1
|
Thakur U, Ramachandran S, Mazal AT, Cheng J, Le L, Chhabra A. Multiparametric whole-body MRI of patients with neurofibromatosis type I: spectrum of imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00256-024-04765-6. [PMID: 39105762 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-024-04765-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis (NF) type I is a neuroectodermal and mesodermal dysplasia caused by a mutation of the neurofibromin tumor suppressor gene. Phenotypic features of NF1 vary, and patients develop benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors and malignant neoplasms, such as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, malignant melanoma, and astrocytoma. Multiparametric whole-body MR imaging (WBMRI) plays a critical role in disease surveillance. Multiparametric MRI, typically used in prostate imaging, is a general term for a technique that includes multiple sequences, i.e. anatomic, diffusion, and Dixon-based pre- and post-contrast imaging. This article discusses the value of multiparametric WBMRI and illustrates the spectrum of whole-body lesions of NF1 in a single imaging setting. Examples of lesions include those in the skin (tumors and axillary freckling), soft tissues (benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, visceral plexiform, and diffuse lesions), bone and joints (nutrient nerve lesions, non-ossifying fibromas, intra-articular neurofibroma, etc.), spine (acute-angled scoliosis, dural ectasia, intraspinal tumors, etc.), and brain/skull (optic nerve glioma, choroid plexus xanthogranuloma, sphenoid wing dysplasia, cerebral hamartomas, etc.). After reading this article, the reader will gain knowledge of the variety of lesions encountered with NF1 and their WBMRI appearances. Timely identification of such lesions can aid in accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uma Thakur
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
| | - Shyam Ramachandran
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA
| | - Alexander T Mazal
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Cheng
- Department of Plastic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Lu Le
- Department of Dermatology and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Avneesh Chhabra
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guimarães JB, da Cruz IAN, Ahlawat S, Ormond Filho AG, Nico MAC, Lederman HM, Fayad LM. The Role of Whole-Body MRI in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Oncology: Current Concepts and Clinical Applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 59:1886-1901. [PMID: 34145692 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) has gained importance in the field of musculoskeletal oncology over the last decades, consisting in a one-stop imaging method that allows a wide coverage assessment of both bone and soft tissue involvement. WB-MRI is valuable for diagnosis, staging, and follow-up in many oncologic diseases and is especially advantageous for the pediatric population since it avoids redundant examinations and exposure to ionizing radiation in patients who often undergo long-term surveillance. Its clinical application has been studied in many pediatric neoplasms, such as cancer predisposition syndromes, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, lymphoma, sarcomas, and neuroblastoma. The addition of diffusion-weighted sequences allows functional evaluation of neoplastic lesions, which is helpful in the assessment of viable tumor and response to treatment after neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. WB-MRI is an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in oncologic children, with comparable accuracy and the convenience of being radiation-free, fast to perform, and available at a similar cost. The development of new techniques and protocols makes WB-MRI increasingly faster, safer, and more accessible, and it is important for referring physicians and radiologists to recognize the role of this imaging method in pediatric oncology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Júlio Brandão Guimarães
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Fleury Group, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alípio Gomes Ormond Filho
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Astolfi Caetano Nico
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Henrique Manoel Lederman
- Diagnostic Imaging Center, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laura Marie Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Debs P, Luna R, Fayad LM, Ahlawat S. MRI features of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors: how do sporadic and syndromic tumors differ? Skeletal Radiol 2024; 53:709-723. [PMID: 37845504 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04479-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare MRI features of sporadic and neurofibromatosis syndrome-related localized schwannomas and neurofibromas. METHODS In this retrospective study, our pathology database was searched for "neurofibroma" or "schwannoma" from 2014 to 2019. Exclusion criteria were lack of available MRI and intradural or plexiform tumors. Qualitative and quantitative anatomic (location, size, relationship to nerve, signal, muscle denervation) and functional (arterial enhancement, apparent diffusion-weighted coefficient) MRI features of sporadic and syndrome-related tumors were compared. Statistical significance was assumed for p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 80 patients with 64 schwannomas (sporadic: 42 (65.6%) v. syndrome-related: 22 (34.4%)) and 19 neurofibromas (sporadic: 7 (36.8%) v. syndrome-related: 12 (41.7%)) were included. Only signal heterogeneity (T2W p=0.001, post-contrast p=0.03) and a diffused-weighted imaging target sign (p=0.04) were more frequent with schwannomas than neurofibromas. Sporadic schwannomas were similar in size to syndrome-related schwannomas (2.9±1.2cm vs. 3.7±3.2 cm, p = 0.6), but with greater heterogeneity (T2W p = 0.02, post-contrast p = 0.01). Sporadic neurofibromas were larger (4.6±1.5cm vs. 3.4±2.4 cm, p = 0.03) than syndrome-related neurofibromas, also with greater heterogeneity (T2W p=0.03, post-contrast p=0.04). Additional tumors along an affected nerve were only observed with syndrome-related tumors). There was no difference in apparent diffusion coefficient values or presence of early perfusion between sporadic and syndrome-related tumors (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Although syndrome-related and sporadic schwannomas and neurofibromas overlap in their anatomic, diffusion and perfusion features, signal heterogeneity and presence of multiple lesions along a nerve are differentiating characteristics of syndrome-related tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Debs
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Rodrigo Luna
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cruz IAN, Fayad LM, Ahlawat S, Lederman HM, Nico MAC, Ormond Filho AG, Guimarães JB. Whole-Body MRI in Musculoskeletal Oncology: A Comprehensive Review with Recommendations. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e220107. [PMID: 37144975 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body (WB) MRI has emerged as an attractive method for oncologic evaluation, potentially replacing conventional imaging modalities and providing a one-step wide-coverage assessment of both the skeleton and soft tissues. In addition to providing anatomic information, WB MRI may also yield a functional analysis with the inclusion of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI translates microstructural changes, resulting in an excellent alternative to fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT. WB MRI (with DWI) offers comparable accuracy to PET/CT and has the advantage of avoiding ionizing radiation. Technological advances and the development of faster protocols have prompted greater accessibility of WB MRI, with growing applications in routine practice for the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of cancer. This review discusses the technical considerations, clinical applications, and accuracy of WB MRI in musculoskeletal oncology. Keywords: Pediatrics, MR Imaging, Skeletal-Axial, Skeletal-Appendicular, Soft Tissues/Skin, Bone Marrow, Extremities, Oncology, Musculoskeletal Imaging © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabela A N Cruz
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Laura M Fayad
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Henrique M Lederman
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Marcelo A C Nico
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Alípio G Ormond Filho
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| | - Júlio Brandão Guimarães
- From the Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Higienópolis, R. Mato Grosso 306, Higienópolis, SP, Brazil 01239-040 (I.A.N.C., M.A.C.N., A.G.O.F., J.B.G.); Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil (I.A.N.C., H.M.L., J.B.G.); The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (L.M.F., S.A.); and Department of Radiology, Pediatric Oncology Institute, Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e à Criança com Câncer (GRAACC), São Paulo, Brazil (H.M.L., J.B.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Debs P, Fayad LM, Romo CG, Ahlawat S. Whole Body MRI with DWI in People with NF1 and Schwannomatosis: Are Qualitative and Quantitative Imaging Features of Peripheral Lesions Comparable to Localized MRI? Eur J Radiol 2023; 162:110802. [PMID: 37001256 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the qualitative and quantitative features of peripheral lesions on localized (L) and whole-body (WB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and schwannomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective, HIPAA compliant study with twenty-seven patients (14 women, 13 men; mean age (years): 38 (3-67)) who underwent both L-MRI and WB-MRI without interval treatment. WB-MRI and L-MRI were comprised of T1-weighted, fat suppressed (FS) T2-weighted or short tau inversion recovery (STIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using b-values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm2, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and pre- and post-contrast FST1 sequences. Two readers recorded qualitative (T1 and T2/STIR signal intensity and heterogeneity, contrast enhancement and heterogeneity, perilesional enhancement, presence of a target sign and perilesional edema) and quantitative (size, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), ADC) features of peripheral lesions on L-MRI and WB-MRI.Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar's test were used. RESULTS There were 31 peripheral lesions identified in 27 subjects, (mean size: 3.1 cm (range: 1-8.1 cm) on both L-MRI and WB-MRI).There were no differences in T1 signal and heterogeneity and T2/STIR signal and heterogeneity between WB-MRI and L-MRI ((p = 0.180, 0.083, 0.317 and 0.157 respectively). There were also no differences in contrast enhancement, heterogeneity and perilesional enhancement between WB-MRI and L-MRI (p = 1.000, 0.380 and 1.000 respectively). Presence of a target sign and perilesional edema did not differ between WB-MRI and L-MRI (p = 1.000 and 0.500 respectively). Craniocaudal (CC), mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) size measurements on WB-MRI did not differ from CC, ML and AP size measurements on L-MRI (p = 0.597, 0.128 and 0.783 respectively). SNR on WB-DWI did not differ from SNR on L-DWI for b50, b400 and b800 images (p = 0.285, 0.166, and 0.974 respectively), and CNR on WB-DWI did not differ from CNR on L-DWI for b50, b400 and b800 images (p = 0.600, 0.124, and 0.787 respectively). There was no significant difference in minimum, mean and maximum ADC values between WB-DWI and L-DWI (p = 0.234, 0.481, and 0.441 respectively). Median minimum, mean and maximum ADC (×10(-3)mm(2)/s) differences between WB-DWI and L-DWI were 0.0 (range -1 to 0.7), 0.0 (range -0.5 to 0.6), and 0.1 (range -1.2 to 0.8) respectively. Relative ADC difference averages were 29.1% for minimum values, 10.1% for mean values, and 14.8% for maximum values. CONCLUSION WB-MRI yields qualitative and quantitative features for peripheral lesions, including DWI and ADC measurements, that are comparable to L-MRI scans. WB-DWI can be reliably used for the assessment of peripheral nerve sheath tumors, obviating the need for a repeat follow-up L-DWI acquisition.
Collapse
|
6
|
Peyre M, Tran S, Parfait B, Bernat I, Bielle F, Kalamarides M. Surgical Management of Peripheral Nerve Pathology in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 2. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:317-328. [PMID: 36637268 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is rare genetic disorder mainly characterized by the development of central nervous system lesions, but peripheral nerve pathology may also cause high morbidity including pain, motor, and sensory loss. OBJECTIVE To describe the tumor burden of patients with peripheral nerve pathology in NF2 including peripheral neuropathies and schwannomas and the results of surgery in the latter group. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients with NF2 followed up at our NF2 Reference Center to include all patients suffering from peripheral nerve pathology. Tumor detection relied on focal MRIs based on symptoms. RESULTS Thirty-four patients harboring 105 peripheral nerve schwannomas and 1 perineurioma were included. Schwannomas were mainly located in major nerves (n = 74, 71%) compared with subcutaneous (n = 23, 22%) and intramuscular (n = 8, 7%) cases. Most schwannomas (81/90-90%) were classical discrete tumors while multinodular cases represented only 9 cases (10%). During follow-up, 63 (60%) tumors were operated in 24 patients, including 39 schwannomas of major nerves. A complete resection was achieved in most of the cases (52/63, 83%) with a complete relief of preoperative pain in most patients (57/60, 95%). Persistent motor deficits (5/39, 13%) were mostly encountered in patients operated from multinodular schwannomas (4/5, 80%). Six patients had an associated peripheral neuropathy with 5 cases of pseudo-Charcot-Marie-Tooth-associated amyotrophy. CONCLUSION Surgery remains a safe and effective method of treating peripheral nerve schwannoma-associated pain in NF2, with the exception of rare multinodular tumors. Special attention should be drawn to patients harboring severely debilitating neuropathies and perineuriomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthieu Peyre
- Sorbonne Universités - Department of Neurosurgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.,Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors - CRICM INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225 - Paris Brain Institute, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Suzanne Tran
- Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors - CRICM INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225 - Paris Brain Institute, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités - Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Béatrice Parfait
- Université de Paris - Department of Genomic Medecine, Groupe Hospitalier Cochin, APHP, Paris, France.,Genomics and Epigenetics of Rare Tumors - Institut Cochin - (U1016 Inserm/UMR8104 CNRS/UMR-S8104) Department "Development, Reproduction and Cancer", Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Bernat
- Sorbonne Universités - Department of Electrophysiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Franck Bielle
- Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors - CRICM INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225 - Paris Brain Institute, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités - Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Michel Kalamarides
- Sorbonne Universités - Department of Neurosurgery, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France.,Genetics and Development of Brain Tumors - CRICM INSERM U1127 CNRS UMR 7225 - Paris Brain Institute, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology now enable the feasible three-dimensional (3D) acquisition of images. With respect to the imaging of musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors, literature is beginning to accumulate on the use of 3D MRI acquisition for tumor detection and characterization. The benefits of 3D MRI, including general advantages, such as decreased acquisition time, isotropic resolution, and increased image quality, are not only inherently useful for tumor imaging, but they also contribute to the feasibility of more specialized tumor-imaging techniques, such as whole-body MRI, and are reviewed here. Disadvantages of 3D acquisition, such as motion artifact and equipment requirements, do exist and are also discussed. Although further study is needed, 3D MRI acquisition will likely prove increasingly useful in the evaluation of patients with tumors of the MSK system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake C Jones
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pasoglou V, Van Nieuwenhove S, Peeters F, Duchêne G, Kirchgesner T, Lecouvet FE. 3D Whole-Body MRI of the Musculoskeletal System. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25:441-454. [PMID: 34547810 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
With its outstanding soft tissue contrast, spatial resolution, and multiplanar capacities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a widely used technique. Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) has been introduced among diagnostic methods for the staging and follow-up assessment in oncologic patients, and international guidelines recommend its use. In nononcologic applications, WB-MRI is as a promising imaging tool in inflammatory diseases, such as seronegative arthritis and inflammatory myopathies. Technological advances have facilitated the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) almost isotropic sequences in MRI examinations covering the whole body. The possibility to reformat 3D images in any plane with equal or almost equal resolution offers comprehensive understanding of the anatomy, easier disease detection and characterization, and finally contributes to correct treatment planning. This article illustrates the basic principles, advantages, and limitations of the 3D approach in WB-MRI examinations and provides a short review of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vassiliki Pasoglou
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sandy Van Nieuwenhove
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frank Peeters
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaetan Duchêne
- MR applications, General Electric Healthcare, Diegem, Belgium
| | - Thomas Kirchgesner
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frederic E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tortora S, Esposito A, Della Pepa G, Paternò M, Cagnoli GA, Cesaretti C, Natacci F, Carrafiello G. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 with Neck and Thoraco-Abdominal Involvement: A Case Series Showing Different Localization and MRI Features. REPORTS IN MEDICAL IMAGING 2021. [DOI: 10.2147/rmi.s300065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
10
|
Current status and recommendations for imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis. Skeletal Radiol 2020; 49:199-219. [PMID: 31396668 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03290-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN) are three clinically distinct tumor predisposition syndromes with a shared tendency to develop peripheral and central nervous system neoplasms. Disease expression and complications of NF1, NF2, and SWN are highly variable, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to care in order to optimize outcomes. This review will discuss the imaging appearance of NF1, NF2, and SWN and highlight the important role that imaging plays in informing management decisions in people with tumors associated with these syndromes. Recent technological advances, including the role of both whole-body and localized imaging strategies, routine anatomic and advanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, and metabolic imaging techniques (MR spectroscopy and positron emission testing) are discussed in the context of the diagnosis and management of people with NF1, NF2, and SWN based on the most up-to-date clinical imaging studies.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ahlawat S, Blakeley JO, Rodriguez FJ, Fayad LM. Imaging biomarkers for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neurology 2019; 93:e1076-e1084. [PMID: 31395668 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000008092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the utility of quantitative metrics obtained from fMRI using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping compared with metabolic (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET/CT) imaging in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the characterization of peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) as benign or malignant. METHODS This Institutional Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study retrospectively reviewed imaging of 55 PNSTs in 21 patients with NF1. Imaging included anatomic (unenhanced T1, fluid-sensitive, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted), functional DWI (b = 50, 400, 800 s/mm2) and ADC mapping, magnetic resonance sequences, and FDG-PET/CT imaging. Anatomic (size), functional (minimum ADC values), and metabolic (maximum standardized uptake values [SUVmax]) imaging characteristics were recorded. ADC values were correlated with SUVmax. With histologic correlation for all malignant PNSTs (MPNSTs) or clinical or imaging stability (>12 months) for benign lesions used as reference standards, diagnostic accuracy was calculated. RESULTS Of 55 PNSTs, there were 19 (35%) malignant and 36 (65%) benign PNSTs. Benign PNSTs were overall smaller than MPNSTs (largest diameter 4.3 ± 1.3 vs 8.2 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, p = 0.014). Benign PNSTs had higher ADCmin (×10-3 mm2/s) than MPNSTs (1.6 ± 0.4 vs 0.6 ± 0.2, respectively, p < 0.0001) and lower SUVmax than MPNSTs (3.2 ± 1.8 vs 8 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001, respectively). ADCmin correlated inversely with SUVmax (correlation coefficient r = -0.0.58, p < 0.0001). Maintaining a sensitivity of 100% with threshold values of ADCmin ≤1 or SUVmax >3.2, DWI yielded a specificity of 94% while FDG-PET/CT offered a specificity of 83%. CONCLUSIONS Both quantitative metabolic imaging and functional imaging offer high sensitivity for the characterization of PNSTs in NF1; however, DWI/ADC mapping offers increased specificity and may be a more useful modality. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with NF1, MRI using DWI/ADC mapping accurately distinguishes malignant and benign PNSTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Ahlawat
- From The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| | | | | | - Laura M Fayad
- From The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Donners R, Blackledge M, Tunariu N, Messiou C, Merkle EM, Koh DM. Quantitative Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018; 26:479-494. [PMID: 30316462 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI has emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool for disease detection and staging mainly used in systemic bone disease. The large field-of-view functional imaging technique highlights cellular tumor and suppresses normal tissue signal, allowing quantification of an estimate of total disease burden, summarized as the total diffusion volume (tDV), as well as global apparent diffusion coefficient (gADC) measurements. Both tDV and gADC have been shown to be repeatable quantitative parameters that indicate tumor heterogeneity and treatment effects, thus potential, noninvasive, imaging biomarkers informing on disease prognosis and therapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Donners
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Matthew Blackledge
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Nina Tunariu
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Elmar M Merkle
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel 4031, Switzerland
| | - Dow-Mu Koh
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton SM2 5NG, UK; Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacobs MA, Macura KJ, Zaheer A, Antonarakis ES, Stearns V, Wolff AC, Feiweier T, Kamel IR, Wahl RL, Pan L. Multiparametric Whole-body MRI with Diffusion-weighted Imaging and ADC Mapping for the Identification of Visceral and Osseous Metastases From Solid Tumors. Acad Radiol 2018; 25:1405-1414. [PMID: 29627288 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 02/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of multiparametric, whole-body, diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T for the detection and monitoring of metastatic disease in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-four participants (32 healthy subjects and 22 patients) were scanned with WB-DWI methods using a 3T MRI scanner. Axial, sagittal, or coronal fat-suppressed T2-weighted (T2WI), T1-weighted (T1WI), and DWI images were acquired. Total MRI acquisition and set-up time was approximately 45 minutes. Metastatic disease on MRI was confirmed based on T2WI characteristics. The number of lesions was established on computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET-CT). Whole-body ADC maps and T2WI were constructed, and region-of-interests were drawn in normal and abnormal-appearing tissue for quantitative analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t tests and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were 91 metastatic lesions detected from the CT or PET-CT with a missed recurrent lesion in the prostate. Multiparametric WB-MRI had excellent sensitivity (96%) for detection of metastatic lesions compared to CT. ADC map values and the ADC ratio in metastatic bone lesions were significantly increased (P < .05) compared to normal bone. In soft tissue, ADC map values and ratios in metastatic lesions were decreased compared to normal soft tissue. CONCLUSION We have demonstrated that multiparametric WB-MRI is feasible for oncologic staging to identify bony and visceral metastasis in breast, prostate, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. WB-MRI can be tailored to fit the patient, such that an "individualized patient sequence" can be developed for a comprehensive evaluation for staging and response during treatment.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Imaging cellularity in benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Utility of the “target sign” by diffusion weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2018; 102:195-201. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
15
|
Ahlawat S, Fayad LM. Diffusion weighted imaging demystified: the technique and potential clinical applications for soft tissue imaging. Skeletal Radiol 2018; 47:313-328. [PMID: 29159675 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2822-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a fast, non-contrast technique that is readily available and easy to integrate into an existing imaging protocol. DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping offers a quantitative metric for soft tissue evaluation and provides information regarding the cellularity of a region of interest. There are several available methods of performing DWI, and artifacts and pitfalls must be considered when interpreting DWI studies. This review article will review the various techniques of DWI acquisition and utility of qualitative as well as quantitative methods of image interpretation, with emphasis on optimal methods for ADC measurement. The current clinical applications for DWI are primarily related to oncologic evaluation: For the assessment of de novo soft tissue masses, ADC mapping can serve as a useful adjunct technique to routine anatomic sequences for lesion characterization as cyst or solid and, if solid, benign or malignant. For treated soft tissue masses, the role of DWI/ADC mapping in the assessment of treatment response as well as recurrent or residual neoplasm in the setting of operative management is discussed, especially when intravenous contrast medium cannot be given. Emerging DWI applications for non-neoplastic clinical indications are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Clinical Value of Multiparametric Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging over Whole-Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type I. World Neurosurg 2017; 108:729-737. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Revised: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
17
|
Ahlawat S, Fayad LM, Khan MS, Bredella MA, Harris GJ, Evans DG, Farschtschi S, Jacobs MA, Chhabra A, Salamon JM, Wenzel R, Mautner VF, Dombi E, Cai W, Plotkin SR, Blakeley JO. Current whole-body MRI applications in the neurofibromatoses: NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis. Neurology 2017; 87:S31-9. [PMID: 27527647 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) International Collaboration Whole-Body MRI (WB-MRI) Working Group reviewed the existing literature on WB-MRI, an emerging technology for assessing disease in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN), to recommend optimal image acquisition and analysis methods to enable WB-MRI as an endpoint in NF clinical trials. METHODS A systematic process was used to review all published data about WB-MRI in NF syndromes to assess diagnostic accuracy, feasibility and reproducibility, and data about specific techniques for assessment of tumor burden, characterization of neoplasms, and response to therapy. RESULTS WB-MRI at 1.5T or 3.0T is feasible for image acquisition. Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence is used in all investigations to date, suggesting consensus about the utility of this sequence for detection of WB tumor burden in people with NF. There are insufficient data to support a consensus statement about the optimal imaging planes (axial vs coronal) or 2D vs 3D approaches. Functional imaging, although used in some NF studies, has not been systematically applied or evaluated. There are no comparative studies between regional vs WB-MRI or evaluations of WB-MRI reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS WB-MRI is feasible for identifying tumors using both 1.5T and 3.0T systems. The STIR sequence is a core sequence. Additional investigation is needed to define the optimal approach for volumetric analysis, the reproducibility of WB-MRI in NF, and the diagnostic performance of WB-MRI vs regional MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Ahlawat
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
| | - Laura M Fayad
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Muhammad Shayan Khan
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Miriam A Bredella
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Gordon J Harris
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - D Gareth Evans
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Said Farschtschi
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Michael A Jacobs
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Avneesh Chhabra
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Johannes M Salamon
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Ralph Wenzel
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Victor F Mautner
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Eva Dombi
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Wenli Cai
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Scott R Plotkin
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Jaishri O Blakeley
- From The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., L.M.F., M.A.J.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (M.A.J.), and Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Khyber Medical College (M.S.K.), Peshawar, Pakistan; Department of Radiology (M.A.B., G.J.H., W.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston; Genomic Medicine (D.G.E.), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, UK; Department of Neurology (S.F., V.F.M.), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Radiology & Orthopedic Surgery (A.C.), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.M.S.), University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf; Radiological Practice Altona (R.W.), Hamburg, Germany; Pediatric Oncology Branch (E.D.), National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Neurology and Cancer Center (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Das A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, Kumar A, Thakar A, Goyal A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in extracranial head and neck schwannomas: A distinctive appearance. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2016; 26:231-6. [PMID: 27413271 PMCID: PMC4931783 DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.184418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of the extracranial schwannomas of head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS The MRI (including DWI) of 12 patients with pathologically proven head and neck schwannomas (4 men, 8 women, with mean age of 32.6 years; age range 16-50 years) were retrospectively evaluated. Images were analyzed for signal intensity and morphology on conventional sequences followed by the qualitative evaluation of DW images (DWI) and measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. RESULTS Majority of the tumors were located in the parapharyngeal space (8/12). All but one showed heterogeneous appearance, with 10 tumors showing scattered areas of hemorrhage. Eight out of 12 tumors showed intensely hyperintense core surrounded by intermediate signal intensity peripheral rim (reverse target sign) on T2-weighted (T2W) images. On DWI, these eight tumors showed a distinctive appearance, resembling target sign on trace DWI and reverse target on ADC map. Out of the remaining four tumors, one showed uniformly restricted diffusion whereas three showed free diffusion. Mean ADC value in the central area of free diffusion was 2.277 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (range of 1.790 × 10 -(3) to 2.605 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) whereas in the peripheral area was 1.117 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s (range of 0.656 × 10(-3) to 1.701 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s). Rest of the schwannomas showing free diffusion had a mean ADC value of 1.971 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s. CONCLUSION Majority of the head and neck schwannomas showed a characteristic appearance of free diffusion in the centre and restricted diffusion in the periphery of the mass.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abanti Das
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashu S Bhalla
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Raju Sharma
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Atin Kumar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Alok Thakar
- Department of Otolaryngorhinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ankur Goyal
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ahlawat S, Morris C, Fayad LM. Three-dimensional volumetric MRI with isotropic resolution: improved speed of acquisition, spatial resolution and assessment of lesion conspicuity in patients with recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45:645-52. [PMID: 26897528 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-016-2348-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 01/31/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the acquisition speed, lesion conspicuity, and inter-observer agreement associated with volumetric T(1)-weighted MR sequences with isotropic resolution for detecting recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS Fifteen subjects with histologically proven recurrent STS underwent MRI, including axial and coronal T(1)-weighted spin echo (T(1)-WSE) (5-mm slice thickness) and coronal 3D volumetric T(1)-weighted (fat-suppressed, volume-interpolated, breath-hold examination; repetition time/echo time, 3.7/1.4 ms; flip angle, 9.5°; 1-mm slice thickness) sequences before and after intravenous contrast administration. Subtraction imaging and multiplanar reformations (MPRs) were performed. Acquisition times for T(1)-WSE in two planes and 3D sequences were reported. Two radiologists reviewed images for quality (>50 % artifacts, 25-50 % artifacts, <25 % artifacts, and no substantial artifacts), lesion conspicuity, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR(muscle)), recurrence size, and recurrence-to-joint distance. Descriptive and intraclass correlation (ICC) statistics are given. RESULTS Mean acquisition times were significantly less for 3D imaging compared with 2-plane T(1)-WSE (183.6 vs 342.6 s; P = 0.012). Image quality was rated as having no substantial artifacts in 13/15 and <25 % artifacts in 2/15. Lesion conspicuity was significantly improved for subtracted versus unsubtracted images (CNR(muscle), 100 ± 138 vs 181 ± 199; P = 0.05). Mean recurrent lesion size was 2.5 cm (range, 0.7-5.7 cm), and measurements on 3D sequences offered excellent interobserver agreement (ICC, 0.98 for lesion size and 0.96 for recurrence-to-joint distance with MPR views). CONCLUSION Three-dimensional volumetric sequences offer faster acquisition times, higher spatial resolution, and MPR capability compared with 2D T(1)-WSE for postcontrast imaging. Subtraction imaging provides higher lesion conspicuity for detecting recurrent STS in skeletal muscle, with excellent interobserver agreement between readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Ahlawat
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Carol Morris
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Laura M Fayad
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Blakeley JO, Plotkin SR. Therapeutic advances for the tumors associated with neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis. Neuro Oncol 2016; 18:624-38. [PMID: 26851632 PMCID: PMC4827037 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN) are tumor-suppressor syndromes. Each syndrome is an orphan disease; however, the tumors that arise within them represent the most common tumors of the nervous system worldwide. Systematic investigation of the pathways impacted by the loss of function of neurofibromin (encoded byNF1) and merlin (encoded byNF2) have led to therapeutic advances for patients with NF1 and NF2. In the syndrome of SWN, the genetic landscape is more complex, with 2 known causative genes (SMARCB1andLZTR1) accounting for up to 50% of familial SWN patients. The understanding of the molecular underpinnings of these syndromes is developing rapidly and offers more therapeutic options for the patients. In addition, common sporadic cancers harbor somatic alterations inNF1(ie, glioblastoma, breast cancer, melanoma),NF2(ie, meningioma, mesothelioma) andSMARCB1(ie, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors) such that advances in management of syndromic tumors may benefit patients both with and without germline mutations. In this review, we discuss the clinical and genetic features of NF1, NF2 and SWN, the therapeutic advances for the tumors that arise within these syndromes and the interaction between these rare tumor syndromes and the common tumors that share these mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaishri O Blakeley
- Neurology, Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (J.O.B.); Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (S.R.P.)
| | - Scott R Plotkin
- Neurology, Neurosurgery and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (J.O.B.); Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Stephen E. and Catherine Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (S.R.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chhabra A, Carrino JA, Farahani SJ, Thawait GK, Sumner CJ, Wadhwa V, Chaudhary V, Lloyd TE. Whole-body MR neurography: Prospective feasibility study in polyneuropathy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44:1513-1521. [PMID: 27126998 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of whole-body magnetic resonance neurography (WBMRN) in polyneuropathy for technical feasibility, distribution of nerve abnormalities, and differentiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty WBMRN examinations were performed on a 3T scanner over 2 years. Patient demographics including history of hereditary and acquired neuropathy were recorded. The images were evaluated by two independent readers with nerve imaging experience for quality. The nerve signal and size alterations were measured in the brachial plexus, lumbosacral plexus, and femoral and sciatic nerves; diffusion tensor imaging parameters (fractional anisotropy [FA] and apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) were determined in plexuses, and tractography was performed. Nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained. RESULTS Excellent image quality was obtained for the majority of lumbosacral (LS) plexus (18/20) and 50% of brachial plexus (10/20) regions. Qualitatively among cases, the nerve hyperintensity and/or thickening involved the brachial plexus (11/11), LS plexus (7/11), and both plexuses (7/11), with most nerve thickenings observed in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. The nerve signal intensity alterations were significantly different for both brachial (P < 0.05) and LS (P < 0.05) plexuses in cases versus controls. The femoral and sciatic nerve size alterations were different (P < 0.05), while signal intensity differences were not significant (P = 0.1-0.97). Transverse dimensions of C8 (4 mm), L5 (6.2 mm) and S1 (5.1 mm) nerve roots, and sciatic nerves (10.2 mm) were the most accurate diagnostic performance measures in distinguishing cases from controls. CONCLUSION WBMRN is feasible for use in the clinical practice for the identification and potential characterization of polyneuropathy. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1513-1521.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avneesh Chhabra
- Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Musculoskeletal Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John A Carrino
- Musculoskeletal Radiology, Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sahar J Farahani
- Musculoskeletal Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gaurav K Thawait
- Musculoskeletal Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Vibhor Wadhwa
- Musculoskeletal Radiology, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Vinay Chaudhary
- Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas E Lloyd
- Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Das A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, Kumar A, Sharma M, Gamanagatti S, Thakar A, Sharma S. Benign neck masses showing restricted diffusion: Is there a histological basis for discordant behavior? World J Radiol 2016; 8:174-182. [PMID: 26981226 PMCID: PMC4770179 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Revised: 08/27/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) evolved as a complementary tool to morphologic imaging by offering additional functional information about lesions. Although the technique utilizes movement of water molecules to characterize biological tissues in terms of their cellularity, there are other factors related to the histological constitution of lesions which can have a significant bearing on DWI. Benign lesions with atypical histology including presence of lymphoid stroma, inherently increased cellularity or abundant extracellular collagen can impede movement of water molecules similar to malignant tissues and thereby, show restricted diffusion. Knowledge of these atypical entities while interpreting DWI in clinical practice can avoid potential misdiagnosis. This review aims to present an imaging spectrum of such benign neck masses which, owing to their distinct histology, can show discordant behavior on DWI.
Collapse
|
23
|
Koh DM, Lee JM, Bittencourt LK, Blackledge M, Collins DJ. Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Oncology: Imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2016; 24:31-44. [PMID: 26613874 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2015.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Advances in hardware and software enable high-quality body diffusion-weighted images to be acquired for oncologic assessment. 3.0 T affords improved signal/noise for higher spatial resolution and smaller field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI at 3.0 T can be applied as at 1.5 T to improve tumor detection, disease characterization, and the assessment of treatment response. DWI at 3.0 T can be acquired on a hybrid PET-MR imaging system, to allow functional MR information to be combined with molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
| | - Jeong-Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt
- Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; CDPI and Multi-Imagem Clinics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Soldatos T, Ahlawat S, Montgomery E, Chalian M, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Multiparametric Assessment of Treatment Response in High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcomas with Anatomic and Functional MR Imaging Sequences. Radiology 2015; 278:831-40. [PMID: 26390048 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the added value of quantitative diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast material-enhanced imaging to conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for assessment of the response of soft-tissue sarcomas to neoadjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS MR imaging examinations in 23 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy were reviewed by two readers during three sessions: conventional imaging (T1-weighted, fluid-sensitive, static postcontrast T1-weighted), conventional with diffusion-weighted imaging, and conventional with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. For each session, readers recorded imaging features and determined treatment response. Interobserver agreement was assessed and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of each session for determining response by using results of the histologic analysis as the reference standard. Good response was defined as less than or equal to 5% residual viable tumor. RESULTS Of the 23 sarcomas, four (17.4%) showed good histologic response (three of four with >95% granulation tissue and <5% necrosis, one of four with 95% necrosis and <5% viable tumor) and 19 (82.6%) showed poor response (viable tumor range, 10%-100%). Interobserver agreement was substantial or excellent for imaging features in all sequences (k = 0.789-1.000). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed an increase in diagnostic performance with the addition of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for prediction of response compared with that for conventional imaging alone (areas under the curve, 0.500, 0.676, 0.821 [reader 1] and 0.506, 0.704, 0.833 [reader 2], respectively). CONCLUSION Adding functional sequences to the conventional MR imaging protocol increases the sensitivity of MR imaging for determining treatment response in soft-tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Soldatos
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom (T.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., M.C., M.A.J., L.M.F.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (E.M., M.A.J., L.M.F.), and Department of Pathology (E.M.), Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Shivani Ahlawat
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom (T.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., M.C., M.A.J., L.M.F.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (E.M., M.A.J., L.M.F.), and Department of Pathology (E.M.), Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Elizabeth Montgomery
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom (T.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., M.C., M.A.J., L.M.F.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (E.M., M.A.J., L.M.F.), and Department of Pathology (E.M.), Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Majid Chalian
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom (T.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., M.C., M.A.J., L.M.F.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (E.M., M.A.J., L.M.F.), and Department of Pathology (E.M.), Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Michael A Jacobs
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom (T.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., M.C., M.A.J., L.M.F.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (E.M., M.A.J., L.M.F.), and Department of Pathology (E.M.), Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Laura M Fayad
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, United Kingdom (T.S.); Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (S.A., M.C., M.A.J., L.M.F.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (E.M., M.A.J., L.M.F.), and Department of Pathology (E.M.), Johns Hopkins University Hospital, 601 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|