1
|
Ananthan A, Balasubramanian H, Rath C, Muthusamy S, Rao S, Patole S. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2024:10.1038/s41430-024-01474-0. [PMID: 39060543 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-024-01474-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is a widely used and extensively researched probiotic. Probiotic effects are considered to be strain specific. We aimed to comprehensively assess the strain-specific effects of LGG in preterm infants. A systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs to evaluate the effect of LGG in preterm infants. We followed the Cochrane methodology, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement for conducting and reporting this review. We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases till December 2023. The review was registered in PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs that used LGG as the sole probiotic showed significantly lower risk of NEC ≥Stage II [5 RCTs, n = 851, RR:0.50 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.93), P = 0.03] in the LGG group. There was no significant difference in the risk of LOS [7 RCTs, n = 1037, RR:1.08 (95% CI 0.84, 1.39), P = 0.55], mortality [3 RCTs, n = 207, RR: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.42, 2.33), P = 0.99], time to reach full feeds [2 RCTs, n = 19, SMD = 0.11 days (95% CI: -0.22, 0.45), P = 0.51] and duration of hospital stay [3 RCTs, n = 293, SMD: -0.14 days (95% CI: -0.37 to 0.09), P = 0.23]. Meta-analysis of data from non-RCTs showed no significant effect of LGG on NEC, LOS, and mortality. RCTs showed beneficial effects of LGG when used as the sole probiotic in reducing the risk of NEC, whereas observational studies did not. Strain-specific systematic review of LGG provides important data for guiding research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anitha Ananthan
- Department of Neonatology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
| | | | - Chandra Rath
- Department of Neonatology, Joondalup Health Campus, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Shripada Rao
- Department of Neonatology, Joondalup Health Campus, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sanjay Patole
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Neonatal Directorate, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bui A, Johnson E, Epshteyn M, Schumann C, Schwendeman C. Utilization of a High Potency Probiotic Product for Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants at a Level IV NICU. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 2023; 28:473-475. [PMID: 38130501 PMCID: PMC10731933 DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.5.473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a serious gastrointestinal disease that can be seen in premature infants with high risk for morbidity and mortality. There is currently no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) medication approved for the prevention of NEC. Despite great heterogeneity among available studies, large meta-analyses of clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of multiple-strain probiotics in reducing NEC and all-cause mortality. In 2020, Medical City Dallas's Level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) implemented a probiotic protocol for NEC prevention. As a result, a reduction in NEC was observed, with no occurrence of probiotic-related sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Bui
- Department of Pharmacy (AB, EJ, ME), Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, TX
| | - Emory Johnson
- Department of Pharmacy (AB, EJ, ME), Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael Epshteyn
- Department of Pharmacy (AB, EJ, ME), Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, TX
| | - Caitlin Schumann
- Department of Nursing (C. Schumann), Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, TX
| | - Clair Schwendeman
- Department of Neonatology (C. Schwendeman), Pediatrix Medical Group, North Dallas Practice, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kulkarni T, Majarikar S, Deshmukh M, Ananthan A, Balasubramanian H, Keil A, Patole S. Probiotic sepsis in preterm neonates-a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr 2022; 181:2249-2262. [PMID: 35348825 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04452-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Sepsis due to the administered probiotic strain/s is a barrier against adoption of prophylactic probiotic supplementation in preterm infants to reduce the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC ≥ Stage II), all-cause mortality, late-onset sepsis, and feeding intolerance. We aimed to conduct a systematic review for reports of probiotic sepsis in preterm infants (gestation < 37 weeks). Databases including PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Central library, and Google Scholar were searched in August 2021 and updated in Jan 2022. Probiotic sepsis was defined as positive blood/CSF culture isolating administered probiotic strain with symptoms suggestive of infection. Data collection included birth weight, gestation, comorbidities (e.g. gut surgery, NEC), presence of central venous catheters, treatment, and outcome. Literature search revealed 1569 studies. A total of 16 reports [randomised control trial (RCT): none; non-RCT: 1; case series: 8; case report: 7] involving 32 preterm infants with probiotic sepsis were included after exclusions for various reasons. Majority of the cases were born < 32 weeks' gestation. Bifidobacterium (N = 19) was the most commonly isolated organism followed by Lactobacillus (N = 10), and Saccharomyces (N = 3). A total of 25/32 cases were confirmed to be due to the administered probiotic strain on full genomic analysis. Two studies reported one neonatal death each. Twelve neonates had comorbidities. Majority were treated with antibiotics (29/32) whereas others (3/32) required antifungal treatment. CONCLUSION Probiotics sepsis is relatively an uncommon event in preterm infants. Majority of the cases recovered after antibiotic or antifungal treatment. The importance of optimal surveillance and treatment of probiotic sepsis and research towards alternatives to probiotics (e.g. postbiotics) is emphasised. WHAT IS KNOWN • Probiotics have been shown to reduce necrotising enterocolitis, late-onset sepsis, all-cause mortality, and time to reach full enteral feeds in preterm infants. • Despite the evidence, use of probiotics is not universal due to concerns regarding probiotic-associated sepsis in preterm infants. WHAT IS NEW • This comprehensive systematic review showed that probiotic sepsis is a relatively rare phenomenon in preterm infants. • All except one case where the diagnosis was uncertain recovered after antimicrobial therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tithi Kulkarni
- Department of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Swati Majarikar
- Department of Neonatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 11 Robin Warren Drive, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia
| | - Mangesh Deshmukh
- Department of Neonatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 11 Robin Warren Drive, Perth, WA, 6150, Australia.
- Department of Neonatology, St. John of God Hospital Subiaco, Perth, WA, Australia.
| | - Anitha Ananthan
- Department of Neonatology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Anthony Keil
- PathWest Laboratory Medicine Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sanjay Patole
- Department of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jeong J, Kwun Y, Kim MJ, Choi SH, Jung E, Lee BS, Kim KS, Kim EAR. Targeting Risk Factors for the Control of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Single Tertiary Center Experience. NEONATAL MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.5385/nm.2021.28.3.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of targeting risk factors for the control of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) among high-risk infants in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).Methods: Infants admitted to the NICU and diagnosed with CLABSI from January to December 2013 were eligible for inclusion to the study. The CLABSI group (n=47) was matched in a 1:2 ratio to the control group (n=94) based on gestational age, birth weight, and Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II. Risk factors for CLABSI were identified using the Cox proportional hazard model, and analysis of the effect of these risk factors targeting infection control was performed.Results: The risk factors associated with CLABSI were prolonged central line dwell days (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.028; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011 to 1.045; P=0.001), use of a silicone catheter (adjusted HR, 5.895; 95% CI, 1.893 to 18.355; P=0.002), surgical treatment (adjusted HR, 3.793; 95% CI, 1.467 to 9.805; P=0.006), and less probiotic supplementation (adjusted HR, 0.254; 95% CI, 0.068 to 0.949; P=0.042). By targeting these risk factors with a quality improvement initiative, the mean CLABSI incidence rate per 1,000 catheter-days decreased from 6.6 to 3.1 (P=0.004).Conclusion: Targeting risk factors for infection control significantly reduced the rate of CLABSI among high-risk infants in the NICU.
Collapse
|
5
|
Razak A, Patel RM, Gautham KS. Use of Probiotics to Prevent Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Evidence to Clinical Practice. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175:773-774. [PMID: 34047767 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.1077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Razak
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ravi Mangal Patel
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kanekal Suresh Gautham
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deshmukh M, Patole S. Prophylactic Probiotic Supplementation for Preterm Neonates-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies. Adv Nutr 2021; 12:1411-1423. [PMID: 33460432 PMCID: PMC8321836 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that probiotics reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC ≥ Stage II), late onset sepsis (LOS), all-cause mortality, and feeding intolerance in preterm neonates. Data from observational studies is important to confirm probiotic effects in clinical practice. We aimed to compare outcomes before and after implementing routine probiotic supplementation (RPS) in preterm neonates (<37 weeks of gestation) by performing a systematic review of non-RCTs using Cochrane methodology. Databases including PubMed, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central library, and Google Scholar were searched in May 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Categorical measure of effect size was expressed as OR and 95% CI. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-squared test, I2 statistic. The level of evidence (LOE) was summarized using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) guidelines. Primary outcomes were NEC ≥ Stage II, LOS, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included probiotic sepsis. Thirty good-quality non-RCTs (n = 77,018) from 18 countries were included. The meta-analysis showed RPS was associated with significantly reduced: 1) NEC ≥ Stage II (30 studies, n = 77,018; OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.50, 0.73; P <0.00001, I2: 65%; LOE: Moderate), 2) LOS: (21 studies, n = 65,858; OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.97; P = 0.02, I2: 74%; LOE: Low), and 3) all-cause mortality (27 non-RCTs, n = 70,977; OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.88; P = 0.0001, I2: 49%; LOE: Low). Subgroups: 1) extremely low birth weight (ELBW: birth weight <1000 g) neonates: RPS was associated with significantly reduced NEC ≥ Stage II (4.5% compared with 7.9%). However, there was no difference in LOS and mortality. 2) Multistrain RPS was more effective than single strain. One study reported 3 nonfatal cases of probiotic sepsis. In summary, moderate- to low-quality evidence indicates that RPS was associated with significantly reduced NEC ≥ Stage II, LOS, and all-cause mortality in neonates <37 weeks of gestation and NEC ≥ Stage II in ELBW neonates.
Collapse
|