mm^-1 versus 15.4±1.9mm^-1, p=0.050) were significantly lower in the BT group than in the NT group. Furthermore, Young's modulus was significantly higher in the BT group than in the NT group (72.14±30.75MPa versus 47.89±29.89MPa, p=0.037). In both groups, trabecular bone pattern was the most closely correlated microstructural parameter to bone strength. Microstructural analysis demonstrated that bone connectivity was better preserved in the BT group than in the NT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonate treatment preserves bone mass and bone quality. The factors influencing osteoporotic hip fractures in patients treated with bisphosphonates warrant further research.