1
|
Ding B, Lu Y. Omalizumab in combination with subcutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of multiple allergies associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a case report and a literature review. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1367551. [PMID: 38887551 PMCID: PMC11180729 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1367551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
We describe the case of a 10-year-old boy with asthma (AS), accompanied by allergic rhinitis (AR), food allergy (FA), and combined attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), who was treated at Shanghai Renji Hospital on 11 July 2020. The efficiency of the previous treatment with salmeterol/ticlosone was poor. Treatment with montelukast sodium resulted in development of neurological symptoms. Treatment with omalizumab in combination with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was then initiated in our department based on anti-asthmatic therapy. Symptoms of asthma were completely controlled, and FA and AR symptoms improved. The treatment regimen led to a significant improvement in ADHD symptoms and the overall quality of life of the patient. The literature search was done in the PubMed database using "attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder/ADHD" and "asthma" as keywords, and we identified 47 relevant articles. In conclusion, our results show that treating asthma with omalizumab in combination with salmeterol/ticlosone and SCIT is efficient in controlling symptoms of multiple allergies and may lead to the improvement in ADHD symptoms and the overall quality of life of pediatric patients with ADHD. While current studies suggest that allergic diseases are closely related to ADHD, there is still a lack of studies or case reports of complete treatment protocols to provide clinical clues for management of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yanming Lu
- Department of Pediatrics, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bozek A, Rogala B, Miodonska M, Canonica GW. Progressive clinical effects of the combination omalizumab and HDM - allergen immunotherapy in asthma. J Asthma 2024; 61:532-538. [PMID: 38064236 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2293057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The combination of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and omalizumab is used to treat patients at risk of anaphylaxis. There is currently a very little evidence that this combination increases the effectiveness of AIT in patients with inhalant allergies. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of HDM-SCIT therapy (injection immunotherapy for house dust mites) in combination with omalizumab in treating HDM-induced asthma. METHODS This study was a placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial including 82 patients with HDM-driven mild to moderate asthma. Omalizumab alone (A), HDM SCIT + omalizumab (B), SCIT alone (C), or placebo (D) for 24 months were applied. All patients received asthma treatment in accordance with GINA recommendations. The treatment efficacy was defined by a reduction in the daily dose of inhaled steroids (ICS) and a reduction in the number of asthma exacerbations (AX). RESULTS After 24 months of therapy, a statistically significant reduction in the daily doses of ICS in groups A and B was observed (p = 0.021 and p = 0.008). Daily ICS reduction was considerably more significant in group B (p = 0.01). During 24 months of observation, the AX was significantly reduced in all study groups, with the greatest significant difference observed between groups A and B and groups C and D (placebo) as follows: 0.42 patient/per year vs. 0.39 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.91 (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION The combination of HDM SCIT and omalizumab is significantly and progressively reducing ICS use and AX in a 24-month study. The combination is significantly more effective than the single treatments or placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Bozek
- Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Martyna Miodonska
- Clinical Department of Internal Diseases, Dermatology and Allergology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Head Personalized Medicine Asthma & Allergy Clinic-Humanitas, Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruëff F, Bauer A, Becker S, Brehler R, Brockow K, Chaker AM, Darsow U, Fischer J, Fuchs T, Gerstlauer M, Gernert S, Hamelmann E, Hötzenecker W, Klimek L, Lange L, Merk H, Mülleneisen NK, Neustädter I, Pfützner W, Sieber W, Sitter H, Skudlik C, Treudler R, Wedi B, Wöhrl S, Worm M, Jakob T. Diagnosis and treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy: S2k Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Berufs- und Umweltdermatologie e.V. (ABD), the Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society of Dermatology (DDG), the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKC), the German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), the Society for Pediatric Allergy and Environmental Medicine (GPA), German Respiratory Society (DGP), and the Austrian Society for Allergy and Immunology (ÖGAI). Allergol Select 2023; 7:154-190. [PMID: 37854067 PMCID: PMC10580978 DOI: 10.5414/alx02430e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Hymenoptera venom (HV) is injected into the skin during a sting by Hymenoptera such as bees or wasps. Some components of HV are potential allergens and can cause large local and/or systemic allergic reactions (SAR) in sensitized individuals. During their lifetime, ~ 3% of the general population will develop SAR following a Hymenoptera sting. This guideline presents the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to SAR following Hymenoptera stings. Symptomatic therapy is usually required after a severe local reaction, but specific diagnosis or allergen immunotherapy (AIT) with HV (VIT) is not necessary. When taking a patient's medical history after SAR, clinicians should discuss possible risk factors for more frequent stings and more severe anaphylactic reactions. The most important risk factors for more severe SAR are mast cell disease and, especially in children, uncontrolled asthma. Therefore, if the SAR extends beyond the skin (according to the Ring and Messmer classification: grade > I), the baseline serum tryptase concentration shall be measured and the skin shall be examined for possible mastocytosis. The medical history should also include questions specific to asthma symptoms. To demonstrate sensitization to HV, allergists shall determine concentrations of specific IgE antibodies (sIgE) to bee and/or vespid venoms, their constituents and other venoms as appropriate. If the results are negative less than 2 weeks after the sting, the tests shall be repeated (at least 4 - 6 weeks after the sting). If only sIgE to the total venom extracts have been determined, if there is double sensitization, or if the results are implausible, allergists shall determine sIgE to the different venom components. Skin testing may be omitted if in-vitro methods have provided a definitive diagnosis. If neither laboratory diagnosis nor skin testing has led to conclusive results, additional cellular testing can be performed. Therapy for HV allergy includes prophylaxis of reexposure, patient self treatment measures (including use of rescue medication) in the event of re-stings, and VIT. Following a grade I SAR and in the absence of other risk factors for repeated sting exposure or more severe anaphylaxis, it is not necessary to prescribe an adrenaline auto-injector (AAI) or to administer VIT. Under certain conditions, VIT can be administered even in the presence of previous grade I anaphylaxis, e.g., if there are additional risk factors or if quality of life would be reduced without VIT. Physicians should be aware of the contraindications to VIT, although they can be overridden in justified individual cases after weighing benefits and risks. The use of β-blockers and ACE inhibitors is not a contraindication to VIT. Patients should be informed about possible interactions. For VIT, the venom extract shall be used that, according to the patient's history and the results of the allergy diagnostics, was the trigger of the disease. If, in the case of double sensitization and an unclear history regarding the trigger, it is not possible to determine the culprit venom even with additional diagnostic procedures, VIT shall be performed with both venom extracts. The standard maintenance dose of VIT is 100 µg HV. In adult patients with bee venom allergy and an increased risk of sting exposure or particularly severe anaphylaxis, a maintenance dose of 200 µg can be considered from the start of VIT. Administration of a non-sedating H1-blocking antihistamine can be considered to reduce side effects. The maintenance dose should be given at 4-weekly intervals during the first year and, following the manufacturer's instructions, every 5 - 6 weeks from the second year, depending on the preparation used; if a depot preparation is used, the interval can be extended to 8 weeks from the third year onwards. If significant recurrent systemic reactions occur during VIT, clinicians shall identify and as possible eliminate co-factors that promote these reactions. If this is not possible or if there are no such co-factors, if prophylactic administration of an H1-blocking antihistamine is not effective, and if a higher dose of VIT has not led to tolerability of VIT, physicians should should consider additional treatment with an anti IgE antibody such as omalizumab as off lable use. For practical reasons, only a small number of patients are able to undergo sting challenge tests to check the success of the therapy, which requires in-hospital monitoring and emergency standby. To perform such a provocation test, patients must have tolerated VIT at the planned maintenance dose. In the event of treatment failure while on treatment with an ACE inhibitor, physicians should consider discontinuing the ACE inhibitor. In the absence of tolerance induction, physicians shall increase the maintenance dose (200 µg to a maximum of 400 µg in adults, maximum of 200 µg HV in children). If increasing the maintenance dose does not provide adequate protection and there are risk factors for a severe anaphylactic reaction, physicians should consider a co-medication based on an anti-IgE antibody (omalizumab; off-label use) during the insect flight season. In patients without specific risk factors, VIT can be discontinued after 3 - 5 years if maintenance therapy has been tolerated without recurrent anaphylactic events. Prolonged or permanent VIT can be considered in patients with mastocytosis, a history of cardiovascular or respiratory arrest due to Hymenoptera sting (severity grade IV), or other specific constellations associated with an increased individual risk of recurrent and/or severe SAR (e.g., hereditary α-tryptasemia). In cases of strongly increased, unavoidable insect exposure, adults may receive VIT until the end of intense contact. The prescription of an AAI can be omitted in patients with a history of SAR grade I and II when the maintenance dose of VIT has been reached and tolerated, provided that there are no additional risk factors. The same holds true once the VIT has been terminated after the regular treatment period. Patients with a history of SAR grade ≥ III reaction, or grade II reaction combined with additional factors that increase the risk of non response or repeated severe sting reactions, should carry an emergency kit, including an AAI, during VIT and after regular termination of the VIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU University Hospital, Munich
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden
| | - Sven Becker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Tübingen
| | - Randolf Brehler
- Department of Dermatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - Adam M. Chaker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Klinikum rechts der Isar, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - Ulf Darsow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich
| | - Jörg Fischer
- University Hospital for Dermatology and Allergology, Clinic Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | - Thomas Fuchs
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen
| | - Michael Gerstlauer
- Clinic for Children and Adolescents, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg
| | | | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Children’s Center Bethel, University Hospital OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Wolfram Hötzenecker
- Department of Dermatology, Kepler University Hospital, Medical Faculty of University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | | | - Lars Lange
- Pediatric Clinic, Marienhospital Bonn, GFO Kliniken, Bonn
| | - Hans Merk
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen
| | | | | | - Wolfgang Pfützner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg
| | | | - Helmut Sitter
- Institute for Theoretical Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg
| | - Christoph Skudlik
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm) at the University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, and BG Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg
| | | | - Bettina Wedi
- Comprehensive Allergy, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Stefan Wöhrl
- Floridsdorf Allergy Center (FAZ), Vienna, Austria
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, and
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Giessen, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Filippo M, Votto M, Caminiti L, Carella F, Castro GD, Landi M, Olcese R, Panasiti I, Vernich M, Barberi S, Ciprandi G, Marseglia GL. Omalizumab and allergen immunotherapy for respiratory allergies: A mini-review from the Allergen-Immunotherapy Committee of the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP). Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2022; 50:47-52. [PMID: 36335444 DOI: 10.15586/aei.v50i6.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
Although currently approved to treat severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria, omalizumab has also been an effective and safe add-on treatment for other allergic diseases. Namely, omalizumab has been proposed to be used as add-on therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma and undergoing specific allergen immunotherapy (AIT). AIT is the only treatment that modifies the natural history of IgE-mediated diseases. This brief review summarizes the available evidence and controversies on the efficacy and safety of omalizumab combined with specific AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria De Filippo
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Martina Votto
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy;
| | - Lucia Caminiti
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Carella
- Pediatric Unit, Azienza Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Landi
- Pediatric National Healthcare System, Turin, Italy - Istituto di Biomedicina e Immunologia molecolare, Italian National Research Council, Palermo, Italy; Department of Biomedicine, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council, Palermo, Italy
| | - Roberta Olcese
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Center, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilenia Panasiti
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Gian Luigi Marseglia
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pfaar O, Bousquet J, Durham SR, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Larché M, Roberts G, Shamji MH, Gerth van Wijk R. One hundred and ten years of Allergen Immunotherapy: A journey from empiric observation to evidence. Allergy 2022; 77:454-468. [PMID: 34315190 DOI: 10.1111/all.15023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
One hundred and ten years after Noon's first clinical report of the subcutaneous application of allergen extracts, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has evolved as the most important pillar of the treatment of allergic patients. It is the only disease-modifying treatment option available and the evidence for its clinical efficacy and safety is broad and undisputed. Throughout recent decades, more insights into the underlying mechanisms, in particular the modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses, have been described. AIT is acknowledged by worldwide regulatory authorities, and following the regulatory guidelines for product development, AIT products are subject to a rigorous evaluation before obtaining market authorization. Knowledge and practice are anchored in international guidelines, such as the recently published series of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). Innovative approaches continue to be further developed with the focus on clinical improvement by, for example, the usage of adjuvants, peptides, recombinants, modification of allergens, new routes of administration, and the concomitant use of biologicals. In addition, real-life data provide complementary and valuable information on the effectiveness and tolerability of this treatment option in the clinical routine. New mobile health technologies and big-data approaches will improve daily treatment convenience, adherence, and efficacy of AIT. However, the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has also had some implications for the feasibility and practicability of AIT. Taken together, AIT as the only disease-modifying therapy in allergic diseases has been broadly investigated over the past 110 years laying the path for innovations and further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg, Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center Berlin Germany
- University Hospital Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute London UK
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend, Outpatient and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Mark Larché
- Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada
- Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton ON Canada
| | - Graham Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre St Mary's Hospital Isle of Wight UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute London UK
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|