Long-term followup with evaluation of the surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Timing of Surgery to Treat Ulcerative Colitis: An Investigation Focused on Japanese Adults

Introduction

There are no specific standards for the timing of surgery to treat ulcerative colitis, so reaching a decision on timing is often difficult.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the timing of surgery from the patients' perspective.

Methods

From among 203 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis to treat ulcerative colitis at our hospital from 1985 to 2013, we mailed a questionnaire to 101 of those who are currently attending periodic follow-up at our hospital.

Results

We analyzed 72 valid responses (71.2%). Overall, 65 patients (90.3%) responded that they were happy that they underwent surgery, 38 patients (52.8%) responded that the timing of surgery was appropriate, and 32 patients (44.4%) responded that they would have preferred to have had surgery earlier. The group of patients who would have preferred to have had surgery earlier included 23 patients (71.9%) who had undergone emergency surgery; the incidence of emergency surgery was significantly higher than in the group of 13 patients (34.2%) who had responded that the timing of surgery was appropriate (p = 0.002). Scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), which reflect postoperative quality of life, were maintained at the same level as the Japanese standard values in our Japanese patients.

Conclusion

The degree of satisfaction of patients who underwent surgery for ulcerative colitis was favorable, although it is important to consider surgery at an earlier stage in patients who may need emergency surgery.

Health-related quality of life assessment among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases after surgery - review

Aim of the work was to review systematically the published literature addressing whether quality of life (QoL) and health-related QoL (HRQoL) are influenced by surgery among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Electronic databases and published articles were searched to identify relevant studies published in the years 1990-2015. Then, a multistep selection was undertaken to identify articles that met specific selection criteria, such us specific key-words (IBD, HRQoL, ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn's disease (CD), and surgery), and the population was assessed (studies concerning patients < 18 years old were excluded). The review included 27 studies that were evaluated in the context of the influence of surgery on QoL and HRQoL. Concluding, with the increase in the incidence of IBD, monitoring of QoL is an important indicator of the health effects at each stage of the surgical treatment.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: A narrative review

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (RP-IPAA) is the gold standard surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis. However, despite the widespread use of RP-IPAA, many aspects of this treatment still remain controversial, such as the approach (open or laparoscopic), number of stages in the surgery, type of pouch, and construction type (hand-sewn or stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis). The present narrative review aims to discuss current evidence on the short-, mid-, and long-term results of each of these technical alternatives as well as their benefits and disadvantages. A review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Ovid databases was performed to identify studies published through March 2016. Few large, randomized, controlled studies have been conducted, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding controversial issues. The available data from retrospective studies suggest that laparoscopic surgery has no clear advantages compared with open surgery and that one-stage RP-IPAA may be indicated in selected cases. Regarding 2- and 3-stage RP-IPAA, patients who underwent these surgeries differed significantly with respect to clinical and laboratory variables, making any comparisons extremely difficult. The long-term results regarding the pouch type show that the W- and J-reservoirs do not differ significantly, although the J pouch is generally preferred by surgeons. Hand-sewn and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomoses have their own advantages, and there is no clear benefit of one technique over the other.

Differences in short-term outcomes among patients undergoing IPAA with or without preoperative radiation: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis

BACKGROUND

Single-institution studies demonstrate a correlation between preoperative pelvic radiation and poor long-term pouch function after IPAA. The rarity of the radiated pelvis before these procedures limits the ability to draw conclusions on the effects of preoperative radiation on short-term outcomes, which may contribute to long-term pouch dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this work was to better understand the impact of pelvic radiation on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing IPAA.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2011).

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at all participating NSQIP institutions.

PATIENTS

The cohort was composed of patients undergoing nonemergent IPAA procedures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportions of patients experiencing postoperative complications within 30 days were compared by Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests based on whether they received preoperative radiation. Multivariate logistic regression models controlled for the effects of multiple risk factors.

RESULTS

Included were 3172 patients receiving IPAA; 162 received pelvic radiation. The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different in patients receiving pelvic radiation versus not receiving pelvic radiation (p = 0.06). In a subset of patients with cancer diagnoses (n = 598), 157 received pelvic radiation; complication rates were not significantly different (p = 0.16). Patients receiving pelvic radiation had significantly lower rates of sepsis in both the overall and cancer diagnosis groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.047), a finding which persisted after controlling for the effects of multiple risk factors (multivariate p values = 0.030 and 0.047).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective database design with short-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received radiation before IPAA had no difference in overall 30-day complication rates but had significantly lower rates of sepsis when compared with patients not receiving pelvic radiation. The perceived inferior long-term pouch function in patients undergoing preoperative pelvic radiation does not appear to be attributable to increases in 30-day complications.