The comparison of relative reliability on biaxial and three point flexural strength testing methods of light curing composite resin

Mechanical properties of CAD/CAM polylactic acid as a material for interim restoration

Statement of problem

Biomaterials, including polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and bisacrylate, have been widely used as conventional interim materials and may exhibit cytotoxicity or systemic toxicity.

Purpose

This study was designed to compare the mechanical properties of polylactic acid (PLA) as an alternative to conventional dental polymers for computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM).

Material and methods

Four groups (n = 20 per group) of CAD/CAM polymers were assessed. Specimens of PLA (PLA Mill) and PMMA (PMMA Mill) for subtractive manufacturing, PLA for fused deposition modeling (PLA FDM), and bisphenol for additive manufacturing by stereolithography (Bisphenol SLA) were fabricated into 2-mm-wide, 2-mm-thick and 25-mm-long specimens using a milling machine, an FDM printer, and an SLA printer, respectively.The flexural strength (FS) and elastic modulus (EM) were calculated. The surface roughness and Shore D hardness were analyzed with a 3D optical surface roughness analyzer and a Shore durometer, respectively.

Results

PLA Mill showed the lowest FS (64.9 ± 8.28), followed by PLA FDM (104.27 ± 4.42 MPa), PMMA Mill (139.2 ± 20.95 MPa), and Bisphenol SLA (171.56 ± 15.38 MPa), with statistically significant differences. PLA FDM showed the highest EM, followed by PLA Mill, Bisphenol SLA, and PMMA Mill. Significant differences were observed not only between PMMA Mill and Bisphenol SLA but also between PLA FDM and PLA Mill. The lowest Shore D hardness was observed for PLA FDM, followed by PLA Mill, PMMA Mill, and Bisphenol SLA, which showed the highest value among the 4 groups, with significance. The highest values for the surface roughness parameters were observed for PLA Mill, and the lowest were observed for Bisphenol SLA.

Conclusions

Among the tested CAD/CAM polymers, Bisphenol SLA was the most durable material, and the mechanical properties of PLA FDM were within the clinically acceptable range.

Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of overglazing and two polishing procedures on flexural strength and quality and quantity of surface roughness of a monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic computer-aided design (CAD) after grinding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This in vitro study was conducted on 52 partially crystalized bar-shaped specimens (16 × 4 × 1.6 mm) of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. The specimens were wet polished with 600-, 800-, and 1200-grit silicon carbide papers for 15 seconds using a grinding/polishing machine at a speed of 300 rpm. Then, the specimens were crystalized and glaze-fired in one step simultaneously and randomly divided into four groups of 13: (I) Glazing group (control); (II) Grinding-glazing group, subjected to grinding with red band finishing diamond bur (46 μm) followed by glazing; (III) Grinding-D+Z group, subjected to grinding and then polishing by coarse, medium, and fine diamond rubber points (D+Z); and (IV) Grinding-OptraFine group, subjected to grinding and then polishing with a two-step diamond rubber polishing system followed by a final polishing step with an OptraFine HP brush and diamond polishing paste. The surface roughness (Ra and Rz) values (μm) were measured by a profilometer, and the mean values were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's test (post hoc comparison). One specimen of each group was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for surface topography. The three-point flexural strength values of the bars were measured using a universal testing machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed and recorded. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were noted among the experimental groups for Ra, Rz (p < 0.0001), and flexural strength values (p < 0.009). The lowest Ra and Rz values were found in the grinding-OptraFine group (0.465 ± 0.153), which were significantly lower than those in glazing (p < 0.03) and grinding-glazing (p < 0.001) groups. The Ra and Rz values were not significantly different between the two polishing systems (p = 0.23 and p = 0.25, respectively). The highest flexural strength was found in the glazing group (283.350 ± 49.854 MPa) without significant differences compared to grinding-glazing (p = 0.98) and grinding-OptraFine groups (p = 0.86). The lowest flexural strength was found in grinding-D+Z group (225.070 ± 17.299), which was significantly different from the value in glazing (p < 0.03) and grinding-glazing (p < 0.04) groups. SEM analysis of polished surfaces revealed regular morphology with some striations.

CONCLUSIONS

The OptraFine system created smoother and more uniform surfaces in terms of quantity (p < 0.03 for Ra, p < 0.01 for Rz) and quality of roughness compared to glazing. The flexural strength of lithium disilicate ceramic after polishing with the OptraFine system was similar to that after glazing (p = 0.86). Despite similar surface roughness after polishing with the two systems, the D+Z system reduced the flexural strength of ceramic (p < 0.03).

Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic

OBJECTIVES

There has been a growing interest in glass ceramic systems with good esthetics, high fracture resistance and bonding durability, and simplified fabrication techniques using CAD/CAM. The aim of this study is to compare flexural strength before and after heat treatment of two lithium disilicate CAD/CAM blocks, IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent) and Rosetta SM (Hass), and to observe their crystalline structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biaxial flexural strength was tested according to ISO 6872 with 20 disc form specimens sliced from each block before and after heat treatment. Also, the crystalline structures were observed using field-emission scanning microscopy (FE-SEM, Hitachi) and x-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku) analysis. The mean values of the biaxial flexural strength were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test at a significance level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in flexural strength between IPS e.max CAD and Rosetta SM either before heat treatment or after heat treatment. For both ceramics, the initial flexural strength greatly increased after heat treatment, with significant differences (p < 0.05). The FE-SEM images presented similar patterns of crystalline structure in the two ceramics. In the XRD analysis, they also had similar patterns, presenting high peak positions corresponding to the standard lithium metasilicate and lithium disilicate at each stage of heat treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

IPS e.max CAD and Rosetta SM showed no significant differences in flexural strength. They had a similar crystalline pattern and molecular composition.