1
|
Uwaremwe C, Yue L, Wang Y, Tian Y, Zhao X, Liu Y, Zhou Q, Zhang Y, Wang R. An Endophytic Strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Suppresses Fusarium oxysporum Infection of Chinese Wolfberry by Altering Its Rhizosphere Bacterial Community. Front Microbiol 2022; 12:782523. [PMID: 35069484 PMCID: PMC8767019 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.782523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Root rot disease is a serious infection leading to production loss of Chinese wolfberry (Lycium barbarum). This study tested the potential for two bacterial biological control agents, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HSB1 and FZB42, against five fungal pathogens that frequently cause root rot in Chinese wolfberry. Both HSB1 and FZB42 were found to inhibit fungal mycelial growth, in vitro and in planta, as well as to promote the growth of wolfberry seedlings. In fact, a biocontrol experiment showed efficiency of 100% with at least one treatment involving each biocontrol strain against Fusarium oxysporum. Metagenomic sequencing was used to assess bacterial community shifts in the wolfberry rhizosphere upon introduction of each biocontrol strain. Results showed that HSB1 and FZB42 differentially altered the abundances of different taxa present and positively influenced various functions of inherent wolfberry rhizosphere bacteria. This study highlights the application of biocontrol method in the suppression of fungal pathogens that cause root rot disease in wolfberry, which is useful for agricultural extension agents and commercial growers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantine Uwaremwe
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,CAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Mengla, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Yue
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yun Wang
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Desert and Desertification, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xia Zhao
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yubao Zhang
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ruoyu Wang
- Gaolan Station of Agricultural and Ecological Experiment, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Lanzhou, China.,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rhizosphere Microbiomes of Potato Cultivated under Bacillus subtilis Treatment Influence the Quality of Potato Tubers. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222112065. [PMID: 34769506 PMCID: PMC8584837 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222112065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Plants serve as a niche for the growth and proliferation of a diversity of microorganisms. Soil microorganisms, which closely interact with plants, are increasingly being recognized as factors important to plant health. In this study, we explored the use of high-throughput DNA sequencing of the fungal ITS and bacterial 16S for characterization of the fungal and bacterial microbiomes following biocontrol treatment (DT) with Bacillus subtilis strain Bv17 relative to treatments without biocontrol (DC) during the potato growth cycle at three time points. A total of 5631 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified from the 16S data, and 2236 OTUs were identified from the ITS data. The number of bacterial and fungal OTU in DT was higher than in DC and gradually increased during potato growth. In addition, indices such as Ace, Chao, Shannon, and Simpson were higher in DT than in DC, indicating greater richness and community diversity in soil following the biocontrol treatment. Additionally, the potato tuber yields improved without a measurable change in the bacterial communities following the B. subtilis strain Bv17 treatment. These results suggest that soil microbial communities in the rhizosphere are differentially affected by the biocontrol treatment while improving potato yield, providing a strong basis for biocontrol utilization in crop production.
Collapse
|
3
|
Biocontrol arsenals of bacterial endophyte: An imminent triumph against clubroot disease. Microbiol Res 2020; 241:126565. [DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
4
|
Hu D, Li S, Li Y, Peng J, Wei X, Ma J, Zhang C, Jia N, Wang E, Wang Z. Streptomyces sp. strain TOR3209: a rhizosphere bacterium promoting growth of tomato by affecting the rhizosphere microbial community. Sci Rep 2020; 10:20132. [PMID: 33208762 PMCID: PMC7675979 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76887-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aiming at revealing the possible mechanism of its growth promoting effect on tomato, the correlations among Streptomyces sp. TOR3209 inoculation, rhizobacteriome, and tomato growth/production traits were investigated in this study. By analyses of Illumina sequencing and plate coating, differences in rhizosphere microbial communities were found in different growth stages and distinct inoculation treatments. The plant biomass/fruit yields and relative abundances of families Flavobacteriaceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Polyangiaceae and Enterobacteriaceae in treatments T (tomato inoculated with TOR3209) and TF (tomato inoculated with TOR3209 + organic fertilizer) were higher than that in the controls (CK and CK+ organic fertilizer), respectively. The analysis of Metastats and LEfSe revealed that the genera Flavobacterium and Sorangium in seedling stage, Klebsiella in flowering stage, Collimonas in early fruit setting stage, and genera Micrococcaceae, Pontibacte and Adhaeribacter in late fruit setting stage were the most representative rhizobacteria that positively responded to TOR3209 inoculation. By cultivation method, five bacterial strains positively correlated to TOR3209 inoculation were isolated from rhizosphere and root endosphere, which were identified as tomato growth promoters affiliated to Enterobacter sp., Arthrobacter sp., Bacillus subtilis, Rhizobium sp. and Bacillus velezensis. In pot experiment, TOR3209 and B. velezensis WSW007 showed joint promotion to tomato production, while the abundance of inoculated TOR3209 was dramatically decreased in rhizosphere along the growth of tomato. Conclusively, TOR3209 might promote the tomato production via changing of microbial community in rhizosphere. These findings provide a better understanding of the interactions among PGPR in plant promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hu
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuhong Li
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ying Li
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Jieli Peng
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyan Wei
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Ma
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Cuimian Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Jia
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China
| | - Entao Wang
- Departamento de Microbiología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, C.P. 11340, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Zhanwu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Plants Genetic Engineering Center, Institute of Genetics and Physiology (Hebei Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Research Center), Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jiménez JA, Novinscak A, Filion M. Inoculation With the Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM677 Impacts the Rhizosphere Microbiome of Three Oilseed Crops. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:569366. [PMID: 33162951 PMCID: PMC7581686 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.569366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The bacterial communities inhabiting the rhizosphere play an important role in plant development and health. Here we studied the effect of inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM677, a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium that promotes seed oil accumulation, on the rhizosphere microbiome of three oilseed crops (Brassica napus, Buglossoides arvensis, and Glycine max) over time. Next-Generation high-throughput sequencing targeting the V4 region of 16S rDNA was used to characterize the microbial communities associated with the three different crops, inoculated or not with LBUM677, over a time period of up to 90 days post-inoculation. A total of 1,627,231 amplicon sequence variants were obtained and were taxonomically grouped into 39 different phyla. LBUM677 inoculation and sampling date were found to significantly influence the rhizosphere microbiome of the three oil-producing crops under study. Specifically, inoculation with LBUM677 and sampling date, but not the plant species, were found to significantly alter the alpha- and the beta-diversity of the rhizosphere microbial communities. Differential abundance analyses found that 29 taxonomical bacterial groups were significantly more abundant in the LBUM677 treatments while 30 were significantly more abundant in the control treatments. Predicted functions of the microorganisms were also enriched, including 47 enzymatic pathways in LBUM677 treatments. These non-targeted effects on rhizosphere bacterial communities are discussed in the context of oilseed crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús A Jiménez
- Biology Department, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada
| | - Amy Novinscak
- Biology Department, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada
| | - Martin Filion
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu Research and Development Center, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Azizoglu U, Jouzani GS, Yilmaz N, Baz E, Ozkok D. Genetically modified entomopathogenic bacteria, recent developments, benefits and impacts: A review. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 734:139169. [PMID: 32460068 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Entomopathogenic bacteria (EPBs), insect pathogens that produce pest-specific toxins, are environmentally-friendly alternatives to chemical insecticides. However, the most important problem with EPBs application is their limited field stability. Moreover, environmental factors such as solar radiation, leaf temperature, and vapor pressure can affect the pathogenicity of these pathogens and their toxins. Scientists have conducted intensive research to overcome such problems. Genetic engineering has great potential for the development of new engineered entomopathogens with more resistance to adverse environmental factors. Genetically modified entomopathogenic bacteria (GM-EPBs) have many advantages over wild EPBs, such as higher pathogenicity, lower spraying requirements and longer-term persistence. Genetic manipulations have been mostly applied to members of the bacterial genera Bacillus, Lysinibacillus, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus. Although many researchers have found that GM-EPBs can be used safely as plant protection bioproducts, limited attention has been paid to their potential ecological impacts. The main concerns about GM-EPBs and their products are their potential unintended effects on beneficial insects (predators, parasitoids, pollinators, etc.) and rhizospheric bacteria. This review address recent update on the significant role of GM-EPBs in biological control, examining them through different perspectives in an attempt to generate critical discussion and aid in the understanding of their potential ecological impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugur Azizoglu
- Department of Crop and Animal Production, Safiye Cikrikcioglu Vocational College, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey.
| | - Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani
- Microbial Biotechnology Department, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
| | - Nihat Yilmaz
- Department of Crop and Animal Production, Safiye Cikrikcioglu Vocational College, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Ethem Baz
- Laboratory and Veterinary Health Department, Safiye Cikrikcioglu Vocational College, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Duran Ozkok
- Department of Crop and Animal Production, Safiye Cikrikcioglu Vocational College, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moreno Reséndez A, García Mendoza V, Reyes Carrillo JL, Vásquez Arroyo J, Cano Ríos P. Rizobacterias promotoras del crecimiento vegetal: una alternativa de biofertilización para la agricultura sustentable. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA 2018. [DOI: 10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v20n1.73707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
La agricultura moderna enfrenta nuevos desafíos, integrando enfoques ecológicos y moleculares, para lograr mayores rendimientos de los cultivos y reducir al mínimo los impactos sobre el ambiente. Para generar mayores rendimientos se han incrementado significativamente las dosis de fertilizantes sintéticos por unidad de superficie, los cuales pueden provocar contaminación, daños a la salud y pérdida de la fertilidad de los suelos, convirtiéndose en una de las preocupaciones más importantes en la producción agrícola. Para mejorar la producción sin el uso de fertilizantes de origen químico, las investigaciones se han orientado hacia el desarrollo de nuevas biotecnologías: provocando que exista un interés creciente en los microorganismos benéficos del suelo ya que éstos pueden promover el crecimiento de las plantas y, en algunos casos, evitar infecciones del tejido vegetal por patógenos. Las interacciones de las rizobacterias promotoras del crecimiento vegetal (RPCV) con el medio biótico – plantas y microorganismos – son muy complejas y utilizan diferentes mecanismos de acción para promover el crecimiento de las plantas. Estos mecanismos se agrupan en: 1) Biofertilización; 2) Fito-estimulación; y 3) Biocontrol. Inocular los cultivos con RPCV reduce sustancialmente el uso de fertilizantes sintéticos y los impactos negativos al suelo, aumenta el rendimiento de los cultivos, contribuyendo a la economía del productor y a la alimentación de la población. Esta revisión describe aspectos básicos inherentes a la interacción entre las RPCV y las especies vegetales, centrándose en los beneficios que aportan las RPCV a la actividad agrícola.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hao DC, Xiao PG. Rhizosphere Microbiota and Microbiome of Medicinal Plants: From Molecular Biology to Omics Approaches. CHINESE HERBAL MEDICINES 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s1674-6384(17)60097-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|