Influence of 3 antivertiginous medications on the vigilance of healthy volunteers

Antivertiginous drug therapy does not hinder the efficacy of individualized vibrotactile neurofeedback training for vestibular rehabilitation - a randomized trial

Vestibular rehabilitation using individualized vibrotactile neurofeedback training (IVNT) can lead to significant improvement in the postural stability of patients with vestibular symptoms of different origins. However, some of these patients have complex, severe dizziness, meaning that a pharmacological pretreatment or parallel (to vestibular rehabilitation) treatment can help them perform the rehabilitation exercises. Hence, the present study investigated the influence of a pharmacological treatment on the efficacy of vibrotactile neurofeedback training in patients with chronic, noncompensated vestibulopathies. All participants performed IVNT for ∼10 min each day for 2 weeks. In addition, every second participant was selected randomly to receive oral medication (20 mg cinnarizine and 40 mg dimenhydrinate per tablet), taking three tables per day. Trunk and ankle sway and postural stability were measured. In addition, the dizziness handicap inventory was evaluated immediately before training on the last day of training and 6 months after training. After the 10-day period of IVNT, both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in all parameters tested. A follow-up analysis after 6 months showed a long-term efficacy for the IVNT, that is, the patients remained significantly improved in their postural stability. The antivertiginous therapy did not hinder the efficacy of the IVNT. The present results indicate that IVNT even in combination with an antivertiginous drug therapy is an effective treatment regime for patients with disabling vertigo of different origins.

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate with betahistine in vestibular neuritis: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study

BACKGROUND

Vestibular neuritis (VN) is a strongly disabling disease of the peripheral vestibular system. Rapid and effective relief of symptoms is important to allow patients to promptly return to normal physical activity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to evaluate the efficacy of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate in unilateral VN in comparison with betahistine in terms of improvement of vertigo and concomitant symptoms, and performance in neurotological testing.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients were randomized to receive either cinnarizine 20 mg/dimenhydrinate 40 mg as a fixed combination or betahistine 12 mg, each three times daily for 4 weeks. Vertigo and concomitant symptoms, activities of daily living (ADL), posturography and a battery of vestibulo-ocular tests, registered by electronystagmography including spontaneous nystagmus, bithermal caloric and rotatory test, among others, were assessed at baseline (t(0)), after 1 week (t(1w)) and after 4 weeks (t(4w)). The primary endpoint was the Mean Vertigo Score (MVS) at t(1w), a composite of 12 individual scores for unprovoked and provoked vertigo, each assessed using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Non-inferiority of the fixed combination versus betahistine would be assumed if the two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for between-group differences in MVS lay entirely below the non-inferiority margin of 1.25 (12.5% of VAS range).

RESULTS

The fixed combination led to significantly greater improvements in MVS than betahistine both at t(1w) (primary endpoint) and at t(4w) (95% CI for the difference in baseline-adjusted means -0.95, -0.64 at t(1w), -0.77, -0.44 at t(4w); p < 0.001). Vegetative symptoms and ADL also improved significantly more under the fixed combination than under betahistine at t(1w) (p < 0.001, each parameter) and t(4w) (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), both showing a nearly complete remission at t(4w). In the two groups, pathological posturography and electronystagmography parameters normalized during the 4-week treatment. The fixed combination group showed an earlier recovery of spontaneous nystagmus than the betahistine group (t(1w), p < 0.001) and slightly higher improvements in asymmetry of rotation-induced nystagmus at t(1w) and t(4w) (p = 0.041, each time point). No significant differences were found between the treatments in abatement of spontaneous nystagmus at t(4w) and decrease of caloric lateralization or improvement of equilibrium (sensory organization test [SOT], conditions 5/6) at t(1w) and t(4w). No patient reported any adverse event.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate is an effective and well tolerated option for symptomatic treatment in unilateral VN. The fixed combination led to significant improvements in vertigo and ADL within the first week, and to a nearly complete recovery after 4 weeks. Neurotological testing revealed no signs of a possible detrimental influence of the 4-week treatment with the fixed combination compared with betahistine in terms of recovery of caloric responsiveness and abatement of rotation-induced nystagmus.

A fixed combination of cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate for the treatment of patients with acute vertigo due to vestibular disorders : a randomized, reference-controlled clinical study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Vestibular dysfunction commonly leads to - often severe - vertigo symptoms. The objective of this study was to compare the antivertiginous efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate with those of betahistine in patients with acute vertigo due to vestibular disorders.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients experiencing acute vertigo attacks participated in this prospective, double-blind, three-centre, comparative study. Patients who assessed at least one vertigo symptom as being of medium intensity (> or =2) on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS; from 0 = no symptoms to 4 = very severe symptoms) were randomly allocated to treatment with the fixed combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg three times daily or betahistine 12 mg three times daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in mean vertigo score, as determined by patients' assessments of 12 individual vertigo symptoms on the 5-point VAS after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Treatment with the fixed combination led to significantly greater improvements in mean vertigo scores than the reference therapy betahistine after 4 weeks of therapy (p = 0.013). The differences were clinically relevant, based on the Mann-Whitney estimator. Furthermore, the incidence of vertigo-associated vegetative symptoms was significantly reduced after 1 (p = 0.004) and 4 weeks (p = 0.023) in the fixed-combination group relative to the betahistine group. Three patients, all of them in the betahistine group, reported adverse events, none of which was considered serious. Almost all patients (n = 62) rated the tolerabilities of both medications as very good or good.

CONCLUSION

The fixed combination of cinnarizine/dimenhydrinate was shown to be an effective and very well tolerated treatment option for patients with acute vertigo due to vestibular disorders. The combination proved to be significantly more efficient in reducing vertigo and associated vegetative symptoms than betahistine in such patients.

Efficacy and tolerability of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate in the treatment of vertigo: a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-group, outpatient study

BACKGROUND

Most cases of vertigo are attributable to both peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Therefore, it would be of interest to determine whether a combination therapy having both peripheral and central actions would translate into more efficient symptom relief.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine 20 mg + dimenhydrinate 40 mg in the treatment of vertigo of central, peripheral, or combined central/peripheral origin.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-group, outpatient study in men and women (age >30 years) with central, peripheral, or combined central/peripheral vestibular vertigo. Patients who assessed > or =1 vertigo symptom as being of medium intensity (> or =2) on a 5-point visual analog scale (from 0 = no symptoms to 4 = very severe symptoms) and who had abnormal vestibulospinal movement patterns on cramocorpography were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 tablet of the fixed combination of cinnarizine 20 mg + dimenhydrinate 40 mg, cinnarizine 50 mg, dimenhydrinate 100 mg, or placebo 3 times daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the decrease in mean vertigo score (MVS), which was composed of 12 individual vertigo symptoms, each assessed on the 5-point visual analog scale after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 246 patients, of whom 239 were evaluable for efficacy. Approximately two thirds of the efficacy population were female and one third male. The mean age was 51.3 years, and the mean duration of vertigo was 2.6 years. The least squares mean (SD) change from baseline in MVS was significantly greater in the group receiving the fixed combination (1.37 [0.66]) than in any of the comparator groups (cinnarizine 50 mg: 0.87 [0.53]; dimenhydrinate 100 mg: 0.83 [0.66]; placebo: 0.76 [0.48]; all comparisons, P < 0.001). The differences were clinically relevant, based on the Mann-Whitney estimator. The incidence of vertigo-associated nausea was significantly reduced in the fixed-combination group relative to the comparator groups (P< or = 0.016). Thirty-four patients reported adverse events, 6 each in the fixed combination and placebo groups, 12 in the cinnarizine group, and 10 in the dimenhydrinate group. None of these adverse events were considered serious. After 4 weeks of treatment, the tolerability of treatment was rated as very good or good by 57 (96.6%) patients in the fixed-combination group; the values for cinnarizine, dimenhydrinate, and placebo were 54 (93.1%), 42 (72.4%), and 50 (87.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine 20 mg + dimenhydrinate 40 mg was effective, clinically beneficial, and well tolerated in patients with vestibular vertigo of central and/or peripheral origin. It was significantly more effective in reducing the MVS compared with placebo and the routinely prescribed higher doses of cinnarizine (50 mg) and dimenhydrinate (100 mg).

Betahistine: a retrospective synopsis of safety data

Betahistine is a structural analogue of histamine that is prescribed for the treatment of vestibular disorders such as Ménière's disease and the symptomatic treatment of vertigo. It is estimated from sales information that >130 million patients have been exposed to the drug since its registration in 1968. In this review we analyse the safety profile of betahistine based on data obtained during >35 years of worldwide postmarketing surveillance. Until 31 December 2005, 554 adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports with 994 individual signs and symptoms were received by the marketing authorisation holder from worldwide sources and were reviewed and evaluated. Signs and symptoms of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions during betahistine therapy were the most frequently reported complaints. They consisted of usually mild and self-limiting rash, pruritus and urticaria, and all symptoms were reversible after drug discontinuation. Betahistine was reported to be involved in one anaphylactoid reaction and one case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Anaphylactic reactions with fatal outcome were not reported. The reports that describe gastrointestinal complaints mostly concern nausea and vomiting or unspecific abdominal pain. These were typically non-serious complaints. Hepatobiliary involvement was reported 25 times, including increases in alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels. None of the patients concerned developed severe liver failure or died. ADRs related to the nervous system predominantly reveal heterogeneous events that are not suggestive of a specific adverse reaction profile for betahistine. A clinical intolerance to betahistine that gave rise to asthma or bronchospasm was only reported in eight ADRs. A total of three cases of neoplasm have been reported. One case concerned a male patient of unknown age who experienced weight loss, insomnia, impatience and irritability soon after the start of betahistine therapy. An undiagnosed phaeochromocytoma was suspected. The remaining two cases were assessed as being unrelated to betahistine by the reporter. Finally, four deaths have been reported during the course of postmarketing surveillance for betahistine. The reporter assessed the causal relationship to betahistine in two as unrelated, in one as unlikely and the other as unassessable. In summary, clinical and postmarketing studies have revealed a good safety profile of betahistine that was confirmed by the safety surveillance data presented.

Treatment of vertigo due to acute unilateral vestibular loss with a fixed combination of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate: a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical study

BACKGROUND

Acute unilateral vestibular loss is a balance disorder that is accompanied by vertigo symptoms and concomitant vegetative symptoms, including nausea and vomiting. Patients are frequently confined to bed rest but may continue to experience vertigo symptoms. A well-established antivertiginous therapy consisting of cinnarizine and dimenhydrinate at low doses may offer rapid relief of acute vertigo symptoms due to acute vestibular loss, without inhibiting physiological compensation processes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg versus monotherapy with its respective components in the treatment of acute vertigo symptoms due to acute unilateral vestibular loss.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study, 50 patients with acute vestibular vertigo were randomly assigned to receive 4 weeks of treatment (1 tablet 3 times daily) with a fixed combination of 20 mg cinnarizine and 40 mg dimenhydrinate, 20 mg cinnarizine alone, or 40 mg dimenhydrinate alone. All patients received a 15% mannitol infusion as standard therapy during the first 6 days of treatment. Efficacy was determined by the patients' assessments of vertigo symptoms after 1 and 4 weeks of treatment using a verbal rating scale (vertigo score) and by vestibulo-ocular and vestibulospinal tests. The primary efficacy criterion was defined as the relief of vertigo symptoms after 1 week of treatment.

RESULTS

After 1 week of treatment, the fixed combination was significantly more effective than 20 mg cinnarizine (P < 0.001) and 40 mg dimenhydrinate (P < 0.01). After 4 weeks, the fixed combination was still significantly more effective than cinnarizine in reducing vertigo symptoms (P < 0.01) and significantly more effective than dimenhydrinate in improving the patients' balance while standing (P < 0.05). The tolerability of the fixed combination was rated good or very good by 100% of the patients (cinnarizine alone, 82.4%; dimenhydrinate alone, 94.4%). No serious adverse events occurred. Four patients in the fixed combination and the cinnarizine groups, and 6 patients in the dimenhydrinate group reported nonserious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest a distinct benefit in using a fixed combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg versus the respective monotherapies in this population of patients with acute vestibular vertigo.