Dental care for patients taking antiresorptive drugs: a literature review

Periodontal ligament-associated protein-1 promotes osteoclastogenesis in mice by modulating TGF-β1/Smad1 pathway

BACKGROUND

Periodontal ligament-associated protein-1 (PLAP-1), an important target molecule of osteoarthritis research, may affect alveolar bone resorption. The aim of our study was to comprehensively and systematically detect the effect of PLAP-1 on alveolar bone resorption and the underlying mechanism in PLAP-1 knockout mouse models.

METHODS

We used a PLAP-1 knockout (C57BL/6N-Plap-1-/- ) mouse model to investigate the effect of PLAP-1 on osteoclast differentiation and the underlying mechanism by adding Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide to stimulate bone marrow-derived macrophages. The effect of PLAP-1 on alveolar bone resorption and the underlying mechanism were studied using a ligature periodontitis model, with microcomputed tomography imaging, immunochemistry, and immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

The in vitro analysis results demonstrated that PLAP-1 knockout significantly inhibited osteoclast differentiation under both normal and inflammatory conditions. Bioinformatic analysis, immunofluorescence, and co-immunoprecipitation showed colocalization and interaction between PLAP-1 and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). The phosphorylation of Smad1 was reduced in the PLAP-1 knockout cells compared with that in the cells from wild-type mice. The in vivo analysis results demonstrated that PLAP-1 knockout decreased bone resorption and the levels of osteoclast differentiation markers in experimental periodontitis compared with those in wild-type mice. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed colocalization of PLAP-1 and TGF-β1 in the experimental periodontitis model. The phosphorylation level of Smad1 was significantly reduced in PLAP-1 knockout mice compared with that in wild-type mice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the knockout of PLAP-1 inhibits osteoclast differentiation and decreases alveolar bone resorption through the TGF-β1/Smad1 signaling pathway, which could serve as an innovative target for the prevention and treatment of periodontitis.

Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Non-Surgical Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

In recent years, the application of Guided Endodontics has gained interest for non-surgical endodontic treatment and retreatment. The newest research focuses on the accuracy of Dynamic Navigation (DN). This article systematically reviewed existing data on the accuracy of non-surgical endodontic treatment procedures that were completed using DN. Following the PRISMA criteria, an electronic database search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies comparing the accuracy of non-surgical endodontic treatment using DN and the conventional freehand technique were eligible. The literature search resulted in 176 preliminary records. After the selection process six studies were included. The risk of bias was evaluated using the modified Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Five studies examined the aid of DN for planning and executing endodontic access cavities, and one for fiber post removal. In two studies, endodontic access cavities were performed in teeth with pulp canal obliteration. The main outcomes that were measured in the included studies were preparation time, global coronal entry point and apical endpoint deviations, angular deviation, tooth substance loss, qualitative precision, number of unsuccessful attempts or procedural mishaps. The risk of bias was rated from low to raising some concerns. Overall, DN showed increased accuracy compared to the freehanded technique and could be especially helpful in treating highly difficult endodontic cases. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the published in vitro data.

Periapical status in patients affected by osteoporosis: A retrospective clinical study

Objectives

To assess the periapical status in patients with osteoporosis (OP) treated with denosumab (D), bisphosphonates (BPs), or not on medication, and to understand if these conditions influence the prevalence and the progression of apical periodontitis (AP).

Material and Methods

Seventy‐six patients with OP alone or treated with D, or BPs, formed the study group (O), and those from 76 patients matched for age and sex, without diseases, and not taking medications, constituted the control (C) in this retrospective case−control study. The data from the complete clinical and radiographic examination, medical history, decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT), and periapical index score (PAI) were recorded for each patient. Wilcoxon rank test, χ², and Student's t test were used as appropriate.

Results

The prevalence of AP was similar in O and C. Furthermore, AP was significantly more frequent in root canal‐treated teeth in O patients (p = .03).

Conclusions

OP does not appear to be associated with the development of AP. Moreover, the increased prevalence of AP in root canal‐treated teeth in O patients highlights a possible relationship between the healing dynamics of the disease post‐therapy and the patients' medication. A larger sample is needed to confirm these findings.

A 5-year retrospective cohort study of denosumab induced medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis patients

Denosumab has been suggested as a first-line therapy for osteoporotic patients. However, a standardized protocol for the prevention of denosumab induced medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to report denosumab induced MRONJ cases, and investigate the factors affecting the occurrence of MRONJ in patients who underwent denosumab and invasive dental treatment (especially tooth extraction) between October 2016 and March 2020. Four of the 98 patients developed MRONJ before and after tooth extraction. The participants were divided into two groups: receiving only denosumab (n = 51) and receiving bisphosphonate as first treatment and denosumab as second treatment (n = 47). There was no significant difference between groups in the occurrence of MRONJ and factors affecting MRONJ. Two out of 4 patients developed MRONJ regardless of invasive treatment after denosumab administration and proceeded with extraction; one patient developed MRONJ after denosumab administration and extraction. The other patient underwent a tooth extraction without osteoporosis treatment, and non-identified MRONJ developed after denosumab administration. MRONJ cases reported in this study show that MRONJ can develop as chronic inflammation without invasive dental treatment; therefore, implementing preventive dental treatment before initiating denosumab treatment is necessary to reduce the occurrence of MRONJ.

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw and Antiresorptive Agents in Benign and Malignant Diseases: A Critical Review Organized by the ECTS

CONTEXT

Antiresorptive therapy significantly reduces fracture risk in patients with benign bone disease and skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases (BM). Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but severe condition manifested as necrotic bone lesion or lesions of the jaws. ONJ has been linked to the use of potent antiresorptive agents, termed medication-related ONJ (MRONJ).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the differences various aspects of MRONJ among distinct patient categories and provide recommendations on how to mitigate the risk and optimally manage MRONJ in each of them.

METHODS

A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) and 2 experts performed an updated detailed review of existing literature on MRONJ incidence, characteristics, and treatment applied in bone diseases with variable severity of skeletal insult, ranging from osteoporosis to prevention of cancer treatment-induced bone loss and SREs in cancer patients with BM.

RESULTS

The risk for MRONJ is much higher in patients with advanced malignancies compared to those with benign bone diseases because of the higher doses and more frequent administration of antiresorptive agents in individuals with compromised general health, along with coadministration of other medications that predispose to MRONJ. The overall risk for MRONJ is considerably lower than the benefits in all categories of patients.

CONCLUSION

The risk for MRONJ largely depends on the underlying bone disease and the relevant antiresorptive regimen applied. Physicians and dentists should keep in mind that the benefits of antiresorptive therapy far outweigh the risk for MRONJ development.

LONG-TERM USE OF DENOSUMAB IN GIANT CELL TUMORS AND VERTEBRAL ANEURYSMAL BONE CYSTS

ABSTRACT Introduction: Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kB (RANKL), it is used in the treatment of Osteoporosis. The Giant Cell Tumor (GCT) and the Aneurysmal Bone Cyst (ABC) use the same RANKL, and for this reason this drug began to be used for its treatment. There is consensus on the use, dose-time and 12-month duration for Denosumab treatment of GCT. Not so for ABC. In unresectable, disabling or recurrent tumors, its use could be for life. The adverse events of the habitual use of the drug are known, but it is not known if these increase with time. The objective of the present work is to identify the possible adverse events of treatment with Denosumab for more than 12 months. Material and Method: Series of cases with a diagnosis of GCT or ABC in spine, treated with Denosumab for more than 12 months. Adverse events are: arthralgia, fatigue, spinal pain, pain in extremities, headache, hypokalaemia, hypocalcemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw, malignant transformation, pathological fractures. Results: Eight patients, 6 TCG and 2 ABC, with a mean age at diagnosis of 25,6 years; presenting a mean treatment of 4.18 years (range 1.7 - 8.7). Of 6 operated patients, 4 had recurrence (2 to 36 months after surgery). One patient had to suspend treatment due to necrosis of the jaw, another hypocalcemia, both returned to treatment when stabilized. Conclusions: A minor adverse event (hypocalcemia) and a major adverse event (jaw bone necrosis) were observed. Level of Evidence IV; Original.

A Retrospective Observational Study of Risk Factors for Denosumab-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Patients with Bone Metastases from Solid Cancers

This single-center retrospective observational study aimed to identify risk factors for developing denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DRONJ) in stage IV solid cancer patients with bone metastases. In total, 123 consecutive patients who had received 120 mg of denosumab every 4 weeks at least twice between July 2014 and October 2018 were included. We surveyed their demographics, medical history, blood test, underlying disease, and intraoral findings. Fourteen patients (11.4%) developed DRONJ within a mean denosumab administration period of 4 months (range: 2-52 months). Univariate analyses showed a statistically significant correlation between DRONJ and hormone therapy, chemotherapy/molecular target drug, apical periodontitis, periodontal disease, sex and body mass index. Multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between DRONJ and hormone therapy (odds ratio [OR], 22.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.86-170.24), chemotherapy and/or molecular targeted therapy (OR, 18.61; 95% CI, 2.54-136.27), and apical periodontitis (OR, 22.75; 95% CI, 3.20-161.73). These findings imply that collaborative oral examinations by oral specialists may reduce the risk of development of DRONJ in patients treated with denosumab for bone metastases from solid cancers.

Osteoporosis Therapeutics 2020

Numerous safe and efficient drug therapies are currently available to decrease risk of low trauma fractures in patients with osteoporosis including postmenopausal, male, and secondary osteoporosis. In this chapter, we give first an overview of the most important outcomes regarding fracture risk reduction, change in bone mineral density (BMD by DXA) and/or bone markers of the phase III clinical studies of well-established therapies (such as Bisphosphonates, Denosumab or Teriparatide) and also novel therapies (such as Romosozumab or Abaloparatide) and highlight their mechanisms of action at bone tissue/material level. The latter understanding is not only essential for the choice of drug, duration and discontinuation of treatment but also for the interpretation of the clinical outcomes (in particular of eventual changes in BMD) after drug administration. In the second part of this chapter, we focus on the management of different forms of osteoporosis and give a review of the respective current guidelines for treatment. Adverse effects of treatment such as atypical femoral fractures, osteonecrosis of the jaw or influence of fracture healing are considered also in this context.