1
|
Todoric K, Merrill S. Oral Immunotherapy: An Overview. Med Clin North Am 2024; 108:719-731. [PMID: 38816113 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an alternative treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy that has been shown to increase tolerance threshold to many of the top food allergens, although this effect may be dependent on age, dose, frequency, and duration. OIT has been shown to be effective and safe in infants, and early initiation can improve rates of desensitization even for those foods whose natural history favors loss of allergy. Studies looking at protocol modification to improve OIT success are ongoing as is the evaluation of clinical tools to help monitor OIT effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista Todoric
- Medical Arts Allergy, 220 Wilson Street Suite 200, Carlisle, PA 17013, USA.
| | - Sarah Merrill
- Family Medicine Department, UC San Diego Health, 402 Dickinson Street, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lloyd M, Loke P, Mack DP, Sicherer SH, Perkin MR, Boyle R, Yin Leung AS, Lee BW, Levin M, Blumchen K, Fiocchi A, Ebisawa M, Oliveira LCLD, Tang MLK. Varying Approaches to Management of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy in Children Around the World. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:1010-1027.e6. [PMID: 36805346 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy is a chronic disease that affects individuals of all ages and is a significant public health problem globally. This narrative overview examines clinical management strategies for IgE-mediated food allergy in children around the world to understand variations in practice. Information was drawn from clinical practice guidelines, recent research, the websites of professional and governmental bodies with expertise in food allergy, and clinical experts from a broad cross-section of geographical regions. The structure and delivery of clinical services, allergen avoidance and food labeling, and resources to support the management of allergic reactions in the community are discussed in detail. The adoption of emerging food immunotherapies is also explored. Wide variations in clinical management of food allergy were apparent across the different countries. Common themes were continuing issues with access to specialist care and recognition of the need to balance risk reduction with dietary and social restrictions to avoid unnecessary detrimental impacts on the quality of life of food allergy sufferers. Findings highlight the need for standardized presentation of practice and priorities, and may assist clinicians and researchers when engaging with government and funding agencies to address gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Lloyd
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Paxton Loke
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Douglas P Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Kravis Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Michael R Perkin
- Population Health Research Institute, St. George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Boyle
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Agnes Sze Yin Leung
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Bee Wah Lee
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michael Levin
- Division of Paediatric Allergology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Katharina Blumchen
- Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pneumology, Allergology and Cystic Fibrosis, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Alessandro Fiocchi
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities Area, Allergy Division, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Lucila Camargo Lopes de Oliveira
- Department of Paediatrics, Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an alternative treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy that has been shown to increase tolerance threshold to many of the top food allergens, although this effect may be dependent on age, dose, frequency, and duration. OIT has been shown to be effective and safe in infants, and early initiation can improve rates of desensitization even for those foods whose natural history favors loss of allergy. Studies looking at protocol modification to improve OIT success are ongoing as is the evaluation of clinical tools to help monitor OIT effects.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mori F, Giovannini M, Barni S, Jiménez-Saiz R, Munblit D, Biagioni B, Liccioli G, Sarti L, Liotti L, Ricci S, Novembre E, Sahiner U, Baldo E, Caimmi D. Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate. Front Immunol 2021; 12:636612. [PMID: 34650547 PMCID: PMC8507468 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy has increased in recent years, especially in children. Allergen avoidance, and drugs in case of an allergic reaction, remains the standard of care in food allergy. Nevertheless, increasing attention has been given to the possibility to treat food allergy, through immunotherapy, particularly oral immunotherapy (OIT). Several OIT protocols and clinical trials have been published. Most of them focus on children allergic to milk, egg, or peanut, although recent studies developed protocols for other foods, such as wheat and different nuts. OIT efficacy in randomized controlled trials is usually evaluated as the possibility for patients to achieve desensitization through the consumption of an increasing amount of a food allergen, while the issue of a possible long-term sustained unresponsiveness has not been completely addressed. Here, we evaluated current pediatric OIT knowledge, focusing on the results of clinical trials and current guidelines. Specifically, we wanted to highlight what is known in terms of OIT efficacy and effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life. For each aspect, we reported the pros and the cons, inferable from published literature. In conclusion, even though many protocols, reviews and meta-analysis have been published on this topic, pediatric OIT remains a controversial therapy and no definitive generalized conclusion may be drawn so far. It should be an option provided by specialized teams, when both patients and their families are prone to adhere to the proposed protocol. Efficacy, long-term effectiveness, possible role of adjuvant therapies, risk of severe reactions including anaphylaxis or eosinophilic esophagitis, and impact on the quality of life of both children and caregivers are all aspects that should be discussed before starting OIT. Future studies are needed to provide firm clinical and scientific evidence, which should also consider patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Mori
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Barni
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rodrigo Jiménez-Saiz
- Department of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Immunology & Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.,Inflammation, Repair and Development Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benedetta Biagioni
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Liccioli
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Sarti
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Liotti
- Department of Pediatrics, Salesi Children's Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Ricci
- Division of Immunology, Section of Pediatrics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence and Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Elio Novembre
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Umit Sahiner
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ermanno Baldo
- "Giovan Battista Mattei" Research Institute, Stenico, Italy
| | - Davide Caimmi
- Allergy Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,IDESP, UA11, INSERM-Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guarnieri KM, Slack IF, Gadoury-Lévesque V, Eapen AA, Andorf S, Lierl MB. Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127:214-222.e4. [PMID: 33839246 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Additional information is needed to inform optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). OBJECTIVE To provide insight into the optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy by analyzing a real-world peanut OIT cohort. METHODS Records were reviewed for 174 children undergoing peanut OIT at a pediatric allergy clinic. Patient age, peanut skin prick test results, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) results, with inclusion of additional foods in OIT, were analyzed for correlations with OIT outcomes. RESULTS To date, 144 patients have achieved maintenance dosing, 50 of whom transitioned to ad lib twice-weekly peanut ingestion. A total of 30 discontinued OIT. In addition, 47 patients who underwent multifood OIT had no significant difference in reactions (FDR-adjusted P = .48) or time-to-reach maintenance (FDR-adjusted P = .48) compared with those on peanut OIT alone. Age at initiation inversely correlated with achievement of maintenance: 92% of patients 0.5 to less than 5 years, 81% of those 5 to less than 11 years, and 70% of those 11 to less than 18 years reached and continued maintenance (P = .01). Baseline peanut-sIgE level positively correlated with number of reactions during updosing (P < .001) and maintenance (P = .005), though it was not significantly different in patients achieving successful maintenance vs those who discontinued OIT (P = .09). Furthermore, 66% of patients experienced greater than or equal to 1 adverse reaction during OIT. Of those on ad lib peanut ingestion, 2 reported mild reactions after lapses in peanut consumption. CONCLUSION Clinical peanut OIT has similar outcomes to research protocols. OIT can be successful in older children and those with high peanut-sIgE levels, though these factors affect outcomes. Clinical and laboratory criteria can guide successful transition to intermittent ad lib peanut consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine M Guarnieri
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Ian F Slack
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Vanessa Gadoury-Lévesque
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Amy A Eapen
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Sandra Andorf
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Michelle B Lierl
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Adverse events associated with peanut oral immunotherapy in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020; 10:659. [PMID: 31959857 PMCID: PMC6971009 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56961-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
While peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) represents a promising treatment for peanut allergies in children, safety concerns remain a common barrier to widespread adoption. We aimed to systematically assess available evidence to determine the risk and frequency of adverse events occurring during POIT, and examine study-level characteristics associated with their occurrence and severity. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted through April 2019. Controlled and non-controlled studies evaluating POIT were eligible. Twenty-seven studies, involving 1488 subjects, were included. Adverse events to POIT were common and led to treatment discontinuation in 6.6% of children (95% CI 4.4–9.0; 27 studies, I2 = 48.7%). Adverse events requiring treatment with epinephrine occurred among 7.6% (4.5–11.4; 26 studies, I2 = 75.5%) of participants, at a rate of 2.0 per 10,000 doses (0.8–3.7; 15 studies, I2 = 64.4). Use of a rush treatment phase and targeting a higher maintenance dose were associated with a higher risk and frequency of epinephrine use, while using co-treatments in addition to POIT was associated with a lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. While adverse events to POIT are common, this study provides promising explorative evidence that certain modifications to existing treatment protocols could significantly improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
|
8
|
Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 55:medicina55100684. [PMID: 31614929 PMCID: PMC6843277 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55100684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), a promising allergen-specific approach in the management of Food Allergies (FA), is based on the administration of increasing doses of the culprit food until reaching a maintenance dose. Each step should be adapted to the patient, and OIT should be considered an individualized treatment. Recent studies focused on the standardization and identification of novel biomarkers in order to correlate endotypes with phenotypes in the field of FA.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang YS. Innovation in Asia Pacific Allergy. Asia Pac Allergy 2019; 9:e10. [PMID: 30740358 PMCID: PMC6365654 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2019.9.e10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon-Seok Chang
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|