Outcomes of Combined Neck and Trochanter Fractures of the Femur Treated with Cephallomedullary Nail in Elderly

Treatment outcomes of concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures using Gamma3 nails with U-blade lag screws

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of Gamma3 nails fitted with U-blade lag screws in the management of combined neck and trochanter fracture of the femur. Two hundred-fifty patients with fractures in the proximal femur underwent treatment using Gamma3 nails integrated with U-blade lag screws from 2015 to 2022. Among these cases, 33 had combined neck and trochanteric fractures; 8 patients were excluded because of follow-up for <1 year. The remaining data of 25 patients (7 males and 18 females) were reviewed. Bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), tip-apex distance (TAD), extent of lag screw migration, femoral neck-shaft angle, callus formation, fracture type, and treatment failure were analyzed. The mean patient age was 76.3 (range, 61-91) years, and the mean follow-up duration was 17.3 (range, 12.5-57.3) months. The mean BMD T-scores for the spine and femoral neck were -2.3 ± 1.0 and -2.8 ± 0.7, respectively; 18 patients had T-scores ≤-2.5, indicating osteoporosis. The mean BMI was 23.2 ± 3.8 kg/m2 , and the mean operative time was 69.8 (range, 45-90) minutes. Twenty-one patients experienced injuries from slipping, 2 sustained injuries from falling, and 2 from car traffic accidents. The mean TAD was 21.6 ± 5.9 mm, with 16 patients showing <25 mm. The mean extent of lag screw migration was 5.7 ± 5.1 mm. The mean femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs was 125.1 ± 8.6 degrees immediately postoperatively and 120.3 ± 9.5 degrees at the final follow-up. During the follow-up period, the first callus formation was observed at 3.8 months (range, 1.4-7.3) on plain radiographs in the anteroposterior and axial views. Based on our fracture criteria, 4 patients had a two-part fracture type, 12 patients had three-part, and 9 patients had four-part. Out of 25 patients, 3 exhibited treatment failure. No significant differences were observed between the groups with and without bone union regarding age, BMD, BMI, operative time, TAD of the lag screw, extent of lag screw migration, and femoral neck-shaft angle. The bone union was achieved in 88% of patients who underwent treatment utilizing the U-blade Gamma3 nail for concomitant ipsilateral neck and trochanteric fractures. Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Biomechanical analysis analyzing association between bone mineral density and lag screw migration

A proximal femoral nail using a helical blade (HB) is commonly utilized to treat proximal femoral fracture but cut through failure of the lag screws is one of the devastating complications following the surgery. While controversial, one of the potential risk factors for cut through failure is poor bone strength which can be predicted by measuring bone mineral density (BMD). In this study, we performed a biomechanical test on the fractured femoral head to validate whether the indirectly measured BMD from the contralateral hip or that measured directly from the retrieved femoral head can elucidate the structural strength of the fractured femoral head and thereby can be used to predict migration of lag screws. Our result showed that directly measured BMD has a significant correlation with the HB migration on the osteoporotic femoral head. However, while the BMDs measured from the contralateral femoral neck or total hip is the most widely used parameter to predict the bone strength of the fractured femur, this may have limited usability to predict HB migration.

A Cautionary Tale of a Complex Peri-Trochanteric Fracture in a Very Important Person (VIP) Patient at a Community-Based Hospital: A Case Report

Peri-trochanteric fractures with an extension into the femoral neck are relatively rare. Due to the lack of a defined treatment in the literature, these fractures pose a challenge to orthopedic surgeons. This case report highlights the value of timing to surgical intervention, choosing the appropriate operative course, not treating very important person (VIP) patients differently than standard patients, and decreasing unnecessary costs for the patient and the US healthcare system. An 85-year-old male VIP patient presented to the emergency department (ED) with a left peri-trochanteric fracture with an extension into the ipsilateral femoral neck. The initial plan was to perform arthroplasty with diaphyseal fixation. However, the community-based hospital would have to wait two to three days for the proper implants, and the patient insisted on being treated at this hospital. Due to concerns about increased mortality with delayed treatment, the patient underwent short cephalomedullary nail (CMN) fixation the next day. On postoperative day (POD) 49, a pop was heard and felt while ambulating, and radiographs revealed substantial lateral cutout of the CMN and subsidence of the femoral head. On POD 54, the patient underwent a successful left total hip arthroplasty using a modular diaphyseal press-fit femoral component, which resulted in an uneventful recovery. This case illustrates a cautionary tale in choosing the appropriate operative course for a VIP patient with a peri-trochanteric fracture extending into the femoral neck (a relatively rare fracture type that has no clearly defined treatment option). This is imperative to reduce pain and length of stay for the patient, postoperative complications, and cost. Based on the results from the second procedure and weighing the risk of prolonged treatment, the authors believe that this patient would likely have benefited from a primary arthroplasty procedure given his body habitus and complex fracture pattern.

What Is the Best Treatment Choice for Concomitant Ipsilateral Femoral Neck and Intertrochanteric Fracture? A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of 115 Consecutive Patients

PURPOSE

Although a concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture has been considered to be a rare type of injury, its incidence has been increasing, especially among elderly hip fracture patients. However, there is limited evidence on the optimal treatment option. This study surveys surgical outcomes of different implants in order to assist in selecting the best possible implant for a combined femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture.

METHODS

The postoperative complications after the treatment of a concomitant ipsilateral femoral neck and intertrochanteric fracture via cephalomedullary nail (CMN), dynamic hip screw (DHS), and hip arthroplasty groups were analyzed by retrospectively reviewing the electronic medical records of 115 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

The patient demographics and perioperative details showed no significant discrepancies amongst different surgical groups, except for the operative time; a CMN had the shortest mean operative time (standard deviation) of 85.6 min (31.1), followed by 94.7 min (22.3) during a DHS, and 107.3 min (37.2) during an HR (p = 0.021). Of the 84 osteosynthesis patients, 77 (91.7%) achieved a fracture union. Only one (3.2%) of the 31 HR cases had a dislocation. The sub-analysis of the different osteosynthesis methods showed a higher incidence of excessive sliding and the nonunion of the fracture fragment in the DHS group than that in the CMN group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.022, respectively). The different surgical methods did not significantly vary in other outcome variables, such as the re-operation rate, mortality, and hip function.

CONCLUSIONS

For the surgical treatment of combined femoral neck and trochanteric fractures, osteosynthesis did not differ significantly from an HR in terms of the overall postoperative complications, reoperation and mortality rate, and hip function, however, the risk of nonunion and more mechanical complications should be considered when choosing a DHS. Our suggestion for the treatment of a femoral neck and ipsilateral trochanteric fracture is that a surgeon should choose wisely between an HR and a CMN depending on the patient's age, the displacement of the femoral neck, and one's expertise.

[Patterns and research progress on the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of intracapsular femoral neck and extracapsular trochanter]

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the patterns and research progress of the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of intracapsular femoral neck and extracapsular trochanter, and to provide a common language among orthopedic surgeons for scientific exchange.

METHODS

According to related literature and authors own experiences concerning the anatomic border between femoral neck and trochanter region, the intertrochanteric line (or intertrochanteric belt) and its capsularligament attachment footprint, fracture patterns, and treatment strategies were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

With the rapid growing of geriatric hip fractures, an increased incidence was noted in recent years regarding the proximal femoral comminuted fractures that involving ipsilateral intracapsular neck and extracapsular trochanter regions simultaneously. But the concept of femoral neck combined with trochanter fractures was ambiguous. Based on the anatomic type of femoral neck fracture, the location of fracture center, and the ability to achieve direct inferior calcar or anteromedial cortex-to-cortex apposition and buttress, we classified these complex fractures into 3 sub-types: ① Segmental femoral neck fractures (two separate fracture centers at subcapital and trochanteric region respectively); ② Femoral neck fracture (trans-cervical) with extension to the supero-lateral trochanteric region (fracture center in femoral neck); ③ Trochanteric fracture with extension to the medio-inferior femoral neck region (fracture center in trochanter, comminuted basicervical fracture, or variant type of comminuted trochanter fracture). For treatment strategy, surgeons should consider the unique characteristics of femoral neck and trochanter, usually with combined fixation techniques, or arthroplasty supplemented with fixation.

CONCLUSION

Currently there is no consensus on diagnosis and terminology regarding the concomitant ipsilateral fractures of femoral neck and trochanter. Further studies are needed.

Segmental Fractures of the Neck of Femur: Fix or Replace?

Combined intracapsular and extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur—segmental fractures of neck of femur (SFNOF)—are rare and complex injuries. Literature regarding SFNOF is very limited; only one small retrospective study and 19 unique case reports have been described. We report the case of a 42-year-old man who suffered a compound subcapital femur fracture type Garden IV and an ipsilateral multifragmentary greater trochanter fracture from severe crush trauma. Neither the precise fracture constellation nor our management strategy, primary cemented total hip arthroplasty combined with tension band cerclage and triple K-wire trochanteric fixation, has been described in contemporary literature. We conclude that SFNOF needs clear categorization and derivative treatment principles. Prosthesis longevity, risk of nonunion, and avascular necrosis should be considered.