Painful conditions of the acromioclavicular joint

Distal Clavicular Osteolysis Treated With Platelet-Rich Plasma: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

Atraumatic distal clavicular osteolysis (DCO) is a cause of shoulder pain in younger athletes, often resulting from weightlifting and activities with repetitive pressing and overhead lifting. Athletes will present with shoulder pain localized to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, with tenderness to palpation over the joint exacerbated by provocative testing on examination. Conservative management often includes activity modification, oral analgesics, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injection. Distal clavicular osteolysis can be refractory to conservative management and these athletes are often referred for surgical consultation. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been used to treat a wide variety of musculoskeletal injuries, but there have been no published studies assessing the efficacy of PRP injections specifically for distal clavicle osteolysis. We present a case of refractory DCO successfully treated with an ultrasound-guided PRP injection of the AC joint.

The incidence and treatment of symptomatic acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis following total shoulder arthroplasty

Background

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) Osteoarthritis (OA) is very common in the general population. Despite this, there is little mention of concomitant glenohumeral and ACJ arthropathy in the literature, and no documented incidence of symptomatic ACJ OA post total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We present the incidence and timescale of the problem, and the response to treatments.

Methods

Patients who had developed ACJ-related symptoms following a TSA were retrieved from a prospectively collected database. It was determined that these symptoms were not related to the prosthesis or other non-ACJ pathology.

Results

There were 230 primary anatomic total shoulder replacements carried out over a 9-year period, with 219 with adequate follow-up for analysis. Thirty-five (16%) developed a symptomatic ACJ. The majority developed symptoms within the first two years however there was one patient who developed symptoms eight years later. Twenty six percent of patients responded to a period of rest. Seventy one percent had a cortisone injection in the ACJ and in 44% of patients this was effective. Twelve (34%) patients had an arthroscopic excision of distal clavicle with good resolution of the symptoms.

Discussion

ACJ symptoms following a total shoulder replacement appears more common than thought and can be treated successfully.

Ligament Reconstruction and Interposition Arthroplasty of the Acromioclavicular Joint

Distal clavicle excision (DCE) for acromioclavicular (AC) joint primary osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis has been shown to have good to excellent outcomes. However, there are studies that report significant rates of residual AC joint pain and distal clavicle instability after open and arthroscopic techniques. We describe a surgical technique for management of AC joint primary osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, and revision DCE that involves DCE with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition arthroplasty. It provides distal clavicle stability and can theoretically reduce residual AC joint pain secondary to acromial abutment after DCE.

Osteoarthritis in the Upper Extremity

Osteoarthritis is a common cause of morbidity in an increasingly aging population. Although the weight-bearing joints of the leg and foot are frequently affected by osteoarthritis, degenerative changes in the joints of the upper extremity are likewise common and can be both particularly debilitating for affected individuals and uniquely challenging for the health care providers managing it. The present review seeks to overview the epidemiology, anatomy, diagnosis, and management of osteoarthritis in the joints of the shoulder, elbow, and hand with the intent of providing accessible and relevant information to the range of medical professionals involved in patient care.

Distal Clavicle Excision: An Epidemiologic Study Using the National Ambulatory Surgery Sample Database

Background: This study aimed to examine national trends pertaining to patient demographics and hospital characteristics among distal clavicle excision (DCE) procedures performed in the United States.

Methods: The National Ambulatory Surgery Sample (NASS) database was queried for data. Encounters with Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 29824 were selected. Metrics derived from these encounters included patient demographic information such as age, geographic location, median household income per zip code, and primary expected insurance payer. Hospital characteristics derived included total charges for DCE procedures, location of the hospital, disposition of the patient, hospital census region, control/ownership of the hospital, and location/teaching status of the hospital. The proportion of DCE performed concomitantly with rotator cuff repair (RCR) was also analyzed. P-values were obtained from continuous variables using a t-test with a linear regression model. P-values were obtained from event variables using chi-square analysis.

Results: The incidence of arthroscopic DCE in the US decreased from 99,070 in 2016 to 93,678 (5.5%) in 2018. Of note, the proportion of DCE performed concomitantly with RCR significantly increased from 50.4% in 2016 to 52.8% in 2018 (P < 0.0001). Median patient age increased from 2016 to 2018 (56.4 to 57.2; P < 0.0001). The income quartile that saw the highest number of encounters was between $43,000 and $53,999 (P < 0.0001). Hospital trends display an increasing cost from $16,944 to $18,855 over the study period (P = 0.0016). Private insurance, including health maintenance organizations (HMOs), were the largest payers for this procedure; however, a decreasing trend in DCE covered by private insurance was noticed (50.2% to 47.3%; P < 0.0001). Medicare was the second-largest payer ranging from 27.9% in 2016 to 29.9% in 2018. The urban teaching model of hospitals continues to see the highest number of encounters for this procedure.

Conclusions: In both 2016 and 2018, private insurance was the most common payer, most DCEs were performed in urban teaching hospitals, and most patients undergoing the procedure had a median household income between $43,000 and $59,000. Between 2016 and 2018, there was a significant increase in costs associated with DCE, as well as an increase in the median age of patients undergoing the procedure. The proportion of DCE performed concurrently with RCR also significantly increased during the study period.

No differences between conservative and surgical management of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

To conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, as well as to identify any existing gaps in the current knowledge.

METHODS

Studies were identified by electronic databases (Ovid, Pubmed) from their inception up to April 2nd, 2020. All studies reporting functional outcomes after conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis, either primary or secondary to trauma or distal clavicle osteolysis, were included. Following data were extracted: authors, year of publication, study design (prospective or retrospective), LOE, number of shoulders treated conservatively or surgically, patients' age, OA classification, type of conservative treatment, surgical approach, surgical technique, functional outcomes, complications, revisions, and length of follow-up. Descriptive statistics was used. Quality appraisal was assessed through the Cochrane risk of bias tool for LOE I/II studies, while the MINORS checklist was used for LOE III/IV studies.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included for a total of 861 shoulders. Mean age of participants was 48.5 ± 7.4 years. Mean follow-up was 43.8 ± 29.9 months. Four studies reported functional results after conservative treatment, whereas 15 studies were focused on surgical management. No studies directly compared conservative and surgical treatment. Seven studies reported a surgical approach after failure of previous conservative treatment. All studies reported functional improvement and pain relief. Complication rate was low. Overall methodological quality of included studies was very low.

CONCLUSION

Conservative and surgical treatments are both effective in acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis management. However, available data did not allow to establish the superiority of one technique over another.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Percutaneous distal clavicle excision for acromioclavicular joint arthritis: our experience and early results of a novel surgical technique

PURPOSE

Symptomatic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis causes pain and limitations in activities of daily living. Open and arthroscopic distal clavicle excision techniques have been described with good outcomes. However, both techniques have their own sets of advantages and disadvantages. This study describes a novel technique of percutaneous distal clavicle excision for symptomatic ACJ osteoarthritis and our two-year results.

METHODS

Fifteen consecutive patients underwent percutaneous distal clavicle excision for ACJ arthritis. These patients had failed a trial of conservative treatment. The ACJ was confirmed as the pain generator with an intraarticular steroid/lignocaine injection, and shoulder MRI was used to exclude alternative pain generators in the shoulder. They had a minimum of two years of follow-up.

RESULTS

At a mean of 26.8 months postoperatively, the mean VAS pain score was 0, and the mean Constant score for the shoulder was 87.3 points (range 50-94), which corresponded to 1 good, 1 very good and 13 excellent results. The mean SF-36 score was 94.9 points (range 65-100). There were statistically significant improvements in the VAS scores, Constant shoulder scores and SF-36 scores at one year and two years of follow-up (p < 0.05). Three unique complications, namely subcutaneous emphysema, "missing" of the distal clavicle and thermal skin injury, were encountered. Our surgical technique has since been modified to circumvent these complications.

CONCLUSION

Our novel technique of percutaneous distal clavicle excision yields a 93.3% good-to-excellent results based on the Constant shoulder score and durable pain relief based on VAS at two years.

Is conventional radiography still relevant for evaluating the acromioclavicular joint?

INTRODUCTION

Conventional radiography using an anteroposterior view of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is the gold standard for evaluating arthritic degeneration.

OBJECTIVE

Based on a standardised AP view of the AC joint, the objective of this study was to determine whether this radiographic view is reliable and reproducible for evaluating the AC joint space.

METHODS

A cadaver scapula-clavicle unit, free of osteoarthritis, was used for this study. The scapula was positioned in a stand; and then with fluoroscopy guidance, a strict AP view of the AC joint was taken. Starting from this "0" position, a radiograph was taken by varying the angle by 5°, 10°, and 15° in every plane in space. All radiographs were taken during a single session to ensure the distance between the X-ray tube and scapula did not change. The images were then exported to OsiriX for processing; the superior and inferior AC distance and the joint area were measured.

RESULTS

There was no reproducibility in the AC joint measurements as a function of the incidence angle relative to a strict AP view.

CONCLUSION

Conventional radiography using an AP view of the AC joint cannot be used to do a fine analysis of arthritic degeneration of this joint. It is likely that only CT scan or MRI is sufficient to analyse osteoarthritis in this joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, basic science study.

Acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and shoulder pain: a review of the role of ultrasonography

Acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is often a cause of shoulder pain. On the other hand, imaging frequently leads to such a diagnosis, especially in elderly patients, and some authors believe it to have a poor correlation with the clinical picture. It is, however, widely accepted that such a condition can be the cause of rotator cuff impingement. In the case of shoulder pain, it is important to distinguish between symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and other causes, especially rotator cuff pathology, which is more common. Sometimes, the clinical picture does not allow for differential diagnosis; in these cases, the injection of a local anesthetic into the acromioclavicular joint or into the subacromial bursa can be of great help. Ultrasonography can easily detect acromioclavicular osteoarthritis and rotator cuff pathology, and it is highly effective in guiding the articular or bursal injection of a local anesthetic to assess the origin of the pain. In addition, in conservative therapy, ultrasonography can guide the articular or bursal injection of corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid.

Seven-year course of asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis diagnosed by MRI

BACKGROUND

Asymptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis (AC-OA) is a frequent finding in shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its natural course is unknown. Therefore, the question arises whether a resection should be performed simultaneously with shoulder surgery for another reason to prevent future pain and reoperation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term course of asymptomatic AC-OA.

METHODS

Overall, 114 asymptomatic AC-OA diagnosed on MRI were followed for 7 years between 2011 and 2018. At baseline, MRI signal enhancement in the clavicle and acromion, OA grade, physical demand as well as the parameters (1) Constant Score Visual Analogue Scale, (2) pain on AC-joint compression, and (3) cross-body adduction test were measured. All patients were followed up after 7 years by interview, and in case of symptoms by clinical examination. The endpoint "deterioration" was reached if 2 of the 3 parameters turned worse.

RESULTS

Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 83% of cases, 7% turned better, 10% turned worse. Physical demand and osteoarthritis grade increased the risk of deterioration, whereas MRI signal enhancement in the clavicle or acromion had no influence on outcome. During follow-up, the frequency of pain on AC-joint compression increased from 11% to 16% (P = .24), the frequency of a positive cross-body adduction test increased from 6% to 20% (P = .017), and the mean Constant Score Visual Analogue Scale increased from 10 to 13 points (P < .001) indicating less pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic AC-OA remained asymptomatic in 90% over 7 years. A simultaneous resection of an asymptomatic AC-OA during shoulder surgery for another reason is not indicated in every patient.

Effect of autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis

The aim of this case report is to evaluate the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy in the treatment of small joint osteoarthritis (OA). Acromio-clavicular (AC) joint OA is an under-diagnosed and yet frequent source of shoulder pain. MSCs have shown evidence of benefit in the treatment of knee OA. This is the first report to describe the use of MSC therapy in OA of the upper limb. A 43-year-old patient presents with painful AC joint OA and undergoes MSC therapy. The patient reported pain and functional improvement as assessed by the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. Imaging at 12 months showed structural improvement with reduction in subchondral oedema, synovitis and subchondral cysts. This case is the first to show the benefit of MSC therapy in the treatment of small joint arthropathy and also of the upper limb.

Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12617000638336).

Does Distal Clavicle Resection Decrease Pain or Improve Shoulder Function in Patients With Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis and Rotator Cuff Tears? A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular joint arthritis is a common, painful, and often missed diagnosis, and it often accompanies other shoulder conditions such as rotator cuff disease. Whether distal clavicle resection is important to perform in patients undergoing surgery for rotator cuff tears and concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis is controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of distal clavicle resection on (1) outcome scores; (2) shoulder ROM, joint pain or tenderness, and joint instability; and (3) risk of reoperation among patients treated surgically for rotator cuff tears who had concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis.

METHODS

We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases to find RCTs that met our eligibility criteria, which, in summary, (1) compared rotator cuff repair plus distal clavicle resection with isolated rotator cuff repair for patients who sustained a full- or partial-thickness rotator cuff tear and concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis; and (2) the followup period was at least 2 years. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality, and performed data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was quantitatively evaluated with the I index. No heterogeneity was detected (I = 0%; p = 0.75) in terms of acromioclavicular joint pain or tenderness, Constant score, forward flexion, external rotation, and risk of reoperation, so fixed-effect models were used in these endpoints. Heterogeneity was moderate for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score (I = 53%; p = 0.12) and low for the visual analog scale (VAS) score (I = 35%; p = 0.22), so random-effect models were used in these endpoints. Subgroup analysis was stratified by the symptom of acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Three RCTs with 208 patients were included. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool; in aggregate, the three RCTs included showed low to intermediate risk, although not all parameters of the Cochrane tool could be assessed for all studies.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the distal clavicle resection plus rotator cuff repair group and the isolated rotator cuff repair group in ASES score (mean difference =1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.37 to 6.18; p = 0.56) nor in terms of the VAS score and Constant score. Likewise, we found no difference in ROM of the shoulder (forward flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation) or acromioclavicular joint pain or tenderness between the groups (pooled results of acromioclavicular joint pain or tenderness: risk ratio [RR], 1.59; 95% CI, 0.67-3.78; p = 0.30). Acromioclavicular joint instability was only detected in the rotator cuff repair plus distal clavicle resection group. Finally, we found no difference in the proportion of patients undergoing repeat surgery between the study groups (pooled results of risk of reoperation for the rotator cuff repair plus distal clavicle resection and isolated rotator cuff repair: one of 52 versus two of 78; RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.11-6.48; p = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Distal clavicle resection in patients with rotator cuff tears did not result in better clinical outcome scores or shoulder ROM and was not associated with a lower risk of reoperation. Distal clavicle resection might cause acromioclavicular joint instability in patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant asymptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection is not recommended in patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant acromioclavicular joint arthritis. Additional well-designed RCTs with more participants, long-term followup, and data on patient-reported outcomes are needed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Should all acromioclavicular joint injections be performed under image guidance?

INTRODUCTION

Steroid and local anaesthetic injection to the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) is a very common diagnostic and therapeutic procedure, which is often performed in the outpatient department. However, it can be difficult to localize this joint because of its small size, presence of osteophytes and variable morphology in the population. We performed a study to determine whether the use of an image intensifier (X-ray guidance), in theatre, improves the accuracy of this injection.

METHODS

This was a prospective study carried out between March 2014 and March 2015. The injections were performed by two senior orthopaedic surgeons. First, we clinically palpated the ACJ and marked the area over this point as A. Then, with the use of a needle and an image intensifier in a single plane, we identified the actual location of the ACJ and marked this point as B. We measured the distance between A and B in millimetres (mm) and determined the accuracy of the injections. Further analysis taking into account the ACJ capsular attachments was also performed.

RESULTS

In total, 45 patients and 50 injections were included in the study; five patients had repeated injections at different times. We found that only 12 injections (24%) were palpated to be correct with no discrepancies between A and B (95% confidence interval: 14-37%). For the remaining 38 injections (76%), the use of an image intensifier had significantly improved the accuracy of ACJ location ( p < 0.05). Taking the capsular attachments of the ACJ into consideration reduced the number of inaccurate injections to 27 (54%).

CONCLUSION

We recommend the use of an image intensifier (or ultrasound guidance) to accurately determine the location of the ACJ for steroid and local anaesthetic injections. This prevents an injection into the wrong place, which can lead to wrong diagnosis and/or suboptimal treatment.

A concise evidence-based physical examination for diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint pathology: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The clinical examination of the shoulder joint is an undervalued diagnostic tool for evaluating acromioclavicular (AC) joint pathology. Applying evidence-based clinical tests enables providers to make an accurate diagnosis and minimize costly imaging procedures and potential delays in care. The purpose of this study was to create a decision tree analysis enabling simple and accurate diagnosis of AC joint pathology.

METHODS

A systematic review of the Medline, Ovid and Cochrane Review databases was performed to identify level one and two diagnostic studies evaluating clinical tests for AC joint pathology. Individual test characteristics were combined in series and in parallel to improve sensitivities and specificities. A secondary analysis utilized subjective pre-test probabilities to create a clinical decision tree algorithm with post-test probabilities.

RESULTS

The optimal special test combination to screen and confirm AC joint pathology combined Paxinos sign and O'Brien's Test, with a specificity of 95.8% when performed in series; whereas, Paxinos sign and Hawkins-Kennedy Test demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.7% when performed in parallel. Paxinos sign and O'Brien's Test demonstrated the greatest positive likelihood ratio (2.71); whereas, Paxinos sign and Hawkins-Kennedy Test reported the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.35).

CONCLUSION

No combination of special tests performed in series or in parallel creates more than a small impact on post-test probabilities to screen or confirm AC joint pathology. Paxinos sign and O'Brien's Test is the only special test combination that has a small and sometimes important impact when used both in series and in parallel. Physical examination testing is not beneficial for diagnosis of AC joint pathology when pretest probability is unequivocal. In these instances, it is of benefit to proceed with procedural tests to evaluate AC joint pathology. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections are diagnostic and therapeutic. An ultrasound-guided AC joint corticosteroid injection may be an appropriate new standard for treatment and surgical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II - Systematic Review.

Diagnosis and Management of Distal Clavicle Osteolysis

Distal clavicle osteolysis is an uncommon condition that most commonly affects weight lifters and other athletes who perform repetitive overhead activity. Although this condition most commonly presents in young active men, it is becoming increasing more common in women with the rise in popularity of body building and extreme athletics. Distal clavicle osteolysis can be debilitating, especially in those with rigorous training regimens, preventing exercise because of pain with activities such as bench presses and chest flies. Aside from a careful history and physical examination, radiographic evaluation is essential in distinguishing isolated distal clavicle osteolysis from acromioclavicular joint pathology, despite a potentially similar presentation of the 2 conditions. Nonoperative therapy that includes activity modification, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and cortisone injections is the first-line management for this condition. Patients whose conditions are refractory to nonoperative modalities may benefit from distal clavicle resection via either open or arthroscopic techniques. Arthroscopic techniques typically are favored because of improved cosmesis and the added benefit of the ability to assess the glenohumeral joint during surgery to rule out concomitant pathology. There are varying operative techniques even within arthroscopic management, with pros and cons of a direct and an indirect surgical approach. Patients often do well after such procedures and are able to return to their preinjury level of participation in a relatively short period. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):119-124.].

Successful injection of the acromioclavicular joint with use of ultrasound: anatomy, technique, and follow-up

BACKGROUND

Injection into the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is often inaccurate (approximately 50%) even in experienced hands. In light of new anatomic observations, we evaluate accuracy of an innovative ultrasound-guided method and follow the clinical course of successful therapeutic injections.

METHOD

Relevant anatomy was investigated in 200 three-dimensional computed tomography scans, 100 magnetic resonance images, and 14 cadavers. Baseline measurements of joint depth and width were performed ultrasonically in 100 normal volunteers; 50 symptomatic patients were injected. Uniquely in a clinical ultrasound study, injection success was documented by arthrography. Outcomes after concomitant steroid instillation were observed for 6 months by visual analog scale (VAS) scores and pain provocation test results.

RESULTS

Anatomic studies showed that the widest area for joint penetration was anterior superior. Injection success rate was 96%, overwhelmingly on the first needle pass. Shallow joint depth allowed access with a standard 3-cm needle. Joint width diminished with age but did not reduce injection success. Cadaveric joints admitted 1.2 ± 0.5 mL, but fluid ingress was initially blocked by soft tissues in one third of both cadaveric and clinical cases. Diligent follow-up after steroid injection showed sustained pain relief in the majority with isolated AC disease but significantly less in those with concomitant shoulder disorders.

CONCLUSION

This high level of clinical injection success, irrefutably substantiated with arthrography, has not been previously demonstrated. The anterior superior aspect of the joint is the preferred place for entry. Initial intra-articular blockage to fluid inflow is common but can be surmounted. Encouraging 6-month results of steroid instillation in isolated AC disease do not apply to patients with coexisting shoulder pathologic processes.

Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint instability is a common source of pain and disability. The injury is most commonly a result of a direct impact to the AC joint. The AC joint is surrounded by a capsule and has an intra-articular synovium and an articular cartilage interface. An articular disc is usually present in the joint, but this varies in size and shape. The AC joint capsule is quite thin, but has considerable ligamentous support; there are four AC ligaments: superior, inferior, anterior and posterior. The coracoclavicular (CC) ligament complex consists of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments. They insert on the posteromedial and anterolateral region of the undersurface of the distal clavicle, respectively. The coracoid origin of the trapezoid covers the posterior half of the coracoid dorsum; the conoid origin is more posterior on the base of the coracoid. Several biomechanical studies showed that horizontal stability of the AC joint is mediated by the AC ligaments while vertical stability is mediated by the CC ligaments. The radiographic classification of AC joint injuries described by Rockwood includes six types: in type I injuries the AC ligaments are sprained, but the joint is intact; in type II injuries, the AC ligaments are torn, but the CC ligaments are intact; in type III injuries both the AC and the CC ligaments are torn; type IV injuries are characterized by complete dislocation with posterior displacement of the distal clavicle into or through the fascia of the trapezius; type V injuries are characterized by a greater degree of soft tissue damage; type VI injuries are inferior AC joint dislocations into a subacromial or subcoracoid position. The diagnosis of AC joint instability can be based on historical data, physical examination and imaging studies. The cross body adduction stress test has the greatest sensitivity, followed by the AC resisted extension test and the O'Brien test. Proper radiographic evaluation of the AC joint is necessary. The Zanca view is the most accurate view for examining the AC joint. The axial view of the shoulder is important in differentiating a type III AC joint injury from a type IV injury.

Intra-articular versus periarticular acromioclavicular joint injection: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this randomized study was to compare the clinical efficacy of intra-articular versus periarticular acromioclavicular joint injections.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 101 patients (106 shoulders) with symptomatic acromioclavicular joints were treated with an injection and were randomly assigned to either the intra-articular group or the periarticular group. To ensure accurate needle placement either intra-articularly or in a periarticular manner, the needle was placed under ultrasound guidance. Baseline values including the Constant-Murley score, pain assessment with a visual analog scale for pain under local pressure and pain at night, and the crossover arm test were investigated in 7 different centers immediately before treatment. Follow-up examinations were scheduled after 1 hour, 1 week, and 3 weeks.

RESULTS

All patients completed the study. Overall, a highly significant clinical improvement in all tested variables and in both groups was observed over time (P < .0001) beginning with 1 hour after treatment and lasting for the entire follow-up period of 3 weeks. The difference between the 2 groups was not significant except regarding the crossover arm test (P < .016).

CONCLUSIONS

With both injection techniques, a highly significant clinical advantage for the patient can be achieved. The difference between the 2 treatments was not significant except for more pain reduction according to the crossover arm test after intra-articular injection at 3 weeks' follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

Intra- and interdisciplinary agreement in the rating of acromioclavicular joint dislocations

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is a common injury observed and treated by physicians from several disciplines; proper classification and communication of the diagnosis between physicians is essential to manage injuries properly. This study assessed inter- and intradepartmental agreement in the rating of AC joint dislocations and compared departments of orthopedic surgery, musculoskeletal (MSK) radiology, and emergency medicine (EM).

METHODS

Fifty radiographs indicating a random distribution of AC dislocations (Rockwood types I, II, III, and V) were sent to 25 resident, fellow, and attending physicians; the study group consisted of orthopedic surgeons (n = 9), MSK radiologists (n = 7), and EM physicians (n = 9). Dislocations were rated by physicians using the Rockwood classification (excluding type IV) and rating agreement was derived using the multirater κ statistic.

RESULTS

Moderate rating agreement was found among orthopedic surgeons (κ = 0.5147), which was higher than among radiologists (κ = 0.3628) or EM physicians (κ = 0.1894). Interdisciplinary rating agreement was highest between orthopedic surgeons and MSK radiologists and lowest between MSK radiologists and EM physicians. Attending orthopedic surgeons showed the highest rating agreement (κ = 0.5167) compared with attending MSK radiologists (κ = 0.3585) and attending EM physicians (κ = 0.2612). In-training orthopedic surgeons had higher rating agreement (κ = 0.4918) than in-training MSK radiologists (κ = 0.4218) and in-training EM physicians (κ = 0.1410).

DISCUSSION

Orthopedic surgeons exhibited the highest intradepartmental rating agreement in assessing AC joint injuries, but interdepartmental rating agreement was low. It is unclear if low interdepartmental rating agreement reflects classification or training weaknesses; recognition of these differences may help develop a more standardized education for physicians to improve the management of AC joint injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Interdisciplinary rating agreement of AC joint injuries is low. Further study may help improve education and communication about AC joint injuries among physicians.

Degenerative joint disease of the acromioclavicular joint: a review

Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a common condition causing anterior or superior shoulder pain, especially with overhead and cross-body activities. This most commonly occurs in middle-aged individuals because of degeneration to the fibrocartilaginous disk that cushions the articulations. Diagnosis relies on history, physical examination, imaging, and diagnostic local anesthetic injection. Diagnosis can be challenging given the lack of specificity with positive physical examination findings and the variable nature of AC joint pain. Of note, symptomatic AC osteoarthritis must be differentiated from instability and subtle instability, which may have similar symptoms. Although plain radiographs can reveal degeneration, diagnosis cannot be based on this alone because similar radiographic findings can be seen in asymptomatic individuals. Nonoperative therapy can provide symptomatic relief, whereas patients with persistent symptoms can be considered for resection arthroplasty by open or arthroscopic technique. Both techniques have proven to provide predictable pain relief; however, each has its own unique set of potential complications that may be minimized with an improved understanding of the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of the joint along with meticulous surgical technique.

A new test for acromio-clavicolar pathology

BACKGROUND

A prospective study was established to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the new Saccomanni (SAC) test for isolated AC pathology, and compare with 4 commonly used clinical tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Saccomanni (Sac) test is essentially the cross-adduction test, with the addition of attempted elevation against resistance. In a positive test, this results in some pain and the inability of the patient to maintain the arm in the adducted and elevated position against resistance. Fifty-eight patients with isolated AC joint symptoms were assessed in random order with the Saccomanni test and 4 other tests. A corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection was administered into the AC joint space. The Saccomanni test and 4 other tests were then repeated following the injection. After the injection, a symptom free clinical examination was used as a measure of true positive tests.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

RESULTS

The SAC test showed a sensitivity of 98% and specificity is 91.7%. All 4 other tests were less sensitive.

CONCLUSION

The SAC test is a highly sensitive test in patients presenting with isolated AC related symptoms. This study is an innovation for clinical tests in the world. The primary aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of my newly described SAC test. From the present study, it can be concluded that the easy-to use SAC is a highly sensitive test to evaluate AC joint pathology, when compared to other standard tests.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Level III, Diagnostic Study of Nonconsecutive Patients.

Shoulder pain in primary care: diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination tests for non-traumatic acromioclavicular joint pain

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous methodological flaws in previous study designs and the lack of validation in primary care populations, clinical tests for identifying acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain are widely utilised without concern for such issues. The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of traditional ACJ tests and to compare their accuracy with other clinical examination features for identifying a predominant ACJ pain source in a primary care cohort.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with shoulder pain were recruited prospectively from primary health care clinics. Following a standardised clinical examination and diagnostic injection into the subacromial bursa, all participants received a fluoroscopically guided diagnostic block of 1% lidocaine hydrochloride (XylocaineTM) into the ACJ. Diagnostic accuracy statistics including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) were calculated for traditional ACJ tests (Active Compression/O'Brien's test, cross-body adduction, localised ACJ tenderness and Hawkins-Kennedy test), and for individual and combinations of clinical examination variables that were associated with a positive anaesthetic response (PAR) (P≤0.05) defined as 80% or more reduction in post-injection pain intensity during provocative clinical tests.

RESULTS

Twenty two of 153 participants (14%) reported an 80% PAR. None of the traditional ACJ tests were associated with an 80% PAR (P<0.05) and combinations of traditional tests were not able to discriminate between a PAR and a negative anaesthetic response (AUC 0.507; 95% CI: 0.366, 0.647; P>0.05). Five clinical examination variables (repetitive mechanism of pain onset, no referred pain below the elbow, thickened or swollen ACJ, no symptom provocation during passive glenohumeral abduction and external rotation) were associated with an 80% PAR (P<0.05) and demonstrated an ability to accurately discriminate between an PAR and NAR (AUC 0.791; 95% CI 0.702, 0.880; P<0.001). Less than two positive clinical features resulted in 96% sensitivity (95% CI 0.78, 0.99) and a LR- 0.09 (95% CI 0.02, 0.41) and four positive clinical features resulted in 95% specificity (95% CI 0.90, 0.98) and a LR+ of 4.98 (95% CI 1.69, 13.84).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of primary care patients with predominantly subacute or chronic ACJ pain of non-traumatic onset, traditional ACJ tests were of limited diagnostic value. Combinations of other history and physical examination findings were able to more accurately identify injection-confirmed ACJ pain in this cohort.

Accuracy of acromioclavicular joint injections

BACKGROUND

Injection to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint can be both diagnostic and therapeutic.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of in vivo AC joint injections.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Thirty patients with pain localized to the AC joint were injected with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine and 0.5 mL of radiographic contrast material (Isovue). Radiographs of the AC joint were taken after the injection. Each radiograph was reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist and graded as intra-articular, extra-articular, or partially intra-articular.

RESULTS

Of the 30 injections performed, 13 (43.3%) were intra-articular, 7 (23.3%) were partially articular, and 10 (33.3%) were extra-articular. When the intra-articular and the partially articular groups were combined, 20 patients (66.7%) had some contrast dye in the AC joint.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that despite the relatively superficial location of the AC joint, the clinical accuracy of AC joint injections remains relatively low.

Localization of degenerative changes of the acromioclavicular joint: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

It has not been fully clarified yet how degenerative changes occur within the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, including their localizations. The aim of this study was to clarify the localization of degenerative changes in the AC joint using cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

Thirty-eight cadaveric AC joints with the sections were cut in the coronal plane. For both the acromion and the clavicle, the joint surface was divided into upper and lower halves. Histological features including the mean thickness of cartilage, reduction of proteoglycan staining and the extent of damaged tidemark were evaluated. The shapes of intraarticular discs as well as their histological structures were also assessed, which were compared between the upper and lower halves.

RESULTS

Articular cartilage in the lower half was significantly thinner than that in the upper half for both the acromion and the clavicle (p < 0.01). Similarly, the lower half of cartilage was more degenerated than the upper half. Intraarticular discs were absent in nine joints and the meniscoid-like type in 29, which contained rich fibrocartilaginous tissues in the upper half, whereas it mainly consisted of the fibrous tissues with granulation in the lower half.

CONCLUSION

The lower half of the AC joint demonstrated more advanced degeneration than the upper half, which might reflect the greater repetitive mechanical stress. The present study revealed both the localization and the extent of degenerative changes in AC joint, which might be useful information for surgeons to determine the proper amount of bony resection in the surgical treatment for osteoarthritis of this joint.

Load on the shoulder complex during wheelchair propulsion and weight relief lifting

BACKGROUND

This study focuses on the relationship between overuse in association with wheelchair activities of daily living and risks for osteoarthrosis in the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. The aim is to quantify the joint moments and joint reaction forces in all three joints of the shoulder complex during wheelchair-related activities of daily living.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 17 subjects performed two tasks (wheelchair propulsion and weight relief lifting). Three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were measured and position and force data were used as input for a musculoskeletal model of the arm and shoulder. Output variables of the model were the moments and the joint reaction forces on the sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joints.

FINDINGS

Moments on the sternoclavicular joint were higher than on the acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joint, but the joint reaction forces on the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints were only one third of those on the glenohumeral joint (peak forces around 96N compared to 315N for wheelchair propulsion and around 330N compared to 1288N for weight relief lifting).

INTERPRETATION

Based on the results found in this study, net joint moments are likely a better measure to describe the load on the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints due to the passive stabilization. Prospective studies on wheelchair overuse injuries should also look at the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints since the load of wheelchair tasks might be a risk factor for osteoarthrosis in these joints.

Ultrasound guidance improves the accuracy of the acromioclavicular joint infiltration: a prospective randomized study

Degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint (AC) often causes impaired shoulder function and pain. Its infiltration results in reportedly beneficial short-term effects. Misplacement of infiltrations is observed in high numbers. A previous study showed high accuracy of infiltrations of one surgeon comparing conventional palpation technique to ultrasound guidance. This study evaluates if ultrasound-guided AC joint infiltration is feasible for therapists of different levels of experience and if the accuracy can be increased. One hundred and twenty AC joints of 60 cadavers were enrolled into a prospective, randomized observer-blinded study. Six therapists of three different levels of experience infiltrated 20 AC joints each. Half of them were infiltrated after palpation of the joint space, half of them were ultrasound-guided infiltrated. Controls were performed pre- and post-infiltration by an independent radiologist. In total, accurate infiltration was observed in 70%. In 25%, misplacement of the infiltration was recorded in the palpation-, in 2% in the ultrasound- and in 3% in both groups. The difference between the two groups was significant (P = 0.009). Ultrasound-guided infiltration to the AC joint is significantly more accurate than conventional palpation technique. This method is simple, efficient and can be applied by therapists of all levels of experience.

Clinical evaluation of acromioclavicular joint pathology: sensitivity of a new test

BACKGROUND

A prospective study was established to assess the sensitivity of the newly described Bell-van Riet (BvR) test for isolated AC pathology, and compare with 4 commonly used clinical tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The BvR test is essentially the cross-adduction test, with the addition of attempted elevation against resistance. In a positive test, this results in some pain and the inability of the patient to maintain the arm in the adducted and elevated position against resistance. Fifty-eight patients with isolated AC joint symptoms were assessed in random order with the BvR test and 4 other tests. A corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection was administered into the AC joint space. The BvR test and 4 other tests were then repeated following the injection. After the injection, a symptom free clinical examination was used as a measure of truly positive tests.

RESULTS

The BvR test showed a sensitivity of 98%. All 4 other tests were less sensitive.

CONCLUSION

The BvR test is a highly sensitive test in patients presenting with isolated AC related symptoms, and demonstrates AC joint pathology better than other accepted tests.

Surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis: patient selection, surgical options, complications, and outcome

Osteoarthritis is one of the most common causes of pain originating from the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. An awareness of appropriate diagnostic techniques is necessary in order to localize clinical symptoms to the AC joint. Initial treatments for AC joint osteoarthritis, which include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and corticosteroids, are recommended prior to surgical interventions. Distal clavicle excision, the main surgical treatment option, can be performed by various surgical approaches, such as open procedures, direct arthroscopic, and indirect arthroscopic techniques. When choosing the best surgical option, factors such as avoidance of AC ligament damage, clavicular instability, and post-operative pain must be considered. This article examines patient selection, complications, and outcomes of surgical treatment options for AC joint osteoarthritis.

Acromioclavicular joint problems in athletes and new methods of management

The acromioclavicular (AC) complex consists of bony and ligamentous structures that stabilize the upper extremity through the scapula to the axial skeleton. The AC joint pathology in the athlete is generally caused by 1 of 3 processes: trauma (fracture, AC joint separation, or dislocation); AC joint arthrosis (posttraumatic or idiopathic); or distal clavicle osteolysis. This article presents systematically the relevant anatomy, classification, evaluation, and treatment of these disorders. Management of AC joint problems is dictated by the severity and chronicity of the injury, and the patient's needs and expectations.

Three-dimensional acromioclavicular joint motions during elevation of the arm

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the 3-dimensional motions occurring between the scapula relative to the clavicle at the acromioclavicular joint during humeral elevation in the scapular plane.

BACKGROUND

Shoulder pathology is commonly treated through exercise programs aimed at correcting scapular motion abnormalities. However, little is known regarding how acromioclavicular joint motions contribute to normal and abnormal scapulothoracic motion.

METHODS AND MEASURES

Thirty subjects (16 males, 14 females) participated. Subjects with positive symptoms on clinical exam or past history of shoulder pathology, trauma, or surgery were excluded. Electromagnetic surface motion analysis was performed tracking the thorax, clavicle, scapula, and humerus. Subjects performed 3 repetitions of scapular plane abduction. Passive motion data were also collected for scapular plane abduction from cadaver specimens. Data were analyzed using within-session reliability and descriptive statistics as well as repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to determine the effect of elevation angle from rest to 90 masculine humeral elevation. Reliability was determined from repeated trials in the same session without removing sensors or redigitizing landmarks.

RESULTS

Angular values were highly repeatable within session (ICC>0.94; SEM, < 2.3 degrees ). During active scapular plane abduction from rest to 90 degrees , average acromioclavicular joint angular values demonstrated increased internal rotation (approximately 4.3 degrees ), increased upward rotation (approximately 14.6 degrees ), and increased posterior tilting (approximately 6.7 degrees ) (P<.05). Passive motions on cadavers demonstrated similar kinematic patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant motion occurs at the acromioclavicular joint during active humeral elevation, contributing to scapular motion on the thorax. This information provides a foundation for understanding normal acromioclavicular joint motion as a basis for further investigation of pathology and rehabilitation approaches.

Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection: a biomechanical analysis of resection length and joint compliance in a cadaveric model

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess the effects of a distal clavicle resection of less than 5 mm on bony contact and compliance in the acromioclavicular (AC) joint and to localize areas of persistent contact in the AC joint. The hypothesis of this study was that AC contact can be avoided by excising less than 5 mm of bone from the distal clavicle.

METHODS

Ten human AC joints underwent compressive loading of the distal clavicle into the acromion after the following: disk excision, distal clavicle resection of 2.5 mm, and distal clavicle resection of 5 mm. The joint resistance force, stiffness, and presence and location of contact were monitored.

RESULTS

Excising 2.5 mm or less resulted in no bone-to-bone abutment in 6 of 10 specimens. A 5-mm resection resulted in successful decompression in all specimens. The specimens that required a 5-mm resection had minimal contact after the 2.5-mm resection (inferior-posterior quadrant only). AC joint stiffness decreased significantly with increasing amounts of clavicular resection (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-mm distal clavicle resection guaranteed no abutment but decreased joint stiffness. Persistent contact occurred only in the inferior-posterior quadrant of the joint after a 2.5-mm resection.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings support the efficacy of a 5-mm distal clavicle resection for eliminating bony contact but suggest that there is a bony contribution to AC joint stiffness. A resection of 2.5 to 5.0 mm could be adequate if care is taken to excise a greater depth of bone in the inferior-posterior quadrant.

[Arthroscopic surgery of the acromioclavicular joint.]

Lesion of the acromioclavicular joint is a usual clinical condition because of it superficial situation. It is often involved in trauma of the shoulder girdle. Moreover, degenerative changes are quite always observed for patients over 40. Distal clavicle resection as a treatment of acromioclavicular joint disease had been first described in 1941. Clinical results in term of mobility and shoulder pain are good and durable in time. Referring to the expansion arthroscopic techniques, distal clavicle resection lead to same middle and long term results as open surgery. Arthroscopic procedures have the theoretical advantages of no deltoid disruption and may help the surgeon to diagnose and treat associated lesions such as rotator cuff ruptures. More recently, arthroscopic surgeries for fresh and/or chronic acromioclavicular disjunctions were proposed. These procedures remain in development and need further evaluations.

Accuracy of needle placement in ACJ injections

Localization of the Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) even at arthroscopic surgery may be difficult because of its small size, osteophytes, variable anatomy of the joint and capsule. Therefore injection of the ACJ in the clinic may well be inaccurate. The aim of this study was to review the clinical accuracy of needle placement in ACJ injections, if performed without the aid of image intensification. Sixty patients with 66 shoulders were injected in the Day Unit in our department. The joint was palpated clinically, and the needle was placed in the site thought to be in the AC Joint. An image intensifier was then used to check the position of the needle in the AP and axillary views. The needle was considered correctly placed if between the bony boundaries of the acromion and clavicle. This was found in only 26 injections (39.4%). The remaining 40 injections (60.6%) were misplaced, either laterally in 21 injections (31.8%), medially in 13 (19.8%), anteriorly in 3 (4.5%) and inferiorly in 3 injections (4.5%). Theses were then reinserted under image intensifier guidance. The misplaced injections would have lead to inaccurate clinical outcomes, and decision making. This study is similar to other studies in that X-ray guidance improves the accuracy of injections and surgery. However the potential error rate for the small, anatomically variable AC joint is high. There is a 60% potential for ACJ injections to be out of the joint if performed by palpation alone, and we recommend the routine use of image intensification guidance.

Visualization of Intraarticular Structures of the Acromioclavicular Joint in an Ex Vivo Model Using a Dedicated MRI Protocol

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to develop an MRI protocol that could visualize the intraarticular structures of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using six fresh specimens from cadaveric shoulders, several MRI sequences were performed on 1.0-T scanners with a superficial coil (the temporomandibular joint coil). After the radiologic examination, the specimens were prepared for histology and 300-microm-thick, toluidine blue-stained sections were prepared that corresponded to the MR images. In each series of sections, immunohistochemistry using a type II collagen antibody was performed to further characterize the intraarticular structures.

RESULTS

The coronal 3D T1-weighted fast-field echo water-selective sequence allowed the identification of the intraarticular disk in all cases. Determination on MRI of other intraarticular structures--adipose tissue, synovial fluid, and the borders between neighboring tissues of different types--that corresponded to the histologic sections was possible. The use of a second plane in the 1.0-T sequences did not reveal additional information.

CONCLUSION

The described MRI protocol allows the visualization of the intraarticular fibrocartilaginous disk and the border between articular cartilage and the disk. Future clinical studies will indicate the diagnostic value of this protocol. We assume that this MRI protocol could help us to better understand AC joint disorders, in particular those located intraarticularly, and dislocations.

Osteoarthritis of the Acromioclavicular Joint

Shoulder pain is a frequent presenting complaint to physiatrists. Commonly encountered pathogeneses include rotator cuff pathology, bursitis, biceps tendonitis, and labral tears. Because the majority of shoulder pain originates within the subacromial region and the glenohumeral joint, the acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, and scapulothoracic articulations may be overlooked. Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint is a common source of shoulder pain that is often neglected by clinicians and researchers. The proper diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis requires a thorough physical exam, plain-film radiograph, and a diagnostic local anesthetic injection. Current treatment options are rather limited. Initial therapies are similar to that of osteoarthritis in other joints and include oral analgesics or anti-inflammatories and an emphasis on activity modification. Physical therapy, unfortunately, has little to offer, as therapeutic exercise and range of motion play only a minor role. If a diagnostic local anesthetic injection provides relief, there may be a role for corticosteroid injections. It seems that the administration of local corticosteroids into the acromioclavicular joint may provide short-term pain relief. The judicious administration of such injections remains controversial, and most experts agree that steroid injections do not alter the natural progression of the disease. Surgical options, indicated typically after a minimum of 6 mos of unsuccessful conservative treatment consist of open or arthroscopic distal clavicle resection.

Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint

The acromioclavicular joint is a frequent source of shoulder pain.This article reviews acromioclavicular separations and other disorders affecting the joint and its surrounding structures.

Shoulder injections for osteoarthritis and other disorders

Shoulder injection procedures are powerful diagnostic and therapeutic tools for the care of patients with osteoarthritis and other pathologic conditions of the shoulder-girdle region. Although questions regarding many of the details of the specific procedures still need to be answered, a modest body of literature is available. The musculoskeletal physiatrist is in a good position to contribute to this knowledge base through further clinical research.

Diagnostic value of physical tests for isolated chronic acromioclavicular lesions

PURPOSE

Chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions are a common source of pain and disability in the shoulder. The goal of this study was to evaluate diagnostic values of physical tests for isolated, chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Between 1994 and 2002, 35 patients underwent a distal clavicle excision for isolated acromioclavicular joint lesions. The results of 3 commonly used examinations for acromioclavicular joint lesions were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy.

RESULTS

The cross body adduction stress test showed the greatest sensitivity (77%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (72%) and active compression test (41%). The active compression test had the greatest specificity (95%). All tests had a negative predictive value of greater than 94%, but the positive predictive value was less than 30% for all tests. The active compression test had the highest overall accuracy (92%), followed by the acromioclavicular resisted extension test (84%) and the cross arm adduction stress test (79%). Combinations of the tests increased the diagnostic values for chronic acromioclavicular joint lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

These tests have utility in evaluating patients with acromioclavicular joint pathologic lesions, and a combination of these physical tests is more helpful than isolated tests.