Effects of steroid injection during rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Types and doses of anti-adhesive agents injected into subacromial space do not have an effect on the clinical and anatomical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE

Joint stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Various antiadhesive agents are commonly administered after rotator cuff repair for its prevention. This study aimed to compare the outcomes among patients injected with different types and amounts of anti-adhesive agents after rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized that the outcomes might differ depending on the use of the anti-adhesive agent and its type and dose.

METHODS

A total of 267 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without subacromial injection of anti-adhesive agents were enrolled. The first group (group A; 51 patients) were injected with 3 mL of poloxamer/sodium alginate-based anti-adhesive agent. The second group (group B; 93 patients) were injected with 3 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. The third group (group C; 82 patients) were injected with 1.5 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. Finally, the last group (group D; 41 patients) who did not use anti-adhesive agents served as the control. The range of motion (ROM) and pain VAS scores were measured preoperatively and at 5 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores, whereas cuff integrity was assessed via MRI or ultrasonography at least 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

All ROM measurements, pain VAS scores, and functional scores were significantly improved regardless of the use, type, and dose of the anti-adhesive agents. In addition shoulder ROM and rotator cuff healing did not significantly differ among the groups (all n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in the clinical and anatomical outcomes according to the type and dose of the anti-adhesive agents subacromially injected after rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effects of glenohumeral corticosteroid injection on stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, multicentric, case-control study with 18-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of single-dose corticosteroid injection (CSI) administered at 6 weeks postoperative to treat stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

METHODS

In this prospective, multicentric, case-control study, post-ARCR stiffness at 6 weeks was treated with either a single dose of intra-articular CSI (CSI group) or physical therapy with oral analgesics (non-CSI group). Pain intensity according to visual analog scale (VAS), functional outcome using the Constant Murley Shoulder Score, time to return to activities of daily living (ADLs), and retear rate were recorded at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months postoperatively in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients (54.5%) in the CSI group and 124 patients (45.5%) in the non-CSI group were included in this study. Pain and function were significantly better in the CSI group at 9-week, 12-week, and 6-month (P<0.001) follow-up, whereas they were not significantly different when the groups were compared at 12- and 18-month follow-up. The mean duration to return to ADLs was significantly shorter (P<0.001) in the CSI group. The incidence of retears was not significantly different (P=0.36) between groups at the end of 18 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose intra-articular CSI administered at 6 weeks postoperative to treat post-ARCR stiffness significantly improved pain, function, and duration of return to ADLs without increasing the risk of retears compared to patients who did not receive intra-articular CSI.

The Efficacy of Pain Neuroscience Education on Active Rehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A CONSORT-Compliant Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial

Pain neuroscience education (PNE), a modern educational therapy, has been reported to be effective in pain control by reducing fear of movement. This study investigated the effects of additional PNE on a physical therapy rehabilitation protocol (PTRP) following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 34 patients who had undergone ARCR were randomly allocated (1:1) into two groups: PNE (PTRP plus PNE) and PTRP. PTRP was performed five times a week, for four weeks, 115 min per session (physical agents, manual therapy, and exercises), and PNE was performed twice at the beginning (face-to-face PNE) and end (non-face-to-face) of the PTRP. The outcome measures were measured four times for pain intensity, pain cognition, and shoulder function; two times for a range of motion; and once for satisfaction. No significant difference in pain intensity was observed between the groups. However, in pain cognition, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia avoidance showed a significant interaction between time and group, and PNE showed a higher effect size than PTRP in the post-test and follow-up in several variables. In conclusion, the significant improvement in avoidance in postoperative rehabilitation suggests that there is a partially positive benefit in terms of pain, range of motion, and shoulder function in ARCR patients.

Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Single-Arm Pragmatic Interventional Study

Background and Objectives: Rotator cuff tear is the most common cause of shoulder pain. If nonsurgical treatment fails, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is recommended. Since the standards for rehabilitation after ARCR are not clear, various rehabilitation methods have been suggested. This study intends to investigate the effect on the recovery phase of ARCR patients through a postoperative rehabilitation protocol (PRP) that considers the healing process and rehabilitation trend. Materials and Methods: This single-arm, pragmatic intervention study was conducted on 30 patients, two weeks postoperative day (POD) after ARCR. ARCR patients received intervention for six weeks from POD two-week, and pain intensity and shoulder function were evaluated at two-week intervals until POD 12-week, and range of motion (ROM) was evaluated at POD four-week and eight-week. Results: In this study, all variables improved over time (p < 0.05). As a result of the comparison between time points, a significant improvement was found in shoulder function at POD 6-week. In addition, the effect size had a large effect on ROM (flexion, scaption flexion, abduction, and external rotation) and shoulder function. Conclusions: Management through the PRP based on scientific evidence in the strategy of postoperative rehabilitation of patients with ARCR is effective for pain intensity, ROM, and shoulder function.